Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Acer Predator Triton 500 - Superstjärna (Sammanfattning)

Uppdaterad prestanda.

Nvidia uppdaterade nyss sina energibesparande Max-Q chips. Acers Predator Triton 500 är en av de första bärbara datorerna som utrustats med en matchande Super-GPU. Läs vår recension för att få reda på vilken prestanda den här toppskiktsmodellen erbjuder.
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 (Predator Triton 500 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 815 MHz, Minne: 1353 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna, Max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, Full HD, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, NVMe, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280
Ljudkort
Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 hörlurar, 1 mikrofon
Nätverk
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 359 x 255
Batteri
84 Wh, 5550 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 watt, Predator Sense, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.1 kg, Strömförsörjning: 736 g
Pris
2500 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
04/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.8 %
v7 (old)
06/2019
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.8 %
v6 (old)
05/2019
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.2 kg17.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
v7 (old)
09/2019
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.2 kg18.3 mm15.60"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

360.5 mm 276 mm 18.3 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s
ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: 10.61 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 18.71 ∆E
310
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 335 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 318.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 320 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1333:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-4%
-4%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
70.3
67.6
-4%
66.9
-5%
65.3
-7%
sRGB Coverage
99.5
97.5
-2%
98.1
-1%
95.1
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.2
68.9
-5%
68.5
-5%
65.9
-9%
Response Times
-5%
6%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2)
13.6 ?(8, 5.6)
6%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
11%
16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-15%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
-0%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
15%
PWM Frequency
23260 ?(19)
23810 ?(10)
23810 ?(24)
Screen
10%
7%
-26%
Brightness middle
320
282.3
-12%
293
-8%
324.2
1%
Brightness
318
269
-15%
270
-15%
304
-4%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
87
-1%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.24
0.32
-33%
0.29
-21%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1333
882
-34%
1010
-24%
853
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.03
1.17
71%
1.69
58%
5.01
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.43
3.29
61%
3.37
60%
12.7
-51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.98
1.06
-8%
1.24
-27%
1.64
-67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.94
1.3
78%
2.3
61%
7.9
-33%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.2 100%
2.3 96%
2.35 94%
CCT
6751 96%
6643 98%
6758 96%
8455 77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
63.8
-3%
63
-5%
60.8
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
97.5
-2%
98.5
-1%
95.5
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 5%
3% / 5%
-11% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Alienware m15 R2 P87F Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1026 (960.41-1036.48)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points +46%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -8%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points +165%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (1201.27min - 1287.87max) Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1185 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1175 Points -9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
1046 Points -19%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)
725 Points +55%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)
8290 Points +183%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H
2429 Points -17%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13620
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7478
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37299
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
14.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
82.1 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.22 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
149 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1288 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
468 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2932 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points +42%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points -2%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6244 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-21%
-11%
1%
Write 4K
131.7
91.3
-31%
137.2
4%
108.8
-17%
Read 4K
47.34
40.73
-14%
46.82
-1%
45.41
-4%
Write Seq
2884
1915
-34%
1221
-58%
2467
-14%
Read Seq
2303
2051
-11%
1217
-47%
2456
7%
Write 4K Q32T1
423.9
308.3
-27%
527
24%
532
26%
Read 4K Q32T1
487.7
417.4
-14%
614
26%
590
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
2822
1922
-32%
1986
-30%
2801
-1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3478
3395
-2%
3234
-7%
3172
-9%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3478 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2822 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 487.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2303 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2884 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.7 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard Score
38265 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
60306 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
22730 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38107 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18678 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8043 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +41%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
22326 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21758 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20718 Points -7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18962 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +57%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8379 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8342 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7840 Points -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7266 Points -13%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=113, last 2 years)
8704 Points +71%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
5086 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5006 Points -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4275 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4032 Points -21%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +44%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
30456 Points
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28369 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27762 Points -9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
24926 Points -18%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +54%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
83.4 (67min) fps
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81.3 fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
78.3 fps -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66.9 fps -20%
lågmed.högultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 179 172 153 85.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 236 143 83.4 58.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146 134 123 118
Fortnite (2018) 121 114 99.5 80.3 44.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 103 80.8 37.6
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 119 100 72 56.1 31.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 93.4 79.5
Monster Hunter World (2018) 105 97.7 90 63.3 31.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 111 105 97 72 39
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 92 78 58 53 32
Hitman 2 (2018) 86.7 78.6 77 76 46.1
Battlefield V (2018) 139 127 119 96.1 58.7
Darksiders III (2018) 112 109 103 82.1 43.2
Just Cause 4 (2018) 152 113 105 73.9 41.3
Apex Legends (2019) 194 165 163 118 65
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 103 97 87 71 48
Metro Exodus (2019) 101 77.8 63.4 51.2 31.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 166 162 98.8 76.4
The Division 2 (2019) 129 112 80 59 31
Anno 1800 (2019) 94 74.4 44.9 38.8 23.2
Rage 2 (2019) 126 106 103 68.4 34.1
F1 2019 (2019) 174 141 138 122 74
Control (2019) 107 79.8 48.4 24.9
Borderlands 3 (2019) 107 84.3 68.1 49.1 26.6
FIFA 20 (2019) 251 241 240 239 190
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 102 92 70 53 31
GRID 2019 (2019) 85.9 77.7 72 66.4 46.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 134 129 107 78.9 44.5
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 93 86.6 83.3 66.9 40.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 95.7 93.1 89.9 76.2 42.7
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 98 67.4 43.7 37 23.8
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 121 119 83.1 39.7
Hunt Showdown (2020) 119 101 68.8 32.4
Doom Eternal (2020) 164 150 147 108 58
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.532.533.730.633.92539.734.435.438.534.93131.328.329.229.928.94033.73031.228.331.55042.628.729.627.241.26335.526.92826.938.98029.628.127.624.230.11003027.528.124.63012532.726.627.723.933.416037.827.227.623.432.720035.525.427.121.733.725036.125.625.820.536.73153724.626.719.936.740038.224.626.318.637.950039.724.227.918.739.36303721.924.717.936.880037.321.724.917.637.7100038.621.124.917.338.2125038.921.625.619.338.8160039.12125.518.739200039.922.425.217.540250039.619.124.817.339.6315039.118.920.517.338.6400038.618.82017.438.4500034.618.419.217.534.4630031.618.318.317.331.5800028.518.318.217.428.41000024.5181817.324.41250021.11817.917.320.91600019.218.218.117.318.8SPL49.932.935.830.149.7N7.31.92.41.37.1median 37median 21.6median 24.9median 17.6median 36.7Delta4.62.83.81.74.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 33 / 36 dB(A)
Hög belastning
50 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
13%
-3%
13%
off / environment *
30
28.3
6%
28.3
6%
28.3
6%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.4
-1%
28.8
4%
28.5
5%
Idle Average *
33
30.5
8%
28.8
13%
28.5
14%
Idle Maximum *
36
30.6
15%
29
19%
49
-36%
Load Average *
50
37.6
25%
33.5
33%
49
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
46
4%
45
6%
49
-2%
Load Maximum *
50
55.1
-10%
45.2
10%
55
-10%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C44 °C43 °C 
 41 °C41 °C38 °C 
 38 °C39 °C36 °C 
Max: 44 °C
Medel: 40 °C
50 °C49 °C40 °C
46 °C46 °C41 °C
40 °C40 °C40 °C
Max: 50 °C
Medel: 43.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  49 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-5%
-1%
-11%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
45.6
-4%
47
-7%
53.8
-22%
Maximum Bottom *
50
53.8
-8%
49.2
2%
58
-16%
Idle Upper Side *
29
28.6
1%
28.6
1%
29.8
-3%
Idle Bottom *
31
33.2
-7%
31.4
-1%
32.2
-4%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.633.32538.536.63129.929.44028.334.35027.232.36326.932.18024.228.910024.630.212523.933.516023.445.120021.75025020.560.831519.962.540018.66750018.767.163017.970.480017.672.3100017.371.3125019.372.2160018.773.3200017.573.2250017.372.8315017.370.4400017.467.2500017.564.8630017.369.7800017.473.51000017.369.41250017.364.31600017.356.9SPL30.183.1N1.358.1median 17.6median 67.2Delta1.77.144.243.839.440.638.838.938.338.136.636.538.236.736.636.534.238.633.342.333.447.432.951.331.456.231.460.230.361.929.967.429.372.128.779.828.379.428.280.62881.128.380.427.874.127.974.327.673.227.268.627.173.426.880.526.77226.767.126.660.240.389.43.979.6median 28.3median 72.11.911.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 25 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 95 / 211 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-2%
-71%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
11
18.3
-66%
12.5
-14%
19
-73%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
15.3
-2%
40.5
-170%
Idle Maximum *
25
28.8
-15%
20.7
17%
52
-108%
Load Average *
95
93
2%
90.2
5%
132.3
-39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
140
142.6
-2%
162
-16%
183.3
-31%
Load Maximum *
211
215.9
-2%
209.3
1%
217.2
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 15min
WiFi Websurfing
6tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 18min
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-4%
43%
-15%
8%
Reader / Idle
495
953
93%
554
12%
WiFi v1.3
378
362
-4%
393
4%
332
-12%
Load
78
102
31%
44
-44%

För

+ Lätt och kompakt hölje
+ Responsiv 300 Hz-skärm
+ G-Sync och Optimus
+ Riktigt bra prestanda
+ Thunderbolt 3

Emot

- Hög ljudnivå vid 3D-bruk
- Irriterande boot-ljud (som kan deaktiveras)
- Begränsade servicemöjligheter
Predator Triton 500: Recensionsex från Acer Germany
Predator Triton 500: Recensionsex från Acer Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Även under 2020 imponerar Predator Triton 500 med sin kombination av låg vikt, kompakta dimensioner och generös styrka.

Det relativt lätta och tunna höljet på 15 tum kan ta sig an betydligt tjockare kollegor i ett flertal prestandatester, men Max-Q-versionen av RTX 2080 Super är inte direkt det bästa valet ur ett pris-prestanda perspektiv. Oavsett så säkrar den snabba GPU:n smidig bilduppdatering i Full HD även i moderna titlar (med maximala inställningar, förstås). En annan höjdpunkt är 300 Hz-skärmen, som inte bara kändes responsiv utan också hade rik kontrast.

Totalt sett finns det knappt något att ge den nya versionen av Triton 500 kritik för. Det enda vi har att anmärka på är, som ofta är fallet, hög ljudnivå vid belastning.

Price comparison

Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Acer Predator Triton 500 - Superstjärna (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2020-04-26 (Update: 2024-11- 4)