Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Acer Predator Helios 700 - Innovativ spellaptop med många funktioner (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 288 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1440:1 (Svärta: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.89
ΔE Greyscale 6.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080 | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -3% | -1% | 31% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 63.7 -1% | 61.5 -5% | 62.3 -3% | 86.3 34% | 66.3 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 96 4% | 92 0% | 93.4 1% | 100 9% | 96.9 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 65.8 0% | 63.5 -3% | 64.3 -2% | 99.1 51% | 66.5 2% |
| Response Times | -1% | 50% | 33% | -117% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 17.6 ? -5% | 7.2 ? 57% | 8 ? 52% | 41.6 ? -148% | 13.2 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.6 ? | 11.2 ? 3% | 6.6 ? 43% | 10 ? 14% | 21.6 ? -86% | 10.8 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 26040 ? | 26040 ? | |||
| Screen | 26% | 22% | 23% | 11% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 288 | 360 25% | 400.7 39% | 396 38% | 343 19% | 335.2 16% |
| Brightness | 271 | 342 26% | 372 37% | 373 38% | 328 21% | 297 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 89 5% | 89 5% | 82 -4% | 82 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.26 -30% | 0.34 -70% | 0.33 -65% | 0.31 -55% | 0.66 -230% |
| Contrast | 1440 | 1385 -4% | 1179 -18% | 1200 -17% | 1106 -23% | 508 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.79 | 1.91 67% | 1.33 77% | 2.04 65% | 5.03 13% | 2.02 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.89 | 4.08 66% | 3.51 70% | 3.85 68% | 7.91 33% | 7.23 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.89 | 0.78 59% | 1.39 26% | 0.82 57% | 0.86 54% | 1.17 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.92 | 2.72 61% | 1.3 81% | 2.83 59% | 6.29 9% | 3.2 54% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% | 2.49 88% | 2.38 92% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8433 77% | 6692 97% | 6735 97% | 7113 91% | 6389 102% | 6746 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 58.2 -3% | 59 -2% | 88 47% | 61.3 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 96 4% | 92.1 0% | 94 2% | 100 9% | 96.9 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
18% | 23% /
21% | 18% /
19% | -25% /
-1% | 4% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0) | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | -17% | -15% | 6% | 1% | |
| Write 4K | 115.3 | 103.8 -10% | 116.1 1% | 101.4 -12% | 183.2 59% | 111.1 -4% |
| Read 4K | 41.79 | 41.67 0% | 44.98 8% | 40.57 -3% | 52.4 25% | 45.47 9% |
| Write Seq | 2841 | 2639 -7% | 2370 -17% | 2229 -22% | 1790 -37% | 2454 -14% |
| Read Seq | 2547 | 2702 6% | 1465 -42% | 2528 -1% | 1743 -32% | 2212 -13% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 498.6 | 487.3 -2% | 337.5 -32% | 379.6 -24% | 550 10% | 622 25% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 555 | 555 0% | 453.6 -18% | 421.9 -24% | 648 17% | 695 25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3123 | 2967 -5% | 2399 -23% | 2439 -22% | 3236 4% | 2675 -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3476 | 3102 -11% | 3087 -11% | 3199 -8% | 3538 2% | 3184 -8% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26029 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42055 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21258 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9875 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing | |
| HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 187 | 105 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 117 | 78.6 | ||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 138 | 112 | ||
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 301 | 256 | ||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 144 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 106 | 94 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 93.4 | 77.4 | ||
| Anthem (2019) | 108 | 104 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 171 | 114 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 134 | 108 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 74.8 | 43.6 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 125 | 124 | ||
| F1 2019 (2019) | 155 | 152 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30 / 34 / 45 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 40 / 60 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 9% | -2% | 3% | 2% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 34 -13% | 30.4 -1% | 33 -10% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 25.4 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 35 -3% | 30.4 11% | 34 -0% | 33 3% | 28.6 16% | 27.1 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 45 | 36 20% | 33.4 26% | 44 2% | 35 22% | 51 -13% | 30.1 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 51 -28% | 37.1 7% | 47 -18% | 44 -10% | 51 -28% | 42.4 ? -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 47 18% | 54.2 5% | 53 7% | 55 4% | 51 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 60 | 51 15% | 56.4 6% | 59 2% | 58 3% | 51 15% | 53.4 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -10% | -23% | -9% | -8% | -16% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 37 | 47 -27% | 48.8 -32% | 51 -38% | 45 -22% | 47 -27% | 46.2 ? -25% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 40 | 54 -35% | 52 -30% | 57 -43% | 45 -13% | 58.8 -47% | 49.2 ? -23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 32 6% | 36.2 -6% | 26 24% | 36 -6% | 31 9% | 31.1 ? 9% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36 | 30 17% | 44.4 -23% | 28 22% | 33 8% | 35 3% | 32.2 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 5.7 / 6.3 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 28 / 34 / 45 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
98 / 307 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 24% | 13% | -21% | -12% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 26 7% | 13.9 50% | 14 50% | 39 -39% | 23.3 17% | 13.5 ? 52% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 29 15% | 18.8 45% | 18 47% | 45 -32% | 33.5 1% | 19 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 45 | 38 16% | 23.1 49% | 23 49% | 55 -22% | 38.4 15% | 26.7 ? 41% |
| Load Average * | 98 | 106 -8% | 112.3 -15% | 114 -16% | 122 -24% | 114.1 -16% | 106.7 ? -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 263 | 228 13% | 231 12% | 283 -8% | 259 2% | 339.5 -29% | |
| Load Maximum * | 307 | 287 7% | 291.5 5% | 443 -44% | 346 -13% | 485.1 -58% | 251 ? 18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 72 Wh | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 75% | 52% | -13% | -15% | 108% | |
| Reader / Idle | 213 | 250 17% | 409 92% | 165 -23% | 155 -27% | 565 ? 165% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 168 | 196 17% | 294 75% | 302 80% | 135 -20% | 127 -24% | 375 ? 123% |
| Load | 63 | 63 0% | 52 -17% | 65 3% | 66 5% | 85.3 ? 35% | |
| H.264 | 135 | 408 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Predator Helios 700 är en väldigt intressant spellaptop från Acer som har många innovativa idéer - från utbytbara WASD-knappar till en skjutmekanism för inmatningsenheterna - även om Acer inte använder det förbättrade kylsystemet för att begränsa ljudnivån utan snarare för att öka prestandan.
Acer överklockar sin GeForce GPU för att få ut mesta möjliga ur den. Enheten håller sig behagligt sval trots överklockningen, men i gengäld blir den väldigt högljudd. Det var inte i huvudsak ljudnivån som störde oss utan snarare de varierande varvtalen, som oftast inte kändes motiverade. För att sammanfatta så borde Acer verkligen arbeta på sitt kylsystem.
Andra svagheter inkluderar att styrplattan hamnar för långt in på basenheten, att den saknar en kortläsare och att batteritiden är dålig. Höljet lämnade ett blandat intryck. Även om gamers kommer bli nöjda med de många portarna, det bra tangentbordet, de kraftfulla högtalarna och de många alternativen för bakgrundsbelysning så känns den kraftiga konstruktionen (ingen tunn infattning) och den höga vikten inte riktigt moderna 2019. Vi var dock nöjda med 144 Hz-skärmen som hade ett högt kontrastförhållande, trots att den också led av en del svagheter (färgprecision, ljusstyrka och ljusfördelning).
Totalt sett bör Acer-fans som vill spela alla moderna spel med höga detaljer och som har tillräckligt med pengar definitivt ta en titt på denna 17-tumsenhet. Övriga kan istället tänkas föredra en mer klassisk (och troligen billigare) toppskiktslaptop utan alla de krusiduller som Predator Helios 700 har (exempelvis Helios 300 eller Triton 500).
Observera: Predator Helios 700 är en av de första bärbara speldatorerna som utvärderats utifrån de utökade (och svårare) v7-omdömena och det verkar därför som att den fått sämre resultat än andra toppskiktsenheter som vi testat den senaste tiden. I framtiden kommer alla nya spelmaskiner värderas enligt v7-omdömet.
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
-
05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
