Test: Alcatel 3V Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Alcatel 3V
Brand: Alcatel

Plast med stil. Alcatel 3V är väl prissatt och borde vara tillräckligt kraftfull för dom flesta användare. Alcatel har lyckats göra enheten tjusig trots plasthöljet. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida den Alcatel 3V:s interna hårdvara är lika bra som telefonen ser ut.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Mike Wobker, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/14/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alcatel 3V (3 Serie)

Processor

Mediatek MT8735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Minne

2048 MB

Skärm

6.00 tum 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: Upp till 128 GB microSD-kort, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: G-sensor, Närhetssensor, E-Kompass, Gyroskop, Fingeravtrycksläsare

Nätverk

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (B1/2/5/8), LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28A/B38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 162 x 76

Batteri

3000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12 MP: f/2.2, 1.25 μm, Fasdektektions-Autofokus (PDAF), LED-blixt. 2 MP: f/2.4, sensor för skärpedjup. Video i upp till 1080p i 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Två högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Hörlurar, skyddsfodral, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: huvud: 1.04 W/kg. kropp: 0.83 W/kg, fanless

Vikt

155 g, Strömförsörjning: 66 g

Pris

190 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alcatel 3V Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	96.5 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	81.8 MBit/s -15%
Gigaset GS270 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.8 MBit/s -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s -42%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alcatel 3V Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	93.4 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.1 MBit/s -35%
Gigaset GS270 Plus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60.2 MBit/s -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -42%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s -51%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


487 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	436 cd/m²
477 cd/m²	473 cd/m²	441 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	470 cd/m²	441 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 461.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 463 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1689:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Alcatel 3V IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Gigaset GS270 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	HTC Desire 12 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"
Screen		-22%	-17%	4%	10%
Brightness middle	473	392 -17%	487 3%	620 31%	502 6%
Brightness	462	403 -13%	476 3%	612 32%	499 8%
Brightness Distribution	90	85 -6%	89 -1%	96 7%	84 -7%
Black Level *	0.28	0.61 -118%	0.35 -25%	0.57 -104%	0.2 29%
Contrast	1689	643 -62%	1391 -18%	1088 -36%	2510 49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.95	5.4 -9%	6.39 -29%	3.46 30%	5.4 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.1	9.7 20%	14.24 -18%	7.88 35%	10.8 11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	4.2 28%	8.6 -48%	3.9 33%	6.2 -7%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.59 ^85%	1.91 ^115%	2.073 ^106%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7779 ^84%	6734 ^97%	7366 ^88%	7230 ^90%	7660 ^85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	36177 Points
Honor 7C	54731 Points +51%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	44138 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	60490 Points +67%
HTC Desire 12	36253 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (34009 - 36177, n=3)	34778 Points -4%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	3902 Points
Honor 7C	5656 Points +45%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	4496 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	5801 Points +49%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (3617 - 3948, n=3)	3822 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	2981 Points
Honor 7C	4736 Points +59%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	3255 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4905 Points +65%
HTC Desire 12	3320 Points +11%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2980 - 2981, n=2)	2981 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	197 Points
Honor 7C	442 Points +124%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	310 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1229 Points +524%
HTC Desire 12	637 Points +223%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (197 - 647, n=3)	356 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=153, last 2 years)	6274 Points +3085%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	1271 Points
Honor 7C	2665 Points +110%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	1882 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3236 Points +155%
HTC Desire 12	1526 Points +20%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1192 - 1271, n=3)	1218 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=153, last 2 years)	10160 Points +699%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	322 Points
Honor 7C	1522 Points +373%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	789 Points +145%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	961 Points +198%
HTC Desire 12	984 Points +206%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (322 - 769, n=3)	614 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=153, last 2 years)	6729 Points +1990%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	382 Points
Honor 7C	955 Points +150%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	640 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1017 Points +166%
HTC Desire 12	18 Points -95%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (290 - 382, n=3)	321 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)	16804 Points +4299%
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	10 Points
Honor 7C	10 Points 0%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	10 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	722 Points +7120%
HTC Desire 12	591 Points +5810%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (10 - 672, n=3)	231 Points +2210%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=153, last 2 years)	1560 Points +15500%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	647 Points
Honor 7C	758 Points +17%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	610 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	870 Points +34%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (588 - 647, n=2)	618 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=83, last 2 years)	5460 Points +744%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	1833 Points
Honor 7C	3913 Points +113%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	2627 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4292 Points +134%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1697 - 1833, n=2)	1765 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=83, last 2 years)	15023 Points +720%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	1270 Points
Honor 7C	2800 Points +120%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	1766 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3316 Points +161%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1103 - 1270, n=2)	1187 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	12011 Points +846%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	6689 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus	9202 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13682 Points +105%
HTC Desire 12	4188 Points -37%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (5188 - 6689, n=3)	5738 Points -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	6006 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus	9479 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13219 Points +120%
HTC Desire 12	3597 Points -40%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (4622 - 6006, n=3)	5103 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	11114 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus	8348 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	15593 Points +40%
HTC Desire 12	9856 Points -11%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (9076 - 11114, n=3)	10221 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	211 Points
Honor 7C	824 Points +291%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	546 Points +159%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	854 Points +305%
HTC Desire 12	178 Points -16%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (203 - 211, n=3)	207 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +1892%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	173 Points
Honor 7C	713 Points +312%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	476 Points +175%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	732 Points +323%
HTC Desire 12	148 Points -14%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (167 - 173, n=3)	170.3 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +2640%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	896 Points
Honor 7C	1809 Points +102%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	1120 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2058 Points +130%
HTC Desire 12	593 Points -34%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (810 - 896, n=3)	854 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	160 Points
Honor 7C	445 Points +178%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	382 Points +139%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	463 Points +189%
HTC Desire 12	113 Points -29%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (127 - 160, n=3)	140.3 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +1823%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	130 Points
Honor 7C	366 Points +182%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	321 Points +147%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	379 Points +192%
HTC Desire 12	92 Points -29%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (102 - 130, n=3)	113.3 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +2402%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	857 Points
Honor 7C	1817 Points +112%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	1122 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2038 Points +138%
HTC Desire 12	589 Points -31%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (847 - 860, n=3)	855 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +284%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	11 fps
Honor 7C	34 fps +209%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	16 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	17 fps +55%
HTC Desire 12	9.7 fps -12%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (8 - 14, n=3)	11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)	85.9 fps +681%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	11 fps
Honor 7C	21 fps +91%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	17 fps +55%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	23 fps +109%
HTC Desire 12	5.9 fps -46%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (8.3 - 11, n=3)	9.3 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=171, last 2 years)	280 fps +2445%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	4.1 fps
Honor 7C	18 fps +339%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	6.8 fps +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.4 fps +129%
HTC Desire 12	5.4 fps +32%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.9 - 6.2, n=3)	4.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=171, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +1734%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	4.3 fps
Honor 7C	9.2 fps +114%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	6.8 fps +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.9 fps +130%
HTC Desire 12	2.7 fps -37%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (3 - 4.3, n=3)	3.47 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=171, last 2 years)	164.7 fps +3730%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	2.5 fps
Honor 7C	13 fps +420%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	4.6 fps +84%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.2 fps +148%
HTC Desire 12	3.5 fps +40%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.5 - 4.3, n=3)	3.3 fps +32%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=171, last 2 years)	65.5 fps +2520%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3V	2.5 fps
Honor 7C	6 fps +140%
Gigaset GS270 Plus	4.5 fps +80%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.5 fps +160%
HTC Desire 12	1.6 fps -36%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (1.9 - 2.5, n=3)	2.13 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=171, last 2 years)	117.1 fps +4584%

Legend

Alcatel 3V Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 7C Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS270 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT8735

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	23.1 Points +26%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	22.35 Points +22%
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)	18.59 Points +1%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)	18.32 Points
Average Mediatek MT8735 (15.4 - 18.3, n=3)	17.2 Points -6%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	15.79 Points -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	36870 Points +1013%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	4424 Points +34%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	3470 Points +5%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)	3312 Points
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)	3273 Points -1%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	2930 Points -12%
Average Mediatek MT8735 (2290 - 3312, n=3)	2773 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	17134 ms * -30%
Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66)	13367 ms * -1%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)	13199 ms *
Average Mediatek MT8735 (12334 - 13705, n=3)	13079 ms * +1%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	11370 ms * +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	10895 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years)	1577 ms * +88%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	112 Points +75%
Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67)	64 Points
Average Mediatek MT8735 (53 - 64, n=3)	57 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

	Alcatel 3V	Honor 7C	Gigaset GS270 Plus	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	HTC Desire 12	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		152%	129%	203%	125%	57%	1887%
Sequential Read 256KB	219.4	297 35%	269.1 23%	270 23%	211.4 -4%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -25%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 736%
Sequential Write 256KB	47.35	115 143%	72.8 54%	194.5 311%	103.8 119%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -9%	1422 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) 2903%
Random Read 4KB	24.8	30 21%	35.3 42%	79.5 221%	16.69 -33%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -12%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=194, last 2 years) 1021%
Random Write 4KB	10.38	10 -4%	11.51 11%	7.1 -32%	7.54 -27%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -22%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) 2887%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	21.38 ?(Kingston 32GB)	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 292%	80.8 278%	84.4 295%	81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 283%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) 176%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	11.92 ?(Kingston 32GB)	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 425%	55.5 366%	59.5 399%	61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 413%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) 234%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


36.3 °C	34.5 °C	33.2 °C
37.3 °C	37.3 °C	33.5 °C
39.4 °C	35 °C	33.5 °C

Max: 39.4 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C


32.6 °C	34.4 °C	37.4 °C
32.1 °C	34.6 °C	38.8 °C
32.5 °C	35.4 °C	41.5 °C

Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 34.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Alcatel 3V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GS270 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 1.2 Watt
Låg belastning	1.6 / 1.8 / 2.7 Watt
Hög belastning	5.5 / 6.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Alcatel 3V 3000 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Gigaset GS270 Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh	Average Mediatek MT8735	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		29%	27%	-3%	20%	-23%	7%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.6 62%	1.1 31%	0.7 56%	1.13 29%	1.353 ?(0.76 - 1.7, n=3) 15%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 44%
Idle Average *	1.8	2.16 -20%	1.6 11%	2.8 -56%	2.03 -13%	3.14 ?(1.8 - 4.4, n=3) -74%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	2.7	2.24 17%	1.9 30%	3.4 -26%	2.05 24%	3.58 ?(2.7 - 4.7, n=3) -33%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Load Average *	5.5	2.59 53%	3.6 35%	4.2 24%	3.68 33%	6.23 ?(4.79 - 8.4, n=3) -13%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -17%
Load Maximum *	6.3	4.11 35%	4.5 29%	7.2 -14%	4.52 28%	7.07 ?(5.72 - 9.2, n=3) -12%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -53%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing

5tim 41min

	Alcatel 3V 3000 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Gigaset GS270 Plus 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	341	693 103%	747 119%	497 46%	440 29%

För

+ kameran presterar bra i situationer med lite ljus

+ dual-SIM

+ dedikerade platser för SIM och microSD

+ skärm med hög kontrast

Emot

- kort batteritid

- utdaterad SoC

Recension av Alcatel 3V. Recensionsex från Alcatel Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Alcatel 3V får jämförelsevis medelmåttiga resultat i våra prestandatester, i huvudsak på grund av en utdaterad SoC. Den gamla hårdvaran påverkar även batteritiden, då 3V är bedrövlig på den punkten jämfört med våra jämförelseenheter.

Alcatel 3V är en billig mittenskiktstelefon som hålls tillbaka av utdaterad hårdvara och kort batteritid. På grund av dessa anledningar kan 3V inte tävla med sina likvärdigt prissatta konkurrenter.

Bortsett från dessa faktorer är 3V är en gedigen enhet tack vare en imponerande kamera och en skaplig skärm. Enheten kommer dessutom med Android Oreo 8.0, vilket inte är självklart för mittenskikts-enheter. Det är heller inte ofta vi ser enheter som har stöd för dual-SIM och microSD-kort samtidigt, vilket är en fördel med 3V. I stort gillade vi designen och konstruktionskvaliteten, men den kan se billig ut när man jämför den med konkurrenter som har metallhöljen.

Alcatel 3V - 2018-07-02 07/02/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Design

74%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

41 / 60 → 68%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

86%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

10 / 63 → 16%

Programprestanda

30 / 70 → 43%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

66%

Medel

68%

78%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11135 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Alcatel 3V Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2018-07-14 (Update: 2018-07-15)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Alcatel 3V audio analysis

Gigaset GS270 Plus audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison