Test: Alcatel 3X Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Alcatel 3X
Brand: Alcatel

Femtioelfte försöket. Alcatel 3X är tänkt att vara ytterligare ett steg i riktning mot att återuppliva detta tidigare väldigt populära märke. Styrkorna hos TCL:s senaste smartphone är Face Key, en vidvinkel-kamera och App-Start via fingeravtrycksläsaren. Läs vår recension för att få reda på vad du kan förvänta dig från denna Kinesiska enhet.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/24/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Alcatel Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alcatel 3X (3 Serie)

Processor

Mediatek MT6739 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

PowerVR GE8100

Minne

3 GB

Skärm

5.70 tum 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixlar 282 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 16GB eller 32GB, 21 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD (upp till 128GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: rörelsesensor, närhetssensor, E-kompass

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM Quadband (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (B1/2/5/8), 4G LTE Cat. 4 (B1/3/7/8/20/28/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 153.5 x 71.6

Batteri

3000 mAh Litiumpolymer, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 10 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 6 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 480 tim

Operativsystem

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP+5 MP (16 MP+8 MP från SW), AF+ vid FF, 5P+5P linser, pixelstorlek 1.12 μm+1.12 μm, sensorstorlek 1/3.06" + 1/5" bländare f/2.0+f/2.2, vidvinkel från 78.4°+ 120°, dualton-blixt
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5 MP (8 MP från SW), FF, pixelstorlek 1,12 µm, sensorstorlek 1/5", bländare f/2.4, blixt

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-laddare, MicroUSB-kabel, stereo-headset, OfficeSuite, enjoy.now, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden (huvud): 0,64 W/kg, (kropp): 1,09 W/kg, fanless

Vikt

144 g, Strömförsörjning: 66 g

Pris

190 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	273 MBit/s +395%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.9 MBit/s +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 MBit/s +1%
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.1 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G6 Play Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	268 MBit/s +390%
Umidigi A1 Pro PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s +2%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55 MBit/s +1%
Alcatel 3X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.7 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G6 Play Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	44.7 MBit/s -18%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


454 cd/m²	411 cd/m²	383 cd/m²
439 cd/m²	429 cd/m²	407 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	419 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 454 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 420.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.76 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 325 cd/m²
Kontrast: 3300:1 (Svärta: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231

	Alcatel 3X IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5"	Motorola Moto G6 Play IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		-20%	-11%	-23%	-12%
Brightness middle	429	594 38%	614 43%	393 -8%	518 21%
Brightness	421	570 35%	593 41%	365 -13%	532 26%
Brightness Distribution	84	86 2%	90 7%	85 1%	94 12%
Black Level *	0.13	0.22 -69%	0.29 -123%	0.29 -123%	0.23 -77%
Contrast	3300	2700 -18%	2117 -36%	1355 -59%	2252 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.86	6.63 -36%	5.9 -21%	5.28 -9%	5.66 -16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.83	13.99 -58%	9.6 -9%	9 -2%	10.32 -17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6	9.2 -53%	5.5 8%	4.2 30%	6.8 -13%
Gamma	2.231 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.6 ^85%	2.269 ^97%
CCT	8103 ^80%	8663 ^75%	7822 ^83%	7086 ^92%	8564 ^76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	31718 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	36073 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	46267 Points +46%
Huawei Y7 2018	45687 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	92672 Points +192%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13)	33655 Points +6%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	42032 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	45868 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	58511 Points +39%
Huawei Y7 2018	59421 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	115654 Points +175%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46951, n=13)	41995 Points 0%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	4711 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	4330 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	4590 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018	4918 Points +4%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11)	4323 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	3210 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	3159 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	3624 Points +13%
Huawei Y7 2018	3874 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	5642 Points +76%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16)	3206 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	206 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	208 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	923 Points +348%
Huawei Y7 2018	1020 Points +395%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (162 - 637, n=15)	291 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +3055%
System (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	1302 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	1318 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	1531 Points +18%
Huawei Y7 2018	1906 Points +46%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1103 - 1526, n=15)	1294 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +695%
Memory (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	982 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	802 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	741 Points -25%
Huawei Y7 2018	1144 Points +16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (420 - 1039, n=15)	768 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +619%
Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	150 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	184 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	737 Points +391%
Huawei Y7 2018	739 Points +393%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 190, n=15)	160.5 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +11899%
Web (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	9 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	10 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	866 Points +9522%
Huawei Y7 2018	673 Points +7378%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 624, n=15)	165.4 Points +1738%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +17433%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	665 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	643 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	676 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1339 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (571 - 675, n=14)	632 Points
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	1852 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	2322 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	2889 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	4943 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1418 - 1896, n=14)	1733 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	1450 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	2224 Points
Huawei Y7 2018	2133 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	4578 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1460, n=12)	1328 Points
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	3418 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	9585 Points +180%
Huawei Y7 2018	9583 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	20033 Points +486%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3392 - 4339, n=17)	3912 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	2898 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	9713 Points +235%
Huawei Y7 2018	9713 Points +235%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	20909 Points +621%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2878 - 4346, n=17)	3398 Points +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	9188 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Play	9162 Points 0%
Huawei Y7 2018	9153 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	17471 Points +90%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7103 - 10981, n=17)	9367 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	151 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	168 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	600 Points +297%
Huawei Y7 2018	603 Points +299%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1458 Points +866%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 211, n=17)	157.5 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +2684%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	125 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	140 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	522 Points +318%
Huawei Y7 2018	524 Points +319%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	1313 Points +950%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 185, n=17)	131.6 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +3692%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	538 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	537 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	1254 Points +133%
Huawei Y7 2018	1280 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	2379 Points +342%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (445 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +514%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	94 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	108 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	309 Points +229%
Huawei Y7 2018	310 Points +230%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	934 Points +894%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (80 - 221, n=17)	104.9 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +3098%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	76 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	88 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	254 Points +234%
Huawei Y7 2018	255 Points +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	797 Points +949%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (65 - 185, n=17)	85.4 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +4066%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	546 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro	531 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	1259 Points +131%
Huawei Y7 2018	1258 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	2346 Points +330%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (486 - 690, n=17)	567 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +497%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	9 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	9.7 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	26 fps +189%
Huawei Y7 2018	27 fps +200%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	35 fps +289%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 15, n=17)	10.1 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +862%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	4.9 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	6 fps +22%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	16 fps +227%
Huawei Y7 2018	16 fps +227%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	35 fps +614%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=17)	5.64 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +5941%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	5 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	5.4 fps +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	14 fps +180%
Huawei Y7 2018	14 fps +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	15 fps +200%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16)	5.61 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +1422%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	2.2 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	2.7 fps +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	7.1 fps +223%
Huawei Y7 2018	7.1 fps +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	16 fps +627%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)	2.56 fps +16%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +7855%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	3.1 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	3.3 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	10 fps +223%
Huawei Y7 2018	10 fps +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	10 fps +223%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)	3.51 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +2052%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	1.3 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.6 fps +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	4.6 fps +254%
Huawei Y7 2018	4.6 fps +254%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	9.8 fps +654%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)	1.494 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +9462%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	1.6 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	1.4 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	5.3 fps +231%
Huawei Y7 2018	5.4 fps +238%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	6 fps +275%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)	1.553 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +2994%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Alcatel 3X	0.77 fps
Umidigi A1 Pro	0.9 fps +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Play	2.6 fps +238%
Huawei Y7 2018	2.6 fps +238%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	6.3 fps +718%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)	0.826 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +9614%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	255 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years)	2375 Points

Legend

Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G6 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6739

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	44.32 Points +188%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)	18.14 Points +18%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points +16%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points +16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14)	16.7 Points +8%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	15.41 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1258%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	8422 Points +197%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	3363 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)	3296 Points +16%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	3191 Points +12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)	2945 Points +4%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	2838 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	17275 ms *
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)	16427 ms * +5%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)	15718 ms * +9%
Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66)	13730 ms * +21%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	13541 ms * +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	4740 ms * +73%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +91%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67)	158 Points +151%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	82 Points +30%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)	63 Points
Average Mediatek MT6739 (52 - 63, n=2)	57.5 Points -9%

* ... smaller is better

	Alcatel 3X	Umidigi A1 Pro	Motorola Moto G6 Play	Huawei Y7 2018	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	119%	5%	31%	27%	1444%
Sequential Read 256KB	260.5	269.2 3%	243.7 -6%	256 -2%	287.6 10%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -7%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 624%
Sequential Write 256KB	127.7	44.4 -65%	135.8 6%	71.5 -44%	121.6 -5%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -21%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 1052%
Random Read 4KB	26.05	29.6 14%	65.9 153%	38.8 49%	48.9 88%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) 66%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 967%
Random Write 4KB	9.62	10.2 6%	61.7 541%	9.5 -1%	16.3 69%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 133%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 3133%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	79.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	85 7%	83.4 5%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	51.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 18%	61.5 19%	62.4 21%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) 3%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


40.8 °C	36.3 °C	35.1 °C
39.6 °C	36.5 °C	35.9 °C
38.3 °C	36.1 °C	35.5 °C

Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C


33.8 °C	36.5 °C	40.2 °C
34.2 °C	36.6 °C	39.4 °C
34.8 °C	36.6 °C	37.4 °C

Max: 40.2 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 37.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Alcatel 3X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G6 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.05 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastning	2 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt
Hög belastning	5.2 / 6.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Play 4000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6739	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		7%	36%	25%	6%	12%	13%
Idle Minimum *	2	1.8 10%	0.68 66%	0.9 55%	1 50%	1.522 ?(0.87 - 2.8, n=16) 24%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 56%
Idle Average *	2.5	2.3 8%	1.8 28%	1.9 24%	2.6 -4%	2.17 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=16) 13%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	3.2	3.2 -0%	1.83 43%	2.3 28%	2.9 9%	2.86 ?(1.68 - 6.3, n=16) 11%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 49%
Load Average *	5.2	4.7 10%	3.38 35%	4.7 10%	5 4%	4.73 ?(2.8 - 7, n=16) 9%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -26%
Load Maximum *	6.3	6 5%	5.67 10%	5.7 10%	8.2 -30%	5.99 ?(3.5 - 11.9, n=16) 5%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -57%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		11tim 15min

	Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh	Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh	Motorola Moto G6 Play 4000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	675	608 -10%	887 31%	624 -8%	872 29%

För

+ skärm med utmärkt kontrastförhållande

+ kameran presterar bra vid låg ljusnivå

Emot

- systemprestandan

- MicroUSB-port

Recenseras: Alcatel 3X. Recensionsex från: Alcatel Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I vår recension visar sig Alcatel 3X vara en gedigen mittenskikts-smartphone som egentligen inte erbjuder tillräckligt med prestanda för att motivera prislappen på 1.900 kronor. Den som köper Alcatel 3X får en Android-telefon som kan hantera vardagsuppgifter. Användarupplevelsen är dessutom skaplig. Kameran är lämplig för enstaka foton och ger användbara bilder vid bra ljusförhållanden.

Alcatel 3X står ut med sin kontrastrika skärm, men den har inget annat att erbjuda.

Acatel 3X har inget speciellt att erbjuda vid jämförelse med konkurrerande enheter. Det som attraherar mest är den kontrastrika skärmen. Men andra tillverkare erbjuder telefoner med liknande pris och prestanda. I slutändan får man fundera över huruvida personliga preferenser motiverar ett köp av Alcatel 3X. Oavsett så är telefonen lämplig för enklare appar såsom WhatsApp eller för att ta enstaka foton.

Alcatel 3X - 07/04/2018 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Design

76%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

38 / 60 → 63%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

94%

Skärm

84%

Spelprestanda

6 / 63 → 9%

Programprestanda

36 / 70 → 52%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

66%

Medel

69%

80%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Alcatel 3X Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Alcatel 3X audio analysis

Motorola Moto G6 Play audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison