Test: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 524 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1333:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -10% | -22% | -22% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 97.9 -1% | 79.1 -20% | 63.6 -36% | 64.4 -35% | 85.9 -13% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.8 -1% | 93.8 -6% | 93.4 -7% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.6 | 85.9 -1% | 79.2 -9% | 64.9 -25% | 65.5 -24% | 99.1 14% |
Response Times | -6% | -36% | 63% | 66% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 48 ? -11% | 46.4 ? -7% | 16.8 ? 61% | 13.6 ? 69% | 44 ? -2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 33.8 ? -8% | 32 ? -3% | 11.2 ? 64% | 12 ? 62% | 22.8 ? 27% |
PWM Frequency | 117000 ? | 119000 ? 2% | 980 ? -99% | |||
Screen | -19% | -137% | -7% | -28% | -86% | |
Brightness middle | 520 | 545 5% | 494 -5% | 313 -40% | 304.3 -41% | 357.6 -31% |
Brightness | 492 | 523 6% | 457 -7% | 300 -39% | 293 -40% | 350 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 88 0% | 78 -11% | 80 -9% | 85 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.44 -13% | 0.34 13% | 0.33 15% | 0.38 3% | 0.35 10% |
Contrast | 1333 | 1239 -7% | 1453 9% | 948 -29% | 801 -40% | 1022 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.6 -33% | 5.2 -333% | 1.29 -8% | 1.79 -49% | 4.12 -243% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 3.8 -65% | 17.5 -661% | 2.04 11% | 3.69 -60% | 9.91 -331% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.9 -46% | 2.7 -108% | 0.69 47% | 1.1 15% | 1.8 -38% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6738 96% | 6834 95% | 7038 92% | 6550 99% | 6665 98% | 6613 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71.2 | 60 | 59.8 | 87.5 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | 94 | 92.8 | 100 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.23 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-12% | -61% /
-88% | 11% /
0% | 5% /
-12% | -24% /
-51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3735 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3836 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4575 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4805 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7910 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18251 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4961 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1775 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 79 | 51 | 27.6 | |||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.8 | |||||
GTA V (2015) | 157 | 44.9 | 22 | 13.3 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 96 | 55.1 | 34 | 19.7 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 85.3 | 94.6 | 71 | 68.7 | ||
World of Warships (2015) | 67.3 | 22 | ||||
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 180 | 76.4 | 62.9 | 17.4 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 30.5 | 24.3 | ||||
The Division (2016) | 33.7 | |||||
Overwatch (2016) | 235 | 165 | 91 | 45.1 | ||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 61.8 | 27.9 | 13.1 | |||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 134 | 39.2 | 35.6 | 15.2 | ||
Civilization VI (2016) | 39.4 | 29.4 | ||||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 26.9 | |||||
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 48.3 | |||||
For Honor (2017) | 114 | 72 | 41.4 | 31.2 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 69 | 32.5 | 29.7 | 13.3 | ||
Rocket League (2017) | 69.8 | 25.9 | ||||
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 171 | 175 | 165 | 139 | 47.3 | |
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 40 | |||||
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 98 | 41 | 29 | 21 | 9 | |
Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 38.8 | |||||
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 112 | 42 | 37.7 | 30.3 | 3.4 | |
Fortnite (2018) | 149 | 66 | 40 | 31.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.4 | 23.6 | 14.3 | 5.8 | ||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 81 | 27.6 | 25.5 | 19 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 63.7 | 47.7 | 42.1 | 21.4 | ||
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 453 | 108 | 37.4 | 23.8 | 11.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 74 | 37 | 33 | 31 | 10 | |
The Crew 2 (2018) | 59.9 | 38.8 | 38.3 | 35 | 10.3 | |
Monster Hunter World (2018) | 78 | 30 | 27.8 | 19.6 | ||
F1 2018 (2018) | 99 | 57 | 47 | 30 | 12 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 81 | 31 | 27 | 23 | 6 | |
FIFA 19 (2018) | 119 | 38.8 | ||||
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 102 | 53 | 50 | 36 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 50 | 31 | 25 | 14 | ||
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 48.7 | 43.5 | 40.4 | |||
Hitman 2 (2018) | 34.4 | 30.9 | 9.2 | |||
Fallout 76 (2018) | 33.1 | 31.4 | ||||
Battlefield V (2018) | 95 | 43.3 | 36.2 | 32.5 | ||
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 47.7 | 23.5 | ||||
Darksiders III (2018) | 144 | 39 | 29.8 | 25.4 | 7.8 | |
Just Cause 4 (2018) | 37.8 | 28.9 | 27.3 | |||
Apex Legends (2019) | 97 | 40.8 | 33.9 | 32.8 | ||
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 71 | 36 | 31 | 27 | 9 | |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 50.5 | 26.2 | 17 | 14.2 | 11 | 6.5 |
Anthem (2019) | 60 | 34.8 | 28.8 | 26.6 | ||
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 135 | 53.5 | 44.9 | 23.2 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 104 | 41 | 30 | |||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 92 | 39 | 20.8 | 10.7 | ||
Rage 2 (2019) | 65.4 | 18.8 | ||||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 105 | 30.2 | 19.1 | 13.6 | ||
League of Legends (2019) | 209 | 202 | 179 | 174 | 152 | |
F1 2019 (2019) | 120 | 55.5 | 50.7 | 30.8 | 22.4 | |
Control (2019) | 56.5 | 21.6 | 15.2 | |||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 78 | 33.6 | 20.8 | 15.8 | 10.8 | 3.1 |
FIFA 20 (2019) | 99 | 77 | 45.3 | |||
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 51 | 29 | 25 | 18 | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 94 | 43.4 | 33.5 | 20.5 | ||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 61 | 39 | 30.1 | 22.1 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 62 | 33.5 | 29.1 | 23.4 | 15.9 | |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 35.5 | 28.5 | 24.7 | 15.5 | ||
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 61 | 30.4 | 19 | 0 | ||
Hearthstone (2020) | 58.3 | |||||
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 87.8 | 37.2 | 33.5 | 16.3 | ||
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 71 | 23.7 | 20.6 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 90.4 | 46.1 | 29.4 | 25.9 | 18.6 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A) |
Hårddisk |
| 30.1 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 46.8 / 46.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.35 / 1.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.4 / 11 / 14.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
78.9 / 91.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, , , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | -10% | -6% | -60% | -22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 2.3 32% | 3.7 -9% | 3.4 -0% | 9.48 -179% | 6.78 ? -99% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 8.7 21% | 16.2 -47% | 13.9 -26% | 16.1 -46% | 11.3 ? -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.9 | 12.2 18% | 18 -21% | 17.6 -18% | 16.9 -13% | 13.4 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 78.9 | 53.3 32% | 58.4 26% | 71.1 10% | 90.8 -15% | 71.1 ? 10% |
Load Maximum * | 91.2 | 64 30% | 89.6 2% | 88.5 3% | 134.4 -47% | 117.3 ? -29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | -10% | 12% | -22% | -39% | 2% | |
H.264 | 701 | 511 -27% | 738 5% | 504 -28% | 821 ? 17% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 614 | 644 5% | 576 -6% | 942 53% | 513 -16% | 375 -39% | 625 ? 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 88 | 87 -1% | 62 -30% | 62 -30% | 76.3 ? -13% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I likhet med MacBook Pro 13 2018 så tog det två utförliga systemuppdateringar för att fixa en del av de problem som fanns med när datorn släpptes. Utöver allmänna förbättringar, inklusive bättre batteritid, så låg fokus på de nya processorernas dåliga prestandautnyttjande. CPU-prestandan förbättrades efter den första uppdateringen och kunde jämföras med konkurrenten Dell XPS 15, åtminstone ett tag. Kyllösningen räckte inte riktigt i längden. Detta ändrades dock efter den andra större CPU-uppdateringen och efter den är prestandan stabil även efter längre perioder. Men datorn kan ändå inte använda den fulla potentialen hos en Core i7, så det finns ingen anledning att välja alternativet med Core i9.
Nätadaptern på 87 W är ett annat problem, då den begränsar prestandan. Vi uppmätte högre energiförbrukning än så vid belastning och batteriet laddades faktiskt ur en aning under stresstestet. Vi förstår bara inte varför Apple fortsätter att använda en gammal nätadapter till en så dyr maskin. I kombination med kylningsproblemen undrar man huruvida den nya modellen verkligen förjänar tillägget "Pro".
2018 års version av Apple MacBook Pro 15 är en utmärkt multimedialaptop, men den är troligen inte det bästa valet för professionella användare på grund av problemen med prestanda och kylning.
Utöver dessa problem är 2018 års modell av MacBook Pro 15 återigen en övertygande produkt. Ja, tangentbordet är fortfarande en fråga om smak, även efter uppgraderingen, men du får ett utmärkt chassi, en bra 16:10-skärm och lång batteritid. Du bör inte råka på några problem om du inte behöver utnyttja prestandan fullt ut och kan i så fall istället njuta av en tyst enhet. Vi noterade inga problem med avbruten WLAN-anslutning den här gången, så inga poängavdrag har gjorts för detta.
Apple bör nog ordentligt överväga en större omdesign, för tillverkare som Dell erbjuder mer prestanda, både för processor och grafikkort. Lenovos nya ThinkPad X1 Extreme riktar sig också åt samma målgrupp i segmentet tunna laptops på 15 tum.
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
- 12/05/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff, J. Simon Leitner