Test: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2018) Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 359 cd/m²
Kontrast: 422:1 (Svärta: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Lenovo Tab 4 8 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | 19% | 33% | 54% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 359 | 419 17% | 405 13% | 455 27% | 509 42% | 454 26% |
| Brightness | 358 | 412 15% | 392 9% | 446 25% | 477 33% | 411 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 92 3% | 91 2% | 91 2% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.85 | 0.39 54% | 0.67 21% | 0.51 40% | 0.48 44% | 0.73 14% |
| Contrast | 422 | 1074 155% | 604 43% | 892 111% | 1060 151% | 622 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 8.5 -25% | 5.78 15% | 5.5 19% | 3.45 49% | 5.2 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.3 | 13.8 20% | 9.82 43% | 14.8 14% | 5.17 70% | 8.36 52% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.6 | 10.3 -36% | 7.2 5% | 5.5 28% | 4.5 41% | 4.7 38% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.6 85% | 2.278 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.11 104% | 2.271 97% |
| CCT | 7160 91% | 6216 105% | 8405 77% | 7852 83% | 7171 91% | 7361 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz () | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz (13.3 - 21.2, n=6) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz (2821 - 3320, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz (11818 - 14321, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz (23 - 25, n=3) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 (Silk Browser 66.2.10.3359.126.10) | |
| Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Average MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz (57 - 71, n=4) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 | Lenovo Tab 4 8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | 170% | 51% | 33% | 233% | -3% | 1035% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 158.5 | 159.1 0% | 268.6 69% | 265.1 67% | 218.1 38% | 277.6 75% | 164.5 ? 4% | 1045 ? 559% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 41.89 | 47.23 13% | 132.2 216% | 72.3 73% | 54 29% | 207.9 396% | 43 ? 3% | 684 ? 1533% |
| Random Read 4KB | 26.98 | 21.55 -20% | 62.8 133% | 44 63% | 25.96 -4% | 94.2 249% | 21.7 ? -20% | 189.2 ? 601% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.25 | 11.51 -6% | 65.1 431% | 7.1 -42% | 10.98 -10% | 77.9 536% | 8.08 ? -34% | 189.5 ? 1447% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 51.4 ? | 51.1 -1% | 84.9 ? 65% | 84.8 65% | 78.6 53% | 84.2 ? 64% | 59.1 ? 15% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.03 ? | 34.15 0% | 70.7 ? 108% | 61.1 80% | 64.3 89% | 61.2 ? 80% | 39.8 ? 17% |
Dead Trigger 2
Asphalt 9
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.35 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.97 / 3.26 / 3.37 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.68 / 6.21 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 6000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | -43% | -6% | 11% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.97 | 0.99 -2% | 2.1 -116% | 1.1 -13% | 0.89 8% | 1.2 -24% |
| Idle Average * | 3.26 | 2.74 16% | 3.74 -15% | 3.51 -8% | 3.13 4% | 2.2 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.37 | 2.83 16% | 4.33 -28% | 4.14 -23% | 3.36 -0% | 4.1 -22% |
| Load Average * | 5.68 | 4.51 21% | 6.32 -11% | 4.86 14% | 3.93 31% | 8.2 -44% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.21 | 5.69 8% | 9.13 -47% | 6.13 1% | 5.45 12% | 12.2 -96% |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2018 4750 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 5100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 6000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 51% | 16% | 1% | 31% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1168 | 2032 74% | 1154 -1% | 1207 3% | 1357 16% | 1364 17% |
| H.264 | 498 | 744 49% | 701 41% | 603 21% | 493 -1% | 914 84% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 490 | 770 57% | 627 28% | 452 -8% | 895 83% | 827 69% |
| Load | 316 | 393 24% | 298 -6% | 276 -13% | 396 25% | 221 -30% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Amazons Fire HD 8 (2018) är en surfplatta på 8 tum som praktiskt taget är utan rivaler i det här prisskiktet när det kommer till förhållandet mellan pris och prestanda. Om du letar efter en billig platta för att surfa på nätet med är Fire HD 8 definitivt värd att överväga. Den har skapligt stereoljud, hygglig batteritid, bra konstruktionskvalitet och dualbands-WiFi. Barnversionen har ett riktigt robust och hållbart skyddsskal i blått eller rosa och har innehåll som är lämpligt för barn.
Skillnaderna mellan Fire HD 8 (2018) och dess föregångare, som att Alexa ingår nu, är nästintill försumbara. Men de är ändå väldigt välkomna och gör den nya modellen ännu mer lockande än Fire HD 8 (2017) med tanke på att den fortfarande bara kostar runt 800 kronor.
Tillsammans med Show Mode-dockningsstationen som finns som tillval har denna surfplatta samma funktioner som Amazons Echo Show till ett betydligt lägre pris. Vid skrivande stund kostar andra generationen av Echo Show mer än 2.000 kronor medans Fire HD 8 (2018) med 32 GB lagring och ett paket med Show Mode Dock går att få för så lite som 1.400 kronor.
Med det sagt kommer du att stöta på en del begränsningar förr eller senare, exempelvis det aningen slöa fyrkärniga MediaTek MT8163-chippet eller den ganska mörka och lågupplösta (1280x800) skärmen. Surfplattan saknar också ett GPS-chipp, kameran duger som bäst till någon enstaka bild och Android 7-baserade Fire OS är tydligt riktat åt Amazons tjänster. Googles Play-butik kan installeras i efterhand, men det kommer att upphäva garantin, så var försiktig.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2018
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
