Test: Aorus X5 v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070, UHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X5 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X5 v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X5 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X5 v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P56XT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 307 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1023:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.79 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), 3840x2160, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v6 2880x1620, 15.6" | Gigabyte P56XT LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 ID: AUO52ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN05.2, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -5% | -1% | -2% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 62.5 -4% | 64.8 -1% | 66.4 2% | 65.9 1% | 63.9 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.9 | 86.2 -6% | 84.6 -8% | 88.9 -3% | 87.8 -4% | 83.1 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 62.5 -6% | 61.8 -7% | 65.1 -2% | 64.2 -3% | 60.8 -8% |
| Response Times | 1% | 11% | 50% | 60% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 34 ? 23% | 37.2 ? 15% | 24 ? 45% | 20.8 ? 53% | 37 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 32 ? -21% | 24.8 ? 6% | 12 ? 55% | 8.8 ? 67% | 25 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 | 20000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -3% | -14% | -38% | -48% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 307 | 280.4 -9% | 301 -2% | 357 16% | 416.2 36% | 310 1% |
| Brightness | 297 | 271 -9% | 280 -6% | 365 23% | 409 38% | 311 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 83 -10% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% | 94 2% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.249 17% | 0.32 -7% | 0.5 -67% | 0.86 -187% | 0.3 -0% |
| Contrast | 1023 | 1126 10% | 941 -8% | 714 -30% | 484 -53% | 1033 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.72 | 4.94 -5% | 6.21 -32% | 9.93 -110% | 8.4 -78% | 4.82 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.07 | 8.13 -1% | 10.78 -34% | 14.87 -84% | 15.4 -91% | 10.14 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.79 | 5.13 -7% | 6.08 -27% | 10.32 -115% | 11.2 -134% | 3.94 18% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.23 99% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 7690 85% | 7433 87% | 7375 88% | 10096 64% | 10036 65% | 6877 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 55.9 -7% | 55 -8% | 58 -3% | 57.2 -5% | 54 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 85.9 -7% | 84 -9% | 89 -3% | 87.3 -5% | 83 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-3% | -3% /
-9% | 4% /
-19% | 3% /
-24% | 0% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4718 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Aorus X5 v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Aorus X5 v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 3% | 14% | 2% | -47% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 556 | 358.7 -35% | 546 -2% | 511 -8% | 257.9 -54% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 697 | 688 -1% | 668 -4% | 524 -25% | 388.4 -44% |
| Write 4k | 137.8 | 158.8 15% | 177.5 29% | 152.7 11% | 122.8 -11% |
| Read 4k | 44 | 53 20% | 59.1 34% | 58.8 34% | 38.55 -12% |
| Write 512 | 1101 | 1221 11% | 1216 10% | 1132 3% | 286.9 -74% |
| Read 512 | 1086 | 990 -9% | 873 -20% | 840 -23% | 462 -57% |
| Write Seq | 1076 | 1275 18% | 1635 52% | 1521 41% | 422.8 -61% |
| Read Seq | 1479 | 1565 6% | 1718 16% | 1219 -18% | 521 -65% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17468 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30201 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13827 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Doom | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Aorus X5 v7 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 264.4 | 192.1 | 86.8 | 61.1 | 39.19 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 250 | 183.6 | 117.7 | 96.9 | 36.52 |
| Doom (2016) | 169.4 | 169.7 | 144.2 | 139.4 | 53.3 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 35 / 36 / 40 dB(A) |
| Hårddisk |
| 33 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 43 / 55 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 4% | -1% | 9% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.3 2% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 28 7% | 30 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 33.4 5% | 34 3% | 33 6% | 28.5 19% | 34 3% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 35.2 2% | 35 3% | 34 6% | 29.2 19% | 35 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 35.2 12% | 39 2% | 44 -10% | 35.5 11% | 36 10% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 53.3 -24% | 39 9% | 46 -7% | 47 -9% | 40 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 48 2% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 57.6 -5% | 49 11% | 52 5% | 51 7% | 46 16% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -13% | -3% | 2% | 18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 64 | 57 11% | 65 -2% | 49.2 23% | 50 22% | 40.6 37% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 54 4% | 71 -27% | 62 -11% | 52.2 7% | 48.4 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 36.2 -25% | 35 -21% | 32.4 -12% | 33.2 -14% | 26.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 38 -27% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% | 32.4 -8% | 26.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X5 v7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.5 / 0.8 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 26 / 31 / 36 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
93 / 240 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | 28% | 29% | 12% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25 4% | 13 50% | 14 46% | 22 15% | 20 23% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 28.9 7% | 17 45% | 18 42% | 24.5 21% | 24 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 30.1 16% | 22 39% | 24 33% | 25.2 30% | 29 19% |
| Load Average * | 93 | 167.3 -80% | 85 9% | 87 6% | 97.2 -5% | 82 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 176 | 154 12% | 177.5 -1% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 240 | 222.6 7% | 208 13% | 201 16% | 213.8 11% | 193 20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 91.2 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 20% | 124% | 30% | 15% | 54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 208 | 249 20% | 568 173% | 204 -2% | 377 81% | |
| H.264 | 163 | 370 127% | 213 31% | 252 55% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 151 | 182 21% | 384 154% | 195 29% | 174 15% | 246 63% |
| Load | 84 | 100 19% | 120 43% | 110 31% | 98 17% |
För
Emot
Aorus X5 V7 är en bra spelmaskin som har förbättrats avsevärt sen sin föregångare, V6. Den bra 4K-skärmen, dom många portarna inklusive Thunderbolt 3, makroknapparna och Aorus verktyg för överklockning och snabba ändringar av viktiga inställningar är utmärkta tillägg.
Men, det finns några små brister som inkluderar hög energiförbrukning och låg batteritid. Potentiella köpare får själva bestämma om flyttbarhet eller energiförbrukning är viktigt för dom. Temperaturhanteringen kunde också varit bättre, trots det förbättrade kylsystemet - särskilt runt WASD-knapparna, som är så viktiga för gamers.
Aorus X5 V7 kommer göra dom flesta gamers glada då den erbjuder kraftfull hårdvara och bra spelprestanda. Men dess tunna hölje låtsas bara erbjuda hög mobilitet, för hög energiförbrukning och kort batteritid säger något annat.
Allt som allt, Aorus är fortfarande en välgjord spellaptop och det går att se att utvecklare och designers har ansträngt sig för att skapa en så bra dator som möjligt. Men den nya Aorus är inte billig och kostar runt ~22 200 SEK ($2700). Detta gör den till den dyraste enheten bland alla vi jämfört med. Dess poäng sätter den dock inte på toppen. Jämförbara enheter finns tillgängliga från ~20 500 SEK ($2500) men då får du ge avkall på 4K-skärmen. Intresserade köpare får själva välja om skärm och andra funktioner är värda det högre priset.
Aorus X5 v7
- 10/08/2017 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze
Price comparison
