Test: Alcatel 5 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 495 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1686:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.286
| Alcatel 5 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | BQ Aquaris VS Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 12% | -31% | -11% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 489 | 761 56% | 417 -15% | 528 8% | 634 30% |
| Brightness | 480 | 723 51% | 421 -12% | 525 9% | 635 32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 90 -5% | 88 -7% | 89 -6% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.69 -138% | 0.61 -110% | 0.51 -76% | 0.49 -69% |
| Contrast | 1686 | 1103 -35% | 684 -59% | 1035 -39% | 1294 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.21 | 2.4 54% | 6.1 -17% | 4.7 10% | 5.9 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.31 | 5.2 44% | 11.2 -20% | 8.9 4% | 11.6 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 1.8 72% | 7.1 -9% | 6.4 2% | 7.8 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.286 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 8727 74% | 6312 103% | 8362 78% | 7987 81% | 8464 77% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 5 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Alcatel 5 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 5 | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Nokia 6 2018 | Huawei P20 Lite | BQ Aquaris VS Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 128% | 50% | 139% | 53% | 43% | 1039% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 271 | 286.6 6% | 272.6 1% | 293.9 8% | 274.3 1% | 242 ? -11% | 1839 ? 579% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 127.8 | 216.1 69% | 118.3 -7% | 198.3 55% | 205.1 60% | 100.5 ? -21% | 1425 ? 1015% |
| Random Read 4KB | 57 | 58.4 2% | 38.78 -32% | 48.19 -15% | 48.3 -15% | 43.2 ? -24% | 277 ? 386% |
| Random Write 4KB | 13.59 | 62.8 362% | 15.3 13% | 71.1 423% | 6.4 -53% | 22.4 ? 65% | 309 ? 2174% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 36.5 ? | 83.7 ? 129% | 83.4 ? 128% | 83.5 ? 129% | 84.5 ? 132% | 71.8 ? 97% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 20.8 ? | 62.1 ? 199% | 61.3 ? 195% | 69 ? 232% | 60.6 ? 191% | 52.9 ? 154% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel 5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.4 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.5 / 6.8 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alcatel 5 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | 31% | 13% | 11% | 0% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 0.5 64% | 0.67 52% | 0.98 30% | 0.79 44% | 1.13 ? 19% | 0.894 ? 36% |
| Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.78 6% | 1.76 7% | 2 -5% | 2.29 -21% | 2.02 ? -6% | 1.456 ? 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.4 | 1.81 25% | 1.78 26% | 2.11 12% | 2.3 4% | 2.42 ? -1% | 1.616 ? 33% |
| Load Average * | 4.5 | 3.3 27% | 2.82 37% | 3.9 13% | 3.84 15% | 5.21 ? -16% | 6.45 ? -43% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.8 | 5.14 24% | 4.56 33% | 5.62 17% | 5.95 12% | 6.56 ? 4% | 9.8 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 5 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 702 -8% | 942 23% | 582 -24% | 644 -16% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Alcatel försöker locka prismedvetna kunder som letar efter en annorlunda design. För ett pris som börjar på 2.300 kronor får intresserade köpare en smartphone med ett operativsystem som inte längre är särskilt modernt men som har tillräckligt med prestanda för att hantera alla vardagsuppgifter. Den har också bra batteritid och det finns ingen anledning att klaga på hantverket.
Även om Alcatel 5 inte erbjuder ett aktuellt operativsystem med sitt Android 7 så lyckas den ta en del poäng när det kommer till design och batteritid.
Men andra tillverkare kan erbjuda aningen mer för samma pris. I synnerhet när det kommer till systemprestandan och kamerans funktioner. En del konkurrenter är dessutom bättre på att hålla sig uppdaterade. Med sin låga upplösning är skärmen heller inte särskilt modern, men den har levande färger och bra kontrast. Det som i slutändan avgör om Alcatel 5 är ett bra val eller inte är huruvida du prioriterar design eller systemprestanda.
Alcatel 5
- 07/02/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
