Test: Apple MacBook Pro 13 (sent 2016, utan Touch Bar) (sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Klaus I211) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (Klaus I211) | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Intel NUC5i5RYH (Klaus I211) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Klaus I211) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (Klaus I211) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
Intel NUC5i5RYH (Klaus I211) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 600 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1053:1 (Svärta: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 APPA02A, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), , 2560x1440, 12.5" | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, , 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -23% | -17% | -50% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 65.9 -32% | 62.8 -35% | 68.7 -29% | 40.1 -59% | 66.8 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 97 -3% | 89.4 -10% | 95.8 -4% | 59.8 -40% | 95.4 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.7 | 67.4 -22% | 64.6 -25% | 69.9 -19% | 41.51 -52% | 68 -22% |
Response Times | 26% | 29% | 27% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.2 ? | 43.6 ? 8% | 37 ? 22% | 41.2 ? 13% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 51.6 ? | 29.2 ? 43% | 33.4 ? 35% | 30.4 ? 41% | ||
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
Screen | -9% | -44% | -49% | -58% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 600 | 361 -40% | 396.2 -34% | 402 -33% | 329 -45% | 387 -35% |
Brightness | 564 | 342 -39% | 357 -37% | 382 -32% | 310 -45% | 358 -37% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 84 -6% | 88 -1% | 82 -8% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.361 37% | 0.266 53% | 0.45 21% | 0.405 29% | 0.47 18% |
Contrast | 1053 | 1000 -5% | 1489 41% | 893 -15% | 812 -23% | 823 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.82 -21% | 3.9 -160% | 3.6 -140% | 3.96 -164% | 1.6 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 3.26 -12% | 7.58 -161% | 7.5 -159% | 7.51 -159% | 4 -38% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 4.16 -108% | 4.3 -115% | 3.51 -76% | 1 50% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.49 88% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 3.83 57% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6855 95% | 6417 101% | 6514 100% | 6572 99% | 6711 97% | 6680 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77 | 61.9 -20% | 57.5 -25% | 62.3 -19% | 38.4 -50% | 61.6 -20% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 96.9 5% | 88.7 -4% | 95.7 4% | 59.8 -35% | 82.2 -11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-12% | -14% /
-31% | -12% /
-32% | -54% /
-56% | -1% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
51.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 43.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.6 ms rise | |
↘ 25.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3280 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4205 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3853 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Apple SSD SM0128G | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple SSD SD0256F | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -1% | 9% | 117% | 140% | -21% | 112% | |
Read Seq | 1345 | 1403 4% | 1352 1% | 1214 -10% | 1178 -12% | 754 -44% | 1131 -16% |
Write Seq | 1320 | 657 -50% | 1111 -16% | 655 -50% | 305.4 -77% | 638 -52% | 311.4 -76% |
Read 512 | 831 | 810 -3% | 880 6% | 1019 23% | 638 -23% | 616 -26% | 685 -18% |
Write 512 | 1486 | 648 -56% | 1023 -31% | 445.7 -70% | 305.7 -79% | 678 -54% | 276.3 -81% |
Read 4k | 31.68 | 20.95 -34% | 21.93 -31% | 35.55 12% | 38.54 22% | 14.6 -54% | 39.63 25% |
Write 4k | 11.02 | 32.43 194% | 30.94 181% | 130 1080% | 153.4 1292% | 20.5 86% | 133.9 1115% |
Read 4k QD32 | 533 | 343.6 -36% | 339.5 -36% | 537 1% | 614 15% | 464 -13% | 399.7 -25% |
Write 4k QD32 | 362 | 254.4 -30% | 342.9 -5% | 173.8 -52% | 302.7 -16% | 315 -13% | 245.6 -32% |
AS SSD | 7% | 10% | 80% | 116% | -12% | 92% | |
Seq Read | 2275 | 1233 -46% | 1212 -47% | 1346 -41% | 1332 -41% | 1056 -54% | 1323 -42% |
Seq Write | 1435 | 616 -57% | 1001 -30% | 586 -59% | 283.6 -80% | 651 -55% | 235.3 -84% |
4K Read | 13.3 | 20.6 55% | 19.16 44% | 31.64 138% | 35.2 165% | 16.4 23% | 35.4 166% |
4K Write | 15.4 | 30.2 96% | 23.73 54% | 95.6 521% | 127.2 726% | 22.1 44% | 108.3 603% |
4K-64 Read | 904 | 891 -1% | 1140 26% | 655 -28% | 891 -1% | 509 -44% | 767 -15% |
4K-64 Write | 417 | 221.2 -47% | 338.9 -19% | 205.6 -51% | 256.9 -38% | 283 -32% | 186.3 -55% |
Access Time Read * | 0.288 | 0.141 51% | 0.171 41% | 0.065 77% | 0.06 79% | 0.186 35% | 0.088 69% |
Access Time Write * | 0.123 | 0.155 | 0.033 | 0.03 | 0.035 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
3% | 10% /
9% | 99% /
99% | 128% /
129% | -17% /
-17% | 102% /
102% |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.3 | 11.6 | ||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 42 | 35.4 | 22.1 | |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 149 | 36.8 | 18.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.5 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.8 | 46.9 | 29.2 | 34.6 |
World of Warships (2015) | 73.3 | 33.5 | ||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 23.2 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24 small graphical problems (wrong clouds) | 16 small graphical problems (wrong clouds) | ||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 23 | 12 | ||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 13.3 | |||
Doom (2016) | 31.5 | |||
Overwatch (2016) | 68 | 47.6 | 21.3 | |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 35 | 20.5 | ||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 16.7 | |||
FIFA 17 (2016) | 61 small graphical problems | 72 small graphical problems | 0 small graphical problems | |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 11.3 | |||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 43.4 | 25.3 | 12.6 | |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 112 | 76 | 30.6 | 19.1 |
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 55.3 | 38.6 | 14.3 | |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 30 | 27.3 | ||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 17.3 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.17 / 0.6 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3 / 8.9 / 8.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
43.4 / 42.1 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 6650U, Iris Graphics 540, 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | 29% | 0% | -51% | -31% | -48% | |
Reader / Idle | 2557 | 1572 -39% | 654 -74% | 899 -65% | 833 -67% | ||
H.264 | 620 | 619 0% | 547 -12% | 397 -36% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 686 | 620 -10% | 554 -19% | 526 -23% | 293 -57% | 427 -38% | 340 -50% |
Load | 101 | 97 -4% | 208 106% | 137 36% | 79 -22% | 111 10% | 62 -39% |
För
Emot
Sammanfattning
Innan vi får tag i en modell med omtalade Touch Bar testar vi instegsmodellen av MacBook Pro 13, som blev tillgänglig omedelbart. Den är tänkt att ersätta MacBook Air på medellång sikt, men prislappen på ca 17 000 kr kan verka avskräckande. Däremot är hårdvaran nyare och snabbare än i Air.
Jämfört med förra MacBook Pro har däremot inte prestandan gynnats av 15-wattsprocessorn (Skylake) som används i instegsmodellen (28W i de dyrare modellerna med Touch Bar, liksom i föregångaren). Som väntat har ljudet blivit bättre, med högre volym och bättre ljudkvalitet. Skärmen är mer ljusstark än någonsin och gör bra ifrån sig i våra tester.
Efter de första testerna är allt positivt utom den rasslande fläkten i vår testmodell. Vi misstänker att det är en felaktig del eller en fraktskada som ligger bakom missljudet.