Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Specifikationer
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, LED-blixt
Price comparison
Ett genomsnitt på 20 poäng (från 29 recensioner)
Tester av Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Igår plast, idag metall. Den nya versionen av Galaxy J5 vill göra ett bättre kvalitetsintryck, men innanmätet är i stort sett oförändrat. Är det ändå en lyckad uppdatering?
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 07/16/2018
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 03/20/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 10/19/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Expert Reviews EN→SV Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 10/07/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 100%
Källa: Tech Nave EN→SV Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 09/11/2016
Källa: Yugatech EN→SV Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 08/23/2016
Källa: KL Gadget Guy EN→SV Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Jämförelse, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/22/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 73% pris: 80% prestanda: 75% funktioner: 75% mobilitet: 75% design: 80%
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/15/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Laptop Media EN→SV Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 07/04/2016
Källa: Phone Arena EN→SV Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 06/20/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 60%
Källa: It Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 06/03/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: Think Digit EN→SV Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 05/30/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 59%
Källa: GSM Arena EN→SV Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 05/25/2016
Källa: Recombu EN→SV Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 05/16/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 90%
Källa: PC Pro EN→SV Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 04/29/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 100%
Källa: Computerbild - 2/2017
Fristående test, , Längd okänd, Datum: 01/15/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 86%
Källa: Netzwelt DE→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 11/12/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 78% funktioner: 60% mobilitet: 90% design: 80%
Källa: Computerhoy ES→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 12/19/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 71% pris: 60% funktioner: 60% skärm: 80% mobilitet: 90% design: 70%
Källa: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 11/22/2016
Källa: Descargar.mobi ES→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 02/15/2016
Källa: All About Phones NL→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 10/17/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: CNet France FR→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 10/14/2016
Källa: Komputerswiat PL→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Medellängd, Datum: 02/04/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 75% funktioner: 73%
Källa: Teleguru PL→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 12/06/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 67% prestanda: 80% skärm: 70% mobilitet: 60% design: 50%
Källa: Komputerswiat PL→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket kort, Datum: 08/17/2016
Källa: Tekno Seyir TR→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 03/16/2017
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 80%
Källa: VNReview VN→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Kort, Datum: 08/22/2016
Källa: Jagat Review ID→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Mycket lång, Datum: 09/15/2016
Källa: Moj Android SK→SV Archive.org version
Fristående test, finns online, Lång, Datum: 08/30/2016
Betyg: Totalpoäng: 92% prestanda: 81% skärm: 82% mobilitet: 92% design: 80%
Kommentarer
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
De här grafikkorten är inte lämpliga för spel. Om spelet fungerar alls är det ofta med mycket låg bildfrekvens och andra problem med renderingen. Vanligt kontorsbruk och surfande bör däremot fungera bra.
» Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila grafikkort och motsvarande benchmarklista.
410 MSM8916: » Mer information finns i vår jämförelse av mobila processorer
5.20": Den här skärmstorleken resulterar i en relativt stor smartphone, men storleken är vanligt förekommande.
Större skärmar möjliggör högre upplösning så att detaljer som bokstäver blir större och jämnare. Å andra sidan är strömförbrukningen lägre med mindre skärmar och enheterna är överlag mindre, lättare och billigare. » För att ta reda på mer om skärmupplösning, läs vår DPI-lista.
79.67%: Det här betyget är inte övertygande. Den bärbara datorn har fått ett lägre betyg än vanligt och är därför svår att rekommendera.
» Mer information finns i vår köpguide för bärbara datorer.