Notebookcheck Logo

Recension av Asus VivoBook Pro 16: En bärbar multimediebärare med Core i7, RTX 3050 Ti och DCI-P3

Triple A.

VivoBook har inte precis den senaste hårdvaran (Alder Lake, Ampere), men den får poäng av andra skäl: Den bärbara datorn från Asus har en ljusstark 16-tumsskärm (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar) i 16:10-format som har en hög uppdateringsfrekvens (120 Hz) och stor färgomfångstäckning (DCI-P3).
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Asus VivoBook är en bärbar 16-tums bärbar dator för spelare och kreativa arbetare. Den bärbara datorn levereras med passande hårdvara: ACore i7-12700H,GeForce RTX 3050 Tioch en ljusstark IPS-skärm i 16:10-format som har bra färgprecision. Den här bärbara datorn liknarVivoBook Pro 16X som vi tidigare testat - men de är inte byggda på samma sätt. Konkurrenter till den här bärbara datorn är t.ex Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620, denXMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)ochAcer Swift X 16.

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 (Vivobook Pro 16 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1035 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, 65 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.3179, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel-Mode, one memory slot (not in use) 16 GB onboard
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, glansig: nej, 120 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 3, M.2-2280, 896 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 355.3 x 252
Batteri
70 Wh, 5895 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.9 kg, Strömförsörjning: 463 g
Pris
1499 Euro
Länkar
Asus hemsida
Asus kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %
v7 (old)
05/2023
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		1.9 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.4 %
v7 (old)
11/2022
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
i7-1260P, A370M		1.8 kg21.2 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08/2022
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		2.1 kg18.99 mm16.00"3072x1920
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08/2022
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440

Case & funktioner - VivoBook med Thunderbolt 4

VivoBook är mörkblå (Quiet Blue) i färgen och har släta, matta ytor. Dess basenhet (plast) och lock (aluminiumrygg) kan vridas lite för lätt. Den maximala vinkeln i vilken du kan öppna locket mäter 180 grader. Batteriet (fastskruvat, inte fastlimmat) samt resten av den bärbara datorns inre kan nås när du har tagit bort botten av fodralet.

Enheten har två USB-A-portar (USB 3.2 Gen 1) samt två USB-C-portar (1x Thunderbolt 4, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2). De sistnämnda stöder strömförsörjning och TB4-porten kan även ge ut en DisplayPort-signal. Totalt finns det två videoutgångar (1x DP, 1x HDMI). SD-kortläsaren (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) levererar ungefär genomsnittliga hastigheter. Positivt: Webbkameran (2,1 MP, max. 1 920 x 1 080 pixlar) har ett mekaniskt skydd.

Under optimala förhållanden (inga WiFi-enheter i närheten, kort avstånd mellan bärbar dator och serverdator) kan du uppnå bra WiFi-datahastigheter. Den bärbara datorn använder ett WiFi 6E-chip (Mediatek MT7922). Trådbundna anslutningar sköts av ett Realtek-chip (RTL 816878111; 1 GBit/s).

Storleksjämförelse

❌
356.4 mm 233.8 mm 21.65 mm 1.9 kg356.3 mm 239.7 mm 21.2 mm 1.8 kg356.78 mm 251.9 mm 18.99 mm 2.1 kg355.3 mm 252 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster sida USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombination, SD-kortläsare
Vänster sida USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombination, SD-kortläsare
Höger sida: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; strömförsörjning, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; strömförsörjning), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, strömanslutning
Höger sida: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; strömförsörjning, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; strömförsörjning), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, strömanslutning
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.1 MB/s +54%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s +16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
66.5 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.02 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.7 MB/s +98%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
72.2 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.41 MB/s -61%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1595 (1119min - 1711max) MBit/s +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (829min - 1665max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)
1359 MBit/s -9%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=55)
1279 MBit/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1119 (873min - 1194max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1622 (1539min - 1665max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)
1447 MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (707 - 1775, n=55)
1397 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Multimedia
  (705 - 1816, n=37, last 2 years)
1416 MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (394 - 1800, n=38)
1399 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
944 (526min - 1098max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1712 (1593min - 1743max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (700 - 1807, n=37, last 2 years)
1494 MBit/s -13%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (684 - 1771, n=39)
1433 MBit/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1217 (1157min - 1297max) MBit/s -29%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø926 (526-1098)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1593-1743)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1216 (1157-1297)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1465 (829-1665)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1119 (873-1194)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (1119-1711)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1584 (817-1646)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1622 (1539-1665)
ColorChecker
31.1 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
31 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook Pro 16: 27.24 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 41.11 ∆E

Inmatningsenheter - Asus-datorn med ett belyst tangentbord

Chiclet-tangentbordets tangenter (delvis böjda och med tre belysningslägen) har ett medelhögt lyft och en tydlig tryckpunkt. De har trevliga nivåer av motstånd - men de skulle kunna kännas lite skarpare. Tangentbordet har en liten eftergift när du skriver - detta är egentligen inget negativt. Allt som allt är Asus bärbara datorers tangentbord bra för vardagligt bruk.

En klickplatta (13 x 8,5 cm) ersätter behovet av en mus och dess släta yta gör att dina fingrar glider bekvämt över den. Det reagerar på inmatningar ända ut till kanterna, har ett minimalt lyft och en tydlig tryckpunkt.

Tangentbord VivoBook Pro 16
Tangentbord VivoBook Pro 16

Skärm - 16:10-panel med DCI-P3-täckning

Pixelmatris
Pixelmatris

Den snabbt reagerande 120 Hz-panelen i 16:10-format visar inga tecken på PWM-flimmer vid alla ljusstyrkor. Ljusstyrka och kontrast på den matta 16-tumsskärmen (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar) är precis som de ska vara (> 300 cd/m² eller 1 000:1).

474
cd/m²		461
cd/m²		461
cd/m²
456
cd/m²		504
cd/m²		453
cd/m²
466
cd/m²		469
cd/m²		440
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Au Optronics B160QAN02.L tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 504 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 464.9 cd/m² Minimum: 27.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 509 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1440:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.34
ΔE Greyscale 3.02 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
B160QAN02.M, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-14%
-19%
-11%
Display P3 Coverage
98.5
70.8
-28%
67.3
-32%
76.4
-22%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.5
0%
96.7
-3%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.1
73.2
-15%
68.2
-21%
76.6
-11%
Response Times
-1025%
-234%
-819%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
38 ?(21.2, 16.8)
-1800%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
33 ?(15, 18)
-1550%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(1, 7)
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-250%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
12%
15 ?(5, 10)
-88%
PWM Frequency
Screen
7%
-32%
-4%
Brightness middle
504
288.9
-43%
326
-35%
411
-18%
Brightness
465
276
-41%
303
-35%
378
-19%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
89
2%
83
-5%
Black Level *
0.35
0.26
26%
0.33
6%
0.29
17%
Contrast
1440
1111
-23%
988
-31%
1417
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.83
1.88
-3%
2.73
-49%
2.18
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.51
4.37
21%
9.54
-73%
4.84
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.34
0.42
69%
1.36
-1%
1.48
-10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.02
1.4
54%
5.2
-72%
2.68
11%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.3 96%
2.074 106%
2.43 91%
CCT
6688 97%
6634 98%
6911 94%
6717 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-344% / -145%
-95% / -58%
-278% / -122%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmens X Rite Pantone-certifiering innebär att den har en mycket naturlig färgåtergivning: Med avvikelser på cirka 1,8 ger den acceptabla resultat (DeltaE < 3) direkt från förpackningen. Kalibrering av den leder till en mindre avvikelse på 1,3 och mer balanserade gråtoner. Färgnoggrannheten är inget problem: Panelen kan avbilda hela DCI P3-färgrymden och 86 procent av Adobe RGB-rymden.

CalMAN - färgkontrollant
CalMAN - färgkontrollant
CalMAN - gråskala
CalMAN - gråskala
CalMAN - färgmättnad
CalMAN - färgmättnad
CalMAN - färgkontrollant (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - färgkontrollant (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN - färgmättnad (kalibrerad)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Den stabila IPS-panelen med betraktningsvinkel kan enkelt läsas från alla vinklar. Utomhus är skärmen i allmänhet läsbar så länge solen inte skiner för starkt.

VivoBook utomhus
VivoBook utomhus

Prestanda - Alder Lake och Ampere

VivoBook Pro 16-serien består av 5 modellserier (se modellnummer) som är baserade på olika CPU- och GPU-generationer. Den nuvarande modellen K6602ZE använder Alder Lake CPU:er och enGeForce-RTX-3050-TgPU. Vår testenhets MRSP är 1 247 dollar. Andra varianter var inte tillgängliga vid testtillfället.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia systeminformation
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Provningsförhållanden

Du kan växla mellan tre tillverkarspecifika kylningslägen (se tabell) med hjälp av tangentkombinationen "Fn" + "F". Vi använde "standardläge" (benchmarks) och "whisper-läge" (batteritest).

Prestandaläge Standardläge Whisper-läge
Effektbegränsning 1 (HWInfo) 80 watt 50 watt 28 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 120 watt 120 watt 120 watt
TGP (Witcher 3) 65 watt 50 watt 25 watt

Processor

Den bärbara datornsCore-i7-12700Hprocessor (Alder Lake) består av 6 prestandakärnor (hypertrådning, 2,4 - 4,7 GHz) och 8 effektivitetskärnor (ingen hypertrådning, 1,8 - 3,5 GHz). Totalt uppgår detta till 20 logiska CPU-kärnor.

Vi uppmätte de bästa benchmarkresultaten med aktiverat "prestandaläge" - även om avståndet till "standardläge" var minimalt. I vilket fall som helst låg dessa värden under processorns genomsnitt. I batteriläget minskade dess prestanda för entrådiga processer (127 poäng) i större utsträckning än dess prestanda för flertrådiga processer (1 695 poäng).

CB15-slingtestet visade: Kontinuerlig belastning av flera trådar ledde till att turboklockfrekvensen sjönk från den första till den fjärde körningen. Därefter förblev hastigheterna konstanta. Användning av "prestandaläge" ledde inte till någon prestandaförbättring.

Flertrådig (ansluten till elnätet)
Flertrådig (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkeltrådig (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkeltrådig (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2130.95-2446.31)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1587 (1546.19-1980.59)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (standardläge)
CPU:s klockfrekvenser under CB15-slingan (standardläge)
CPU-klockfrekvens under CB15-slingan (prestandaläge)
CPU-klockfrekvens under CB15-slingan (prestandaläge)
CPU:s klockfrekvens under CB15-slingan (whisper-läge)
CPU:s klockfrekvens under CB15-slingan (whisper-läge)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
82 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
80.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
80.3 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
75.9 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
69.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
62.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
14704 (12621.1min - 14704.4max) Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
14555 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
11571 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points -26%
Single Core
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1766 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
1764 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
1739 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5648 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
5551 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
4465 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points -25%
CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points +1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
675 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
670 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
2446 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
2430 (1901.59min - 2430.28max) Points -1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
1981 (1546.19min - 1980.59max) Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points -37%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
254 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
252 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
247 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -9%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * -36%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
301 Seconds * -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
235 Seconds * -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
227 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * +1%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS +25%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
59929 MIPS +24%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
48332 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS -2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
43173 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
5590 MIPS
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5570 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS -2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
5123 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points +43%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
11887 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points +41%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
10570 Points +27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
8346 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points -1%
Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
1786 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1733 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
1683 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points -6%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.3 fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
13.1 fps -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps -16%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
54.2 s * -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * -0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
47.4 s *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.1 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * -14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4873 sec *
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * +1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.473 sec * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.467 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2446 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
206 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
252 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5551 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
670 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1739 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14555 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84.6 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82.7 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
80.6 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M
67.7 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14429 KRay/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
14390 KRay/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
12734 KRay/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
12680 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s -25%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
9345 KRay/s -35%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
72920 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72714 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
63563 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
61649 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points -28%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
49203 Points -33%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
4107 MB/s +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3389 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3375 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
2892 MB/s -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
2359 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
102438 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
92646 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90849 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points -15%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
82127 Points -20%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9329 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
8932 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
8872 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
8567 Points -4%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
6522 Points -27%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
37197 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36169 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
35011 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
31113 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points -20%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
24476 Points -30%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
135380 MB/s +106%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75995 MB/s +15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
65858 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
65597 MB/s 0%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
48462 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
969 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
940 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
935 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
690 MB/s -27%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
684 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7836 KRay/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
7629 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
6946 KRay/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
6747 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s -22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
5120 KRay/s -33%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M (v6.70.6000)
43359 MPixel/s +217%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40459 MPixel/s +195%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
35147 MPixel/s +157%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s +142%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)
26692 MPixel/s +95%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
13699 MPixel/s

Systemprestanda

Det smidigt fungerande systemet klarar spel, streaming och rendering. En del av processorkraften ligger outnyttjad, eftersom RAM-minnet (16 GB, DDR4-3200, inbyggt) endast körs i enkanaligt läge. Om man installerar en minnesmodul (= dubbla kanallägen aktiva) skulle detta problem lösas - och det skulle också öka datahastigheterna till liknande nivåer jämfört med konkurrenterna med samma lagringsutrymme.

En minnesbank är ledig
En minnesbank är ledig
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6846 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6623 - 7075, n=5)
6823 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
6652 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points -8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
5969 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10551 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9540 - 10970, n=5)
10305 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10172 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9540 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9098 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8530 - 9555, n=5)
9050 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9016 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7168 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9409 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
9288 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8855 - 9542, n=5)
9253 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points -1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7634 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1740 Points +3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1728 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1654 - 1872, n=5)
1721 Points +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)
1703 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1683 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points -2%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1675 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1669 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1595 - 1792, n=5)
1666 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1651 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1616 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1916 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)
1909 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1699 - 1993, n=5)
1832 Points +8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1814 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1699 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1677 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1637 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1383 - 1768, n=5)
1576 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1523 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1435 Points -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4565 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5386 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
6652 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
68580 MB/s +168%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M
66612 MB/s +160%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54375 MB/s +112%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s +110%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s +88%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
25615 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
69599 MB/s +172%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M
66938 MB/s +162%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62046 MB/s +142%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s +124%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s +91%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
25586 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
69752 MB/s +195%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M
59294 MB/s +150%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57432 MB/s +143%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s +131%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s +95%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
23679 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M
111.5 ns * -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
106.6 ns * -17%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns * +15%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Det standardiserade testet för övervakning av latens (webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 hög belastning) visade på vissa avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
Övervakning av latenstid
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * -107%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1573.4 μs *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
989.5 μs * +37%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
848.7 μs * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Asus har utrustat den bärbara datorn med en PCIe-3 SSD (M.2-2280) från Intel med en kapacitet på 1 TB. Den levererar bra datahastigheter men kan inte klassas som en SSD-elit. Datorn erbjuder utrymme för en andra SSD.

En PCIe-3 SSD fungerar som systemenhet
En PCIe-3 SSD fungerar som systemenhet
Det finns plats för ytterligare en SSD
Det finns plats för ytterligare en SSD
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2979 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2425 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 624.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 542.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2641 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2279 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 82.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 248.9 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
90.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
89.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
59.8 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
52.5 pt
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
 
49.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
40.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4206 (4179.41min - 4206.02max) MB/s +58%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2970 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
2669 (2638.39min - 2668.53max) MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2405 - 2813, n=6)
2631 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2355 (2335.33min - 2354.8max) MB/s -12%
seq write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5015 (3544.4min - 5014.54max) MB/s +119%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s +88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3092 MB/s +35%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2292 - 2539, n=6)
2404 MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
2292 (2277.15min - 2292.43max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2020 (1893.72min - 2020.34max) MB/s -12%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6940 (6614.84min - 6939.9max) MB/s +129%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s +126%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5486 MB/s +81%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2711 - 3277, n=6)
3036 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
3034 (2688.83min - 3034.37max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2569 (2176.89min - 2569.43max) MB/s -15%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5031 (4963.54min - 5031.07max) MB/s +100%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s +99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4169 MB/s +66%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2752 (2520.98min - 2752.46max) MB/s +9%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2440 - 2653, n=6)
2588 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
2514 (2483.93min - 2513.65max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
88 (81.83min - 88.03max) MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
84.7 (83.57min - 84.65max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s -8%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (71.9 - 84.7, n=6)
77.5 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
62.9 MB/s -26%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
62.7 (61.51min - 62.72max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
305 (301.96min - 304.87max) MB/s +15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
265 (263.14min - 265.39max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s -10%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (213 - 265, n=6)
224 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
170.9 MB/s -36%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
162.6 (156.2min - 162.6max) MB/s -39%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s +362%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2605 (1553.88min - 2604.5max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1357 MB/s +46%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (932 - 951, n=6)
941 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
932 (902.95min - 931.73max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
652 (637.52min - 651.63max) MB/s -30%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s +164%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2780 (2533.37min - 2780.4max) MB/s +114%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1299 (1149.78min - 1298.86max) MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (1075 - 1335, n=6)
1257 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1025 MB/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
408 (386.27min - 408.12max) MB/s -69%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points +143%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
7636 Points +121%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5061 Points +47%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
3450 Points
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2917 - 3450, n=2)
3184 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2529 Points -27%
Score Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3136 Points +168%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points +166%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1630 Points +39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1190 Points +2%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (1172 - 1204, n=2)
1188 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1172 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3723 Points +121%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2968 Points +76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2660 Points +58%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1684 Points
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (1117 - 1684, n=2)
1401 Points -17%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
762 Points -55%
Seq Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5639 MB/s +102%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5171.96 MB/s +86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4248 MB/s +52%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2786 - 2823, n=2)
2805 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
2786.1 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2693.29 MB/s -3%
Seq Write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4171 MB/s +91%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3881.37 MB/s +77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2749 MB/s +26%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
2188.43 MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (2083 - 2188, n=2)
2136 MB/s -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1683.46 MB/s -23%
4K Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
76.1 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
75.84 MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (63.8 - 75.8, n=2)
69.8 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
66.29 MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
65.01 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -19%
4K Write
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
221.6 MB/s
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
210.2 MB/s -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
197.81 MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.3 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
189.98 MB/s -14%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (150.9 - 222, n=2)
186.3 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2539.3 MB/s +211%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2496 MB/s +205%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1144 MB/s +40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
855.48 MB/s +5%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (818 - 858, n=2)
838 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
817.72 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3144.88 MB/s +153%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2340 MB/s +88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2195 MB/s +77%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
1243.09 MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (758 - 1243, n=2)
1001 MB/s -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
395.8 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
0.104 ms *
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (0.067 - 0.104, n=2)
0.0855 ms * +18%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.078 ms * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.07 ms * +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.0551 ms * +47%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.031 ms * +70%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06104 ms * -118%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.06 ms * -114%
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
  (0.028 - 0.033, n=2)
0.0305 ms * -9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
0.028 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +21%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.018 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ: Ø3315 (2957.78-3377.46)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G: Ø2726 (2541.49-2809.97)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø3543 (251.99-6911.58)

Grafikkort

Våra benchmarks och speltester visade att GeForce RTX 3050 TigPU för bärbar dator (TGP: 65 watt) ligger strax under GPU:ns genomsnitt ("standardläge"). Användning av "prestandaläge" ledde till 10 till 15 procent högre hastigheter - enligt Witcher 3 -testet var TGP uttömd. Användning av dGPU-läge (via appen MyAsus) ledde inte till någon förbättring av prestandan.

Datorn tillåter FHD-spel med låga till höga inställningar och HD-spel med låga till medelhöga inställningar (whisper-läge). Det sistnämnda sänkte TGP till 25 watt, vilket resulterade i lägre ljudemissioner.

Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, standard)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, standard)
Fire Strike (användning av batteri, standard)
Fire Strike (användning av batteri, standard)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, viskning)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, viskning)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda, dGPU)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
100 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
55.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
55.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
53.5 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53.3 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
35.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32235 Points +95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +22%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
18679 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
16509 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
12338 Points -25%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137434 Points +64%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
83553 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30158 - 102432, n=23)
67913 Points -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
66662 Points -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points -32%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
39098 Points -53%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24766 Points +99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
13760 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12449 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
8307 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9048 Points +96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +18%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
5352 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4611 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
3899 Points -15%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
45370 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
16180 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45033 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11448 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
4969 poäng
Hjälp
Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.3)
53 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48 - 60, n=7)
52.3 Seconds * +1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
49 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years)
42.7 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.3)
93 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (83 - 104, n=7)
90 Seconds * +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
84 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=46, last 2 years)
74.5 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P (3.2.0)
564 Seconds * -49%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
559 Seconds * -47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (379 - 557, n=7)
446 Seconds * -18%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
436 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)
430 Seconds * -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.3)
379 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
228 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years)
209 Seconds *
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
109157 Points +78%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
66819 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53719 - 71459, n=26)
63660 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
61413 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 122560, n=85, last 2 years)
60173 Points -2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
20375 Points -67%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (43084 - 51428, n=6)
47917 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
46471 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (2104 - 62587, n=46, last 2 years)
28640 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P
19152 Points
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Average of class Multimedia
  (9398 - 103262, n=21, last 2 years)
31823 Points +115%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14777 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
14777 Points 0%
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Multimedia
  (15229 - 119407, n=23, last 2 years)
60603 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
56331 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
56331 Points 0%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1455 mpaths +132%
Average of class Multimedia
  (391 - 1751, n=23, last 2 years)
1338 mpaths +113%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (628 - 679, n=5)
652 mpaths +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
628 mpaths
GPU CUDA
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1194 mpaths +141%
Average of class Multimedia
  (274 - 1259, n=23, last 2 years)
883 mpaths +78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (495 - 552, n=5)
524 mpaths +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
495 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P (5.0.1)
209 mpaths -58%
CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (5027 - 19998, n=39, last 2 years)
10018 mpaths +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
9888 mpaths +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
9733 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7250 - 10101, n=8)
9146 mpaths -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
7572 mpaths -22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P (5.0.1)
7543 mpaths -23%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
456 mpaths +135%
Average of class Multimedia
  (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)
270 mpaths +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (171 - 216, n=22)
195 mpaths +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
194 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P (v4.10.07 )
62 mpaths -68%
CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (7035 - 30140, n=64, last 2 years)
15553 ksamples +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
14461 ksamples
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P (v4.10.07 )
11946 ksamples -17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
11804 ksamples -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (5796 - 16665, n=22)
11553 ksamples -20%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
97.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
64.4 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
60 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
29.6 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.8 (38.7min, 41.3P0.1, 60.8P1) fps +95%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57 (53min) fps +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19 - 58.5, n=29)
47.5 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47.1 (39min) fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
26.3 (24min, 25P1) fps -44%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 (16.4min, 66.7P1) fps +86%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75.4 (7.66min, 50P1) fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.8 - 75.6, n=26)
63.3 fps +18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.8 (30.1min, 38.5P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)
53.5 fps -1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
16.4 (1.81min, 10.2P1) fps -70%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
93.8 fps +103%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
54.1 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.5 - 106, n=24)
51.2 fps +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +10%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
46.2 fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M (1.3)
26.3 fps -43%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
165.6 (39.1min, 131.2P1) fps +96%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
95.2 (68.1min, 72.5P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.8 - 101.3, n=25)
87.5 fps +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
87.4 fps +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
84.5 (48.3min, 64.9P1) fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
52.1 (41.7min, 43.4P1) fps -38%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
140.7 (122.6min) fps +38%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
125.3 (106.2min) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (67.3 - 145, n=27)
113 fps +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101.6 (87.6min) fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
66.3 (43.4min) fps -35%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.8 fps +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
90.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.8 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.8 - 100.6, n=27)
77.4 fps -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.8 fps -26%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
24 fps -73%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø48.1 (43-51)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø50.5 (48-54)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M: Ø26.3 (24-28)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (standardläge)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (standardläge)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (prestandaläge)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (prestandaläge)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (viskningsläge)
GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (viskningsläge)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 175.1 170.9 111.9 53.8 39
The Witcher 3 (2015) 218.5 150.8 87.6 47.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 134.6 118.9 108.5 101.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 112.7 65 46.2 32
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 125.4 110.2 90.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 241 121.2 98.3 84.5 61
Doom Eternal (2020) 188.1 120
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 99 52.1 38.4 26.4 19.6
F1 22 (2022) 127.5 115.3 73.1 24.3 17.4
FIFA 23 (2022) 78.2
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 48.4 30.5 20.6 20 14.1
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 63 58 44 36
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 66.6 53.6 44.8 36.8 26.3
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 82.5 62.2 58.3 31.7 21.4
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 73.9 62.6 35.5 27.9 15.6
High On Life (2023) 104.7 77.5 60.3 50.8 31.8
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 88.4 75.6 36.8 32.4 19.6
Dead Space Remake (2023) 37.2 35.1 28.2 24.6 9.81
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 63.9 50 40.2 32.8 25
Returnal (2023) 52 50 45 34 27
Atomic Heart (2023) 94.3 71.4 41.6 32.3 24.5
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 106.2 91.1 68.4 68.5 48.8
Sons of the Forest (2023) 54.9 38.8 35.4 33.3 25.6
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) 74.6 47.4 41 8.97 7.82
The Last of Us (2023) 44.9 32.9 25.6
Dead Island 2 (2023) 95.7 75.7 64.1 58 45.9
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 36.9 31 28.9 25.8 15.4

Utsläpp och ström - Asus-datorn är bullrig

Bullerutsläpp

I tomgångsläge och vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) arbetar den bärbara datorn i allmänhet tyst - ibland till och med ljudlöst. Vid full belastning uppmätte vi ljudemissioner på upp till 61,5 dB(A) ("prestandaläge") - alldeles för högt. Att använda "standardläge" ledde till ett mer balanserat förhållande mellan buller och prestanda - trots detta gjorde kylaren en hel del oväsen.

"Whisper mode" kommer förmodligen att vara de flesta användares förstahandsval - det gör precis vad det står på plåten. Fläktarna körs med låga hastigheter även vid belastning och är knappt hörbara - på bekostnad av processorkraften. Spelande är fortfarande möjligt, men endast i HD.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
25.2 / 25.2 / 25.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
55.1 / 61.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs20024.923.821.718.825028.729.327.922.731037.927.830.224.840032.12525.624.150034.427.333.235.36302622.122.120.780025.922.716.615.6100026.230.621.217.4125027.125.516.514.7160028.529.615.214.3200029.73313.612.6250030.735.213.615.7315036.340.217.223.7400034.738.512.313.2500036.539.811.912.3630036.439.811.212800036.240.212.411.81000039.243.511.711.11250039.843.811.611.61600041.246.111.812.12000041.145.612.3122500040.34512.612.3315004146.513.312.84000041.747.213.312.95000041.947.213.613.56300046.650.613.713.88000048.65514.515.110000050.357.91517.512500041.15014.115.216000028.938.412.913.4SPL055.16125.225.8N09.713.60.60.7median 39.2median 43.5median 13.3median 13.2Delta4.75.21.71.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook Pro 16
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ		Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G		SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW		Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
3%
0%
8%
off / environment *
25.2
23.3
8%
26
-3%
25
1%
Idle Minimum *
25.2
25.7
-2%
26
-3%
25
1%
Idle Average *
25.2
26.1
-4%
28
-11%
25
1%
Idle Maximum *
25.2
30.6
-21%
31
-23%
25
1%
Load Average *
55.1
46.2
16%
45
18%
44.7
19%
Load Maximum *
61.5
49.4
20%
48
22%
45.6
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.2
46

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

VivoBook under stresstestet.
VivoBook under stresstestet.

Vid belastning nådde den bärbara datorn ganska höga temperaturer, men i genomsnitt var temperaturen måttlig. Detta innebär att vi uppmätte högst 55,5 °C under vårt stresstest. Vid daglig användning befinner sig dock temperaturerna i allmänhet inom ett acceptabelt intervall.

Stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig användning) simulerar ett extremt scenario för att testa hur stabilt systemet förblir vid full belastning. Processorn inledde stresstestet med genomsnittliga klockfrekvenser (P: 3,2 - 3,3 GHz; E: 2,7 GHz) och grafikkärnan hade en frekvens på 1,1 - 1,4 GHz. Medan CPU-klockfrekvenserna sjönk under testets gång, steg GPU-klockfrekvenserna med en liten bit.

Hög belastning
 42.9 °C44.2 °C36.8 °C 
 37.5 °C43.8 °C31 °C 
 22.8 °C21.6 °C22.2 °C 
Max: 44.2 °C
Medel: 33.6 °C
42.6 °C53 °C33.5 °C
26.4 °C41.2 °C38.7 °C
22.4 °C22.7 °C22.6 °C
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 33.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.7 °C / 74.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.1 °C / 9.1 F).
värmeutvecklingsfronten (vid belastning)
värmeutvecklingsfronten (vid belastning)
värmeutvecklingsfronten (tomgång)
värmeutvecklingsfronten (tomgång)
värmeutvecklingsfront (Witcher 3)
värmeutvecklingsfront (Witcher 3)
värmeutveckling i botten (vid belastning)
värmeutveckling i botten (vid belastning)
värmeutveckling i botten (tomgång)
värmeutveckling i botten (tomgång)
värmeutveckling i botten (Witcher 3)
värmeutveckling i botten (Witcher 3)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M
Heat
10%
-13%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.2
46
-4%
52
-18%
49.4
-12%
Maximum Bottom *
53
45.8
14%
63
-19%
55.5
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
32.1
29.2
9%
37
-15%
28.4
12%
Idle Bottom *
38.4
31
19%
38
1%
32.6
15%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett hyfsat ljud, men knappt någon bas.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs20021.722.925027.925.431030.232.740025.626.250033.229.563022.12380016.628.3100021.242.7125016.549.6160015.248.8200013.642.4250013.649.8315017.256.7400012.362.1500011.964.9630011.269.9800012.471.91000011.768.71250011.669.21600011.869.82000012.371.32500012.669.13150013.367.94000013.372.95000013.678.16300013.777.38000014.581.91000001586.112500014.181.316000012.969.4SPL025.288.6N00.668.8median 13.3median 69.2Delta1.75.936.436.336.429.325.429.330.12530.131.524.631.527.122.327.121.619.921.626.62126.636.726.636.744.922.744.952.815.252.857.316.357.357.516.757.560.816.960.867.315.567.370.215.270.269.115.169.17817787717.97776.718.576.773.918.273.975.116.675.172.315.372.376.313.976.375.813.375.878.212.878.275.912.675.978.712.378.774.412.374.472.612.272.672.611.972.687.827.887.876.10.976.1median 73.9median 15.3median 73.96.32.26.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook Pro 16Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Effektförbrukning

Den bärbara datorn uppvisade ingen anmärkningsvärd energiförbrukning. De värden vi mätte ligger på en normal nivå för den installerade maskinvaran. Testet Witcher 3 kördes med konstant energiförbrukning. Dess strömförsörjning (150 watt) är tillräckligt stor.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 8.7 / 13.1 / 18.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 116 / 162 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"		SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
i7-1260P, A370M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16"		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
-26%
42%
10%
26%
Idle Minimum *
8.7
6.8
22%
12
-38%
3.7
57%
8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25)
6%
6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average *
13.1
9.6
27%
17
-30%
7.6
42%
12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25)
4%
11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
18.3
17
7%
24
-31%
11.1
39%
17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25)
6%
13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years)
27%
Load Average *
116
117.5
-1%
106
9%
70
40%
92 ?(45.9 - 129, n=25)
21%
71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years)
39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
117.6
113.1
4%
159.9
-36%
68.8
41%
Load Maximum *
162
137.4
15%
208
-28%
108
33%
139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25)
14%
117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years)
28%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø117.6 (110.4-128.4)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø128.4 (114.9-180.9)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.76 (7.21-13.9)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø95 (84.6-178.1)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø151.2 (136.9-173.4)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø102.8 (99.7-114.3)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø113.6 (108.2-123.9)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17.4 (15.8-20.9)

Batteriets livslängd

Den 16-tums bärbara datorn klarade en drifttid på 7:14 timmar i vårt praktiska WLAN-test (kartläggning av belastningen när du ringer upp webbplatser via ett skript) - ett hyggligt, men inte fantastiskt värde. Inom jämförelsefältet tar VivoBook sista platsen.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)
7tim 15min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Multimedia
  (279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years)
625 min +44%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
575 min +32%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
i7-1260P, A370M, 56 Wh
543 min +25%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh
446 min +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
435 min

För

+ ljusstark IPS-skärm i 16:10-format
+ DCI-P3-täckning
+ plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-diskar
+ begränsad RAM-expansion
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ strömförsörjning
+ viskningsläge

Emot

- kan bli mycket högljudd vid belastning
- "Endast" DDR4 3200 RAM-minne
- RAM-minnet fungerar endast i single-channel-läge

Bedömning - En multimedial allrounder med en imponerande skärm

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZE-KV040W, testprov tillhandahållet av Asus Deutschland.
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZE-KV040W, testprov tillhandahållet av Asus Deutschland.

Video- och fotoredigering, streaming, rendering och spel: Allt detta hör till VivoBook Pro 16:s främsta styrkor. DessCore 7-12700HochGeForce RTX 3050 Ti bärbar datorlevererar all nödvändig kraft - båda komponenterna körs konsekvent med höga klockfrekvenser. Fast den används inte riktigt till sin fulla potential, eftersom RAM-minnet endast körs i enkanaligt läge.

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 är en bärbar dator som passar spelare och kreatörer som inte lägger alltför stor vikt vid att ha den senaste hårdvaran.

Den bärbara datorn värms bara upp lite vid belastning, men den kan bli väldigt högljudd - eller för högljudd till och med. Positivt: Det finns ett whisper-läge som kan sänka de ljudemissioner som den bärbara datorn producerar på bekostnad av dess prestanda - vilket åtminstone kan möjliggöra lite mer avslappnat arbete.

Den kompakta byggnaden, den relativt låga vikten (1,9 kg) och hyggliga driftstider (WLAN: 7:15 h) gör VivoBook till en ganska mobil enhet. Positivt: Batteriet kan laddas med en USB-C-strömförsörjning (minst 65 watt, 20 V) - båda USB-C-portarna stöder strömförsörjning. Du behöver alltså inte fortsätta använda den medföljande proprietära strömförsörjningen.

Vårt testexemplar har ingen OLED-skärm, men den är allmänt tillgänglig inom VivoBook Pro 16-serien. Du bör inte missa den: Den installerade IPS-skärmen (16 tum, 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar) i 16:10-format imponerar med sin ljusstyrka, goda kontrast, stabila betraktningsvinklar, korta reaktionstider, bra färgskildring och utmärkt färgrymdstäckning.

alternativt kan du ta en titt påDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620: Med jämförbar prestanda erbjuder den betydligt bättre körtider. Ett budgetvänligt alternativ ärAcer Swift X 16, som ger lägre grafikprestanda - men den kan erbjuda mycket bra körtider och ett pris på cirka 1 000 dollar.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Den version av Asus VivoBook Pro 16 som vi testade kan köpas på Amazon för 1 247 dollar.

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 - 05/22/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
82%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
73 / 80 → 91%
Vikt
64 / 20-72 → 85%
Batteri
76 / 95 → 79%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
89 / 90 → 99%
Programprestanda
93 / 90 → 100%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
66 / 95 → 69%
Audio
77%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
77%
86%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av Asus VivoBook Pro 16: En bärbar multimediebärare med Core i7, RTX 3050 Ti och DCI-P3
Sascha Mölck, 2023-05-25 (Update: 2023-05-25)