Test: Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Core i7-7Y75, 256 GB, FHD, Touch) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 232 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1169:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.36
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T AUO B140HAN05.1, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 SHARP LQ133M1JW15, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, 3840x2160, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 4% | 4% | -1% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.6 2% | 67.5 6% | 67.8 7% | 64 1% | 68.9 9% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.2 | 89.1 -5% | 94.5 0% | 91.6 -3% | 90.7 -4% | 98.4 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 64.8 0% | 68.7 6% | 69.8 8% | 65.1 1% | 69.5 8% |
Response Times | 25% | 10% | 12% | 34% | -36% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 31 ? 39% | 43 ? 16% | 39.6 ? 22% | 27 ? 47% | 67.2 ? -32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 27 ? 10% | 29 ? 3% | 29.3 ? 2% | 24 ? 20% | 41.6 ? -39% |
PWM Frequency | 217 ? | 220 ? | 2500 ? | |||
Screen | -4% | 5% | -19% | 5% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 304 | 359 18% | 344 13% | 370 22% | 304 0% | 496.4 63% |
Brightness | 309 | 344 11% | 320 4% | 355 15% | 287 -7% | 469 52% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 92 11% | 77 -7% | 90 8% | 80 -4% | 84 1% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.25 4% | 0.31 -19% | 0.23 12% | 0.21 19% | 0.5 -92% |
Contrast | 1169 | 1436 23% | 1110 -5% | 1609 38% | 1448 24% | 993 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 4.57 -15% | 2.72 32% | 6.9 -73% | 3.66 8% | 2.9 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.47 | 9.25 -69% | 5.92 -8% | 12.2 -123% | 5.66 -3% | 5.26 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.36 | 1.4 -3% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 5.2 -20% | 2.74 37% | 7.4 -71% | 3.51 19% | 3.9 10% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.47 89% | 2.38 92% | 1.76 125% | 2.55 86% | 2.066 106% |
CCT | 7261 90% | 6887 94% | 6794 96% | 7529 86% | 6955 93% | 7169 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 58 -2% | 61 3% | 59 0% | 63.9 8% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 89 -5% | 94 0% | 91 -3% | 98.2 4% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
0% | 6% /
5% | -1% /
-10% | 13% /
8% | -8% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11845 - 82102, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T | |
Average Intel Core i7-7Y75 () | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13726 - 68857, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T | |
Average Intel Core i7-7Y75 () | |
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2933 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3614 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3970 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2068 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Apple MacBook 12 2017 Apple SSD AP0256 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre 13-af033ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Average SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -36% | -41% | -14% | 25% | 12% | -5% | ||
Read Seq | 976 | 431.2 -56% | 464.9 -52% | 955 -2% | 1288 32% | 907 -7% | 1055 ? 8% | |
Write Seq | 758 | 401 -47% | 401 -47% | 899 19% | 1160 53% | 878 16% | 753 ? -1% | |
Read 512 | 647 | 283.7 -56% | 320.2 -51% | 658 2% | 751 16% | 515 -20% | 811 ? 25% | |
Write 512 | 506 | 313.6 -38% | 335.2 -34% | 579 14% | 843 67% | 546 8% | 492 ? -3% | |
Read 4k | 45.47 | 36.62 -19% | 26.45 -42% | 9.721 -79% | 59.2 30% | 60 32% | 41.5 ? -9% | |
Write 4k | 130.6 | 76.1 -42% | 79.8 -39% | 12.78 -90% | 146.9 12% | 144 10% | 106 ? -19% | |
Read 4k QD32 | 428.3 | 329.4 -23% | 246.5 -42% | 521 22% | 425.9 -1% | 543 27% | 328 ? -23% | |
Write 4k QD32 | 358.2 | 325.6 -9% | 277.2 -23% | 370.1 3% | 325 -9% | 476 33% | 307 ? -14% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1474 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 53841 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5601 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 861 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 409 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.6 | 28.3 | 24.4 | 7.9 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 37.3 | 26.9 | 19.1 | 6.4 |
Sims 4 (2014) | 155.1 | 94.2 | 43.5 | 29.6 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14.2 | 9.1 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Apple MacBook 12 2017 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 2% | -8% | -10% | -13% | -14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.7 | 45.7 -2% | 39.3 12% | 38.9 13% | 50 -12% | 41.2 8% | 43.2 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.8 | 48.7 -14% | 43.1 -1% | 42.5 1% | 47 -10% | 44.2 -3% | 46.2 -8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.5 | 25.5 -0% | 25.4 -0% | 30.6 -20% | 27 -6% | 32.1 -26% | 29.8 -17% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.8 | 25.2 -2% | 25.6 -3% | 30.8 -24% | 28 -13% | 32.8 -32% | 32.8 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
Av/Standby | 0.7 / 1.9 Watt |
Låg belastning | 2.8 / 5.5 / 7.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
18.4 / 20 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Average Intel HD Graphics 615 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -19% | 5% | -76% | -38% | -81% | -21% | -103% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 2.4 14% | 2 29% | 3.9 -39% | 2.8 -0% | 4.3 -54% | 4.12 ? -47% | 4.49 ? -60% |
Idle Average * | 5.5 | 6.4 -16% | 5.5 -0% | 5.4 2% | 7 -27% | 6.2 -13% | 8 -45% | 7.02 ? -28% | 7.66 ? -39% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 6.8 14% | 6 24% | 6.6 16% | 7.5 5% | 9.4 -19% | 8.1 -3% | 7.89 ? -0% | 9.56 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 18.4 | 16 13% | 31 -68% | 22 -20% | 44.4 -141% | 32.2 -75% | 46.6 -153% | 20 ? -9% | 46.6 ? -153% |
Load Maximum * | 20 | 18.7 6% | 32.6 -63% | 20 -0% | 55.1 -176% | 36.6 -83% | 49.8 -149% | 23.8 ? -19% | 68.6 ? -243% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Wh | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 39 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -3% | 19% | -24% | -3% | -22% | 42% | |
Reader / Idle | 1176 | 792 -33% | 1167 -1% | 779 -34% | 869 -26% | 1599 ? 36% | ||
H.264 | 450 | 410 -9% | 433 -4% | 477 6% | 649 44% | 896 ? 99% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 452 | 438 -3% | 506 12% | 540 19% | 368 -19% | 352 -22% | 408 -10% | 710 ? 57% |
Load | 154 | 182 18% | 123 -20% | 77 -50% | 104 -32% | 106 -31% | 116.6 ? -24% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 81 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Acer Swift 7 SF714 är en ultra-kompakt subnotebook som lämpar sig väl åt portabel användning. Swift 7 är en aning bättre än sin föregångare på samtliga områden: den största skillnaden är den större multitouch-skärmen på 14 tum. Acer har dessutom reviderat chassit för att göra nya Swift 7 ännu tunnare än sin föregångare. Tyvärr äventyrar detta stabiliteten en aning.
Acer har behållt det begränsade portutbudet i sin nya Swift 7, men vi välkomnar att ett LTE-modem ingår. Vi hade dock önskat att Acer inkluderade en minneskortsläsare då det hade bidragit till enhetens flexibilitet.
Vi har dock mycket beröm att ge de medföljande tillbehören. Fodralet är välgjort och känns lyxigt. Detta gäller även USB Typ C-hubben, som utökar portutbudet på Swift 7 med en USB Typ A-port och en enkel HDMI-port.
Acer Swift 7 SF714 är bättre än sin föregångare på alla områden, särskilt när det kommer till den större multitouch-skärmen. Även priset har ändrats; mer specifikt har det ökat. Har Acer kanske missat något när det kommer till den punkten?
En stor anledning till kritik är priset på Swift 7. Acer Swift 7 SF714 kostar en tårdrypande summa på 17.000 kronor, vilket innebär ett betydligt lägre förhållande mellan pris och prestanda jämfört med föregångaren. I slutändan får varje intresserad köpare själv avgöra huruvida innovationerna och den aningen förbättrade prestandan berättigar denna kraftiga prisökning.
På grund av det höga priset kan vi inte ge Acer Swift 7 SF714 en definitiv köprekommendation.
Ytterligare ett klagomål rör styrplattan. Avsaknaden av en klickmekanism gör det mycket svårare att använda enheten i vardagen.
Totalt sett är Acer Swift 7 SF714 en smart och ultramobil enhet med imponerande batteritid som dras ner av sitt höga pris.
Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T
-
08/28/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade