Samsung Galaxy A03s
Specifikationer
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Price comparison
Ett genomsnitt på 10 poäng (från 25 recensioner)
Tester av Samsung Galaxy A03s
Jämfört med förra året har Samsung inte ändrat mycket i Galaxy A03s. Den mycket prisvärda telefonen kommer åtminstone med stabilare Wi-Fi, vilket var en av våra största kritikpunkter med föregångaren. Är Galaxy A03s värd det eller är den för dyr för 160 euro?
Källa: Android Police EN→SV
As someone typically running with some sort of flagship phone as my daily driver, be that a Google Pixel, a Samsung S-series, or even an iPhone, the Galaxy A03s took me a little while to get used to. However, if you are a budget phone expert, you won't make the same mistake I did and try to use this phone the way you would a flagship device. Once I got used to using the phone a bit slower, I didn't hate the experience too much. As long as I didn't have to take a picture, the phone felt like it had enough going for it. With a budget phone, some compromises are expected. It's unsurprising that the Samsung Galaxy A03s is a bit slow, doesn't have great cameras, and can be frustrating when trying to do too much on it. Still, the phone is $160 or less, making it a perfect match for someone looking for a barebones phone at an incredibly affordable price.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 03/30/2023
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 75%
Källa: Trusted Reviews EN→SV
The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a basic smartphone that’s neither cheap enough nor good enough to warrant your money. It offers decent battery life and it looks pretty good, but performance and camera quality are severely lacking. You can get practically the exact same user experience from Samsung’s older and cheaper Galaxy A02s. If you’re looking to upgrade from the A02s, don’t be duped by the naming convention; the A03s is not a step up.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/16/2022
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 50%
Källa: Android Authority EN→SV
Samsung’s Galaxy A03s is a decent option among sub-$200 smartphones and a fair fit for those looking at the Galaxy A03s as a first smartphone or an option for those on a tight budget. It’s the most affordable way to enter Samsung’s Galaxy ecosystem, and One UI is feature-packed and extremely well-supported for those looking to keep a phone for several years. The addition of a fingerprint reader is a nice touch for simple security, too. However, the processor and overall camera setup still leave something to be desired — two crucial areas for any modern phone. The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 06/10/2022
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: CNet EN→SV
I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Jämförelse, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 04/17/2022
Källa: Android Authority EN→SV
The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating. If you don’t mind spending a bit more, the Samsung Galaxy A13 ($249) and Nokia X100 ($252) are affordable ways to add 5G to the mix. Nokia’s device adds a 48MP primary camera with a sharp Full HD+ display but falls short on software updates. The Galaxy A13, on the other hand, offers a 50MP camera with Samsung’s robust update policy and a sleek, minimalist design.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 01/31/2022
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 70%
Källa: GSM Arena EN→SV
The Galaxy A03s is a good entry-level smartphone - that's undeniable. It has a good screen, a reliable battery, a recent Android OS with OneUI interface, and a non-nonsense primary camera. Unfortunately, the A03s feels overpriced for what it offers - there are much better phones on the same shelf. If it were priced around €100-€110, it would have been a great competitive offer, a worthy budget phone. So, if you can get the Galaxy A03s with a price cut that makes sense - we'd recommend it for its skills. But for now - we'd suggest looking elsewhere.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 12/20/2021
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 52%
Källa: Unbox EN→SV
We’ve found that in our Samsung Galaxy A03s Hands-On that the device does cover a lot of the basics if you’re looking for a more affordable option from the Korean brand; coming in at Php 6,490 or if you’re lucky to catch it on sale — Php 5,990. Unfortunately, we all know that there are some serious tough contenders out there that pretty much rule the roost. If you’re sen on getting a Samsung device and can increase your budget a bit, then we suggest taking a look at the Galaxy M22 as an option.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 11/29/2021
Källa: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→SV
All in all, considering Samsung’s recent budget launches, the Galaxy A03s is a pretty average offering. It has a solid design, an above-average primary camera, and a reliable battery life. That being said, Samsung could have done better in the performance department seeing how Chinese companies offer the same CPU-memory configuration for much cheaper. Its slow charging speed is also a headache material.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 10/05/2021
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 64% pris: 70% prestanda: 60% skärm: 60% mobilitet: 80% design: 70%
Källa: OI Spice Tech News EN→SV
It is clearly seen that the Samsung Galaxy A03s smartphone is a strong competitor of the Galaxy M02s which has more advanced features with the same budget. While the battery and chipset can be strong features on the Galaxy A03s, they don’t get much attention from users. There aren’t any spectacular features worth mentioning, but it’s interesting to know that you’ll get some premium services, including Samsung Health, Samsung Members, and Smart Switch. There shouldn’t be a lot of enthusiasm for these features because most Samsung phones come with these starter features. This 4G product is available especially in India, but you also have alternatives. If you are looking for an alternative our recommendation would be the OnePlus Nord N200 smartphone. Every device has some decent features that are worth your money and everyone’s purposes of use.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/13/2021
Källa: Computerbild DE→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 01/03/2022
Källa: News Bytes DE→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 11/11/2021
Källa: Canaltech PT→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 03/03/2022
Källa: Les Numeriques FR→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 07/06/2022
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 40% prestanda: 40% skärm: 40% mobilitet: 80% design: 40% ergonomi: 40%
Källa: Frandroid FR→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 12/25/2021
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 60% prestanda: 40% skärm: 60% mobilitet: 70% design: 70%
Källa: MobilArena HU HU→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 12/27/2021
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 60% skärm: 40% mobilitet: 100% design: 80%
Källa: Cell Phones VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 10/02/2021
Källa: Cell Phones VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 10/01/2021
Källa: The Gioididong VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 10/01/2021
Källa: FPT shop VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 09/17/2021
Källa: The Gioididong VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/07/2021
Källa: FPT shop VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/31/2021
Källa: FPT shop VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 08/28/2021
Källa: Cell Phones VN→SV
Hands-On, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/25/2021
Källa: FPT shop VN→SV
Hands-On, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 08/24/2021
Källa: The Gioididong VN→SV
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 08/23/2021
Kommentarer
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
Integrerat grafikkort för ARM SoC:er i mellanklassen.
De här grafikkorten är inte lämpliga för spel. Om spelet fungerar alls är det ofta med mycket låg bildfrekvens och andra problem med renderingen. Vanligt kontorsbruk och surfande bör däremot fungera bra.
» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila grafikkort och motsvarande benchmarklista.
Helio P35 MT6765: » Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila processorer
6.50": Bara ett fåtal smartphones har större skärmar än så här.
Större skärmar möjliggör högre upplösning så att detaljer som bokstäver blir större och jämnare. Å andra sidan är strömförbrukningen lägre med mindre skärmar och enheterna är överlag mindre, lättare och billigare. » För att ta reda på mer om skärmupplösning, läs vår DPI-lista.
61.46%: Ett så här dåligt betyg är ovanligt. Det finns väldigt få bärbara datorer som fått sämre betyg.
» Mer information finns i vår köpguide för bärbara datorer.