Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Alcatel 3V Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Plast med stil. Alcatel 3V är väl prissatt och borde vara tillräckligt kraftfull för dom flesta användare. Alcatel har lyckats göra enheten tjusig trots plasthöljet. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida den Alcatel 3V:s interna hårdvara är lika bra som telefonen ser ut.
Alcatel 3V (3 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT8735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
6.00 tum 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: Upp till 128 GB microSD-kort, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: G-sensor, Närhetssensor, E-Kompass, Gyroskop, Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (B1/2/5/8), LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A/B38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 162 x 76
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12 MP: f/2.2, 1.25 μm, Fasdektektions-Autofokus (PDAF), LED-blixt. 2 MP: f/2.4, sensor för skärpedjup. Video i upp till 1080p i 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Två högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Hörlurar, skyddsfodral, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: huvud: 1.04 W/kg. kropp: 0.83 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
155 g, Strömförsörjning: 66 g
Pris
190 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Alcatel 3V
Alcatel 3V
Alcatel 3V
Alcatel 3V
Alcatel 3V
Alcatel 3V

Size Comparison

162 mm 76 mm 8.1 mm 155 g158.5 mm 75.5 mm 8.1 mm 180 g158.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.8 mm 164 g149.5 mm 74 mm 8.95 mm 160 g148.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.2 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alcatel 3V
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
96.5 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.8 MBit/s -15%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.8 MBit/s -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s -42%
Honor 7C
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alcatel 3V
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
93.4 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.1 MBit/s -35%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60.2 MBit/s -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s -42%
Honor 7C
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s -51%
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V - Översikt
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V - Översikt
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V – Bro
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V – Bro
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Alcatel 3V – Skogsområde

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Foto av testkartan
Foto av testkartan
Testkartan i detalj
487
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 461.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 463 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1689:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Alcatel 3V
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Honor 7C
IPS, 1440x720, 6"
Gigaset GS270 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
HTC Desire 12
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen
-22%
-17%
4%
10%
Brightness middle
473
392
-17%
487
3%
620
31%
502
6%
Brightness
462
403
-13%
476
3%
612
32%
499
8%
Brightness Distribution
90
85
-6%
89
-1%
96
7%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.28
0.61
-118%
0.35
-25%
0.57
-104%
0.2
29%
Contrast
1689
643
-62%
1391
-18%
1088
-36%
2510
49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.95
5.4
-9%
6.39
-29%
3.46
30%
5.4
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.1
9.7
20%
14.24
-18%
7.88
35%
10.8
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
4.2
28%
8.6
-48%
3.9
33%
6.2
-7%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.59 85%
1.91 115%
2.073 106%
2.07 106%
CCT
7779 84%
6734 97%
7366 88%
7230 90%
7660 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
36177 Points
Honor 7C
54731 Points +51%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
44138 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points +67%
HTC Desire 12
36253 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (34009 - 36177, n=3)
34778 Points -4%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
3902 Points
Honor 7C
5656 Points +45%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
4496 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points +49%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (3617 - 3948, n=3)
3822 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
2981 Points
Honor 7C
4736 Points +59%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
3255 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points +65%
HTC Desire 12
3320 Points +11%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2980 - 2981, n=2)
2981 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
197 Points
Honor 7C
442 Points +124%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
310 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points +524%
HTC Desire 12
637 Points +223%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (197 - 647, n=3)
356 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +3096%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
1271 Points
Honor 7C
2665 Points +110%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
1882 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points +155%
HTC Desire 12
1526 Points +20%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1192 - 1271, n=3)
1218 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +700%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
322 Points
Honor 7C
1522 Points +373%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
789 Points +145%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points +198%
HTC Desire 12
984 Points +206%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (322 - 769, n=3)
614 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +2002%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
382 Points
Honor 7C
955 Points +150%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
640 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points +166%
HTC Desire 12
18 Points -95%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (290 - 382, n=3)
321 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +4326%
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
10 Points
Honor 7C
10 Points 0%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
10 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points +7120%
HTC Desire 12
591 Points +5810%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (10 - 672, n=3)
231 Points +2210%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +15540%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
647 Points
Honor 7C
758 Points +17%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
610 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points +34%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (588 - 647, n=2)
618 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +748%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
1833 Points
Honor 7C
3913 Points +113%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
2627 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points +134%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1697 - 1833, n=2)
1765 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +722%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
1270 Points
Honor 7C
2800 Points +120%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
1766 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points +161%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1103 - 1270, n=2)
1187 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +845%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
6689 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus
9202 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points +105%
HTC Desire 12
4188 Points -37%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (5188 - 6689, n=3)
5738 Points -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
6006 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus
9479 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points +120%
HTC Desire 12
3597 Points -40%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (4622 - 6006, n=3)
5103 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
11114 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus
8348 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points +40%
HTC Desire 12
9856 Points -11%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (9076 - 11114, n=3)
10221 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
211 Points
Honor 7C
824 Points +291%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
546 Points +159%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points +305%
HTC Desire 12
178 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (203 - 211, n=3)
207 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +1892%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
173 Points
Honor 7C
713 Points +312%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
476 Points +175%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points +323%
HTC Desire 12
148 Points -14%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (167 - 173, n=3)
170.3 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +2640%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
896 Points
Honor 7C
1809 Points +102%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
1120 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points +130%
HTC Desire 12
593 Points -34%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (810 - 896, n=3)
854 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
160 Points
Honor 7C
445 Points +178%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
382 Points +139%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points +189%
HTC Desire 12
113 Points -29%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (127 - 160, n=3)
140.3 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +1828%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
130 Points
Honor 7C
366 Points +182%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
321 Points +147%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points +192%
HTC Desire 12
92 Points -29%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (102 - 130, n=3)
113.3 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +2410%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
857 Points
Honor 7C
1817 Points +112%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
1122 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points +138%
HTC Desire 12
589 Points -31%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (847 - 860, n=3)
855 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +283%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
11 fps
Honor 7C
34 fps +209%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
16 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps +55%
HTC Desire 12
9.7 fps -12%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (8 - 14, n=3)
11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +685%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
11 fps
Honor 7C
21 fps +91%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps +109%
HTC Desire 12
5.9 fps -46%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (8.3 - 11, n=3)
9.3 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +2445%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
4.1 fps
Honor 7C
18 fps +339%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
6.8 fps +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps +129%
HTC Desire 12
5.4 fps +32%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.9 - 6.2, n=3)
4.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +1741%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
4.3 fps
Honor 7C
9.2 fps +114%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
6.8 fps +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps +130%
HTC Desire 12
2.7 fps -37%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (3 - 4.3, n=3)
3.47 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +3744%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
2.5 fps
Honor 7C
13 fps +420%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
4.6 fps +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps +148%
HTC Desire 12
3.5 fps +40%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.5 - 4.3, n=3)
3.3 fps +32%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +2528%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V
2.5 fps
Honor 7C
6 fps +140%
Gigaset GS270 Plus
4.5 fps +80%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps +160%
HTC Desire 12
1.6 fps -36%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1.9 - 2.5, n=3)
2.13 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +4588%

Legend

 
Alcatel 3V Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7C Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS270 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.1 Points +26%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
22.35 Points +22%
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)
18.59 Points +1%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)
18.32 Points
Average Mediatek MT8735 (15.4 - 18.3, n=3)
17.2 Points -6%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
15.79 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +1022%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points +34%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
3470 Points +5%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)
3312 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)
3273 Points -1%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2930 Points -12%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2290 - 3312, n=3)
2773 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
17134 ms * -30%
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)
13367 ms * -1%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)
13199 ms *
Average Mediatek MT8735 (12334 - 13705, n=3)
13079 ms * +1%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)
11370 ms * +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points +75%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)
64 Points
Average Mediatek MT8735 (53 - 64, n=3)
57 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

Alcatel 3VHonor 7CGigaset GS270 PlusXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusHTC Desire 12Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
152%
129%
203%
125%
57%
1886%
Sequential Read 256KB
219.4
297
35%
269.1
23%
270
23%
211.4
-4%
164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256)
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB
47.35
115
143%
72.8
54%
194.5
311%
103.8
119%
Random Read 4KB
24.8
30
21%
35.3
42%
79.5
221%
16.69
-33%
Random Write 4KB
10.38
10
-4%
11.51
11%
7.1
-32%
7.54
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
21.38 ?(Kingston 32GB)
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
292%
80.8
278%
84.4
295%
81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
283%
59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137)
176%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
11.92 ?(Kingston 32GB)
62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
425%
55.5
366%
59.5
399%
61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
413%
Hög belastning
 36.3 °C34.5 °C33.2 °C 
 37.3 °C37.3 °C33.5 °C 
 39.4 °C35 °C33.5 °C 
Max: 39.4 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C
32.6 °C34.4 °C37.4 °C
32.1 °C34.6 °C38.8 °C
32.5 °C35.4 °C41.5 °C
Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202527.42527.6303126.828.34028.128.55028.130.46320.520.78017.519.310015.616.812515.916.516014.414.320013.714.725012.217.731511.124.240010.133.950010.1416309.349.98008.857.410008.561.912508.163.616008.362.520007.762.125007.862.431508.166.140007.966.65000856.663008.246.780008.346.7100008.246.6125008.249160008.335.6SPL63.620.773.9N13.90.326.6median 8.5median 46.7median 50.3Delta3.720.923.734.833.838.535.939.935.239.14043.441.628.730.32828.425.226.720.727.621.830.919.835.219.538.117.441.717.247.417.45016.355.71659.315.163.814.763.114.961.614.260.914.761.514.561.814.66114.561.214.661.914.765.314.864.114.559.914.553.557.827.573.711.5131.5median 14.9median 59.3median 52.63.311.821.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlcatel 3VGigaset GS270 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alcatel 3V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GS270 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 1.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.5 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel 3V
3000 mAh
Honor 7C
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS270 Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Average Mediatek MT8735
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
27%
-3%
20%
-23%
6%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.6
62%
1.1
31%
0.7
56%
1.13
29%
1.353 ?(0.76 - 1.7, n=3)
15%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.16
-20%
1.6
11%
2.8
-56%
2.03
-13%
3.14 ?(1.8 - 4.4, n=3)
-74%
Idle Maximum *
2.7
2.24
17%
1.9
30%
3.4
-26%
2.05
24%
3.58 ?(2.7 - 4.7, n=3)
-33%
Load Average *
5.5
2.59
53%
3.6
35%
4.2
24%
3.68
33%
6.23 ?(4.79 - 8.4, n=3)
-13%
Load Maximum *
6.3
4.11
35%
4.5
29%
7.2
-14%
4.52
28%
7.07 ?(5.72 - 9.2, n=3)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
5tim 41min
Alcatel 3V
3000 mAh
Honor 7C
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS270 Plus
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
341
693
103%
747
119%
497
46%
440
29%

För

+ kameran presterar bra i situationer med lite ljus
+ dual-SIM
+ dedikerade platser för SIM och microSD
+ skärm med hög kontrast

Emot

- kort batteritid
- utdaterad SoC
Recension av Alcatel 3V. Recensionsex från Alcatel Germany.
Recension av Alcatel 3V. Recensionsex från Alcatel Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Alcatel 3V får jämförelsevis medelmåttiga resultat i våra prestandatester, i huvudsak på grund av en utdaterad SoC. Den gamla hårdvaran påverkar även batteritiden, då 3V är bedrövlig på den punkten jämfört med våra jämförelseenheter.

Alcatel 3V är en billig mittenskiktstelefon som hålls tillbaka av utdaterad hårdvara och kort batteritid. På grund av dessa anledningar kan 3V inte tävla med sina likvärdigt prissatta konkurrenter.

Bortsett från dessa faktorer är 3V är en gedigen enhet tack vare en imponerande kamera och en skaplig skärm. Enheten kommer dessutom med Android Oreo 8.0, vilket inte är självklart för mittenskikts-enheter. Det är heller inte ofta vi ser enheter som har stöd för dual-SIM och microSD-kort samtidigt, vilket är en fördel med 3V. I stort gillade vi designen och konstruktionskvaliteten, men den kan se billig ut när man jämför den med konkurrenter som har metallhöljen.

Alcatel 3V - 07/02/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
74%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
41 / 60 → 68%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
86%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
10 / 63 → 16%
Programprestanda
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
66%
Medel
68%
78%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Alcatel 3V Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-14 (Update: 2018-07-15)