Debut för ScreenPad 2.0: Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL (Sammanfattning)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (VivoBook S15 S532 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1519 MHz, Minne: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 419.72, Optimus
Minne
8 GB
, 4 GB fastlött + 4 GB Samsung DDR4-2666 (1x SODIMM), 1200 MHz, 17-17-17-39
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, LGD0563, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB
Vikt
1.8 kg, Strömförsörjning: 325 g
Pris
800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 262.3 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 250 cd/m² Minimum: 13.02 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 262.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 610:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 99% | 11% | 69% | 7% | 4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.12 | 79.6 114% | 41.36 11% | 67.2 81% | 40.02 8% | 38.51 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 55.9 | 98.4 76% | 62.2 11% | 88.4 58% | 58.5 5% | 57.9 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.35 | 79.7 108% | 42.74 11% | 64.6 68% | 41.34 8% | 39.79 4% |
| Response Times | -72% | -35% | -68% | -60% | -34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.8 ? | 52.4 ? -111% | 40 ? -61% | 45 ? -81% | 45 ? -81% | 38.8 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 31.6 ? -32% | 26 ? -8% | 37 ? -54% | 33 ? -38% | 26.8 ? -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 25000 ? | 250 ? | |||
| Screen | 28% | 34% | 31% | 19% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 262.3 | 451.9 72% | 221 -16% | 311 19% | 278 6% | 262 0% |
| Brightness | 250 | 414 66% | 207 -17% | 303 21% | 271 8% | 256 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 87 -2% | 81 -9% | 89 0% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.36 16% | 0.15 65% | 0.24 44% | 0.26 40% | 0.21 51% |
| Contrast | 610 | 1255 106% | 1473 141% | 1296 112% | 1069 75% | 1248 105% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.81 | 5.62 3% | 4.35 25% | 5.1 12% | 4.73 19% | 5.8 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.7 | 19.1 -30% | 8.98 39% | 8.91 39% | 8.38 43% | 14.3 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.36 | 2.69 50% | 2.48 54% | 5.17 4% | 4.6 14% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 6.9 -146% | 3.09 -10% | 4.93 -76% | 2.59 7% | 2.5 11% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.44 90% | 2.38 92% | 1.99 111% |
| CCT | 7016 93% | 6254 104% | 6068 107% | 7641 85% | 6160 106% | 6528 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35.2 | 71.8 104% | 56 59% | 58 65% | 36 2% | 36.6 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55.6 | 98.5 77% | 86 55% | 88 58% | 58 4% | 57.6 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
29% | 3% /
20% | 11% /
26% | -11% /
7% | -4% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø588 (570.26-651.27)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3575 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4946 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4148 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 71% | 1% | 102% | 34% | |
| Seq Read | 1147 | 1320 15% | 2465 115% | 2469 115% | 1557 36% |
| Seq Write | 752 | 1500 99% | 1318 75% | 1991 165% | 1237 64% |
| 4K Read | 41.52 | 30.73 -26% | 42.97 3% | 54.3 31% | 42.56 3% |
| 4K Write | 149.7 | 94.4 -37% | 81.9 -45% | 99.8 -33% | 127.2 -15% |
| 4K-64 Read | 605 | 1453 140% | 1025 69% | 1823 201% | 1034 71% |
| 4K-64 Write | 453.2 | 1815 300% | 338.6 -25% | 1282 183% | 1186 162% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.061 16% | 0.077 -5% | 0.042 42% | 0.077 -5% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.025 | 0.044 -76% | 0.046 -84% | 0.039 -56% | 0.028 -12% |
| Score Read | 761 | 1616 112% | 1314 73% | 2125 179% | 1233 62% |
| Score Write | 678 | 2059 204% | 552 -19% | 1581 133% | 1437 112% |
| Score Total | 1821 | 4507 148% | 2488 37% | 4771 162% | 3291 81% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1093 | 2577 136% | 700 -36% | 1313 20% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 775 | 515 -34% | 167.2 -78% | 334.6 -57% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1196 | 1120 -6% | 370.4 -69% | 684 -43% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1728 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
662 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
410.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
460.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1085 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
970 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
149.9 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2726 - 3567, n=28) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4946 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12992 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3308 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1223 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Asus GL552VW-DK725T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F: Ø33.4 (11-37)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 191.8 | 109.2 | 88.3 | 33.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.9 | 36.8 | 19.1 | 10.7 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 24 | 7 |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -2% | -3% | -5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 30.13 -8% | 30.3 -8% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.5 -2% | 30.13 -8% | 30.3 -8% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 28.6 -2% | 30.13 -8% | 30.3 -8% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 28.8 4% | 30.13 -0% | 30.3 -1% | 30.5 -2% | 29.9 -0% |
| Load Average * | 41.4 | 36.2 13% | 38.8 6% | 39.3 5% | 40.8 1% | 41.7 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 47.6 -15% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 41.5 | 47.6 -15% | 38.8 7% | 39.6 5% | 41.8 -1% | 41.7 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28 / 28 / 30 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 41.4 / 41.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.36 / 4.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 6 / 10.3 / 10.5 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
69.1 / 88 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | 31% | 8% | 14% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6 | 7.1 -18% | 4.8 20% | 3.7 38% | 2.7 55% | 4.4 27% |
| Idle Average * | 10.3 | 13.6 -32% | 7 32% | 8 22% | 8 22% | 6.9 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 14.1 -34% | 9.5 10% | 9.8 7% | 10.6 -1% | 9.9 6% |
| Load Average * | 69.1 | 103.9 -50% | 40.8 41% | 85 -23% | 74 -7% | 55 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.8 | 103 -78% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 88 | 130.9 -49% | 44.3 50% | 92.4 -5% | 89 -1% | 63.4 28% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 79 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 26% | 39% | 73% | 104% | 30% | 27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 655 | 899 37% | 1356 107% | 1587 142% | 773 18% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 306 | 514 68% | 426 39% | 588 92% | 519 70% | 414 35% | 388 27% |
| Load | 86 | 62 -28% | 102 19% | 171 99% | 117 36% |
För
+ ScreenPad 2.0 är mer ljusstark, smidigare, snabbare och lättare att använda än ScreenPad 1.0
+ diskret '1D13' GeForce MX250-grafik; respektabel grafikprestanda
+ 2x M.2 2280, 1x SODIMM-expansionsplats
+ grå matta ytor som döljer fingeravtryck
+ relativt billig
+ MicroSD-kortläsare
Emot
- ScreenPad-ljusstyrkan ändras dramatiskt beroende på betraktningsvinkel
- CPU-prestanda under genomsnittet; dålig Turbo Boost-prestanda
- batteritiden är bara medelmåttig; låg batterikapacitet
- saknar fingeravtrycksläsare och Kensington-lås
- förlitar sig fortfarande på propretiär AC-adapter
- ScreenPad är fortfarande en aning grynig
- långsam MicroSD-prestanda
- svår att serva
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I vår recension av den första ZenBook Pro 15 med ScreenPad 1.0 kallade vi den för en av sin natur användbar innovation som dock led av ett flertal förstagenerationsproblem som hög inlärningskurva, klumpigt gränssnitt, en riktigt grynig skärm och reducerad batteritid. ScreenPad 2.0 åtgärdar många av dessa klagomål med en större storlek, en mer ljusstark skärm och ett uppdaterat Android-liknande gränssnitt i en laptop som bara kostar hälften så mycket som ZenBook Pro 15. Det är vanligt att användare hoppar över första generationens produkter då andra generationen nästan alltid är betydligt bättre och billigare. Detta hade inte kunnat vara mer sant för ScreenPad 2.0; Om du tilltalades av Asus teknik men valde att vänta förra året är årets billiga VivoBook läget att ta klivet.
ScreenPad 2.0 är inte på något sätt perfekt. Det matta överdraget är fortfarande en aning grynigt, särskilt när man jämför med de skarpa blanka skärmarna som sitter på telefonerna vi har i våra fickor. Den extra skärmen påverkar fortfarande batteritiden och Windows är inte särskilt optimerat för en skärm med så låg PPI. Kanske hade en ScreenPad med samma upplösning, kontrast och färg som huvudskärmen skapat en bättre synergi mellan de båda.
Vad det gäller själva datorn så är processorn långsammare än genomsnittet på grund av sin begränsade förmåga att upprätthålla Turbo Boost. Som tur är påverkar detta inte spelprestandan, vilket gör VivoBook till en bra lösning för både arbete och casual-spelande.
ScreenPad är inte bara en nymodighet som försöker vara annorlunda. Dess bildförhållande och funktion som andra skärm gör den objektivt sett mer användbar än Apples Touch Bar-lösning. Det finns fortfarande en hel del problem att lösa, särskilt när det gäller grynighet, men detta är ett stort steg i rätt riktning jämfört med förra årets ScreenPad 1.0.
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
- 07/23/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Vägt medel
Price comparison
