Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Alcatel 3X Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 325 cd/m²
Kontrast: 3300:1 (Svärta: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
| Alcatel 3X IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Motorola Moto G6 Play IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -20% | -11% | -23% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 429 | 594 38% | 614 43% | 393 -8% | 518 21% |
| Brightness | 421 | 570 35% | 593 41% | 365 -13% | 532 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 86 2% | 90 7% | 85 1% | 94 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.22 -69% | 0.29 -123% | 0.29 -123% | 0.23 -77% |
| Contrast | 3300 | 2700 -18% | 2117 -36% | 1355 -59% | 2252 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.86 | 6.63 -36% | 5.9 -21% | 5.28 -9% | 5.66 -16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.83 | 13.99 -58% | 9.6 -9% | 9 -2% | 10.32 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6 | 9.2 -53% | 5.5 8% | 4.2 30% | 6.8 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.6 85% | 2.269 97% |
| CCT | 8103 80% | 8663 75% | 7822 83% | 7086 92% | 8564 76% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (25012 - 38060, n=13) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46951, n=13) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (3742 - 5136, n=11) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (2467 - 5377, n=16) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 10, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 6.7, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3X | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14) | |
| Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15) | |
| Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Play (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6739 (52 - 63, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 3X | Umidigi A1 Pro | Motorola Moto G6 Play | Huawei Y7 2018 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | 119% | 5% | 31% | 27% | 1424% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 260.5 | 269.2 3% | 243.7 -6% | 256 -2% | 287.6 10% | 242 ? -7% | 1839 ? 606% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 127.7 | 44.4 -65% | 135.8 6% | 71.5 -44% | 121.6 -5% | 100.5 ? -21% | 1425 ? 1016% |
| Random Read 4KB | 26.05 | 29.6 14% | 65.9 153% | 38.8 49% | 48.9 88% | 43.2 ? 66% | 277 ? 963% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.62 | 10.2 6% | 61.7 541% | 9.5 -1% | 16.3 69% | 22.4 ? 133% | 309 ? 3112% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.7 ? | 81 ? 2% | 83.2 ? 4% | 85 7% | 83.4 5% | 71.8 ? -10% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 51.5 ? | 58.8 ? 14% | 60.7 ? 18% | 61.5 19% | 62.4 21% | 52.9 ? 3% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel 3X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G6 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.05 / 0.08 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  2 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.2 / 6.3 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Play 4000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6739 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 36% | 25% | 6% | 12% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 0.68 66% | 0.9 55% | 1 50% | 1.522 ? 24% | 0.894 ? 55% |
| Idle Average * | 2.5 | 2.3 8% | 1.8 28% | 1.9 24% | 2.6 -4% | 2.17 ? 13% | 1.456 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.2 | 3.2 -0% | 1.83 43% | 2.3 28% | 2.9 9% | 2.86 ? 11% | 1.616 ? 49% |
| Load Average * | 5.2 | 4.7 10% | 3.38 35% | 4.7 10% | 5 4% | 4.73 ? 9% | 6.45 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.3 | 6 5% | 5.67 10% | 5.7 10% | 8.2 -30% | 5.99 ? 5% | 9.8 ? -56% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 3X 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Play 4000 mAh | Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 608 -10% | 887 31% | 624 -8% | 872 29% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I vår recension visar sig Alcatel 3X vara en gedigen mittenskikts-smartphone som egentligen inte erbjuder tillräckligt med prestanda för att motivera prislappen på 1.900 kronor. Den som köper Alcatel 3X får en Android-telefon som kan hantera vardagsuppgifter. Användarupplevelsen är dessutom skaplig. Kameran är lämplig för enstaka foton och ger användbara bilder vid bra ljusförhållanden.
Alcatel 3X står ut med sin kontrastrika skärm, men den har inget annat att erbjuda.
Acatel 3X har inget speciellt att erbjuda vid jämförelse med konkurrerande enheter. Det som attraherar mest är den kontrastrika skärmen. Men andra tillverkare erbjuder telefoner med liknande pris och prestanda. I slutändan får man fundera över huruvida personliga preferenser motiverar ett köp av Alcatel 3X. Oavsett så är telefonen lämplig för enklare appar såsom WhatsApp eller för att ta enstaka foton.
Alcatel 3X
- 07/04/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
