Notebookcheck Logo

Recension av HP Omen 17 (2022) - Snyggt hölje och hårdvara med hög potential

Lovande styrka

kan man inte riktigt säga om HP Omen 17. Den bärbara speldatorn utnyttjar sin potential fullt ut när det gäller TDP och TGP för Intel Core i7 12700H och Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Men gamers kan också göra saker annorlunda: om energisparinställningarna är korrekt inställda blir den energislukande gamern en ödmjuk, lammliknande laptop med en användbar batteritid.

I flera år har HP framgångsrikt marknadsfört Omen-serien som starka bärbara speldatorer med en tilltalande design och utmärkt byggkvalitet. Tillverkaren tar dock också ut ganska höga priser. Köparna måste för närvarande betala över 2 000 euro (~ 2000 US-dollar) för den aktuella Omen 17.

Ett urval av starka hårdvarukomponenter i HP Omen 17 säkerställer mycket starka prestanda i processorns riktmärken. I 2022 års version av den bärbara speldatorn används nu enIntel Core i7-12700Hfrån den senaste processorgenerationen, som åtföljs av 16 GB DDR5 RAM och en 1 TB NVMe SSD från Western Digital. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Tii vårt andra granskningsprov presterar också bra. Vårt första recensionsexemplar fick bytas ut av HP på grund av ett fel på grafikkortet. På det hela taget presterar 17-tums Omen ofta bättre än de starka HP Omen 16med samma hårdvara.

Andra jämförbara gamers är MSI Vector GP76 12UGS, Asus TUF Gaming F17 och den betydligt billigare Acer Nitro 5 med AMD-processor.

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng (Omen 17-ck Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 106 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 135 W TDP
Minne
16 GB 
, 2x 8GB DDR5 SODIMM
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, BOE09EE, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN810 1TB, 1024 GB 
Ljudkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 4 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Headset, Kortläsare: SD
Nätverk
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 31 x 398 x 261
Batteri
78 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: 0.9
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Cicklett, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Alexa, ExpressVPN (30 days trail version), LastPass (30 days trail version), McAfee (30 days trail version), Microsoft 365 (30 days trail version), HP Omen Gaming HUB, HP Support Assistent, HP QuickDrop, myHP, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.801 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.27 kg
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.3 %
v7 (old)
09/2022
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.7 %
v7 (old)
08/2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.7 %
v7 (old)
05/2022
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg25.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.1 %
v7 (old)
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.3 %
v7 (old)
09/2021
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg24.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.4 %
v7 (old)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.5 %
v7 (old)
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Hölje - Oförändrad utformning

HP Omen har ett hölje av svart plast och svartmålad metall. Omen-logotypen på displaylocket är den enda iögonfallande färgpunkten. I övrigt har den bärbara datorns design hållits enkel. Raka linjer med få dekorationer utgör utsidan av den bärbara gamingdatorn. Ingenting har förändrats i designen sedan förra året. Till och med de annars typiska stora öppningarna för fläktarna är diskreta här. HP lyckas få den bärbara datorn att se mycket mindre stor ut än vad den är tack vare schweiziska kanter och andra optiska trick. I gengäld verkar den nästan sväva ovanför ytan.

När den öppnas avslöjas ett hyfsat tangentbord med omkopplingsbar RGB-belysning. Ovanför detta finns ett intressant triangelmönster som inte verkar ha någon funktion alls. I övrigt fångar en stor O17-skrift vår uppmärksamhet. Den bärbara datorn står säkert på stora gummifötter på undersidan.

Displaylocket och basens undersida är tillverkade av plast. Den bärbara datorns ovansida med tangentbordet och pekplattan är tillverkad av metall. En positiv aspekt här är att handflatorna förblir svala även vid tung belastning. Trots sin storlek kan skärmen öppnas upp till 150° med en hand. HP har gjort ett bra jobb med gångjärnen eftersom skärmens läge förblir stabilt även när den bärbara datorn utsätts för skakningar.

HP:s bärbara dator har en storlek och vikt som är typisk för bärbara speldatorer. Tillsammans väger den bärbara datorn och nätadaptern mer än 4 kg. I bästa fall ser den lite smalare ut än många av sina rivaler

Storleksjämförelse

398 mm 261 mm 31 mm 2.8 kg403.5 mm 280 mm 24.9 mm 2.7 kg398 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 284 mm 25.9 mm 2.9 kg394 mm 264 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg369 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Utrustning - Alla anslutningar på sidorna

Anslutningsmöjligheterna på HP:s bärbara dator är relativt normala för spelare, även om en SD-kortläsare med god hastighet överraskade oss här. Alla portar är placerade på sidorna av den bärbara datorn. Om du ansluter en trådbunden mus eller annan hårdvara på höger sida bör du dock vara försiktig så att du inte blockerar ventilationsöppningen.

DC-ingång, RJ45 GigabitLAN, USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1 (alltid på), mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, USB Type-C med Thunderbolt 4 och DisplayPort, 3,5 mm hörlurs/mikrofonuttag, SD-kortläsare
DC-ingång, RJ45 GigabitLAN, USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1 (alltid på), mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, USB Type-C med Thunderbolt 4 och DisplayPort, 3,5 mm hörlurs/mikrofonuttag, SD-kortläsare
2 x USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1
2 x USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1

SD-kortläsare

Referenskortet AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 når betydligt högre överföringshastigheter på många bärbara datorer. Men det är ändå möjligt att arbeta med en läshastighet på mer än 100 MB/s.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
208.9 MB/s +107%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
100.9 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.63 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69 MB/s -32%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
59 MB/s -42%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
190.1 MB/s +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
91.1 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
88.65 MB/s -3%

Kommunikation

MediaTek MT7921 limmad under ett värmerör
MediaTek MT7921 limmad under ett värmerör

HP Omen 17 använder MediaTek MT7921 för trådlös kommunikation. Den här modulen stöder WLAN 6 och Bluetooth 5.2. I kombination med Netgear Nighthawk AX12 är hastigheterna för dataöverföring tyvärr inte lika höga som för andra bärbara datorer. Men å andra sidan är över 880 MBit/s i mottagnings- och sändningsriktningen inte heller någon dålig hastighet. Placeringen av WLAN-modulen kan bli problematisk i längden, eftersom den är placerad under värmerören mellan kylaren och grafikkretsen. Den är till och med fäst där med en självhäftande pad, så den kan bli ganska varm under användning. I det långa loppet kan detta också leda till anslutningsproblem.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1364 (756min - 1486max) MBit/s +54%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1239 (1143min - 1322max) MBit/s +40%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
MediaTek MT7921
885 (808min - 986max) MBit/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
MediaTek MT7921
845 (560min - 969max) MBit/s -5%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (548 - 985, n=16)
797 MBit/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
450 (211min - 459max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1623 (1min - 1710max) MBit/s +84%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1491 (1415min - 1540max) MBit/s +69%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
MediaTek MT7921
881 (818min - 900max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (90 - 972, n=16)
628 MBit/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
423 MBit/s -52%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
MediaTek MT7921
140 (33min - 562max) MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (609 - 1245, n=5)
894 MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1133-1711)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1679-1765)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (818-900)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1624 (1355-1710)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12: Ø422 (403-429)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø139.8 (33-562)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1415-1540)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (808-986)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1347 (1078-1486)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (211-459)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (560-969)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1239 (1143-1322)

Webbkamera

Även om den inbyggda kamerans bildkvalitet är skarp och kontrastrik i bra omgivande ljus är webbkameran knappast lämplig för streamers. I mörkare rum har den knappast en chans att leverera någorlunda bra bildkvalitet.

ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck1075ng: 10.37 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 17.41 ∆E

Säkerhet

Användarna kommer inte att hitta något mer än säkerhetsfunktionerna i Intel Core i7, såsom TPM 2.0 och SecureBoot, i den här bärbara speldatorn.

Tillbehör

Leveransen omfattar endast de vanliga dokumenten och den stora strömadaptern på 350 W.

Underhåll

HP Omen 17 är relativt lätt att öppna och det finns många modulära komponenter inuti. En gratis NVMe SSD-plats finns här. En motsvarande värmespridare och en termisk kudde har redan förinstallerats. Det kan dock vara problematiskt att byta ut WLAN-modulen. Som tidigare nämnts ligger den under värmerören och hålls på plats av en självhäftande pad.

HP Omen 17 öppnades
HP Omen 17 öppnades

Garanti

HP erbjuder en 24-månaders garanti för HP Omen 17 i Europa. Detta kan skilja sig åt i andra regioner, så du bör kontrollera med din leverantör innan du köper

Inmatningsenheter - RGB-tangentbord

Tangentbord

En bärbar dator på 17 tum har plats för ett komplett tangentbord, men HP har utelämnat Numpad här för att få mer plats för piltangenterna och vissa makrotangenter (P1 till P6) och för att ge tangentblocken bra avstånd. Det RGB-belysta tangentbordet är mycket haptiskt tilltalande tack vare ett tydligt tangentavstånd på över en millimeter och skarp återkoppling. För européer som är vana vid ISO-layout kan tangentbordets ANSI-layout vara ganska ovanlig. Å andra sidan bör spelare som huvudsakligen använder mekaniska tangentbord snabbt känna sig hemma här.

Bland annat WASD-tangenterna kan lyftas fram visuellt med de fyra kontrollerbara områdena i RGB-belysningen. Gamers kommer sannolikt att bli nöjda med detta. Tangentbordets belysning och tilldelningen av makrotangenterna kan styras via Omen Center. Statiska och dynamiska lägen finns tillgängliga för belysningen. En annan intressant aspekt är att färgen och ljusstyrkan hos tangentbordsbelysningen kan anpassas till skärmens innehåll. Detta resulterar i en effekt som påminner något om Ambilight-systemet. Denna funktion är endast tillgänglig i Light Studio.

HP Omen belysning
HP Omen belysning
HP Omen Light Studio
HP Omen Light Studio

Pekplatta

Klickplattan svarar på varje inmatning med ett fylligt klickande ljud. Den är exakt och lyhörd. Storleken och placeringen av klickplattan är också tilltalande.

Inmatningsenheter för HP Omen 17
Inmatningsenheter för HP Omen 17

Skärm - 144 Hz men inte särskilt responsiv

Skärmblödning på HP Omen 17
Skärmblödning på HP Omen 17
Subpixelgitter
Subpixelgitter

HP Omen 17:s IPS-skärm med Full HD-upplösning och en ljusstyrka på bara 302 cd/m² ligger mer i medelklassen. Tack vare den matta ytan finns det åtminstone inga reflektioner som annars skulle störa spelupplevelsen. Vi fastställde kontrastförhållandet till endast 892:1. Svartvärdet är relativt högt med 0,36 cd/m².

Inga ljushetsskillnader på skärmen är synliga med blotta ögat. Endast kameran kan upptäcka tydliga halos på skärmen, om än först efter lång exponering.

Skärmens svarstider motsvarar inte riktigt vad vi förväntar oss av en bärbar dator för spel. Särskilt krävande spelare kommer sannolikt att märka tydliga streck vid snabba bildväxlingar.

Konkurrerande bärbara gamingdatorer klarar sig dock inte bättre här. BådeAsus TUF Gaming och Acer Nitro 5 använder skärmar i sina 17-tumsvarianter som oftast har betydligt sämre värden.

315
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE09EE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 302 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 313 cd/m²
Kontrast: 783:1 (Svärta: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.46% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.03% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
AUO B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Display
17%
16%
-32%
-38%
18%
17%
Display P3 Coverage
59.03
70.1
19%
70.09
19%
40.2
-32%
36.7
-38%
71.7
21%
71
20%
sRGB Coverage
87.46
99.9
14%
98.98
13%
59.7
-32%
55.3
-37%
98.8
13%
97.9
12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.04
71.9
18%
70.91
16%
41.5
-32%
37.9
-38%
73.6
21%
73.3
20%
Response Times
59%
46%
-188%
-35%
41%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(7, 7)
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
76%
4 ?(1, 3)
71%
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
-180%
18 ?(8, 10)
-29%
4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6)
70%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(6, 4)
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
42%
8 ?(4, 4)
20%
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
-196%
14 ?(7, 7)
-40%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
12%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
6%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
Screen
-74%
-22%
-64%
-93%
-89%
-70%
Brightness middle
321
278
-13%
274
-15%
287
-11%
282
-12%
323.3
1%
335
4%
Brightness
302
273
-10%
264
-13%
268
-11%
255
-16%
315
4%
319
6%
Brightness Distribution
84
79
-6%
87
4%
89
6%
85
1%
91
8%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.41
0.26
37%
0.25
39%
0.17
59%
0.24
41%
0.33
20%
0.28
32%
Contrast
783
1069
37%
1096
40%
1688
116%
1175
50%
980
25%
1196
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.62
3.96
-144%
2.53
-56%
5.1
-215%
5.91
-265%
4.59
-183%
4.38
-170%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.08
10.78
-164%
6.76
-66%
8.72
-114%
10.98
-169%
10.82
-165%
9.48
-132%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.93
1.07
45%
0.98
49%
5.1
-164%
1.4
27%
1.33
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.24
6.8
-448%
3.49
-181%
4.24
-242%
5.85
-372%
7.9
-537%
7
-465%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.224 99%
2.31 95%
2.44 90%
2.32 95%
2.28 96%
2.103 105%
CCT
6261 104%
7651 85%
6714 97%
6008 108%
7372 88%
5941 109%
6244 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -36%
13% / -4%
-95% / -75%
-55% / -71%
-10% / -47%
-17% / -41%

* ... smaller is better

Det visningsbara färgutrymmet för HP Omen 17 är inte särskilt stort, endast 87,46 % sRGB. Detta kan vara tillräckligt för spel och kontorsprogram, men konstnärer kanske vill ha mer

HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. adobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. adobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. DisplayP3
HP Omen 17 vs. DisplayP3

Kalibrerad visar skärmen på HP Omen 17 en ganska liten färgavvikelse. Om du har samma konfiguration kan du minska färgavvikelserna avsevärt med hjälp av färgprofilen i inforutan. Färgavvikelsen sjunker från ett deltaE 6,41 till 1,93, vilket är under ett märkbart värde.

CalMan färger
CalMan färger
CalMan färger kalibrerade
CalMan färger kalibrerade
CalMan gråskala
CalMan gråskala
CalMan kalibrerad gråskala
CalMan kalibrerad gråskala
CalMan-mättnad
CalMan-mättnad
CalMan mättnad kalibrerad
CalMan mättnad kalibrerad

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Skärmens bakgrundsbelysning är något svag i direkt solljus. Men det är fortfarande möjligt att arbeta med den bärbara datorn i starkt solsken med rätt betraktningsvinkel.

HP Omen 17 med solen bakifrån
HP Omen 17 med solen bakifrån
HP Omen 17 mot solen
HP Omen 17 mot solen

Skärmen på den bärbara speldatorn är inte särskilt stabil när det gäller betraktningsvinklar. Även om det inte finns några betydande färgavvikelser vid brantare betraktningsvinklar finns det starka förändringar i märkbar ljusstyrka.

Analys av betraktningsvinkeln för HP Omen 17
Analys av betraktningsvinkeln för HP Omen 17

Prestanda - Bärbar HP-dator med grafikprestanda något över genomsnittet

Hårdvaran i HP Omen 17 är helt klart utformad för PC-spel. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti och Intel Core i7 12700H säkerställer en stark prestanda här. Processorn stöds av 16 GB DDR5-arbetsminne. NVMe-SSD:n från Western Digital är också tillräckligt stor för att rymma några spel med 1 TB.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z: huvudkort
CPU-Z: huvudkort
CPU-Z: RAM
CPU-Z: RAM
CPU-Z: RAM-kortplats 1
CPU-Z: RAM-kortplats 1
CPU-Z: grafik
CPU-Z: grafik
CPU-Z: grafik
CPU-Z: grafik
CPU-Z: riktmärken
CPU-Z: riktmärken
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWinfo
HWinfo
 
 
 

Provningsförhållanden

Effektstyrning av HP Omen 17
Effektstyrning av HP Omen 17

HP Omen 17:s strömstyrning har hållits relativt enkel, men kan också anpassas kraftigt. profilen Balanced valdes för benchmarks inom områdena systemprestanda, CPU-prestanda, DPC-latens och SSD-prestanda. Tester av GPU-prestanda och spelande utfördes i läget Performance . Olika prestandalägen testades också för volym- och energimätningar.

I Balanced- och Performance-läget är CPU:s boost-effekt 100 watt och GPU:ns 135 watt. I Balanced-läget arbetar processorn konstant på cirka 45 watt och i Performance-läget på cirka 75 watt.

Processor

Logganalys Cinebench R15 Loop: blå - Batteri; grön - Balanserad; röd - Prestanda
Logganalys Cinebench R15 Loop: blå - Batteri; grön - Balanserad; röd - Prestanda

Intel Core i7-12700Htillhör de avancerade chipsen i den nuvarande Alder Lake-generationen och består av sex prestandakärnor och åtta effektivitetskärnor för totalt 20 trådar. I prestandaläget ligger PL1 med 75 watt långt över de vanliga värdena på 45 watt. Vid testning, med 25 körningar av riktmärket Cinebench R15, visar logganalysen tydligt olika resultat för de olika prestandaprofilerna och batteriläget. I7 klarar fyra körningar i rad på Boost-effekt (så länge prestandaläget är aktiverat) innan den snabbt faller till 75 watt kontinuerlig effekt. Balanserat läge tillåter en kontinuerlig uteffekt på 45 watt, vilket innebär att prestandaläget uppnår 490 poäng mer. PL1 och PL2 är starkt begränsade i batteriläget. Här har processorn endast 35 respektive 25 watt till sitt förfogande.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø2729 (2696.14-2830.06)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2353 (2287.54-2805.84)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2006 (1963-2025.09)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1865 (1855.12-1943.35)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
85.4 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
79.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
75.3 pt
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
68.7 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
65.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
63.6 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
55.6 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +86%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
18337 Points +55%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
18203 Points +54%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points +18%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
12316 (11587.2min - 12316.3max) Points +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12262 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11814 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1928 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points +1%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1765 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
1504 Points -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +72%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
7037 Points +45%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
6889 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
4847 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4742 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
4724 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
740 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
692 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points 0%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
686 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
556 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +33%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
2872 (2287.68min - 2523.66max) Points +11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
2830 (2696.14min - 2830.06max) Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points +9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2580 (2349.9min - 2579.98max) Points
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2518 (1886.88min - 2518.1max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2025 Points -22%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
1943 (1855.12min - 1943.35max) Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
276 Points +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points 0%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points -11%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points -11%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
256 Seconds * -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
250 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * +9%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
208 Seconds * +15%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
201 Seconds * +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +53%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS +30%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69778 MIPS +25%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
62405 MIPS +12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS +8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
55958 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54596 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
52870 MIPS -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6343 MIPS +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5818 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5588 MIPS -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS -4%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
5510 MIPS -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
5472 MIPS -6%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
15116 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +30%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points +9%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
11934 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11626 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7472 Points -36%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1902 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points +3%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
1769 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1749 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1464 Points -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +62%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps +37%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
19.6 fps +34%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
19 fps +30%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps +3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.1 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.6 fps
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps -3%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * -98%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
77.6 s * -78%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.1 s * -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.5 s *
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * +1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
37.7 s * +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.555 sec * -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.514 sec * -10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4659 sec *
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * +1%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4609 sec * +1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4159 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
256 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
201 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2518 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
692 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4847 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11814 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1765 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.9 pt
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
79.7 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77.2 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
72.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
63 pt
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60.6 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49.8 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +46%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15078 KRay/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14345 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s -28%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8399 KRay/s -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s -49%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90996 Points +21%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
75435 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points -30%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40635 Points -46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points -52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points -57%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +30%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3791 MB/s
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s -6%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3408 MB/s -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3100 MB/s -18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +14%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102833 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98276 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points -5%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97195 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11871 Points +23%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points +9%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9835 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9634 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points -14%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +45%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
50136 Points +35%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37158 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points -25%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
22321 Points -40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points -43%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
136241 MB/s
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122777 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s -20%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100255 MB/s -26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s -37%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s -64%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +36%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1124 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1004 MB/s
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
793 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +48%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7989 KRay/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7439 KRay/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s -25%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4769 KRay/s -40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s -44%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s -51%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s +17%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s +15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34944 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s -6%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27001 MPixel/s -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
15341 MPixel/s -56%

Systemets prestanda

Tack vare den starka hårdvaran visar den bärbara speldatorn också sin styrka i benchmarks för systemprestanda. Starka resultat kan ses i alla delområden i PCMark10 och CrossMark. Även om HP:s Omen 17 inte kan placera sig i toppen av jämförelseenheterna har alla enheter mycket höga prestandavärden. Detta ger en konsekvent responsiv bärbar dator vid daglig användning.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7947 Points +8%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6941 - 7947, n=11)
7554 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7357 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7311 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
6749 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points -19%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10832 Points +2%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10648 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10646 Points
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9892 - 10935, n=11)
10525 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
10131 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10638 Points +15%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9024 - 10638, n=11)
9816 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9279 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
9205 Points -1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9149 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points -34%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points +11%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
12038 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10165 - 12546, n=11)
11337 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10938 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10701 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
8948 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points +18%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1957 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1833 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (974 - 2000, n=12)
1817 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points -10%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points +17%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1921 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (907 - 1962, n=12)
1761 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1741 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2012 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points -2%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1938 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1027 - 2057, n=12)
1873 Points -7%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2134 Points +32%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1029 - 2142, n=12)
1833 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1613 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points -25%
PCMark 10 Score
7357 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s +24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s +19%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s 0%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44627 MB/s -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38331 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s +16%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47618 MB/s -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
43460 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47203 MB/s -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
34098 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * +7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.5 ns * +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * +11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns * +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
77.9 ns * +23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns * +23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstid

I den nuvarande konfigurationen har HP Omen 17 allvarliga problem med DPC-avbrottet. 9988 µs var resultatet här. Under den första testkörningen kraschade den bärbara datorn helt och visade en blå skärm. Uppdateringar av drivrutiner kan kanske avhjälpa detta.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivrutiner
LatencyMon drivrutiner
Test för uppspelning av YouTube-video
Test för uppspelning av YouTube-video
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9988 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * +77%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1907.6 μs * +81%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
1164 μs * +88%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs * +89%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * +93%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
395.1 μs * +96%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

WDC PC SN810 1TB är en mycket snabb NVMe SSD. I minnesjämförelserna ligger den dock betydligt efter toppmodellerna i vårabenchmarktabell för SSD:er och hårddiskarsSD-enheterna i jämförelseenheterna presterar också bättre här. Å andra sidan är åtkomsttiderna och överföringshastigheterna för NVMe-SSD:n i HP Omen 17 utmärkta. Tyvärr fortsätter dataöverföringshastigheterna för NVMe SSD-droppen att kollapsa efter en viss tid vid långvarig belastning (utan att SSD-sensorerna indikerar överhettning). Vi observerade också samma beteende i HP Omen 16.

WDC PC SN810 1TB
Sequential Read: 5233.79MB/s
Sequential Write: 2355.42MB/s
4K Read: 68.25MB/s
4K Write: 224.32MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1306.59MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2495.32MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.078ms
Access Time Write: 0.017ms
Copy ISO: 1813.44MB/s
Copy Program: 384.09MB/s
Copy Game: 1142.39MB/s
Score Read: 1898Points
Score Write: 2955Points
Score Total: 5693Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
89.2 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.6 pt
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
74.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.6 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
72.1 pt
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
 
68.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
66.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
50.7 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 -1!
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
44.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3871 (2700.14min - 3870.94max) MB/s +7%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (3265 - 4224, n=12)
3731 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3605 (3533.55min - 3604.72max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3167 (2857.53min - 3167.08max) MB/s -12%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2305 (2285.48min - 2305.19max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -51%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -51%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
1156 (1142.97min - 1155.53max) MB/s -68%
seq write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4224 (3372.85min - 4224.08max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3840 (3826.15min - 3839.76max) MB/s +7%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (2767 - 5015, n=12)
3838 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3593 (3469.74min - 3593.2max) MB/s
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3446 (3433.09min - 3446.49max) MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
548 (546.68min - 547.73max) MB/s -85%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6921 (6272.83min - 6920.6max) MB/s +2%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (6674 - 6984, n=12)
6884 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6799 (6449.16min - 6798.76max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6653 (6275.76min - 6652.91max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3638 (3412.7min - 3638.2max) MB/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -48%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
1654 (1469.05min - 1653.6max) MB/s -76%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5199 (5035.05min - 5198.72max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (4454 - 5412, n=12)
5121 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4921 (4905.7min - 4920.56max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -7%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4852 (4198.71min - 4852.39max) MB/s -7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3481 (3457.79min - 3481.27max) MB/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
548 (546.94min - 547.99max) MB/s -89%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77 (72.23min - 77max) MB/s
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
74.1 (64.69min - 74.09max) MB/s -4%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (52.4 - 88, n=12)
71.3 MB/s -7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
70.9 (69.93min - 70.9max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
59 (58.85min - 58.97max) MB/s -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
46.2 (46.1min - 46.22max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -58%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
386 (378.43min - 386.17max) MB/s +88%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
319 (315.54min - 318.7max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (191.92min - 205.24max) MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (85 - 305, n=12)
175.9 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
170 (169.81min - 170.42max) MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
131 (129.84min - 130.68max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4180 (4177.07min - 4179.97max) MB/s +228%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3564 (3554.96min - 3563.6max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s +101%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s +74%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s +74%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1860 (1859.57min - 1859.93max) MB/s +46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s +20%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (417 - 4245, n=12)
1460 MB/s +15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1274 (1194.32min - 1273.9max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
412 (411.05min - 412.02max) MB/s -68%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3570 (3534.41min - 3570.18max) MB/s +546%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 (3290.66min - 3545.47max) MB/s +541%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3361 (3349.29min - 3360.57max) MB/s +508%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s +317%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s +317%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s +285%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (162.3 - 2907, n=12)
859 MB/s +55%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
553 (499.28min - 552.72max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
547 (544.27min - 547.32max) MB/s -1%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9242 Points +62%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8874 Points +56%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7830 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
5842 Points +3%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (4112 - 8556, n=12)
5834 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5693 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5514 Points -3%
Score Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3629 Points +91%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3300 Points +74%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2766 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points +29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
2186 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2121 Points +12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points +5%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (1211 - 3482, n=12)
1974 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1898 Points
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3963 Points +34%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3877 Points +31%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3636 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2955 Points
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (2416 - 3341, n=12)
2940 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
2546 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2324 Points -21%
Seq Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5715 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5302 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5233.79 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (3823 - 5642, n=12)
5185 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -5%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3199 MB/s -39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
2891 MB/s -45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2656 MB/s -49%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3977 MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s +60%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3218 MB/s +37%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3173 MB/s +35%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (2229 - 4795, n=12)
3152 MB/s +34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
2692 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2667.04 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2535 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2355.42 MB/s
4K Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
94.04 MB/s +38%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
91.56 MB/s +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
73.81 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
68.25 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (53 - 81.9, n=12)
67.8 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
55 MB/s -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
52.6 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
28.83 MB/s -58%
4K Write
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
340.52 MB/s +52%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
256.3 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
247.26 MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
224.32 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (139 - 303, n=12)
212 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
148.7 MB/s -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
134.9 MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
59 MB/s -74%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2963 MB/s +127%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2715 MB/s +108%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2355 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s +43%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
1845 MB/s +41%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1827 MB/s +40%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (624 - 2855, n=12)
1388 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1380.56 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1306.59 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3416 MB/s +37%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3299 MB/s +32%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2978 MB/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2579.14 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2495.32 MB/s
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (2017 - 2749, n=12)
2413 MB/s -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
2142 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.085 ms * -9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.078 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.075 ms * +4%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (0.023 - 0.09, n=12)
0.0595 ms * +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * +29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.045 ms * +42%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms * +44%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.027 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.169 ms * -894%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.085 ms * -400%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.059 ms * -247%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -179%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
  (0.012 - 0.074, n=12)
0.02892 ms * -70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
0.028 ms * -65%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.017 ms *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.016 ms * +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.014 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6308 (4668.05-6876.44)
Aorus 17X XES Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6907 (6282.04-6938.39)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK: Ø3594 (3307.51-3604.92)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø2388 (1541.68-3529.86)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø2388 (1541.68-3529.86)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6496 (1637.54-6888.72)

Grafikkort

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Tiär ett av de starkaste grafikkorten. Lyckligtvis beror dess prestanda knappast på den valda prestandaprofilen i den bärbara HP-datorn. Därför resulterar både Balanced- och Performance-läget alltid i utmärkta resultat i riktmärkena i 3DMark. Skillnaden här är mindre än 600 poäng. Även om man manuellt ställer in fläktarna på högsta nivå ökar knappast prestandan. När vi tittar på loggarna märker vi att Balanced-läget endast begränsar grafikkortets prestanda med cirka 10 watt vid kortvarig belastning i riktmärket Time Spy. Trots detta stiger temperaturerna för Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Ti i HP Omen 17 lite mer här.

Vi var dock tvungna att byta ut vår första recensionsenhet på grund av ett fel i Nvidias grafikprocessor. Av oförklarliga skäl sköt hotspot-temperaturerna för RTX 3070 Ti upp så högt i den första HP Omen 17 att den bara kunde köras på cirka 40 watt utan att överhettas. Samtidigt var dGPU:ns medeltemperaturer endast 75 °C.

På batteridrift presterar den bärbara speldatorn fortfarande bra. Mer än 30 FPS ska vara möjligt för spel i Full HD i ett stort antal spel.

Batteriläge
Batteriläge
Balanserat läge
Balanserat läge
Läge för prestanda
Läge för prestanda
Högsta fläkthastighet
Högsta fläkthastighet
Loggar TimeSpy Benchmark: blått - balanserat; grönt - prestanda; rött - maximal fläkthastighet
Loggar TimeSpy Benchmark: blått - balanserat; grönt - prestanda; rött - maximal fläkthastighet
 
 
 
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.4 pt
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
87.5 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
84.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
84.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
80.5 pt
Aorus 17X XES -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
80 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
78.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
68.6 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +18%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
38435 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37112 Points
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
36224 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34141 Points -8%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
32001 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
30335 Points -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27613 Points -26%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
166334 Points +14%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
151618 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
146239 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144658 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
144470 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
105076 Points -28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
81542 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points +12%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28843 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28012 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27114 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25891 Points -8%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
25538 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
23109 Points -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
20874 Points -25%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +25%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10938 Points +4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10595 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10521 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9980 Points -5%
Aorus 17X XES
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX
9834 Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9000 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7901 Points -25%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=112, last 2 years)
8736 Points +26%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
6928 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (5091 - 7510, n=23)
6544 Points -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
6391 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
6090 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4835 Points -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
32071 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
61904 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24663 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
10705 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.8 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * +8%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
447 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * +34%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

HP Omen 17 uppnår mer än 100 FPS i de flesta spelbenchmarks. Endast ett fåtal bärbara datorer medNvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Tilevererar fler FPS här. Full HD-spel är alltså möjligt utan problem i alla testade spel även med de högsta grafikinställningarna.

Även med ray tracing aktiverat lyckas den bärbara datorn fortfarande leverera över 60 FPS i titlar som Ghostwire Tokyo och Metro Exodus.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)
243 fps +19%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
219 (10.9min, 64.3P0.1, 149.7P1) fps +7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
204.8 (183min) fps 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
204.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (139.7 - 226, n=27)
188.8 fps -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
188 (156min) fps -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
159 fps -22%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158 fps -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135 (16.7min, 43P0.1, 83.5P1) fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +24%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.8 (10.7min, 57.6P0.1, 86.9P1) fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
103.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)
102.4 fps -1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100.6 (94min) fps -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.7 (83min) fps -6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 (80min) fps -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.1 fps -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.4 (34.9min, 42.9P0.1, 53.9P1) fps -24%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178.5 (3.24min, 125P1) fps +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
177.3 (2.97min, 111.1P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
173.9 (3.58min, 125P1) fps -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
173 (4.33min, 111P1) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years)
169.6 fps -4%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
167.9 (4.46min, 125P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (80 - 181.9, n=28)
165.5 fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
161 (4.4min, 100P1) fps -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
134 (6.72min, 90.9P1) fps -24%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117.5 (5.88min, 83.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.9 (6.17min, 76.9P1) fps -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.2 (10.6min, 76.9P1) fps -6%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
109.7 fps -7%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
108 (5.52min, 71.4P1) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 123.9, n=36)
106.7 fps -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.5 (7.78min, 66.7P1) fps -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.3 (22.4min, 58.8P1) fps -31%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)
162.2 fps +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158.3 (135.1min) fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
149.1 (131.9min) fps 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
149 (130.5min) fps 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148.4 (127.8min) fps
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
141.2 (124.2min) fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
144 (124.7min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (75.4 - 170.2, n=38)
142.8 fps -4%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.9 (121.7min) fps -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
116 (102.8min) fps -22%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148 (121.3min) fps +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
145.2 (127.1min) fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.8 (121min) fps
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134.4 (116.3min) fps -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
140 (121.3min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)
135.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135 (115.3min) fps -4%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134.5 (115min) fps -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
110 (97min) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +17%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
107.7 fps +5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 fps 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102.8 fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.6 (59min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)
98.5 fps -4%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 fps -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78 fps -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.7 fps -25%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)
104.7 fps +38%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
76 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (57.9 - 93, n=24)
76 fps 0%
X-Plane 11.11 - 3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years)
104.1 fps +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102 fps
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.7 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91.3 - 102, n=3)
95 fps -7%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
147 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146 (123min) fps
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
144 (123min) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years)
140.2 fps -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
131 (106min) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (99 - 147, n=23)
129.6 fps -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
124 fps -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98 (78min) fps -33%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
138 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137 (106min) fps
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
135 (112min) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)
131.2 fps -4%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122 (91min) fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 138, n=25)
120.4 fps -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
118 fps -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 (71min) fps -31%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)
256 fps +20%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
222 (94.8min, 155.5P1) fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
214 (73.2min, 156.4P1) fps
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
212 (26.4min, 158P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (112 - 248, n=27)
203 fps -5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
184.7 (122.1min, 133.5P1) fps -14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
164.1 (81.9min, 109.9P1) fps -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
163 (31.3min, 116P1) fps -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
152 (43.3min, 112P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +23%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
195.1 (81.6min, 145.4P1) fps +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
186.4 (71.9min, 139.2P1) fps
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
186 (27.9min, 140P1) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (109 - 221, n=37)
179.9 fps -3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
163.2 (82.8min, 122.4P1) fps -12%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146.6 (72.6min, 102.4P1) fps -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
142 (78.7min, 104P1) fps -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
138 (48.5min, 106P1) fps -26%
Metro Exodus
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (74.3 - 146.5, n=8, last 2 years)
111.6 fps +44%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77.24 (40.44min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (71 - 77.2, n=2)
74.1 fps -4%
1920x1080 Ultra Quality DXR AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (63.2 - 118.8, n=8, last 2 years)
92.3 fps +42%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65.14 (36.67min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (61.3 - 65.1, n=2)
63.2 fps -3%
F1 2021
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)
145.2 fps +116%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (67.3 - 134.2, n=13)
110.2 fps +64%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67.3 (52min, 46P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (74.3 - 204, n=12, last 2 years)
133.5 fps +181%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (47.5 - 99.2, n=11)
82.9 fps +75%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47.5 (36min, 31P1) fps
Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 High Settings
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
152 (41.5P0.1, 112.1P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
146.2 (31.9min, 50P0.1, 96.4P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (68.6 - 234, n=6, last 2 years)
144 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (123.9 - 152, n=4)
138.3 fps -9%
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Average of class Gaming
  (65.9 - 231, n=7, last 2 years)
151.7 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
145.1 (31.5min, 56.6P0.1, 94.1P1) fps +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
143 (32.4P0.1, 97.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (115.4 - 145.1, n=4)
133.4 fps -7%
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 127, n=7, last 2 years)
75.9 fps +27%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59.9 (7.6min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (48.9 - 59.9, n=3)
55.3 fps -8%

Bildfrekvensen i Witcher 3 benchmark är lite mer oregelbunden än vanligt, men är stabil överlag. I genomsnitt är 105 FPS vid 1920p-upplösning och de högsta grafikinställningarna möjliga.

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)
lågmed.högultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 186.1 181.7 177.3 117.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 417.5 317.5 204.8 103.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 166.6 153.7 148.4 140.8 127.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 209 137.8 102.8 76 46.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 143.8 128 101.6 102
Far Cry 5 (2018) 155 146 137
Strange Brigade (2018) 441 267 214 186.4
Metro Exodus (2019) 140.27 120.28 97.22 77.24
F1 2021 (2021) 333 169.5 139.2 67.3 47.5
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 181.2 156.2 152 143

Utsläpp - Bättre med hörlurar

Buller

När HP Omen är inställd på balanserat läge är den ibland nästan tyst. Men så snart mer än basbelastningen krävs ökar den bärbara datorns volym från ett klart hörbart område till irriterande områden. För det mesta är den bärbara datorn, precis som många bärbara speldatorer, relativt högljudd. HP har ställt in fläktkurvorna på ett sådant sätt att högre värden kommer in ganska tidigt. Vid 52,2 dB(A) ligger den bärbara datorns volym på en irriterande nivå.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28 / 28 / 31.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
52.2 / 52.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.227.528.529.627.227.22531.330.137.730.731.231.33131.534.751.137.435.931.54027.727.93634.929.227.75034.83632.530.626.834.86326.626.444.945.526.526.68020.319.827.530.720.320.310018.918.426.125.317.718.912517.519.627.227.317.717.516016.719.429.730.214.116.720020.320.132.73312.920.32502225.835.334.612.42231521.724.63838.313.821.740019.922.83736.912.219.95001719.234.133.911.31763015.118.435.334.411.315.180015.519.337.237.111.315.5100017.22138.438.211.917.2125015.519.339.138.611.315.5160015.719.238.838.711.615.7200016.520.841.141.812.116.5250014.919.940.941.912.214.9315014.718.839.64012.814.7400014.41639.43913.114.4500014.115.540.44213.314.1630014.414.941.841.71414.4800015.117.142.242.317.415.11000016.220.344.743.116.416.21250014.915.736.936.516.514.9160001313.124.625.613.613SPL2831.352.152.325.428N11.58.68.60.61median 15.7median 19.3median 38median 38.2median 12.9median 15.7Delta1.31.83.641.11.331.830.331.835.533.735.53938.53934.927.634.932.427.532.432.927.232.931.326.631.328.722.328.723.617.923.623.717.523.728.126.128.129.721.629.730.813.330.8338.33331.67.931.6337.13334.67.634.633.97.633.935.67.935.636.68.536.6369.53635.310.235.335.610.435.630.510.630.529.110.829.128.211.428.223.811.223.819.611.319.615.811.215.813.310.313.345.623.445.65.10.55.1median 30.5median 10.6median 30.55.33.75.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 17-ck1075ngAsus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
-7%
-0%
14%
-1%
9%
-4%
off / environment *
25.4
26
-2%
25.6
-1%
24
6%
26
-2%
24.2
5%
26
-2%
Idle Minimum *
28
28
-0%
27
4%
24
14%
26
7%
24.7
12%
30
-7%
Idle Average *
28
32
-14%
27
4%
24
14%
33.1
-18%
24.7
12%
31
-11%
Idle Maximum *
31.2
38
-22%
30.1
4%
24
23%
31.3
-0%
24.7
21%
33
-6%
Load Average *
52.2
53
-2%
54.4
-4%
42.6
18%
49.8
5%
44.3
15%
49
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.2
54
-3%
46.84
10%
56.3
-8%
53
-2%
Load Maximum *
52.2
55
-5%
56.2
-8%
46.84
10%
49.6
5%
47.7
9%
57
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Låga temperaturer råder nästan alltid på ovansidan av basen med tangentbordet och pekplattan. Den bärbara datorn känns därför alltid behaglig att använda. Handflatorna håller sig alltid behagligt svala, även när den bärbara datorn måste fungera med maximal belastning under långa perioder.

 29.6 °C29.8 °C29.7 °C 
 26 °C31.3 °C28.6 °C 
 25.6 °C24.3 °C26.9 °C 
Max: 31.3 °C
Medel: 28 °C
38 °C43.3 °C31 °C
34.1 °C29.2 °C25.8 °C
24.8 °C25 °C24.4 °C
Max: 43.3 °C
Medel: 30.6 °C
| FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).


Tomgång - övre sidan
Tomgång - övre sidan
Tomgång - undersida
Tomgång - undersida
Last - ovansida
Last - ovansida
Last - undersida
Last - undersida
Witcher 3 - ovansida
Witcher 3 - ovansida
Witcher 3 - undersida
Witcher 3 - undersida
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-29%
-12%
-12%
-10%
-9%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
31.3
54
-73%
46.3
-48%
52
-66%
44
-41%
41
-31%
41
-31%
Maximum Bottom *
43.3
58
-34%
45
-4%
47
-9%
52.7
-22%
47.2
-9%
62
-43%
Idle Upper Side *
31.3
37
-18%
34.2
-9%
31
1%
32.6
-4%
33.2
-6%
25
20%
Idle Bottom *
43.3
39
10%
38.3
12%
31
28%
32.1
26%
39
10%
26
40%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Under det en timme långa stresstestet förblev den bärbara datorns prestanda och temperatur relativt konstant. HP Omen 17 kan förlåtas för små fluktuationer på grund av sommartemperaturerna vid granskningstillfället. Inga betydande prestandaförluster observerades och inga upptäcktes heller av logganalysen.

Stresstest för logganalys
Stresstest för logganalys

Högtalare

Bang & Olufsen - bokstäver
Bang & Olufsen - bokstäver

Det fanns en tid då Bang & Olufsen stod för ljud och design på högsta nivå. Detta är dock inte fallet i HP:s bärbara dator. Ljudprofilen för HP Omen 17 är burkig och överdriven i de höga tonerna och kraftlös i de låga tonerna. Om de högljudda fläktarna inte får dig att sätta på dig hörlurar kan du göra det på grund av högtalarna. Lyckligtvis har den bärbara datorn tillräckligt med anslutningsalternativ för externa ljudutgångar med Bluetooth, 3,5 mm jack och USB-C.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.427.235.42540.131.240.13139.535.939.54032.929.232.95034.526.834.56329.826.529.88025.320.325.310028.517.728.512532.417.732.416042.214.142.22004612.94625057.112.457.131563.113.863.140068.212.268.250063.311.363.363068.211.368.280066.411.366.4100068.511.968.5125066.911.366.9160073.311.673.3200069.912.169.9250069.112.269.1315072.112.872.140007213.172500073.913.373.9630077.11477.1800081.217.481.21000087.116.487.1125008216.5821600068.513.668.5SPL88.525.488.5N68.70.668.7median 68.5median 12.9median 68.5Delta6.11.16.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17-ck1075ngApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - HP Omen med acceptabla batteritider

Effektförbrukning

Tack vare Hybrid Mode, där Intel Core i7:s iGPU tar på sig det mesta av arbetet, visar sig den bärbara speldatorn vara ekonomisk. Strömförbrukningen vid tomgång är ganska låg. Under belastning uppvisar HP Omen 17 en hög strömförbrukning. Den bärbara datorns strömadapter utnyttjas dock inte fullt ut.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.35 / 1.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 12.2 / 18 / 19.4 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 128 / 266 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-12%
30%
-6%
-33%
26%
-11%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
12.2
18
-48%
13.5
-11%
6.6
46%
18.7
-53%
20.9
-71%
4
67%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
-16%
Idle Average *
18
28
-56%
15.6
13%
8.3
54%
22
-22%
25.1
-39%
10
44%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
19.4
36
-86%
20.6
-6%
11.8
39%
25.2
-30%
45
-132%
19
2%
26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27)
-35%
Load Average *
128
153
-20%
198
-55%
119
7%
134.7
-5%
102
20%
114
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
209
221
-6%
199
5%
169
19%
135
35%
189
10%
183.2
12%
Load Maximum *
266
290
-9%
319
-20%
222
17%
157
41%
234.8
12%
221
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø210 (204.193-220.129)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø265 (222.3-302.3)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.3 (74.6-134.5)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø122.8 (120.1-126)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø200 (195.4-210)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø205 (198.5-223.1)

Batteritid

Batteritiden är vanligtvis inte den viktigaste kompetensen hos bärbara datorer för spel. Men HP Omen 17 ger hyggliga värden här. Fem till sex timmar i testet för Wi-Fi-webbsurfing vittnar om att den lämpar sig för vardaglig användning utanför spelandet. Körtiderna minskar dock betydligt vid full belastning. Eftersom den bärbara datorn fortfarande förser processorn och dGPU:n med ganska mycket ström i batteriläge är spel bara möjligt i lite mer än en timme.

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 52min
WiFi Websurfing
6tim 11min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
3tim 25min
Spela
1tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 11min
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-31%
-19%
23%
-10%
-24%
-3%
-9%
Reader / Idle
532
440
-17%
608
14%
404
-24%
603
13%
WiFi v1.3
371
266
-28%
307
-17%
519
40%
334
-10%
314
-15%
336
-9%
Gaming
62
Load
131
86
-34%
99
-24%
138
5%
86
-34%
88
-33%
114
-13%
H.264
226
462
420

För

+ hölje av hög kvalitet
+ kraftfull Intel Core i7-12700H
+ RGB-tangentbord med bra återkoppling
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ acceptabel batteritid
+ 144 Hz-panel

Emot

- ANSI-tangentbordslayout
- fläktarnas ljudnivå

Omdöme - En i huvudsak genomsnittlig spellaptop med en hög prislapp

HP Omen 17 - tillhandahålls av HP
HP Omen 17 - tillhandahålls av HP

HP Omen 17 är en ganska diskret bärbar dator för spel. En materialkombination av plast och metall ger höljet en hög stabilitet och en högkvalitativ ytkänsla. Den ospectakulära designen är tilltalande och är knappast en indikation på den bärbara datorns höga prestandapotential. Särskilt Intel Core i7-12700H kan återigen prestera bra. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti från Nvidia är också stark i den bärbara speldatorn. Krävande spel körs smidigt i Full HD-upplösning

HP Omen 17 är en bra spellaptop som till viss del levererar utmärkt prestanda. Men även på den här prestandanivån finns det billigare alternativ.

HP Omen 17:s moderna anslutningsmöjligheter med Thunderbolt 4 och de många alternativen för att ansluta externa skärmar är också glädjande. Alla portar är placerade på sidorna och är lättare att nå än i många andra bärbara speldatorer

Skärmen på den bärbara gamingdatorn visar sig vara lite svag. Färgrumstäckning och svarstider visar inte särskilt bra värden här. Man kan leva med den bärbara datorns volym: den är ganska hög i Performance-läget, men den balanserade prestandaprofilen ger också tillräcklig kraft för många spel

De som letar efter en bärbar dator för spel av hög kvalitet kommer att hitta den i HP Omen 17. Utmärkt utförande möter en ädel design här. HP Omen 17 är dock också relativt dyr. Mycket billigare rivaler, som t.ex Acer Nitro 5, har nästan samma prestandavärden. HP Omen 16 är också lite billigare och mindre.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Användare rekommenderas att kontrollera direkt via HP:s officiella webbplats för den plats där de befinner sig, eftersom HP inte alltid erbjuder identiska konfigurationer i varje region. På UK, Frankrike och Indienhittade vi till exempel bara den starkare varianten med 32 GB RAM, en 2 TB SDD och en GeForce RTX 3080 Ti för 2 799,98 £, 3 799,00 € respektive ₹309 999 ₹309 999 ₹. HP Omen 17 verkar dock ännu inte finnas tillgänglig i USA

Priserna gäller från och med den 23.09 och kan ändras

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng - 10/01/2022 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Design
82 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
80%
Anslutningar
62 / 80 → 78%
Vikt
58 / 10-66 → 85%
Batteri
70 / 95 → 73%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 94%
Ljudnivå
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
77%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Medel
77%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Recension av HP Omen 17 (2022) - Snyggt hölje och hårdvara med hög potential
Marc Herter, 2022-09-23 (Update: 2022-09-27)