Crosscall Stellar-X5
Specifikationer
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Tester av Crosscall Stellar-X5
Källa: DxOMark
EN→SVThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 09/17/2024
Källa: DxOMark
EN→SVThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/11/2024
Källa: DxOMark
EN→SVThe Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/04/2024
Kommentarer
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
En del nyare spel kan spelas med de här grafikkorten, men bara om de är mindre krävande. De har ändå tillräcklig kapacitet för kontorsbruk och film (möjligen högupplöst). Är grafikkretsen dessutom integrerad kan batteritiden vara utmärkt.
» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila grafikkort och motsvarande benchmarklista.
SD 6 Gen 1: Mellanklass-SoC med 8 Kryo-kärnor (4x ARM Cortex A78 2,2 GHz prestandakluster, 4x ARM Cortex A55 med 1,8 effektivitetskluster) och ett X62 5G-modem (upp till 2900 Mbps nedladdning). Chipet tillverkas med hjälp av den moderna 4nm-processen.» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila processorer
6.58": Bara ett fåtal smartphones har större skärmar än så här.
Större skärmar möjliggör högre upplösning så att detaljer som bokstäver blir större och jämnare. Å andra sidan är strömförbrukningen lägre med mindre skärmar och enheterna är överlag mindre, lättare och billigare. » För att ta reda på mer om skärmupplösning, läs vår DPI-lista.
» Mer information finns i vår köpguide för bärbara datorer.
