MSI GE75 Raider 8SF (i7-8750H, RTX 2070) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 370.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1277:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -3% | -3% | 27% | 27% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 64 1% | 62.9 0% | 62.9 0% | 90.8 44% | 90.9 44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.4 | 90.4 -4% | 87.8 -7% | 87.1 -8% | 99.9 6% | 100 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 64.8 -1% | 63.9 -2% | 63.7 -2% | 85.8 32% | 86.2 32% |
| Response Times | -43% | 17% | -46% | -75% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.6 ? | 15.6 ? -63% | 7.2 ? 25% | 17.6 ? -83% | 28 ? -192% | 8 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 12.8 ? -23% | 9.6 ? 8% | 11.2 ? -8% | 13.6 ? -31% | 5.6 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | 25000 ? -3% | 26000 ? 1% | |||
| Screen | -107% | -23% | -42% | -46% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 370.4 | 299.1 -19% | 288 -22% | 295 -20% | 273 -26% | 240 -35% |
| Brightness | 348 | 273 -22% | 287 -18% | 291 -16% | 273 -22% | 248 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 91 2% | 96 8% | 90 1% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.27 7% | 0.2 31% | 0.24 17% | 0.26 10% | 0.22 24% |
| Contrast | 1277 | 1108 -13% | 1440 13% | 1229 -4% | 1050 -18% | 1091 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 5.07 -302% | 2.33 -85% | 3.2 -154% | 3.52 -179% | 2.14 -70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.02 | 10.55 -249% | 5.34 -77% | 6.64 -120% | 6.34 -110% | 5.04 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 3.31 -174% | 2.47 -104% | 2.52 -108% | 2.09 -73% | 1.54 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 6.8 -386% | 1.19 15% | 2.16 -54% | 3.11 -122% | 1.62 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.46 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6747 96% | 7805 83% | 6710 97% | 6872 95% | 6999 93% | 6846 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.7 | 58.5 -2% | 57 -5% | 57 -5% | 76 27% | 77 29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.4 | 89.9 -5% | 88 -7% | 87 -8% | 100 6% | 100 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -50% /
-79% | -3% /
-15% | -30% /
-35% | -31% /
-38% | 10% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25770 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25770 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25770 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3662 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5338 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5138 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 51% | 103% | 20% | -53% | 95% | |
| Seq Read | 949 | 1153 21% | 911 -4% | 1315 39% | 511 -46% | 3058 222% |
| Seq Write | 823 | 1328 61% | 2347 185% | 927 13% | 425.7 -48% | 2196 167% |
| 4K Read | 25.36 | 35.05 38% | 53 109% | 52.4 107% | 14.07 -45% | 38.37 51% |
| 4K Write | 67.1 | 96 43% | 122.5 83% | 122.8 83% | 38.34 -43% | 97.7 46% |
| 4K-64 Read | 748 | 727 -3% | 1577 111% | 326.5 -56% | 351.4 -53% | 1347 80% |
| 4K-64 Write | 650 | 1212 86% | 1734 167% | 727 12% | 172.7 -73% | 1236 90% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.173 | 0.063 64% | 0.08 54% | 0.11 36% | 0.235 -36% | 0.056 68% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.059 | 0.04 32% | 0.031 47% | 0.045 24% | 0.097 -64% | 0.038 36% |
| Score Read | 869 | 878 1% | 1721 98% | 510 -41% | 417 -52% | 1691 95% |
| Score Write | 799 | 1441 80% | 2091 162% | 942 18% | 254 -68% | 1553 94% |
| Score Total | 2109 | 2784 32% | 4771 126% | 1715 -19% | 881 -58% | 4066 93% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1121 | 1487 33% | 412.5 -63% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 532 | 608 14% | 192.9 -64% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 380.5 | 1162 205% | 295.5 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17817 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25784 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16541 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7061 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 231 | 208.9 | 193.1 | 136.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 193.9 | 154 | 115.7 | 70.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 120 | 111.3 | 92.2 | 89.4 |
| MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 1% | -2% | 0% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.3 -0% | 29 -2% | 29 -2% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.5 | 31.5 6% | 29 13% | 29 13% | 32 4% | 32 4% |
| Idle Average * | 33.6 | 31.6 6% | 32 5% | 32 5% | 33 2% | 34 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 31.6 10% | 33 6% | 40 -14% | 34 3% | 37 -6% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 32.3 15% | 47 -24% | 46 -21% | 41 -8% | 43 -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 43 14% | 49 2% | 51 -2% | 50 -0% | 57 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.9 | 45.5 20% | 51 10% | 52 9% | 54 5% | 62 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 33.5 / 33.6 / 35 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 38 / 56.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
MSI GE75 8SF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.11 / 0.26 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 16.4 / 21.9 / 25.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
90.7 / 222.9 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -7% | 2% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16.4 | 20.2 -23% | 19 -16% | 15 9% | 31 -89% |
| Idle Average * | 21.9 | 27.2 -24% | 22 -0% | 20 9% | 35 -60% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.4 | 28.7 -13% | 29 -14% | 26 -2% | 45 -77% |
| Load Average * | 90.7 | 90.8 -0% | 102 -12% | 97 -7% | 130 -43% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 203.3 | 152.1 25% | 190 7% | 186 9% | 268 -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 222.9 | 165.4 26% | 231 -4% | 239 -7% | 374 -68% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | 8% | 11% | -12% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 212 | 190 -10% | 230 8% | 235 11% | 186 -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 298 | 372 | 303 | 225 | ||
| Load | 52 | 67 | 38 | 63 | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
GE75 är ett bra alternativ till den nyss släppta GS75. Den är en aning billigare, en aning tjockare och en aning snabbare eftersom den inte förlitar sig på Max-Q GPU:er. Den får också förra generationens GE73 att kännas utdaterad då den är 19 procent mindre och 10 procent lättare samtidigt som den är 35 procent mer ljusstark och 35 procent snabbare. Skillnaden mellan generationerna är definitivt påtagliga och verkligen inte små.
Det finns fortfarande ett antal aspekter som vi hoppas på att framtida revideringar åtgärdar. Fläktens ljudnivå har inte förbättrats och batteritiden är inte särskilt mycket bättre. Servicemöjligheterna kunde varit bättre och avsaknaden av Thunderbolt 3 är oförlåtligt för en laptop som kostar över 20.000 kronor. G-Sync hade också passat GE-serien bättre än Optimus för att få ut mer från 144 Hz-skärmen.
Den största konkurrenten till GE75 är för tillfället Asus ROG GL704-serien. Även om Asus system har en mörkare skärm och saknar tangentspecifik RGB-belysning så noterade vi att den hade ett rejälare chassi och komponenter som var lättare att underhålla, vilket gamer-målgruppen bör uppskatta. Det är fortfarande jämnt mellan de båda.
Mindre, lättare och snabbare. GE75 är en blandning av flaggskeppsserien GT och den supertunna GS-serien som ger det bästa från båda världar till ett lägre utgångspris. Det finns några nedskärningar såsom att den har en långsam SD-kortläsare och saknar både Thunderbolt 3 och 10 Gbps Ethernet, men dessa förtar inte den grundläggande spelupplevelsen.
MSI GE75 8SF
- 10/03/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
