En LED-ljusshow: Recension av Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 294.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 981:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.08
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GF75 Thin 9SC AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 1% | 2% | 0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 61.9 | 62.3 1% | 62.5 1% | 64 3% | 62.9 2% | 60.6 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 89.4 | 89.1 0% | 90 1% | 90.4 1% | 87.1 -3% | 89 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.3 | 63.7 1% | 64 1% | 64.8 2% | 63.7 1% | 62.1 -2% |
Response Times | -355% | -301% | -79% | -88% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.4 ? | 41 ? -541% | 34 ? -431% | 15.6 ? -144% | 17.6 ? -175% | 6.8 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 30 ? -168% | 30.4 ? -171% | 12.8 ? -14% | 11.2 ? -0% | 9.6 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 5% | 7% | -15% | 12% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 294.3 | 316 7% | 344.7 17% | 299.1 2% | 295 0% | 299.3 2% |
Brightness | 289 | 294 2% | 332 15% | 273 -6% | 291 1% | 294 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 91 2% | 81 -9% | 96 8% | 94 6% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.32 -7% | 0.3 -0% | 0.27 10% | 0.24 20% | 0.29 3% |
Contrast | 981 | 988 1% | 1149 17% | 1108 13% | 1229 25% | 1032 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.95 | 3.39 14% | 3.08 22% | 5.07 -28% | 3.2 19% | 2.55 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.49 | 5.56 14% | 6.32 3% | 10.55 -63% | 6.64 -2% | 4.73 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.08 | 2.14 31% | 2.94 5% | 3.31 -7% | 2.52 18% | 2.9 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.17 14% | 3.8 -3% | 6.8 -84% | 2.16 42% | 3.5 5% |
Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.39 92% | 2.17 101% | 2.46 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 7155 91% | 7098 92% | 7284 89% | 7805 83% | 6872 95% | 7101 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.7 | 51 -12% | 58 1% | 58.5 1% | 57 -1% | 57 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 89 0% | 89.6 1% | 89.9 1% | 87 -2% | 88.7 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -116% /
-41% | -98% /
-32% | -31% /
-20% | -25% /
-3% | 4% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5217 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5744 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5811 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -9% | 29% | -2% | 68% | |
Seq Read | 1319 | 1546 17% | 1153 -13% | 1315 0% | 1831 39% |
Seq Write | 930 | 1182 27% | 1328 43% | 927 0% | 1744 88% |
4K Read | 49.43 | 36.54 -26% | 35.05 -29% | 52.4 6% | 45.16 -9% |
4K Write | 104.3 | 109.2 5% | 96 -8% | 122.8 18% | 107.1 3% |
4K-64 Read | 321.9 | 612 90% | 727 126% | 326.5 1% | 1240 285% |
4K-64 Write | 774 | 436.6 -44% | 1212 57% | 727 -6% | 1695 119% |
Access Time Read * | 0.055 | 0.113 -105% | 0.063 -15% | 0.11 -100% | 0.064 -16% |
Access Time Write * | 0.138 | 0.034 75% | 0.04 71% | 0.045 67% | 0.037 73% |
Score Read | 503 | 803 60% | 878 75% | 510 1% | 1468 192% |
Score Write | 971 | 664 -32% | 1441 48% | 942 -3% | 1977 104% |
Score Total | 1731 | 1869 8% | 2784 61% | 1715 -1% | 4197 142% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1707 | 698 -59% | 1487 -13% | 2086 22% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 852 | 114.1 -87% | 608 -29% | 425.5 -50% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 930 | 379.6 -59% | 1162 25% | 555 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 17966 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36088 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12907 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6573 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5651 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
Alienware m15 P79F | |
Asus G752VS | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (62 - 73, n=8) | |
MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus GL753VD |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 320.1 | 256.8 | 263.3 | 140.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 261.5 | 180.7 | 99.5 | 53.7 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 135 | 90 | 79 | 70 |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GF75 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8 | Asus GL704GM-DH74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 1% | 7% | 8% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.8 -9% | 29 -3% | 28.2 -0% | 28.2 -0% | 28.2 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.8 | 30.8 3% | 29 9% | 28.2 11% | 33.6 -6% | 30 6% |
Idle Average * | 32 | 30.8 4% | 32 -0% | 28.2 12% | 33.6 -5% | 31.8 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 40.6 | 32.2 21% | 40 1% | 30.8 24% | 33.8 17% | 34.6 15% |
Load Average * | 48 | 38.6 20% | 46 4% | 42 12% | 37.2 22% | 56 -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 51 -6% | 51 -6% | 40.6 15% | 54.2 -13% | |
Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 44.8 13% | 52 -1% | 53 -3% | 44.4 14% | 56.7 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 31.8 / 32 / 40.6 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 48 / 51.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.46 / 1.4 Watt |
Låg belastning | 13.6 / 26.2 / 35 Watt |
Hög belastning |
113.6 / 200.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GF72VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 61% | -9% | 0% | 31% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13.6 | 3.9 71% | 19 -40% | 16.2 -19% | 6.1 55% | 15.7 -15% |
Idle Average * | 26.2 | 9.6 63% | 22 16% | 20.4 22% | 11.2 57% | 21.4 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 12.2 65% | 29 17% | 26.1 25% | 24.5 30% | 21.9 37% |
Load Average * | 113.6 | 59 48% | 102 10% | 96.5 15% | 94.7 17% | 83.9 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 134.1 | 190 -42% | 182.9 -36% | 105.8 21% | 130.2 3% | |
Load Maximum * | 200.2 | 80 60% | 231 -15% | 214.3 -7% | 192.2 4% | 159.6 20% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 50% | -35% | -26% | -19% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 517 | 815 58% | 372 -28% | 295 -43% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 294 | 469 60% | 190 -35% | 235 -20% | 280 -5% | 284 -3% |
Load | 94 | 124 32% | 67 -29% | 86 -9% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Även om det finns mycket att uppskatta med Asus GL731GU är det svårt att inte ta sig för pannan över några av designvalen. För det första så kommer LED-remsan oväntat nog på bekostnad av servicemöjligheterna då det nu är mycket svårare att ta bort bottenplattan. Om du vill utöka RAM eller lagring får du vara beredd på att försiktigt ta bort och sen återansluta en del riktigt ömtåliga flatkablar. För det andra så finns det ingen anledning till att piltangenterna är så små och ihoptryckta när chassit har en så stor formfaktor, särskilt med tanke på att förra generationens Strix II hade större piltangenter. För det tredje är avsaknaden av separata färgalternativ för LED-remsan och tangentbordets bakgrundsbelysning en brist med tanke på systemets inställningsmöjligheter. Vi förstår att man vill spara tangentspecifik RGB-belysning till de lyxigare modellerna, men det känns särskilt tveksamt för en laptop som kostar runt 15.000 kronor. Till sist så är de ovanligt placerade portarna nog inte för alla, då det inte finns några alls på den högra kanten — vilket är sällsynt för en spellaptop på 17.3 tum.
Bortsett från de förbryllande bristerna vi nämnt ovan så lyckas Strix G GL731 väldigt bra med att fånga kärnprestandan, skärmen och designen hos den dyrare modellen Strix III G731. Den som vill ha samma utséende och spelförmåga som toppskiktsmodellen G731 men inte vill behöva betala för flashig tangentspecifik RGB-belysning eller aluminiumhölje kommer nog tilltalas av GL731. Priset på ca 15.000 kronor för vår konfiguration är ungefär standard för en laptop på 17.3 tum med GTX 1660 Ti-grafik.
En del irritationsmoment håller tillbaka en dator som i övrigt presterar bra. Om du kan komma över ett större fotavtryck, en högre vikt, små piltangenter och användarovänlig service så är GL731GU en av de snyggare mittenskiktsmodellerna i sin storlekskategori. I synnerhet är kärntemperaturerna och ljudet bättre än vi hade väntat oss.
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
- 07/19/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo