Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Aorus X9 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070 SLI, QHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Dubbel Turbo. Medans dom flesta tillverkare endast ger sina spellaptops en dedikerad grafikenhet så ger Gigabyte sin helt nya 17-tums Aorus X9 med två Nvidia GPU:er. Vi kommer ta reda på huruvida det finns någon anledning att använda ett GeForce GTX 1070 i SLI-läge eller om denna funktion har fler nackdelar än fördelar.
Aorus X9 (X9 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7820HK 4 x 2.9 - 3.9 GHz @ 4.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) - 2x 8192 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1493 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 387.92
Minne
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Kanal, två av fyra platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 170 PPI, AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), TN, QHD, 120 HZ, X-Rite Pantone-certifierad, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Hårddisk
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
, SSD. enhetsplatser: 2x M2 Typ 2280 (PCIe/NVMe eller SATA-III) & 1x 2.5-tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: hörlur (S/PDIF), mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 30 x 428 x 314
Batteri
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2x 2-watt högtalare + 2x 2-watt woofer, Tangentbord: chiclet, RGB, mekaniskt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 330-watts nätadapter, Aorus-klistermärke, rengöringsduk, Snabbstarts-guide, garanti-information, USB-sticka med drivrutiner, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 Testversion, XSplit Broadcaster Testversion, XSplit Gamecaster Testversion, diverse verktyg från tillverkaren, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.634 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.168 kg
Pris
3600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg428 mm 334 mm 53 mm 4.5 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.3 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.6 kg424 mm 332 mm 29.9 mm 4.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
left side: RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, card reader, headphone jack, microphone jack
left side: RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, card reader, headphone jack, microphone jack
back: power supply
back: power supply
right: 2x USB-A 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, HDMI 2.0
right: 2x USB-A 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, HDMI 2.0
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199 MB/s
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s -58%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s -60%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -63%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -63%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s +16%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s +10%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s +4%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s +77%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s +75%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s +72%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s +53%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
396 MBit/s
324
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 346 cd/m²
Kontrast: 641:1 (Svärta: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.47 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Aorus X9
AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), 2560x1440, 17.3"
Alienware 17 R4
2560x1440, 17.3"
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3"
Display
-0%
37%
4%
41%
Display P3 Coverage
60.6
61.2
1%
90.3
49%
61.6
2%
86.4
43%
sRGB Coverage
84
82.9
-1%
99.6
19%
90.3
8%
99.9
19%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.1
60.5
-1%
86.8
42%
62.8
3%
99.1
62%
Response Times
-67%
22%
-181%
-210%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
30 ?(18.8, 11.2)
-39%
11.6 ?(6.4, 5.2)
46%
36 ?(18, 18)
-67%
50 ?(24.4, 25.6)
-131%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(4.6, 2)
12.8 ?(10.8, 2)
-94%
6.8 ?(4.8, 2)
-3%
26 ?(14.4, 11.6)
-294%
25.6 ?(11.2, 14.4)
-288%
PWM Frequency
25000 ?(15)
Screen
3%
36%
5%
29%
Brightness middle
346
402.3
16%
274
-21%
307
-11%
343
-1%
Brightness
326
372
14%
262
-20%
300
-8%
328
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
87
-1%
88
0%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.54
0.62
-15%
0.26
52%
0.32
41%
0.29
46%
Contrast
641
649
1%
1054
64%
959
50%
1183
85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.98
5.6
6%
1.36
77%
5.53
8%
4.01
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.77
9.8
-0%
4.1
58%
11.54
-18%
6.03
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.47
4.7
14%
0.64
88%
7
-28%
4.7
14%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.14 103%
2.19 100%
2.48 89%
2.4 92%
CCT
7721 84%
7519 86%
6551 99%
8103 80%
6451 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
53.7
-2%
77
40%
58
5%
88
60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
82.2
-2%
100
19%
90
7%
100
19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -7%
32% / 34%
-57% / -20%
-47% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.19 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
837 Points
Hjälp
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points -2%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -7%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points +4%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points -9%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points -11%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -8%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points -8%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points +4%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points -9%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points -11%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points -12%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points +4%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points +2%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points +1%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5020 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points -12%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points +4%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points +3%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5240 Points
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points -3%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points -13%
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5611 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5211 Points -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5020 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5240 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5611 poäng
Hjälp
Aorus X9
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD
-72%
1%
-11%
-26%
Seq Read
2695
1752
-35%
3137
16%
2824
5%
2237
-17%
Seq Write
1678
735
-56%
2352
40%
1554
-7%
1230
-27%
4K Read
50.6
35.61
-30%
50.1
-1%
49.71
-2%
37.51
-26%
4K Write
134.3
113.4
-16%
128.8
-4%
138.9
3%
120.8
-10%
4K-64 Read
1214
620
-49%
1048
-14%
744
-39%
851
-30%
4K-64 Write
1176
671
-43%
925
-21%
1185
1%
646
-45%
Access Time Read *
0.039
0.042
-8%
0.041
-5%
0.058
-49%
0.052
-33%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.123
-339%
0.029
-4%
0.027
4%
0.033
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3450 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1705 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 547 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2275 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1694 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 160.5 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
10603 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
7166 Points -32%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
5651 Points -47%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
5238 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
32640 Points
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21846 Points -33%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21366 Points -35%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
18346 Points -44%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16847 Points -48%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
41469 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29109 Points -30%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
26438 Points -36%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
24349 Points -41%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
22510 Points -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
23326 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
166876 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32510 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20379 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8931 poäng
Hjälp
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
69.3 fps
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
52.6 fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
50.4 fps -27%
Battlefield 1 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
74.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
58.7 fps -21%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
50.9 (43min) fps -31%
Titanfall 2 - 3840x2160 High / Enabled AA:TS AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
68.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
56.8 fps -17%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
41.7 (30min) fps -39%
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
73.1 fps +25%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
58.6 fps
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
58.3 (43min) fps -1%
Dishonored 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:TX
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
60 fps
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
52.3 fps -13%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
35.9 (30min) fps -40%
Watch Dogs 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
59 fps
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
41.1 fps -30%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
34.6 (31min) fps -41%
Resident Evil 7 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FXAA+T
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
55.6 fps +32%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
43.4 (36min) fps +3%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
42 fps
For Honor - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
83.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K
53 fps -37%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
43.4 (34min) fps -48%
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
53.1 fps
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
40.9 fps -23%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
32 (24min) fps -40%
Prey - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
79.1 fps
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
68.2 fps -14%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
51.7 (43min) fps -35%
Rocket League - 3840x2160 High Quality AA:High FX
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
141 fps
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
110 fps -22%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
85.3 (72min) fps -40%
F1 2017 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
58 fps +38%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
45 (41min) fps +7%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
42 fps
Ark Survival Evolved - 3840x2160 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
25.8 fps
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
17.2 fps -33%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
13.8 (13min) fps -47%
FIFA 18 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700
198 fps +6%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
187 fps
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
155 (128min) fps -17%
lågmed.högultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 167 99.9 69.3
Battlefield 1 (2016) 143 129 74.1
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143 141 68.4
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 122 111 58.6
Dishonored 2 (2016) 92.4 78.6 60
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 111 90.9 59
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 146 123 42
For Honor (2017) 177 163 83.9
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 112 68.8 53.1
Prey (2017) 140 137 79.1
Rocket League (2017) 219 141
Dirt 4 (2017) 115 70.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 102 93.3 37.1
F1 2017 (2017) 132 89 42
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 88.6 53 25.8
FIFA 18 (2017) 330 310 187

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
35 / 37 / 43 dB(A)
Hög belastning
49 / 60 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Noise
7%
5%
14%
11%
off / environment *
30
28.2
6%
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
35
35.6
-2%
33
6%
30
14%
32
9%
Idle Average *
37
35.6
4%
34
8%
32
14%
35
5%
Idle Maximum *
43
35.7
17%
38
12%
36
16%
38
12%
Load Average *
49
50.2
-2%
44
10%
43
12%
42
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56
50.2
10%
56
-0%
43
23%
44
21%
Load Maximum *
60
50.2
16%
62
-3%
49
18%
50
17%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C47 °C46 °C 
 45 °C46 °C46 °C 
 40 °C43 °C44 °C 
Max: 47 °C
Medel: 44.7 °C
61 °C62 °C59 °C
61 °C61 °C56 °C
44 °C52 °C43 °C
Max: 62 °C
Medel: 55.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  52 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Heat
2%
-5%
16%
17%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
49.6
-6%
46
2%
41
13%
39.1
17%
Maximum Bottom *
62
56
10%
57
8%
39.3
37%
42.1
32%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.6
1%
34
-13%
28.8
4%
27.9
7%
Idle Bottom *
30
29.2
3%
35
-17%
27.3
9%
26.1
13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.750.12537.540.83130.834.14037.7385030.829.96327.329.98026.337.610025.242.812523.242.416021.650.220022.555.625021.760.831520.265.840018.765.150017.566.563017.769.380017.569.910001772.1125017.168.2160017.665.9200017.469.4250017.168.6315017.572.9400017.568500017.569.4630017.468.1800017.359.31000018.2601250017.859.61600017.158.3SPL29.880.9N1.351.8median 17.5median 65.9Delta1.65.638.43834.534.235.135.231.833.23334.431.733.231.234.731.341.130.248.42853.127.551.427.851.52753.527.455.827.166.926.67126.67226.671.826.473.125.569.724.865.623.86822.772.322.47522.172.521.865.121.763.621.658.121.659.521.754.936.782.62.753.7median 26.4median 65.12.69hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X9Alienware 17 R4
Aorus X9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware 17 R4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 29 / 35 / 42 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 140 / 334 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Power Consumption
7%
-2%
33%
23%
Idle Minimum *
29
37.5
-29%
34
-17%
21
28%
23
21%
Idle Average *
35
37.6
-7%
41
-17%
27
23%
33
6%
Idle Maximum *
42
37.6
10%
50
-19%
32
24%
40
5%
Load Average *
140
122.4
13%
106
24%
86
39%
94
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
295
180.3
39%
257
13%
165
44%
177
40%
Load Maximum *
334
277.4
17%
320
4%
206
38%
228
32%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
2tim 54min
WiFi Websurfing
2tim 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 11min
Aorus X9
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh
Asus G752VS-BA338T
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh
Battery Runtime
30%
3%
99%
59%
Reader / Idle
174
276
59%
182
5%
445
156%
323
86%
H.264
138
148
7%
257
86%
WiFi v1.3
134
181
35%
144
7%
293
119%
218
63%
Load
71
69
-3%
65
-8%
96
35%
91
28%

För

+ upp till 3x lagringsenheter och 4x RAM
+ mekaniskt tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ tunt hölje i hög kvalitet
+ praktiska verktyg (inklusive fläktkontroll)
+ möjlighet till överklockning av CPU & GPU
+ utmärkt prestanda
+ X-Rite Pantone-certifierad
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ bra ljud
+ 120 Hz

Emot

- typiska SLI-svagheter (mikro-avbrott, beroende av drivrutiner)
- medioker QHD-skärm (betraktningsvinklar, svärta, kontrast)
- ytor och moderkort blir snabbt smutsiga
- enhetens botten blir varm
- problem med ljudnivå
- låg batteritid
- väldigt stor nätadapter
- ingen G-Sync
Aorus X9, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus X9, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

Trots att X9 är utrustad med två grafikenheter visar Gigabyte upp en väldigt tunn och, med tanke på dess prestanda, hyfsat lätt spellaptop som kan imponera med sitt högkvalitativa metall-hölje, lekfulla design (oavsett om du gillar den eller inte) och ett mekaniskt tangentbord.

Det sistnämnda är en särskilt god nyhet och får 17 tums-enheten att stå ut bland många andra exklusiva laptops. Den har också bra anslutbarhet som kan hålla jämna steg med konkurrensen. X9 är till exempel utrustad med en modern Thunderbolt 3-port.

Vi var mindre nöjda med QHD-skärmen, som stödjer 120 Hz, har låg responstid och är certifierad för X-Rite Pantone, men som även har dålig kontrastratio, svärta och instabila bektraktningsvinklar. Vi blev också besvikna på batteritiden och systemets ljudnivå. 17 tums-enheten blir helt enkelt för högljudd vid 3D-applikationer för vår smak. Det bra ljudsystemet kan inte helt kompensera för dessa brister.

Att välja att använda SLI-teknologi har skapat ytterligare fördelar och svårigheter. Å ena sidan så kan Aorus X9 erbjuda överträffande prestanda i program kompatibla med dual-GPU, som till och med får modeller med GTX 1080 att skämmas. Å andra sidan så har den extra GPU:n - överraskande - en negativ inverkan på kylningen (temperatur och ljudnivå), energiåtgång och mobilitet - detta utöver faktum att alla aktuella spel inte ens stödjer SLI, vilket för dessa fall gör en extra GTX 1070 överflödig.

Med det höga beroendet på drivrutiner och en tendens till mikro-avbrott så är system med dual-GPU gjorda för riktiga entusiaster snarare än en genomsnittlig spelare. Om du helt enkelt vill slå på enheten och spela, utan att konstant behöva bry dig om drivrutinsuppdateringar och fortfarande förvänta dig bra prestanda för upplösningar över 1920x1080 så borde du hålla dig till en dator med en enkel GPU. (Med GeForce GTX 1070 eller GTX 1080). Generellt så är Aorus X9 inte riktigt tillräckligt bra för att komma med i vår rankinglista Topp 10 Speldatorer.

Aorus X9 - 04/14/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Design
78 / 98 → 79%
Tangentbord
87%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
66 / 81 → 81%
Vikt
52 / 10-66 → 76%
Batteri
64%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
99%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
68 / 95 → 72%
Ljudnivå
46 / 90 → 51%
Audio
85%
Medel
75%
84%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Aorus X9 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070 SLI, QHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2017-11- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)