Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Specifikationer
Price comparison
Ett genomsnitt på 10 poäng (från 16 recensioner)
Tester av Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Källa: Techradar EN→SV Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/11/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Laptop Mag EN→SV Archive.org version
The updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 11/28/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Tab Times EN→SV Archive.org version
As a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 11/09/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 83%
Källa: Pocket Lint EN→SV Archive.org version
The 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 09/21/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Techradar EN→SV Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/20/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Laptop Mag EN→SV Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 05/02/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Slashgear EN→SV Archive.org version
I'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 05/02/2016
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 04/29/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Engadget EN→SV Archive.org version
Apple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 04/25/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 82%
Källa: Laptop Mag EN→SV Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 04/22/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: CNet EN→SV Archive.org version
In hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 04/21/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 84% prestanda: 80% mobilitet: 80%
Källa: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/08/2016
Källa: Spiegel Online DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 05/30/2016
Källa: Mobileimho.ru RU→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 04/06/2017
Källa: 3DNews.ru RU→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 07/12/2016
Källa: Ferra.ru RU→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/21/2016
Kommentarer
Intel HD Graphics 515: Integrerad GPU (GT2) med 24 EU:er. Används i Core M-processorer från Skylake-generationen (4,5 W TDP).
En del nyare spel kan spelas med de här grafikkorten, men bara om de är mindre krävande. De har ändå tillräcklig kapacitet för kontorsbruk och film (möjligen högupplöst). Är grafikkretsen dessutom integrerad kan batteritiden vara utmärkt.
» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila grafikkort och motsvarande benchmarklista.
6Y54: » Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila processorer
12.00": Den här skärmstorleken är stor för surfplattor, men liten för bärbara datorer. Vissa kombinationsprodukter använder storleken.
Större skärmar möjliggör högre upplösning så att detaljer som bokstäver blir större och jämnare. Å andra sidan är strömförbrukningen lägre med mindre skärmar och enheterna är överlag mindre, lättare och billigare. » För att ta reda på mer om skärmupplösning, läs vår DPI-lista.
0.92 kg: Den här viktklassen är vanligast för stora surfplattor och hybrider.
77.9%: Det här betyget är inte övertygande. Den bärbara datorn har fått ett lägre betyg än vanligt och är därför svår att rekommendera.
» Mer information finns i vår köpguide för bärbara datorer.