Test: Alldocube M8 T801 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 317.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 635:1 (Svärta: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Alldocube M8 T801 IPS, 8", 1920x1200 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 8", 1280x800 | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 7.9", 2048x1536 | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 8.4", 2560x1600 | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 IPS LCD, 8", 1920x1200 | Chuwi HiPad IPS, 10.1", 1920x1200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -41% | -4% | 44% | 7% | -24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 48 ? -50% | 31 ? 3% | 13 ? 59% | 42 ? -31% | 33.2 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 38 ? -32% | 32 ? -11% | 20.5 ? 29% | 16 ? 44% | 41.2 ? -43% |
PWM Frequency | 2451 ? | 2358 ? | ||||
Screen | -19% | 24% | 3% | 11% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 317.5 | 359 13% | 386 22% | 405 28% | 454 43% | 408.7 29% |
Brightness | 320 | 358 12% | 364 14% | 392 23% | 411 28% | 396 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 88 -6% | 92 -2% | 83 -12% | 85 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.85 -70% | 0.57 -14% | 0.67 -34% | 0.73 -46% | 0.51 -2% |
Contrast | 635 | 422 -34% | 677 7% | 604 -5% | 622 -2% | 801 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.12 | 6.8 -11% | 3.3 46% | 5.78 6% | 5.2 15% | 4.13 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.72 | 17.3 -26% | 7.1 48% | 9.82 28% | 8.36 39% | 7.34 47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 7.6 -31% | 1.7 71% | 7.2 -24% | 4.7 19% | 4.4 24% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.278 97% | 2.271 97% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7633 85% | 7160 91% | 6397 102% | 8405 77% | 7361 88% | 7389 88% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-23% | 10% /
18% | 24% /
11% | 9% /
10% | -2% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Vulkan Medium Native | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
Average MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X () |
* ... smaller is better
Alldocube M8 T801 32 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 64 GB eMMC Flash | Alldocube Alldocube X 64 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | 17% | 45% | 320% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 56.8 | 66.1 | 73.1 | 59.1 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.4 | 87.2 | 84.9 | 80.1 | |
Random Write 4KB | 10.01 | 8.77 -12% | 11.62 16% | 15.35 53% | 24.43 144% |
Random Read 4KB | 19.5 | 13.7 -30% | 14.62 -25% | 27.41 41% | 142 628% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 103 | 92.4 -10% | 101.1 -2% | 94.1 -9% | 195.8 90% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 142.8 | 173.7 22% | 255.4 79% | 278.6 95% | 741 419% |
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 1157 poäng | |
Hjälp |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Alldocube M8 T801 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.4 / 5.1 / 5.3 Watt |
Hög belastning |
6 / 11.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Alldocube M8 T801 MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab 4 8 425, Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 SD 660, Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 39% | 37% | 20% | 20% | 31% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 0.97 71% | 1.1 68% | 2.1 38% | 1.2 65% | 1.01 70% |
Idle Average * | 5.1 | 3.26 36% | 3.51 31% | 3.74 27% | 2.2 57% | 2.71 47% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.3 | 3.37 36% | 4.14 22% | 4.33 18% | 4.1 23% | 2.75 48% |
Load Average * | 6 | 5.68 5% | 4.86 19% | 6.32 -5% | 8.2 -37% | 7.28 -21% |
Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 6.21 46% | 6.13 47% | 9.13 21% | 12.2 -6% | 10.02 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Alldocube M8 T801 5500 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 6000 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | 17% | 49% | 97% | 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 420 | 452 8% | 490 17% | 627 49% | 827 97% | 470 12% |
Reader / Idle | 1207 | 1168 | 1154 | 1364 | 1147 | |
Load | 276 | 316 | 298 | 221 | 263 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
De bästa egenskaperna Alldocube M8 har är relativt stark konstruktion och 4G LTE som tillval. Enheten känns robustare än de flesta andra i det här prisskiktet då den är en aning tjockare. Vi känner oss mer bekväma med att rekommendera den här surfplattan åt barn eller familjer eftersom det är troligare att den kommer att överleva de oundvikliga knuffarna och stötarna jämfört med tunnare eller lättare alternativ.
I övrigt är denna surfplatta en genomsnittlig budgetmodell. Skärmen är mörkare än medelnivån, batteritiden imponerar inte, kamerorna är medelmåttiga och prestandan är inte direkt smidig. Lyxiga extrafunktioner som NFC, IR-kontroll, automatisk ljusstyrka och USB Typ C saknas.
Alldocube M8 fungerar bäst som en surfplatta att ha hemma eller som en extraenhet att ta med på resan. Även om den får jobbet gjort så har den varken prestandan, ljusstyrkan, lagringen, kamerorna, uthålligheten eller funktionerna för att ersätta ett mittenskiktsalternativ eller en smartphone.
Alldocube M8 T801
-
03/15/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo