Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Aorus X7 DT v6 (sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 339.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 754:1 (Svärta: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
| Aorus X7 DT v6 AUO1096, TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT73VR 6RF IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 3% | 5% | 11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 59.6 | 60.9 2% | 64.5 8% | 66.6 12% | 63.6 7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.8 | 84.2 2% | 83.1 0% | 84.1 2% | 95.8 16% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.1 | 61.2 2% | 60.8 1% | 61.5 2% | 65.7 9% |
| Response Times | -10% | -75% | -77% | -92% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 21.6 ? | 31 ? -44% | 38 ? -76% | 37 ? -71% | 33.6 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.2 ? | 10 ? 24% | 23 ? -74% | 24 ? -82% | 30 ? -127% |
| PWM Frequency | 59.5 | ||||
| Screen | -5% | 13% | 21% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 339.5 | 343 1% | 315 -7% | 362 7% | 334.8 -1% |
| Brightness | 309 | 312 1% | 290 -6% | 342 11% | 316 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 80 0% | 85 6% | 87 9% | 87 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.5 -11% | 0.32 29% | 0.31 31% | 0.422 6% |
| Contrast | 754 | 686 -9% | 984 31% | 1168 55% | 793 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.88 | 7.33 -7% | 4.88 29% | 4.5 35% | 4.11 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.99 | 10.79 -8% | 8.88 11% | 9.31 7% | 7.8 22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.57 | 7.6 -16% | 4.17 37% | 3.48 47% | 5.74 13% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.19 100% | 2.53 87% | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 8608 76% | 9024 72% | 6683 97% | 6144 106% | 5987 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 55 2% | 55 2% | 55 2% | 60.5 12% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 84 2% | 83 1% | 84 2% | 96 17% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-4% | -20% /
-1% | -17% /
5% | -23% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.5 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5096 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 8478 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5353 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Aorus X7 DT v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | MSI GT73VR 6RF 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0) | Eurocom Sky X7E2 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -67% | -38% | -37% | -1% | |
| Read Seq | 1829 | 485.4 -73% | 1156 -37% | 914 -50% | 1673 -9% |
| Write Seq | 1588 | 312.4 -80% | 294.9 -81% | 916 -42% | 1576 -1% |
| Read 512 | 1064 | 294.8 -72% | 616 -42% | 698 -34% | 1180 11% |
| Write 512 | 1507 | 287.8 -81% | 294.7 -80% | 916 -39% | 1561 4% |
| Read 4k | 52.9 | 21.44 -59% | 42.7 -19% | 31.37 -41% | 51.5 -3% |
| Write 4k | 161.1 | 75.7 -53% | 153.3 -5% | 65.7 -59% | 144 -11% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 676 | 149.4 -78% | 600 -11% | 425 -37% | 694 3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 419.1 | 256.3 -39% | 295.3 -30% | 441.8 5% | 422.1 1% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| MSI GT73VR 6RF | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34143 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19769 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 169818 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31695 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16908 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 9557 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mafia 2 (2010) | 214.6 | |||
| Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 140.6 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 164.7 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 130 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 125 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 141 | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 124 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 118 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 153 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 32.2 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 51.7 / 55.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | MSI GT73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | 6% | 3% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 30 -5% | 30 -5% | 30 -5% | 29.2 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.2 | 33 -2% | 32 1% | 33 -2% | 32 1% |
| Idle Average * | 35.2 | 35 1% | 33 6% | 34 3% | 32 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35.2 | 40 -14% | 34 3% | 35 1% | 35 1% |
| Load Average * | 51.7 | 43 17% | 39 25% | 45 13% | 50 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.7 | 54 3% | 51 8% | 52 7% | 64 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.2 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
Aorus X7 DT v6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 6.6 / 12.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 31.5 / 33.9 / 34.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
205.6 / 250.8 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X7 DT v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT73VR 6RF 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 33% | 31% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 29 8% | 20 37% | 19 40% | 28.9 8% |
| Idle Average * | 33.9 | 31 9% | 24 29% | 25 26% | 30.6 10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34.6 | 38 -10% | 29 16% | 31 10% | 33.1 4% |
| Load Average * | 205.6 | 111 46% | 86 58% | 90 56% | 224.4 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 250.8 | 253 -1% | 183 27% | 193 23% | 302.6 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X7 DT v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94 Wh | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 62 Wh | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh | MSI GT73VR 6RF 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 26% | 11% | 77% | 25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 182 | 243 34% | 432 137% | 306 68% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 144 | 182 26% | 196 36% | 247 72% | 198 38% |
| Load | 94 | 58 -38% | 115 22% | 65 -31% |
För
Emot
AORUS X7 DT v6 är en av de mest kraftfulla bärbara speldatorer vi testat hittills här på Notebookcheck och är dessutom betydligt lättare än de flesta av konkurrenterna. Tack vare GPU-kraften från ett Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080, en Core i7-6820HK med olåst multiplikator – och inte minst Gigabytes utmärkta systemprogramvara – kan AORUS X7 DT v6 enkelt överklockas från start. I kombination med sin effektiva (och innovativa) kylning toppar maskinen praktiskt taget alla prestandatester.
Datorn åstadkommer allt detta med en vikt på endast 3,25 kg och ett elegant magnesiumchassi som bara är 30 mm tjockt. X7 kan bokstavligen hantera alla spel, förmodligen med maxade inställningar och en upplösning på 1440p.
Skärmen är för övrigt också en höjdpunkt på många sätt; trots att det är bara en TN-panel har den snabba svarstider och en uppdateringsfrekvens på 120 Hz som drar maximal nytta av det snabba grafikkortet. Den enda invändningen, som visserligen kan vara viktig för många, är att det förekommer synliga horisontella linjer på panelen p.g.a. skärmtekniken. Detta märks visserligen bara på statiska bilder och inte under rörelse (oavsett om det handlar om film eller spel).
Inmatningsenheterna är också mycket bra, chassit är välbyggt och helheten känns som en påtaglig uppgradering jämfört med tidigare modeller i AORUS-serien. Bristerna är relativt få till antalet. Högtalarna är en besvikelse, men låter bättre efter lite mixtrande med inställningarna.
Datorn är också som väntat ganska högljudd under belastning, men användaren har direkt kontroll över oljud/prestanda tack vare Gigabytes ”Command & Control”-mjukvara. Slutligen är batteritiden ganska dålig tack vare den höga strömförbrukningen av avsaknaden av växlingsbar grafik – men om någon mot förmodan funderat på en X7 för att få bra batteritid måste vi föreslå en omvärdering av prioriteringarna.
Kort sagt är det här en av de bästa bärbara speldatorer vi har testat hittills. Om du kan och vill bränna ett stort hål i plånboken kommer du inte att bli besviken.
Aorus X7 DT v6
-
12/05/2016 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
