Honor 5C
Specifikationer
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Ett genomsnitt på 27 poäng (från 52 recensioner)
Tester av Honor 5C
It's an honor. En superb skärm och en skaplig kamera i ett metallchassi, med prislapp på under 2 000 kr. 5,2-tummaren Honor 5C gör ett riktigt positivt första intryck i vårt test, men är allt lika bra?
Källa: Gadgetspeak EN→SV Archive.org version
As with all modern phones it has front and back cameras the front often called a Selfie camera is a respectable 8MP while the rear camera is mounted 1.5cm down from the top of the back and has an LED flash by its side. The camera resolution is 13MP and takes good images but not up to the superb standard of the Huawei P9 but then the unit costs only 1/3 of the price.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 10/05/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80% pris: 80% prestanda: 80% funktioner: 80% design: 80%
Källa: Techradar EN→SV Archive.org version
If you're looking for a phone with a bit of high-end flavour on a super-tight budget, the Honor 5C is an excellent choice. As long as you don't mind the Honor software approach, there's nothing major to complain about here. The main consideration is whether you might prefer the Moto G4, which costs £20 more but has a bigger screen, and a very pure take on Android.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 09/27/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: KL Gadget Guy EN→SV Archive.org version
For RM799, the Honor 5C is a perfectly decent mid-range smartphone that does almost everything you need out of it. However, the problem the Honor 5C has is that its just not that interesting as a whole. There are no particularly standout features about the phone that makes the Honor 5C a must buy, and in a market that is highly saturated, the Honor 5C could potentially be lost in the shuffle.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/14/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 74% pris: 80% prestanda: 70% funktioner: 60% mobilitet: 80% design: 80%
Källa: Gadgetspeak EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C’s performance is more than adequate especially when compared against similarly priced handsets. Loading apps and scrolling through images and websites was fine although I would have preferred more of a reluctance of the screen to gather finger smears.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/20/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 90% pris: 100% prestanda: 100%
Källa: Cool Smartphone EN→SV Archive.org version
I was a bit worried taking a punt on this device. I normally recommend a Moto G for people in this segment and had the G4 been smaller, I would’ve bought that for my mother without any hesitation. But this phone really surprised me. Frankly this is the best budget phone on the market now. Sure, as a phone-nerd it doesnt have the features and power that I want for all the things I do with my phone. But for a lot of people, it really is all the phone they’d ever need. Everyday tasks are done easily with good performance, a good screen, good battery life, decent camera and a surprisingly enjoyable software experience.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/17/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 87% mobilitet: 93% design: 87%
Källa: Android Central EN→SV Archive.org version
Nevertheless, the Honor 5C is a decent entry-level phone with a few standout features — solid, multi-day battery life, a touch of class with that metal back panel, expandable storage and easy dual-SIM connectivity. And if you're looking for an affordable Android phone which covers all the major bases, it's definitely worth a look.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/08/2016
Källa: Expert Reviews EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C excels when it comes to speed, but fails to excel in any other regard. Even its camera, which is arguably the phone's only other strong suit, is rather hit and miss depending on lighting conditions. The biggest issue here, though, is the quality of the competition. When you consider that the Moto G4 costs just £20 more yet comes with a better screen, longer-lasting battery and vastly superior build quality, the Honor 5C simply can't compete.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/03/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 60%
Källa: Think Digit EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a good smartphone that gets a lot right, but unfortunately, does not really have anything that sets it apart in competition. It offers good performance, camera, ergonomics, battery life, and is an overall pleasant device. The lack of frills make it a very simple, easy to use and convenient device, and is worthy of being considered at Rs. 10,999.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/10/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 76%
Källa: Techtree.com EN→SV Archive.org version
Despite quite a lot being written about the 13MP and 8MP cameras on the 5C, I found them a bit wanting. They do both shoot video at 1080p, and there's anF2.0 aperture and 78° wide-angle 5-element (5P) macro lens, but I found photos ready to pixelate under many conditions. Image reproduction was good, but the fuzziness and noise set the camera at standard average budget for me. The camera app, on the other hand, is rather nice and easy to use.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 07/07/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Tech2.in.com EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C offers a blend of good design, appealing UI and a capable hardware. It is definitely a good update over its predecessor, the Honor 4C, and feels as good as the Honor 5X. There are minor software issues but nothing that a quick update can’t fix. Having said that, the smartphone doesn’t offer anything unique or a differentiating factor that would set it apart from the competition. It’s a plain Jane phone which will struggle to survive in the market. The only reason one might just go for the Honor 5C is for its smaller display, as there are some consumers who don’t want to go beyond the 5.0-5.2 inch screen size.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/07/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70% prestanda: 70% funktioner: 70% skärm: 65% mobilitet: 70% design: 70%
Källa: Recombu EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C presents itself as an unassuming, middling Android handset, but you’ll quickly realise that it’s full of surprises. Great performance, battery life and cameras elevated the 5C above our expectations and at £149 it undercuts other top affordable offerings like the new Moto G4 giving it a serious edge.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 07/05/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 100%
Källa: Androidbeat EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5c is Huawei’s second entrant into the rapidly growing sub-15k smartphone segment in India. The handset does a lot of things right that the Honor 5x got wrong – especially with respect to software and performance. However, I cannot help but feel that Honor/Huawei should have also launched a 32GB/3GB RAM variant of the 5c at a slightly higher price as it would have then better sufficed the needs of customers who want a phone with dual-SIM capabilities. The sub-par GPU and multitasking performance also immediately rule out the phone for any power user.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 06/30/2016
Källa: Tech Critter EN→SV Archive.org version
Apart from the SoC efficiency, the battery life is also affected by the smart app & battery management under EMUI and they're not so smart if you left it in default. The OS would automatically choose which app is more critical and set it as "protected" app which allows it to run after the screen is turned off.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 06/23/2016
Källa: V3.co.uk EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a mid-tier phone through and through. If we cast our minds back to 2013 we could almost say the same of the iPhone 5C. It was placed just below the more powerful 5S, and both served as updates to the ageing iPhone 5. Ultimately, either would make a great second, standby handset. The choice might be easier to make if you're tied to one ecosystem, but if we have one concern it would be the age of the iPhone 5C.
Jämförelse, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 06/22/2016
Källa: NDTV Gadgets EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C improves ever so slightly on its predecessor, thanks to a more capable SoC and small improvements to the camera. The design and build have also been bettered, and Android Marshmallow adds a few features and tweaks to the software. There isn't much to complain about here, especially at this price. Unfortunately, the 5C still lacks any wow factor. Nothing in the phone stands out, and this is in all ways an average phone that does what it does capably, but not exceptionally well. The pricing is competitive, but a lower price would have suited this phone much more. Buyers are likely to prefer other products in the same price range, such as the Redmi Note 3 or Lenovo Zuk Z1.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/22/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70% pris: 70% prestanda: 70% skärm: 70% mobilitet: 80% design: 70%
Källa: Trusted Reviews EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is undeniably excellent value for money as a piece of hardware. It has internal specs that match, if not beat, the Moto G4's. But its use of Huawei’s Emotion skin will be a sticking point for many buyers. I can’t help but feel Honor should follow Motorola’s example and load its handsets with an unskinned version of Android.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 06/20/2016
Källa: Stuff TV EN→SV Archive.org version
The Honor 5C looks set to be a cracking deal for £150, falling in between the £116 Vodafone Ultra 6 and £170 Moto G4. With a metal build, G4-matching specs, and a price that won’t destroy your wallet, Honor could have a real winner on its hands here. Stay tuned for our full review, to see if we’ll be crowning it our new budget smartphone champion.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 06/20/2016
Källa: Pocket Lint EN→SV Archive.org version
For the low asking price of £149, you really do get quite a lot of phone for your money in the Honor 5C. That's the aim of Honor - giving good value for money without making too many compromises. The only real omission on the spec sheet is the lack of a fingerprint scanner. With most devices offering this technology, both in the top and mid ranges, it would have been more appealing if that had been offered.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 06/20/2016
Källa: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Fristående test, , Längd okänd, Datum: 01/01/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 93%
Källa: Area DVD DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 10/17/2016
Källa: eTest DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/09/2016
Källa: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Fristående test, , Längd okänd, Datum: 08/01/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 82%
Källa: Android Pit DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/01/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Inside Handy DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 07/22/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/20/2016
Källa: Tech Stage DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/15/2016
Källa: Verivox DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 07/12/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70% pris: 60%
Källa: Honor News Blog DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 07/09/2016
Källa: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/07/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 90%
Källa: PC Welt DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 07/06/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 92% prestanda: 93% funktioner: 94% skärm: 91% mobilitet: 98%
Källa: Allround-PC.com DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 07/01/2016
Källa: Netzwelt DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 06/27/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 85% funktioner: 100% mobilitet: 70% design: 100%
Källa: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/27/2016
Källa: Turn On DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/24/2016
Källa: Curved DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/24/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80% prestanda: 79% skärm: 83% mobilitet: 79%
Källa: n-tv DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 06/21/2016
Källa: Golem DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/20/2016
Källa: WinFuture DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 06/20/2016
Källa: WinFuture DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 06/13/2016
Källa: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Fristående test, , Längd okänd, Datum: 06/01/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 01/11/2017
Källa: InstaNews IT→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 12/02/2016
Källa: Smartphone Italia IT→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 10/05/2016
Betyg: pris: 90% funktioner: 80% skärm: 70% mobilitet: 80% ergonomi: 80%
Källa: Tecno Cino IT→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/25/2016
Källa: AndroidWorld.it IT→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/24/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 86% pris: 85% skärm: 80% ergonomi: 80%
Källa: AndroidPit.it IT→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/28/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Top for Phone FR→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 11/01/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80% prestanda: 70%
Källa: Clubic FR→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 10/14/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 90% mobilitet: 90% design: 80% ergonomi: 80%
Källa: Phonandroid FR→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 09/01/2016
Källa: Product Test RU→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 09/15/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 79%
Kommentarer
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
Bara vissa äldre spel kan spelas flytande med de här grafikkorten. Kretsar med delat minne har fördelen att de utvecklar mindre värme och ger längre batteritid. De duger gott för kontorsbruk, surfande och enklare bildbehandling, men spel och HD-video är inte i syftet med de här kretsarna.
» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila grafikkort och motsvarande benchmarklista.
Kirin 650: » Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila processorer
5.20": Den här skärmstorleken resulterar i en relativt stor smartphone, men storleken är vanligt förekommande.
Större skärmar möjliggör högre upplösning så att detaljer som bokstäver blir större och jämnare. Å andra sidan är strömförbrukningen lägre med mindre skärmar och enheterna är överlag mindre, lättare och billigare. » För att ta reda på mer om skärmupplösning, läs vår DPI-lista.
79.93%: Det här betyget är inte övertygande. Den bärbara datorn har fått ett lägre betyg än vanligt och är därför svår att rekommendera.
» Mer information finns i vår köpguide för bärbara datorer.