Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Aorus 15P WB - Kompakt kraftpaket med riktigt bra batteritid (Sammanfattning)

Lyckad.

Aorus 15P WB kan visa alla moderna datorspel smidigt på sin skärm (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). Dessutom har den en NVMe SSD, 16 GB RAM (med dubbla kanaler) samt batteritid som inte ens vissa kontorsmodeller kan nå upp till.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Aorus 15P WB (15P Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1125 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, 90 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.6089 (Nvidia 460.89), Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, Två minnesplatser, Båda används
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT), 512 GB 
, 2 M.2 2280 Platser (1x NVMe/SATA, 1x NVMe), 408 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23 x 357 x 244
Batteri
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Litiumpolymer, 15.2 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Thermalpad, MS Office 365 (Testversion), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.07 kg, Strömförsörjning: 722 g
Pris
1 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.5 %
v7 (old)
01/2021
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.1 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
02/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg25.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.7 %
v7 (old)
06/2020
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		2.4 kg21.6 mm15.60"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
365.5 mm 254 mm 21.6 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 275 mm 25.8 mm 2.3 kg363 mm 254 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 244 mm 23 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: HDMI, Mini DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Gigabit Ethernet
Vänster: HDMI, Mini DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Gigabit Ethernet
Höger: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ C), Minneskortsläsare (SD), Nätadapter
Höger: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ C), Minneskortsläsare (SD), Nätadapter
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 15P WB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
96 MB/s -54%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.6 MB/s -82%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 15P WB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
243 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s -50%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.9 MB/s -84%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1385 (1268min - 1486max) MBit/s +24%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1220 MBit/s +9%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1120 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
790 (647min - 869max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1470 (1297min - 1511max) MBit/s +14%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1380 MBit/s +7%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1290 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1152 (586min - 1283max) MBit/s -11%
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 15P WB: 17.89 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 28.86 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
25 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP: 14.35 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 24.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F: 11.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.22 ∆E
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89FDell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LPAcer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Aorus 15P WBAorus 15P WB
Aorus 15P WB
273
cd/m²		279
cd/m²		267
cd/m²
268
cd/m²		275
cd/m²		270
cd/m²
255
cd/m²		262
cd/m²		260
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 279 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 267.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 275 cd/m²
Kontrast: 833:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.09
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.266
Aorus 15P WB
BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Sharp LQ156M1JW09, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-37%
7%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
63
39.51
-37%
67.8
8%
63
0%
sRGB Coverage
91.3
58.1
-36%
98.3
8%
90.1
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.6
40.81
-37%
68.5
6%
64.1
-1%
Response Times
-175%
-48%
-75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8)
-232%
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-82%
20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6)
-132%
Response Time Black / White *
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
20 ?(9.6, 10.4)
-117%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
-13%
10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(29)
198.4 ?(99)
Screen
-65%
-19%
-12%
Brightness middle
275
279
1%
300.9
9%
292
6%
Brightness
268
257
-4%
289
8%
290
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
92
1%
77
-15%
Black Level *
0.33
0.31
6%
0.31
6%
0.27
18%
Contrast
833
900
8%
971
17%
1081
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.72
5.84
-115%
3.54
-30%
3.99
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.45
21.8
-390%
9.82
-121%
6.11
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.09
4.54
-117%
1
52%
3.02
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
3.1
-35%
5.9
-157%
3.3
-43%
Gamma
2.266 97%
2.116 104%
2.37 93%
2.25 98%
CCT
6933 94%
6577 99%
7456 87%
7047 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65
41
-37%
63.3
-3%
58.1
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
59
-34%
98.3
9%
89.7
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-92% / -74%
-20% / -18%
-29% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
 
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800185019001950Tooltip
Aorus 15P WB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1227 (1214.14-1343.01)
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1328 (1277.18-1346.3)
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1845 (1564.03-1971.71)
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15-loop
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en CB15-loop
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
198 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1343 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2941 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
489 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1270 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
7739 Points
Hjälp
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +40%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
206 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
199 Points +1%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3441 Points +156%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1972 (1142.92min - 1972max) Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
1346 (1277.18min - 1346.3max) Points 0%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1343 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1317 (1180.53min - 1317.18max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points -6%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
372 Seconds * -2%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
363 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
326 Seconds * +10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
276 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.1 Seconds * +53%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6320 MIPS +17%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
5391 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
5277 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
5052 MIPS -6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85859 MIPS +135%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
49685 MIPS +36%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
36831 MIPS +1%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
36524 MIPS
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
34772 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS -7%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +49%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
489 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
482 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
480 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
473 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points -3%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8361 Points +184%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4396 Points +49%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
3325 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
2991 Points +2%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
2941 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points -3%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
1329 Points +2%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1309 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1286 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points -4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1158 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15118 Points +139%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7775 Points +23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
6650 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
6365 Points 0%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
6336 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +129%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.6 fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.3 fps +10%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.61 fps -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps -7%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.1 s * -35%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -4%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
51.1 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.2 s * +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
47.2 s * +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
46.9 s * +8%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.607 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.601 sec * -3%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.586 sec *
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4364 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4410 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6169 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5556 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
6301 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7817 Points +24%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
6301 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5936 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5208 - 6301, n=3)
5584 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
5479 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5193 Points -18%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4659 - 5937, n=18, last 2 years)
5259 Points +19%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4894 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4589 Points +4%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
4410 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3409 - 4410, n=3)
3838 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6712, n=16, last 2 years)
6051 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
5964 Points +7%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
5556 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5352 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4396 - 5556, n=3)
4886 Points -12%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4349 μs * -444%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
2216 μs * -177%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1767 μs * -121%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
799 μs *

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3068 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2373 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 590 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 475.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2533 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2273 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.7 MB/s
Aorus 15P WB
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU		Average ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
-31%
-23%
-1%
Write 4K
131.7
117.5
-11%
116.5
-12%
142.1
8%
149.5 ?(131.7 - 162.1, n=4)
14%
Read 4K
55.7
47.36
-15%
27.6
-50%
46.43
-17%
53.6 ?(37.6 - 60.7, n=4)
-4%
Write Seq
2273
2748
21%
1020
-55%
1108
-51%
2346 ?(2273 - 2378, n=4)
3%
Read Seq
2533
2084
-18%
1999
-21%
1622
-36%
2501 ?(2141 - 2696, n=4)
-1%
Write 4K Q32T1
475.1
407.3
-14%
375.9
-21%
467
-2%
419 ?(355 - 475, n=4)
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
590
474.6
-20%
398.5
-32%
525
-11%
520 ?(362 - 590, n=4)
-12%
Write Seq Q32T1
2373
3069
29%
1015
-57%
1203
-49%
2463 ?(2373 - 2526, n=4)
4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3068
3154
3%
3049
-1%
2288
-25%
2997 ?(2556 - 3242, n=4)
-2%
AS SSD
47%
-44%
-35%
8%
Seq Read
2241
2369
6%
1933
-14%
1386
-38%
2688 ?(2241 - 2873, n=4)
20%
Seq Write
2121
2446
15%
787
-63%
1234
-42%
1888 ?(1017 - 2240, n=4)
-11%
4K Read
52.3
40.61
-22%
26.4
-50%
41.32
-21%
53.3 ?(52.3 - 53.9, n=4)
2%
4K Write
116.2
103.2
-11%
109.8
-6%
128
10%
124.8 ?(116.2 - 140.2, n=4)
7%
4K-64 Read
713
1637
130%
848
19%
854
20%
714 ?(713 - 716, n=4)
0%
4K-64 Write
827
1961
137%
923
12%
721
-13%
1114 ?(827 - 1376, n=4)
35%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.06
-11%
0.044
19%
0.098
-81%
0.05575 ?(0.043 - 0.077, n=4)
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.036
-16%
0.158
-410%
0.095
-206%
0.03125 ?(0.027 - 0.036, n=4)
-1%
Score Read
989
1915
94%
1067
8%
1034
5%
1036 ?(989 - 1057, n=4)
5%
Score Write
1155
2309
100%
1112
-4%
973
-16%
1428 ?(1155 - 1714, n=4)
24%
Score Total
2659
5205
96%
2669
0%
2536
-5%
2968 ?(2659 - 3279, n=4)
12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
22% / 26%
-38% / -39%
-29% / -30%
4% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 Performance
19910 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39445 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16759 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
6920 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43982 Points +85%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
27298 Points +15%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
25706 Points +8%
Aorus 15P WB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
23780 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 27694, n=31)
22548 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21338 Points -10%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
144664 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
125143 Points +5%
Aorus 15P WB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
119655 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 134255, n=28)
94310 Points -21%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
72335 Points -40%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31524 Points +70%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
21004 Points +13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
18807 Points +1%
Aorus 15P WB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18582 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 21191, n=31)
17489 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16355 Points -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13169 Points +92%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7826 Points +14%
Aorus 15P WB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6871 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5948 - 8065, n=28)
6745 Points -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
6312 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6012 Points -13%
The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Doom Eternal | X-Plane 11.11 | Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | Yakuza Like a Dragon | Star Wars Squadrons
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years)
129 fps +85%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
78.2 (73min - 82max) fps +12%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
69.8 (54min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (56 - 83.8, n=31)
66.3 fps -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
59.1 (49min) fps -15%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)
131.2 fps +35%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
97 (79min - 112max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (67 - 101, n=7)
88.7 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps -14%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years)
170 fps +30%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (125.6 - 137.9, n=4)
130.4 fps -1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
114.6 fps -13%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (61.6 - 85.3, n=11)
79 fps 0%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
78.8 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
77.6 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
77.5 fps -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
33.7 fps -57%
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War - 1920x1080 Highest Settings
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 (40.3min, 45.3P0.1, 49.2P1 - 177max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  ()
64.1 fps 0%
Yakuza Like a Dragon - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (109.6 - 152.3, n=2, last 2 years)
131 fps +82%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
72 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  ()
72 fps 0%
Star Wars Squadrons - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
172.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  ()
172.4 fps 0%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Aorus 15P WB GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø74.3 (68-78)
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø55.8 (52-61)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04: Ø70.2 (66-77)
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
lågmed.högultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 275.4 222.4 129.2 69.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 150.7 136.2 124.8 115.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 106 93.3 78.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 132 109 102 97
Doom Eternal (2020) 260.8 152.7 136.4 131.1
Crysis Remastered (2020) 196 117 56.6 43
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 272.2 192.7 182.4 172.4
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 107 88 77 51
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 113 75 63 55
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 159 79.3 70.5 64.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 111.1 80.8 81.1 72
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 117 78 66 61
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 106 62 51.5 43.8

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29 / 30 / 31 dB(A)
Hög belastning
41 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.747.844.341.144.62535.940.940.938.141.93141.95247.645.648.84030.736.53331.636.85037.82926.92531.56331.533.427.330.340.98026.232.52118.42610025.52020.917.624.412529.421.520.316.226.916030.321.220.717.828.420029.823.822.422.13025028.321.420.52029.731529.520.819.614.631.340028.521.220.712.432.150029.220.919.312.331.963029.720.218.612.332.380029.422.61811.532.9100030.221.81811.534.2125030.722.418.711.735.5160031.221.218.311.935.7200029.919.918.111.934.4250028.621.918.81232.6315029.616.815.412.632.1400028.31514.21334.6500023.91514.113.430.3630021.714.714.213.726.180001914.113.713.222.91000016.413.813.61319.61250016.113.213.312.616.51600018.513.112.511.715.2SPL40.731.829.42544.8N3.61.51.20.74.9median 29.2median 20.8median 18.3median 12.6median 31.3Delta3.82.92.92.13.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 15P WB
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-3%
-7%
1%
1%
off / environment *
25
25
-0%
25.7
-3%
28
-12%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
29
25
14%
25.7
11%
28
3%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
30
29
3%
29.7
1%
28
7%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years)
9%
Idle Maximum *
31
34
-10%
34
-10%
28
10%
30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years)
2%
Load Average *
41
44
-7%
38.9
5%
28
32%
42.8 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years)
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
49
-14%
54.1
-26%
50.6
-18%
Load Maximum *
45
49
-9%
57.4
-28%
50.6
-12%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 42 °C43 °C47 °C 
 33 °C45 °C43 °C 
 27 °C28 °C30 °C 
Max: 47 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C
61 °C62 °C47 °C
62 °C60 °C43 °C
33 °C29 °C32 °C
Max: 62 °C
Medel: 47.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-18%
-4%
-7%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
55
-17%
53.4
-14%
53
-13%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=153, last 2 years)
2%
Maximum Bottom *
62
65
-5%
49
21%
57.6
7%
49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=153, last 2 years)
21%
Idle Upper Side *
26
32
-23%
29.6
-14%
27.4
-5%
31.3 ?(23 - 42.8, n=153, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Bottom *
27
34
-26%
29.4
-9%
31
-15%
32.3 ?(23 - 43.6, n=153, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.1412538.139.63145.651.94031.635.4502528.16330.328.88018.423.210017.621.212516.222.716017.831.620022.142.12502055.231514.655.540012.456.850012.359.363012.362.280011.564.9100011.568.8125011.768160011.966200011.963.725001258.9315012.660.440001359.7500013.463.8630013.765.3800013.257.4100001356.11250012.654.61600011.751.6SPL2575.9N0.736.7median 12.6median 58.9Delta2.18.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 15P WB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 15P WB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.9 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 13 / 15 / 19 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 100 / 249 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
22%
-33%
27%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
13
4
69%
16.2
-25%
6.5
50%
13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Average *
15
10
33%
24.1
-61%
10.6
29%
19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-27%
Idle Maximum *
19
19
-0%
30.8
-62%
11
42%
26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years)
-42%
Load Average *
100
96
4%
127.6
-28%
84.1
16%
106.1 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years)
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
150
136
9%
187.5
-25%
152.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
249
214
14%
239
4%
180.4
28%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
11tim 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 87)
7tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 04min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 16min
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh		Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-23%
-10%
-17%
-20%
Reader / Idle
680
575
-15%
671
-1%
574 ?(239 - 1290, n=65, last 2 years)
-16%
H.264
484
413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years)
-15%
WiFi v1.3
427
329
-23%
385
-10%
372
-13%
378 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)
-11%
Load
136
92
-32%
87
-36%
85.8 ?(41 - 173, n=115, last 2 years)
-37%

För

+ Matt IPS-skärm
+ 144 Hz panel
+ Kompakt hölje
+ Smal skärminfattning
+ Hög systemprestanda
+ NVMe SSD
+ Plats för en andra SSD
+ Bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord (RGB)
+ Riktigt bra WLAN-överföringshastigheter
+ Blixtsnabb minneskortsläsare
+ Riktigt bra batteritid

Emot

- Skärmen kunde haft högre kontrast och ljusstyrka
- Höljets kanter är vassa
- Varm vid belastning
- Saknar Thunderbolt
Aorus 15P WB-7DE1130SH, recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus 15P WB-7DE1130SH, recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Gigabyte har släppt en kompakt spellaptop på 15.6 tum i form av Aorus 15P WB, och den kan visa alla moderna spel smidigt på sin skärm tack vare en Core i7-10750H processor och ett GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q grafikkort. Det går oftast att välja Full HD och höga eller maximala grafikinställningar.

Aorus 15P WB är en välavrundad spellaptop som inte har några större svagheter.

Hårdvaran har stöd av 16 GB RAM (2x 8 GB, dubbla kanaler, max 64 GB) samt en NVMe SSD på 512 GB. Lagringskapaciteten är inte direkt generös för en spellaptop. Det går dock att sätta i en andra NVMe SSD vid behov. Eftersom det är lätt att ta bort bottenplattan borde datorn vara enkel att uppgradera.

Skärmen (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz) har stabila betraktningsvinklar, en matt yta, snabba responstider, bra färgåtergivning och ett skapligt färgomfång. Men den kunde haft högre ljusstyrka och kontrast. Tangentbordet (som har RGB-bakgrundsbelysning) visade sig passa bra för vardagsbruk. Vidare måste vi nämna den utmärkta batteritiden. En laddning är tillräckligt för en praktisk batteritid på 7-8 timmar - det finns gott om kontorslaptops som inte klarar det.

Aorus 15P WB - 01/02/2021 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
82%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
62 / 80 → 78%
Vikt
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batteri
75 / 95 → 79%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
94%
Programprestanda
91%
Temperatur
81 / 95 → 85%
Ljudnivå
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
66%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Medel
76%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Aorus 15P WB (15P Serie)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Aorus 15P WB - Kompakt kraftpaket med riktigt bra batteritid (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2021-01-11 (Update: 2024-11- 4)