Recension av Corsair Voyager a1600 - Full AMD-kraft för spelare, streamers och kreatörer

Name: Corsair Voyager a1600
Brand: Corsair

Rembrandt och Navi förenade!

Corsair har lanserat en mycket intressant enhet med sin Voyager a1600, som sticker ut från konkurrenterna med speciella Elgato-genvägar. Med en kombination av AMD CPU och AMD GPU bör gamers och streamers få valuta för pengarna. Vi har satt toppmodellen på prov och kommer i den här recensionen i synnerhet att titta på den bärbara datorns funktioner och prestanda.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Corsair är ett välkänt namn när det gäller tillbehör inom PC-sektorn: kringutrustning, nätaggregat, SSD-enheter, höljen, skärmar och även färdiga stationära system, varav vi redan har testat några, ingår i tillverkarens nuvarande sortiment. Med Voyager-serien ger sig Corsair nu även in i segmentet för bärbara datorer och vill delta i spelbranschen med Voyager a1600. Utgångsläget är inte alls dåligt, för med den AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS och en dedikerad AMD Radeon RX 6800M finns det en lovande grund. Du kan också se fram emot 32 GB DDR5 RAM-minne och en SSD med 2 TB lagringsutrymme i toppkonfigurationen. QHD-panelen med 240 Hz är å andra sidan alltid ett måste. Priset på 3 550 euro är dock i den övre ligan.

Det kan bli billigare om du väljer en AMD Ryzen 7 6800HSmed 16 GB RAM-minne och en 1 TB SSD. Här är det för närvarande 2 600 euro som gäller. I testet tävlar Corsair Voyager a1600 mot starka rivaler från fältet av aktuella bärbara gamingdatorer. Mer information finns i följande tabell.

Test device courtesy of Corsair DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Corsair Voyager a1600

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Grafikkort

AMD Radeon RX 6800M - 12 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2525 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 135 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Adrenalin 21.40.56.02, SmartShift

Minne

32 GB

, DDR5-4800

Skärm

16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 188 PPI, BOE0A3B, IPS, 240 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headphone Combo Jack, AC-in, Kortläsare: Full size SD card reader, UHS III, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Integrated CORSAIR SLIPSTREAM

Nätverk

Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 356 x 286.7

Batteri

99 Wh, 6410 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webbkamera: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Dolby Atmos custom tuned internal speakers NVMe SSD, Tangentbord: CHERRY MX Ultra-Low Profile mechanical key switches with CAPELLIX LED RGB backlighting, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230-Watt-Netzteil, Tasche, iCue, Elgato Stream Deck, Camera Hub, Dolby Access, VOYAGER Hub, CORSAIR Diagnostics, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.403 kg, Strömförsörjning: 451 g

Pris

3550 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	12/2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.5 % v7 ^(old)	08/2022	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.10"	2560x1600
90.8 % v7 ^(old)	09/2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	2.6 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	06/2022	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	09/2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Hölje och funktioner - Tunn men robust

Corsair Voyager a1600s hölje är tillverkat av aluminium och ger därmed enheten en mycket god stabilitet. Endast displaylocket vred sig något under våra vridningstester. I övrigt har den bärbara gamingdatorn ett relativt blygsamt utseende och klarar sig utan RGB-belysning, vilket är helt okej. Skärmen hålls av två små gångjärn, vilket inte helt kan förhindra studsande.

När det gäller anslutningsmöjligheter erbjuder Corsair moderna gränssnitt, även om antalet är mycket hanterbart. Det är synd att det bara finns en USB Type-A, men det finns tre USB-C-portar med Thunderbolt-stöd. Den bärbara datorn är alltså väl förberedd för framtiden. Antalet gränssnitt är förmodligen så sparsamt på grund av Slipstream-funktionen eftersom olika tillbehör kan anslutas direkt till den bärbara datorn via denna trådlösa teknik utan ytterligare en dongel. Corsair erbjuder själv sina egna möss, tangentbord och headset för detta. Wi-Fi-modulen kommer från Foxconn och erbjuder den aktuella standarden Wi-Fi 6E.

Den tänkta användningen som bärbar dator för streaming kräver en bra webbkamera. Testet visar att den inbyggda 1080p-kameran presterar bättre än konkurrenterna. Vi rekommenderar ändå att du använder en extern kamera för stationär användning. För mobil användning kan du tryggt falla tillbaka på den inbyggda kameran.

Corsair Voyager a1600 - Utan bottenplatta

Storleksjämförelse

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W DIN A4 ❌

Till vänster: Kensington-lås, AC-in, 2x USB Type-C, mikrofon/hörlurskombinationsuttag

Till höger: USB Typ-A, Thunderbolt USB4, SD-kortläsare (UHS-III)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	158 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	68 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.7 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)	120.4 MB/s +34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s -20%

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1723 (1681^min, 1688.83^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s +94%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (886 - 1790, n=22)	1660 MBit/s +87%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)	1488 MBit/s +68%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1260 (1156^min - 1343^max) MBit/s +42%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1664 (1649^min - 1680^max) MBit/s +95%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (852 - 1777, n=21)	1606 MBit/s +88%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)	1390 MBit/s +63%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1655 (1613^min, 1615.32^P1 - 1702^max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1646 (1468^min - 1762^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (623 - 1961, n=22)	1471 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)	1429 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1565 (988^min - 1682^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (521 - 1838, n=21)	1321 MBit/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)	1227 MBit/s -31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	976 (499^min - 1054^max) MBit/s -45%

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (859-1931)

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø871 (444-941)

ColorChecker Corsair Voyager a1600: 16.78 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 24.62 ∆E

Inmatningsenheter

Corsair ger Voyager a1600 ett mekaniskt tangentbord baserat på Cherry MX-switchar. Dessa är mycket robusta och utformade för extrem livslängd. Den mycket korta resan och den tydligt märkbara tryckpunkten ger användaren bra taktil feedback. Dessutom är slaget inte dämpat, vilket förhindrar en svampig inmatningskänsla.

Tangentbordets belysning kan konfigureras som önskat via programvaran iCUE. Olika effekter och en komplett färgpalett är tillgängliga för användaren. Dessutom kan alla tangenter konfigureras individuellt.

Pekplattan mäter hela 15,5 centimeter i bredd och 10 centimeter i djup. ClickPad är alltså mycket stor och lämpar sig bäst som musersättning i praktiken. Om du tycker att det aktiva inmatningsområdet är för stort kan du avaktivera den högra sidan genom att dubbeltrycka på den vita pricken i det övre vänstra hörnet. Det finns dock ingen optisk eller haptisk indikation för denna funktion. Glasytan har en subtil satinfinish som är bekväm att använda även med något svettiga fingrar. De två inmatningsknapparna i det nedre området fungerar bra och är ganska tysta när de trycks in.

Skärm - Snabb 16:10-panel

Ingen blödning av bakgrundsbelysning i kanterna

Skärmen på Corsair Voyager a1600 är en 16-tums IPS-panel med 240 Hz. 16:10-formatet, som har en upplösning på 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, ger en generös arbetsyta. Det finns inga alternativa skärmvarianter för Voyager a1600 än så länge.

I våra tester uppnår den installerade panelen en bra ljusstyrka på 340 cd/m². Trots detta erbjuder konkurrenterna klart ljusare skärmar i jämförelse. På grund av det relativt höga svartvärdet lider kontrastförhållandet avsevärt. Voyager a1600 uppnår således endast en kontrast på 670:1 i vårt test.

Ögontrötthet på grund av PWM bör inte vara något problem med Corsair Voyager a1600. Bakgrundsblödning var inget problem med vår enhet.


340 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	339 cd/m²
331 cd/m²	355 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	326 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

BOE0A3B tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 339.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 670:1 (Svärta: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		25%	-5%	22%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	99.82 45%	63.7 -7%	97.3 42%	71 3%	69.3 1%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.99 2%	95.3 -3%	100 2%	97.9 0%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.1	90.21 29%	65.7 -6%	84.9 21%	73.3 5%	70.8 1%
Response Times		3%	17%	15%	-3%	24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13 ?(7, 6)	11 ?(1, 10) 15%	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) 29%	13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5) -6%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -12%	12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5, 5)	11 ?(1, 10) -10%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) 4%	6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6) 36%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) 6%	5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1) 44%
PWM Frequency		7400 ?(100)
Screen		71%	12%	29%	-30%	18%
Brightness middle	355	498 40%	478.8 35%	498 40%	335 -6%	547 54%
Brightness	340	502 48%	477 40%	468 38%	319 -6%	523 54%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	90 -1%	80 -12%	90 -1%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.53	0.11 79%	0.43 19%	0.36 32%	0.28 47%	0.44 17%
Contrast	670	4527 576%	1113 66%	1383 106%	1196 79%	1243 86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	1.87 23%	2.24 8%	1.77 27%	4.38 -80%	2.1 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.31	6.15 -43%	4.49 -4%	5.24 -22%	9.48 -120%	7 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.14	1.94 -70%	1.89 -66%	0.63 45%	1.33 -17%	0.9 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.62	3.15 -20%	2.3 12%	2.4 8%	7 -167%	3.2 -22%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	330.95 ^1%	2.25 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2.103 ^105%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6909 ^94%	7294 ^89%	6955 ^93%	7046 ^92%	6244 ^104%	6979 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		33% / 51%	8% / 9%	22% / 26%	-10% / -19%	14% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmkvaliteten är bra, och färgomfånget är också imponerande. Konkurrenten erbjuder dock ofta bättre priser även i den här jämförelsen. Vårt recensionsexemplar kan bara slå Lenovos Legion 7 i den här disciplinen. På grund av de goda Delta E-2000-värdena för gråskalan och färgerna jämfört med sRGB-färgrymden antar vi att Corsair levererar enheten med en kalibrerad skärm. En manuell kalibrering förbättrar Delta E-2000-värdena något igen. Trots detta lider den maximala skärmens ljusstyrka. Vi rekommenderar att man låter skärmen vara i leveransskick. Färgrumstäckningen är tillräcklig för halvprofessionell foto- och videoredigering.

Corsair Voyager a1600 jämfört med AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

I princip är den matta displayytan lämplig för utomhusbruk. Den jämförelsevis låga ljusstyrkan talar dock emot den.

Corsair Voyager a1600 under mulen himmel

Testet av betraktningsvinkeln visar resultatet för en typisk IPS-panel. Små färgförändringar är synliga i de fyra hörnbilderna, vilket inte leder till några begränsningar vid normal användning.

Prestanda - Rembrandt-bas med mycket RAM och lagringsutrymme

Corsair Voyager a1600 med kombinationen avAMD Ryzen 9 6900HSoch AMD Radeon RX 6800Merbjuder en mycket bra grund för att spela aktuella spel med maximal detaljrikedom på en bärbar dator. I samband med 32 GB arbetsminne och en 2 TB SSD får användaren även här en hyfsad prestanda.

Provningsvillkor

Corsair erbjuder möjligheten att använda enheten i tre olika lägen, som kan växlas via iCUE-programvaran. Alternativen är tyst, balanserad och extrem. Skillnaderna ligger i den maximala prestanda som finns tillgänglig för CPU och GPU även i kombination med Smart Shift-tekniken. Alla prestandatester utfördes med profilen Extreme.

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS är en processor med åtta kärnor och bygger på den nuvarande Rembrandt-arkitekturen. SoC:n klockar med en frekvens på 3,3-4,9 GHz i Boost och har stöd för SMT, vilket ger användaren totalt 16 trådar. I direkt jämförelse med den Intel-baserade konkurrensen har AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS svårt att hävda sig. Testprovet klarar dock AIDA64-testerna lite bättre och tar tredjeplatsen i rankingen.

För ytterligare benchmarks hänvisar vi dig till vårJämförelsetabell för processorer.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; @Turbo Mode: Ø2279 (2140.75-2332.5)

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2337 (2320.19-2354.74)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	85.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	71.1 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	66.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	58 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.6 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	22449 Points +67%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21994 Points +64%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	16887 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14455 (14309.4^min - 14455.1^max) Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	14403 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12606 - 14403, n=5)	13439 Points 0%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1935 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1894 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1743 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1564 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1526 - 1570, n=5)	1553 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1526 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	8522 Points +65%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +62%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	6352 Points +23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5616 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5552 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (4829 - 5552, n=5)	5167 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	743 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	640 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	612 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (596 - 620, n=5)	608 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	599 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	3512 (3244.91^min - 3512.16^max) Points +63%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +59%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	2631 (2422.04^min - 2631.06^max) Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2355 (2320.19^min - 2354.74^max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2333 (2140.75^min - 2332.5^max) Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (2054 - 2342, n=5)	2191 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	251 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (218 - 254, n=5)	242 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	241 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	231 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (220 - 277, n=5)	239 Seconds * -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	224 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	215 Seconds * +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	197.6 Seconds * +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	86384 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85738 MIPS +38%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	64864 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62721 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62006 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (52948 - 63591, n=5)	60092 MIPS -3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	6358 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6322 MIPS +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (5538 - 5958, n=5)	5766 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5680 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5679 MIPS -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	5138 MIPS -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	16447 Points +64%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15098 Points +50%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	12463 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10018 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (8381 - 10040, n=5)	9358 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	9224 Points -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1898 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1874 Points +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1746 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1589 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1480 - 1614, n=5)	1541 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1537 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.4 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	18.5 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.2 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.2 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14.2 - 17.9, n=5)	16.2 fps -4%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	56.1 s * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	54 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (47.6 - 57.2, n=5)	51.3 s * +10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)	48.1 s * +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	41.7 s * +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	34.5 s * +40%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.5 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4907 sec * -0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0.4672 - 0.502, n=5)	0.4874 sec * -0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4671 sec * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * +8%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4209 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6406

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

18728 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

73218 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

12340 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17195

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

41849

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.52 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

21.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

174.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

25.29 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

178.03 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2161 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

202.73 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5152 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

596 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

13445 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1554 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	96.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	85.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	83.7 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	81.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	78.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	76.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	57.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21963 KRay/s +39%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	17242 KRay/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	16064 KRay/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14212 - 16072, n=5)	15317 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11535 KRay/s -27%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9316 KRay/s -41%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106952 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	106387 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102881 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (90523 - 102881, n=5)	96872 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52916 Points -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41656 Points -58%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4920 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4216 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3657 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3614 MB/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3378 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (3035 - 3614, n=5)	3326 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	117347 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	105344 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104030 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (97461 - 105203, n=5)	102908 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101029 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98781 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13290 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	13062 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	13011 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12905 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12548 - 13039, n=5)	12830 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9927 Points -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	58428 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	56486 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53819 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49657 - 56486, n=5)	52606 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31779 Points -42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25547 Points -53%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points -61%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	142686 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	142360 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125268 MB/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (51791 - 142686, n=5)	118697 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109208 MB/s -19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102111 MB/s -25%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1392 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1369 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1143 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	905 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	888 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (737 - 888, n=5)	818 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11830 KRay/s +40%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	9147 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8981 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (7530 - 8981, n=5)	8272 KRay/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	6663 KRay/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5322 KRay/s -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40303 MPixel/s +36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40239 MPixel/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36231 MPixel/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	30604 MPixel/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	29413 MPixel/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25757 - 30291, n=5)	28445 MPixel/s -4%

Systemprestanda

Resultaten från benchmarks visar en bra systemprestanda, även om en tydlig skillnad mot Intel-baserade bärbara datorer återigen är märkbar. Subjektivt sett erbjuder Corsair Voyager a1600 dock mycket bra systemprestanda utan märkbara latenser vid daglig användning.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8636 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7539 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7377 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	7208 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6860 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11190 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)	10836 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10715 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10521 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	9970 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9758 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10932 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)	9909 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9632 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9613 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9097 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	8983 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	14291 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)	12168 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11385 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	11350 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11293 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9322 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2132 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)	1910 Points +35%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1861 Points +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1661 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1596 Points +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1415 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2012 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)	1809 Points +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1786 Points +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1609 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1551 Points +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1379 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2307 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)	2099 Points +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1936 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1795 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1754 Points +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1599 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2007 Points +89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1868 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)	1707 Points +61%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1449 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1310 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1060 Points 0%

PCMark 10 Score		7208 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65546 MB/s +31%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63993 MB/s +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60342 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50837 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49150 - 51517, n=5)	50427 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49150 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69716 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69486 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67695 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	51836 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51041 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (43646 - 51838, n=5)	49919 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	67309 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63527 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55102 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51577 MB/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (15975 - 55235, n=5)	46524 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.6 ns * -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.2 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (79.2 - 110.9, n=5)	93.1 ns * +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86 ns * +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	85.4 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjningar

Den dokumenterade latensen ökar inte när flera webbläsarflikar öppnas i Edge. Voyager a1600 klarar också uppspelningen av 4K YouTube-videon utan problem. Vi ser endast något ökade latenser efter att vi startat Prime95.

Maximal latens när du öppnar flera webbläsarflikar och spelar upp 4K-video.

Drivrutiner rangordnade efter längsta exekveringstid

Maximal latenstid efter tio sekunders Prime95

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2127.9 μs * -175%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.9 μs * -80%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1194.1 μs * -54%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1155.7 μs * -50%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Med en SSD-dator på 2 TB erbjuder Corsair Voyager a1600 mycket lagringsutrymme, vilket definitivt behövs med tanke på den avsedda användningen. Den installerade modellen kan inte hålla jämna steg med konkurrenterna i benchmarks. Överföringshastigheterna är dock mer än tillräckliga för de flesta användare. I belastningstestet är SSD-enhetens prestanda konsekvent tillgänglig utan begränsningar. Förresten tjänar den bärbara datorns bottenplatta till värmeavledning. Det går att installera totalt två masslagringsenheter i M.2-2280-format.

För ytterligare jämförelser och riktmärken hänvisar vi till vår SSD/HDD jämförelsetabell.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

Sequential Read: 3524 MB/s

Sequential Write: 2050 MB/s

512K Read: 1754 MB/s

512K Write: 2055 MB/s

4K Read: 39.29 MB/s

4K Write: 137.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 443.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 493.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	91.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX ^-1! Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	88.1 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	87.8 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	86.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	70.8 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	64.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4343 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4195 (4171.24^min - 4194.51^max) MB/s +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=32)	3898 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3625 (3612.57^min - 3624.81^max) MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3595 (3264.19^min - 3594.73^max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3477 MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4954 (4429.55^min - 4954.26^max) MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4780 (3934.47^min - 4779.5^max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4599 (4248.83^min - 4598.67^max) MB/s +36%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2370 - 7628, n=32)	4122 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3818 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3274 (3228.15^min - 3273.86^max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=32)	7102 MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6697 (4182.58^min - 6697.46^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6694 (5547.2^min - 6693.9^max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6693 (6460.49^min - 6692.89^max) MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6499 (5666.71^min - 6499.29^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6318 MB/s +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=32)	5469 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5003 (4959.7^min - 5002.55^max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4985 (4772.28^min - 4984.61^max) MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4982 (4649.6^min - 4981.68^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4765 (4460.74^min - 4765.06^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)	77.5 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.1 (72.94^min - 74.14^max) MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.3 (69.8^min - 70.31^max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	67.6 (66.3^min - 67.64^max) MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	66.7 (66.39^min - 66.66^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	258 (233.29^min - 257.8^max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +58%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	222 (217.59^min - 222.42^max) MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (115.5 - 295, n=32)	214 MB/s +52%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	161 (159.24^min - 160.98^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	159.1 (155.4^min - 159.1^max) MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (658 - 4075, n=32)	2876 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2859 (2841.54^min - 2858.59^max) MB/s +104%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2842 (2837.59^min - 2841.89^max) MB/s +102%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2750 (2675.05^min - 2750.14^max) MB/s +96%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2565 MB/s +83%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1535 (1515.74^min - 1535.37^max) MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1404 (1371.85^min - 1404.22^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2786 (2543.84^min - 2785.68^max) MB/s +461%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2679 (2487.07^min - 2678.86^max) MB/s +439%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2658 (2651.88^min - 2657.7^max) MB/s +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (387 - 3548, n=32)	2190 MB/s +341%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2128 MB/s +328%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	539 (505.45^min - 539.19^max) MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	497 (485.81^min - 496.85^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7400 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7356 Points +25%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 9031, n=31)	7222 Points +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7009 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6733 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6475 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5878 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 Points +57%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2814 Points +54%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2709 Points +49%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1224 - 3399, n=31)	2666 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2440 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1994 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1957 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1824 Points
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3614 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=31)	3262 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3221 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3144 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3128 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3109 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3093 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2930 Points -9%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=31)	5479 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5396.69 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5348.25 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5232 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4996.87 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4948 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4821 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4531.51 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4539.36 MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4336 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4186.78 MB/s +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=31)	3992 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2851.98 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2725 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2667.04 MB/s -2%
4K Read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	73.81 MB/s +48%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)	72.4 MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.72 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65 MB/s +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	64.38 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	63.8 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	61.45 MB/s +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	49.75 MB/s
4K Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	247.26 MB/s +75%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	212.27 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +50%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	203.82 MB/s +44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=31)	197.6 MB/s +40%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	160.74 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	143.61 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	141.54 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2264.38 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2218.05 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2191.95 MB/s +70%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (662 - 2811, n=31)	2045 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1874 MB/s +45%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.84 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1380.56 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1292.41 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3168.51 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2807.18 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=31)	2665 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2579.14 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2546.85 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2490.61 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2298.82 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.078 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05551 ms * +29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.045 ms * +42%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.036 ms * +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)	0.03406 ms * +56%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.028 ms * +64%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.076 ms * -162%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04751 ms * -64%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)	0.03371 ms * -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.022 ms * +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.016 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Corsair Voyager a1600: Ø6086 (5628.61-6111.88)

Grafikkort

AMD Radeon RX 6800M är ett snabbt dedikerat grafikkort med 12 GB VRAM. AMD:s nuvarande 6000-serie för bärbara datorer erbjuder också separata RT-kärnor för ray tracing-beräkningar tack vare RDNA2. I testet kan Corsair Voyager a1600 komma upp med en bra 3D-prestanda. Avståndet till konkurrenterna med GeForce RTX 3080 Ti grafikkretsen är delvis litet. I grund och botten ger Corsair Voyager a1600 tillräckligt med prestanda, vilket för närvarande räcker för att få många moderna spel smidigt på skärmen. CPU:n får alltid den optimala prestandan från GPU:n via AMD:s Smart Shift-teknik.

I 2D-läge gör iGPU:n i AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS jobbet och sparar därmed energi.

För fler jämförelser och benchmarks hänvisar vi till vårG PU-jämförelsetabell.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	96.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	94 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	89 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M	88.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	78.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	75.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43891 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	42089 Points +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (39075 - 41706, n=2)	40391 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	39075 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37288 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	36065 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	34141 Points -13%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	177650 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	170020 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144658 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	144470 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144426 Points -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (91327 - 170020, n=3)	140735 Points -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	108854 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (30507 - 34993, n=3)	33233 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	32853 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	30507 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28006 Points -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	26612 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25891 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11762 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	11076 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (10439 - 11316, n=4)	11067 Points +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10439 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10404 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9980 Points -4%

3DMark 05 Standard		57639 poäng
3DMark 06 Standard Score		46732 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result		77244 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		30013 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		209564 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59585 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25639 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		13599 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		10391 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	380 Seconds * -503%
Average of class Gaming (63 - 345, n=7, last 2 years)	228 Seconds * -262%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	51 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	378 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	372 Seconds * +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13)	295 Seconds * +23%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	293 Seconds * +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	268 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	42 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)	36.9 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	36 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13)	35 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13)	23.1 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	23 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.8 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	251 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)	243 fps +37%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	208.1 (192^min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	189 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (177.8 - 199, n=2)	188.4 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	188 (156^min) fps +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	186.6 (141^min) fps +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	177.8 (43.6^min, 105.5^P0.1, 142.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	118.1 (112^min) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.4 (108^min, 109^P1) fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (108 - 110, n=2)	109 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102.1 (82^min) fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.8 fps -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.7 (83^min) fps -10%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	183.4 (2.86^min, 142.9^P1) fps +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	176.1 (2.91^min, 111.1^P1) fps +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	173.9 (3.58^min, 125^P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years)	169.6 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	162.4 (8.03^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	156.3 fps 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	156.2 (7.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (124 - 156.2, n=2)	140.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.8 fps +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (10.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.4 (6.89^min, 66.7^P1) fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.2 (10.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	96.9 (7.1^min, 62.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.6 fps +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (75.1 - 92.8, n=2)	84 fps -9%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	163.9 fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (33.5 - 230, n=144, last 2 years)	155.1 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	148.5 fps +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	134.7 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (51^min) fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.6 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	123.5 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (118 - 125.6, n=2)	121.8 fps -3%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +24%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	120.1 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	111.9 fps +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.9 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.6 (59^min) fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (97.5 - 99.7, n=2)	98.6 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	97.5 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.9 fps -3%

F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	297 (230^min) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 470, n=16, last 2 years)	263 fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	246 (211^min, 167^P1) fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	231 (185^min, 141^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (187 - 231, n=2)	209 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	182.1 (157^min, 116^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	146 (121^min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)	145.2 fps +17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	124.1 (104^min, 92^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.9 (100^min, 78^P1) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (114 - 124.1, n=2)	119.1 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	97.5 (82^min, 69^P1) fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.2 fps +165%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.5 fps +148%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)	108.5 fps +140%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.1 fps +128%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.8 fps +56%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (45.3 - 50.4, n=2)	47.9 fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	45.3 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	44.1 fps -3%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	150.5 fps +197%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	141.3 fps +179%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 193.1, n=186, last 2 years)	138.4 fps +173%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130.8 fps +158%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.9 fps +73%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (50.7 - 61.4, n=2)	56.1 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	51.2 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	50.7 fps

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	166 fps +52%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years)	140.2 fps +29%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	109 (87^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (95 - 109, n=2)	102 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	153 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)	131.2 fps +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	101 (78^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (89 - 101, n=3)	95 fps -6%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	224 (140^min, 162.1^P1) fps +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (179 - 206, n=3)	188.3 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	171.2 (74.4^min, 123.2^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	167.2 (107.5^min, 131.7^P1) fps -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	146.6 (72.6^min, 102.4^P1) fps -29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 (22.6^min, 94^P1) fps -33%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	261 (74.9^min, 186.3^P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)	256 fps +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	229 (152.3^min, 169.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (192 - 229, n=2)	211 fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	189.4 (106.8^min, 136.7^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	184 (117.2^min, 131.2^P1) fps -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	164.1 (81.9^min, 109.9^P1) fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (44^min, 107.5^P1) fps -32%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	177.8 (154.9^min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)	162.2 fps +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	151.4 (134.2^min) fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	149.1 (131.9^min) fps +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.5 (105.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	125.5 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	116 (100.1^min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	113.7 (86.4^min) fps -9%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	168 (144.9^min) fps +46%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	151.2 fps +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	145.2 (127.1^min) fps +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	144 (127.1^min) fps +25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	114.8 (94.7^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	114.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.1 (93.8^min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	95.2 (75.3^min) fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M: Ø112.7 (97.284-143.2)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	177.1	172	156.2	92.8	84	85.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)	309	236	177.8	108		59.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.1	126.2	125.5	114.8		95.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	160.8	125.6	97.5		71	41.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	60	50.7	45.3			28.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	129	113	109	101	100	61
Strange Brigade (2018)	394	258	229	206	145	77.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	143.9	119.7	112.8	106.1	80.5	43.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	111	97	94	86	82	62
Metro Exodus (2019)	205	137.4	99.8	78.7	61.4	37.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	116.1	100.1	89.2	77.6	57	30.3
F1 2020 (2020)	305	247	228	172.4	127.4	70.2
Dirt 5 (2020)	242	154	121	95	76	47
F1 2021 (2021)	342	277	231	124.1	88.2	47.6
New World (2021)	122.5	103	83.7	66.2		34.1
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	213	165	159	97	79	50
God of War (2022)	88.6	88.3	85.4	68.4	53	33.8
GRID Legends (2022)	233	205	171.2	144.1	115.8	72.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	122.5	95.5	82	76.9	48.1	22.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	196.7	161.5	104.6	80.5	54.9	28.2
F1 22 (2022)	226	226	192.3	49.7	29.9	13.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	104.9	82.5	61.4	46	32.8	17.9
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	93.4	87.9	80.7	76.3	59.2	33.7
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	90.8	94.2	88.6	82.5	63.2	38.1

Utsläpp och energi - något som inte får ignoreras

Bullerutsläpp

De uppmätta bulleremissionerna visar nästan ett typiskt resultat för en bärbar dator för spel. Men de uppmätta 51,1 dB(A) är högt och upplevs subjektivt som betydligt högre. Orsaken är det mycket högfrekventa fläktljudet. Det enda botemedlet är att välja profilen Balanced eller Quiet. Ljudnivån sjunker till 46 respektive 36 dB(A) i stresstestet.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30.5 / 30.6 / 30.7 dB(A)
Hög belastning		44.5 / 51.1 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise		7%	22%	0%	-3%	5%
off / environment *	29.9	25.5 15%	22.8 24%	26 13%	26 13%	24.5 18%
Idle Minimum *	30.5	25.5 16%	23 25%	26 15%	30 2%	24.5 20%
Idle Average *	30.6	25.5 17%	23 25%	29 5%	31 -1%	30 2%
Idle Maximum *	30.7	27.4 11%	23 25%	34 -11%	33 -7%	32.5 -6%
Load Average *	44.5	49.9 -12%	26.8 40%	50 -12%	49 -10%	43.9 1%
Load Maximum *	51.1	55 -8%	54.2 -6%	56 -10%	57 -12%	54.2 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *			54.3	53	53	48.8

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Corsair Voyager a1600 under stresstestet

Vi mätte den varmaste punkten på botten av höljet med upp till 54 °C i stresstestet. Men fallet blir också ganska varmt på ovansidan med strax över 50 °C. Falltemperaturen sjunker endast något med 1-2 °C under spelandet.

Under stresstestet stiger CPU- och GPU-temperaturen till 95 respektive 83 °C. SoC:n klockar dock fortfarande med 3,7 GHz i genomsnitt. AMD:s GPU uppnår också höga klockfrekvenser med strax under 2,2 GHz. Corsair använder ett stort kylsystem med en ångkammare och två fläktar.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


43.3 °C	50.7 °C	41.5 °C
36.3 °C	44.3 °C	33.3 °C
34 °C	31.5 °C	32.2 °C

Max: 50.7 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C


36 °C	54.2 °C	36.7 °C
35.5 °C	51 °C	36.3 °C
33.1 °C	36.1 °C	34.4 °C

Max: 54.2 °C
Medel: 39.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 63.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


32.4 °C	35.8 °C	32.5 °C
30.8 °C	31.3 °C	31.1 °C
30.1 °C	29.3 °C	30.1 °C

Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 31.5 °C


29.8 °C	33 °C	28.8 °C
31.4 °C	32.5 °C	30.1 °C
30.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.8 °C

Max: 33 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 44.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.2 °C | FFIRT 550-Pocket

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


42.6 °C	49.2 °C	40.2 °C
35.9 °C	33.5 °C	32.4 °C
33.6 °C	30.6 °C	31.6 °C

Max: 49.2 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C


36.5 °C	53.6 °C	36.7 °C
34 °C	49.5 °C	36.3 °C
32.4 °C	35.4 °C	33.9 °C

Max: 53.6 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 59.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-3%	14%	8%	14%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	50.7	55.1 -9%	37.2 27%	47 7%	41 19%	44.4 12%
Maximum Bottom *	54.2	50.3 7%	43 21%	49 10%	62 -14%	60.8 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	35.8	35.5 1%	34 5%	31 13%	25 30%	33.8 6%
Idle Bottom *	33	36.1 -9%	32.8 1%	32 3%	26 21%	38.8 -18%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

De två högtalarna är placerade under handflatorna. Ljudet riktas dock uppåt från högtalargallren bredvid tangentbordet. Som ofta är fallet saknar de två högtalarna bas, så mellan- och diskantljud dominerar klart. Vi rekommenderar dock att du använder ett headset för spel. Detta kan anslutas till den bärbara datorn via USB med hjälp av 3,5 mm-uttaget eller via Slipstream.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Corsair Voyager a1600 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Effektförbrukning

När det gäller strömförbrukningen uppmätte vi 16-22 watt vid tomgång. Vid genomsnittlig belastning registrerade vi cirka 133 watt, även om toppar på upp till 258 watt uppnås. Enligt specifikationerna kan nätaggregatet leverera 230 watt. De högre belastningstopparna ledde dock inte till några problem i testet. Batteriet laddades inte ytterligare ur under stresstestet.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 2.05 Watt
Låg belastning	16.9 / 20.3 / 22.2 Watt
Hög belastning	133.4 / Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Corsair Voyager a1600; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø206 (195.6-225)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø211 (161.5-258)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

Corsair Voyager a1600; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.6 (90.5-133.9)

Corsair Voyager a1600; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø105.5 (96.3-142.2)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.4 (190.7-212)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø211 (194.2-221)

Batteriets livslängd

Med 99 Wh har Corsair nått upp till det maximala när det gäller batterikapacitet. På grund av den relativt höga energiförbrukningen vid tomgång släpar enheten efter konkurrenterna vid tomgång. Lenovos Legion 7 får dock ännu sämre resultat. Med det sagt uppnår Voyager a1600 en godkänd drifttid på knappt 6 timmar i WLAN-testet. Skärmens ljusstyrka var 52 procent i det här testet, vilket motsvarar de allmänna förutsättningarna på 150 cd/m². Corsair stryper också CPU:n och GPU:ns prestanda märkbart i batteriläget.

Batteritid för WLAN (maximal ljusstyrka)

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		6tim 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		5tim 50min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		4tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		2tim 06min

	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-31%	-6%	14%	10%	-36%	7%
Reader / Idle	418		293 -30%		603 44%		567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years) 36%
H.264	358			490 37%		306 -15%	413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years) 15%
WiFi v1.3	350	339 -3%	436 25%	344 -2%	336 -4%	267 -24%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 7%
Load	126	53 -58%	110 -13%	133 6%	114 -10%	40 -68%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) -32%
Witcher 3 ultra		51				55	78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

För

+ hög prestanda för CPU och GPU

+ 12 GB VRAM

+ 32 GB DDR5 RAM

+ 2 TB SSD

+ riktigt bra hantverk

+ tunn design

+ snabb, kalibrerad 240 Hz-skärm

+ ingen PWM och ingen molneffekt

+ mycket stor pekplatta

+ mekaniska tangenter med Cherry MX-switchar

+ Elgato Stream deck-funktioner

+ Corsair Slipstream

Emot

- högfrekvent fläktljud

- inget 4K-alternativ

- SSD-prestanda under genomsnittet

- endast Full HD webbkamera

- ingen RJ-45

Bedömning - Mångsidig notebook-spelare och streamer

Recension av Corsair Voyager a1600: recensionsenhet från Corsair Tyskland

Corsair har skapat en riktigt bra enhet med Voyager a1600. Kombinationen av AMD SoC och AMD GPU är bra och är ganska övertygande i testet. Den måste ofta erkänna sig besegrad i den direkta duellen med Intels nuvarande SoC. Skillnaderna i prestanda är dock inte riktigt märkbara. Voyager a1600 ser särskilt högklassig ut på grund av materialvalet, vilket också ger enheten mycket god stabilitet. Enheten ser inte alls klumpig ut

Anslutningsmöjligheterna visar sig vara lite spartanska vid första anblicken. De som förlitar sig på Slipstream-tekniken för att ansluta kringutrustning kommer dock knappast att sakna de frånvarande USB Typ-A-portarna.

AMD:s Ryzen 9 6900HS presterar bra och konsekvent snabbt utan någon större prestandaförlust under belastning. Vi kan också intyga samma sak för AMD:s Radeon RX 6800M. Vi gillade skärmen i formatet 16:10. De enda nackdelarna är den något låga ljusstyrkan och den inte helt perfekta färgrymdstäckningen i färgrymderna AdobeRGB och P3, vilket utesluter professionell användning för video- eller fotoredigering. Som bärbar dator för spel kan Corsair Voyager a1600 dock lätt klara sig utan dem.

Corsair Voyager a1600 är mer än bara en renodlad spellaptop, eftersom dess fantastiska funktioner gör den till en perfekt enhet för streamers och innehållsskapare.

Med de unika streamingfunktionerna kommer Voyager a1600 dock att bli ihågkommen. Snabbstartknapparna, som kan tilldelas efter önskemål, passar streamers och du kan klara dig utan en extra streamdäck. Med det sagt hade vi på grund av den avsedda användningen önskat oss en kamera av högre kvalitet som inte bara är tänkt att fungera som en mobil nödlösning. Den största nackdelen med Corsair Voyager a1600 är den inbyggda kylenheten. Temperaturerna håller sig inom gränserna under belastning, ingen tvekan om det, men ändå är den uppmätta ljudnivån för hög vid maximal prestanda. De som avstår från Extreme-läget kommer att belönas med låga utsläpp, men ger samtidigt bort lite prestanda.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Corsair Voyager a1600 är tillgänglig direkt från Corsair-butiken där du måste betala 3 550 euro för den testade konfigurationen. Alternativt säljer Amazon samma modell för för närvarande 3 540 euro. Den billigare konfigurationen med Ryzen 7 6800HS och 16 GB RAM finns också på Amazon för 2 725 euro.

Corsair Voyager a1600 - 12/05/2022 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Design

91 / 98 → 92%

Tangentbord

88%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

62 / 80 → 78%

Vikt

60 / 10-66 → 90%

Batteri

66 / 95 → 70%

Skärm

89%

Spelprestanda

98%

Programprestanda

96%

Workstation

91%

Temperatur

83 / 95 → 87%

Ljudnivå

72 / 90 → 80%

Audio

56%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Medel

77%

87%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av Corsair Voyager a1600 - Full AMD-kraft för spelare, streamers och kreatörer

Sebastian Bade, 2022-12-14 (Update: 2022-12-19)