Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 - En övertygande multimedialaptop som drivs av en Core i9-9880H och en Radeon Pro 5500M (Sammanfattning)

Tillbaka till sitt ursprung.

Ett tjockare hölje, en beprövad tangentbordsdesign och bättre kylning: Det sammanfattar senaste MacBook Pro. Det verkar som att Apple äntligen lyssnat på sina användare och på pressen och har optimerat sin största proffsfokuserade toppskiktslaptop. Vi testar flaggskeppsmodellen i den här detaljerade recensionen.
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (MacBook Pro 16 2019 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M - 4 GB VRAM, GDDR6, Apple own
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 3072 x 1920 pixlar 226 PPI, APPA044, IPS, Retina, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
Apple SSD AP1024 7171, 1024 GB 
Ljudkort
Apple Audio Device
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 4 Thunderbolt, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlurar, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Broadcom 802.11ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.2 x 358 x 246
Batteri
99.8 Wh, 8790 mAh Litiumjon, 11.36 V Simplo Technology (Changshu) Inc. A2113
Operativsystem
Apple macOS 10.15 Catalina
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 12 Månader Garanti
Released
11/13/2019
Vikt
2 kg, Strömförsörjning: 359 g
Pris
3199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.7 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16.00"3072x1920
87.1 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
1.7 kg18.7 mm15.60"3840x2160
87.8 %
v7 (old)
08/2019
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2 kg17 mm15.60"3840x2160
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
i9-9980HK, Radeon Pro Vega 20
1.8 kg15.5 mm15.40"2880x1800
87.8 %
v6 (old)
06/2018
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
1.9 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
85 %
v7 (old)
06/2019
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg361.8 mm 245.7 mm 18.7 mm 1.7 kg357 mm 247 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg349.3 mm 240.7 mm 15.5 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Höger sida: 2x Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Höger sida: 2x Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Vänster sida: 2x Thunderbolt 3
Vänster sida: 2x Thunderbolt 3
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (566min - 1523max) MBit/s +146%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (533min - 616max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1431 (1279min - 1644max) MBit/s +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (806min - 821max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s -18%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (806-821)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø582 (533-616)
ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M: 12.63 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.49 ∆E
448
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
APPA044 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 519 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 477.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 519 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1331:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2145
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NE156QUM-N66, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4"
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Display
Display P3 Coverage
88.1
82
98.7
85.9
84.4
sRGB Coverage
99.6
99.1
99.9
100
100
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
91.8
96.9
86.6
99.1
98.5
Response Times
30%
12%
6%
26%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5)
2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2)
96%
46.4 ?(22, 24.4)
11%
43.2 ?(20.4, 22.8)
18%
44 ?(22, 22)
16%
51 ?(24, 27)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1)
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
93%
30.4 ?(17.2, 13.2)
13%
31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8)
11%
22.8 ?(12, 10.8)
35%
31 ?(18, 13)
11%
PWM Frequency
131700
59.5 ?(100)
-100%
117000 ?(75, 150)
-11%
Screen
-68%
-85%
9%
-69%
-66%
Brightness middle
519
421.2
-19%
464
-11%
520
0%
357.6
-31%
445
-14%
Brightness
477
417
-13%
448
-6%
492
3%
350
-27%
462
-3%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
90
5%
88
2%
85
-1%
83
-3%
Black Level *
0.39
0.36
8%
0.39
-0%
0.35
10%
0.5
-28%
Contrast
1331
1289
-3%
1333
0%
1022
-23%
890
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.28
6.06
-166%
4.2
-84%
1.2
47%
4.12
-81%
4.75
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.54
11.89
-82%
11.4
-74%
2.3
65%
9.91
-52%
7.79
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.86
0.8
7%
4.23
-392%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
2.8
-211%
7.2
-700%
1.3
-44%
1.8
-100%
4.49
-399%
Gamma
2145 0%
2.15 102%
2.17 101%
2.18 101%
2.17 101%
2.49 88%
CCT
6572 99%
6235 104%
6345 102%
6738 96%
6613 98%
7374 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
78
81
4%
85.2
9%
87.5
12%
87
12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.6
99
100
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -39%
-37% / -69%
8% / 8%
-22% / -53%
-30% / -53%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.8 ms rise
↘ 17.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.9 ms rise
↘ 28.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 131700 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 131700 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 131700 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Latens vid tomgång i Win 10
Latens vid tomgång i Win 10
Latens: Youtube och surfande i Win 10
Latens: Youtube och surfande i Win 10
GPU-Z Render Test
GPU-Z Render Test
Radeon Pro Driver Bootcamp
Radeon Pro Driver Bootcamp
Extrem belastning
Extrem belastning
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1238 (1170.34-1317.35)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1308 (1257.47-1327.02)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1573 (1526.78-1689.97)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years)
257 Points +40%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (181 - 215, n=13)
198.8 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
197 Points +7%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points +7%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
193 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (181 - 198, n=11)
190.1 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
190 Points +3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
183 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
181 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
181 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
177 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
160 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
154 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
139 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=91, last 2 years)
2439 Points +70%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (1327 - 1930, n=14)
1656 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1641 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1600 (1090.6min, 1367.66P1 - 1369.3max) Points +11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1317 - 1721, n=11)
1506 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
1450 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (1401min - 1435max) Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (1268.87min - 1362.31max) Points -5%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1407 (1126.13min - 1407max) Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
1401 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1327 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Intel Core i9-9880H
1317 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1074 (967.16min - 1074.4max) Points -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1064 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1057 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
971 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
953 Points -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1057 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X
unknown
1047 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i7 555X
unknown
1029 Points -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
757 Points -47%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
630 Points -56%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
704 Points -51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
693 Points -52%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
666 Points -54%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1362 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
184 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
199 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6816 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (5211 - 6558, n=8)
5969 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (4305 - 7082, n=14)
5843 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4395 - 6453, n=72)
5533 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
5500 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP0512
5407 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
5296 Points -4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4535 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20, i9-9980HK, Apple SSD AP1024
4305 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4056 Points -26%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Multimedia
  (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years)
5126 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4900 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (3505 - 4900, n=5)
4442 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (3417 - 5661, n=56)
4424 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (3684 - 5731, n=11)
4298 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points -22%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
3684 Points -25%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3417 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3348 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (4482 - 6095, n=5)
5462 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4241 - 6593, n=57)
5461 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years)
5081 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (4558 - 6524, n=11)
5056 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4812 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points -1%
Dell Precision 5540
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB
4558 Points -5%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4246 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4241 Points -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4900 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7359 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4812 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5500 poäng
Hjälp
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Dell Precision 5540
SK hynix PC400 512 GB
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
30%
-11%
8%
52%
58%
Write 4K
55.5
104.3
88%
99
78%
98
77%
169.6
206%
153
176%
Read 4K
16.21
45.23
179%
35.63
120%
41.25
154%
58
258%
60.5
273%
Write Seq
1959
1729
-12%
706
-64%
1295
-34%
1516
-23%
1938
-1%
Read Seq
1763
1861
6%
1044
-41%
1441
-18%
2362
34%
1932
10%
Write 4K Q32T1
398.5
509
28%
326.6
-18%
429.2
8%
481.8
21%
482.5
21%
Read 4K Q32T1
648
388.5
-40%
270
-58%
400.1
-38%
506
-22%
594
-8%
Write Seq Q32T1
2727
2813
3%
820
-70%
1366
-50%
1530
-44%
2324
-15%
Read Seq Q32T1
3242
2906
-10%
2028
-37%
2201
-32%
2645
-18%
3539
9%
AS SSD
34%
-26%
8%
-17%
21%
Seq Read
2531
1723
-32%
1122
-56%
1743
-31%
1812
-28%
2352
-7%
Seq Write
2289
1386
-39%
514
-78%
930
-59%
1512
-34%
2184
-5%
4K Read
15.85
43.25
173%
34.98
121%
39.1
147%
32.68
106%
28.65
81%
4K Write
39.88
98.3
146%
96.8
143%
92.1
131%
107.7
170%
61.3
54%
4K-64 Read
1267
1078
-15%
492
-61%
956
-25%
504
-60%
1317
4%
4K-64 Write
1749
1456
-17%
339.9
-81%
863
-51%
534
-69%
2156
23%
Access Time Read *
0.122
0.05
59%
0.056
54%
0.074
39%
0.05
59%
0.101
17%
Access Time Write *
0.095
0.039
59%
0.11
-16%
0.053
44%
0.227
-139%
0.09
5%
Score Read
1536
1294
-16%
639
-58%
1170
-24%
718
-53%
1581
3%
Score Write
2018
1693
-16%
488
-76%
1048
-48%
793
-61%
2435
21%
Score Total
4317
3638
-16%
1434
-67%
2781
-36%
1871
-57%
4813
11%
Copy ISO MB/s
1995
3182
59%
828
-58%
946
-53%
2705
36%
Copy Program MB/s
584
984
68%
200.5
-66%
414.3
-29%
666
14%
Copy Game MB/s
1135
1824
61%
387.4
-66%
1263
11%
1583
39%
PCMark 8
Storage Score v2
1818
Total Average (Program / Settings)
32% / 33%
-19% / -21%
8% / 8%
18% / 8%
40% / 35%

* ... smaller is better

Apple SSD AP1024 7171
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3242 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2727 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 648 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 398.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1763 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1959 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 16.21 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 55.5 MB/s
Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
96.8 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
94.4 pt
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
90 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
86.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
 
81.1 pt
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
70.1 pt
unknown 5300M laptop -2!
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
66.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
65.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 
59.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
54.7 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 -1!
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-9980HK
54.1 pt
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
51 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
50.3 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i9-8950HK
42.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
18.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)
20419 Points +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 22670, n=24)
20096 Points +36%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
19666 Points +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (17010 - 18653, n=8)
17711 Points +20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17668 Points +20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
16339 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
14725 Points
unknown 5300M laptop
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
14265 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10885 - 13575, n=30)
12797 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-9980HK
12474 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
12388 Points -16%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
11468 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
10885 Points -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i9-8950HK
8854 Points -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
4380 Points -70%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (59839 - 104780, n=18)
94171 Points +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
86229 Points +31%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
65859 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
65776 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (38321 - 89505, n=7)
63736 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
57741 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (38016 - 66073, n=21)
55346 Points -16%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
50946 Points -23%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
47166 Points -28%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
45246 Points -31%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i9-8950HK
43721 Points -34%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
42409 Points -36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
19255 Points -71%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 16488, n=24)
14867 Points +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
14768 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)
14688 Points +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (12903 - 13870, n=7)
13356 Points +28%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
12111 Points +16%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
11754 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
10399 Points
unknown 5300M laptop
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
10306 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (7741 - 9810, n=32)
9195 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-9980HK
9108 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8532 Points -18%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8107 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
7741 Points -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i9-8950HK
7291 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
2789 Points -73%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5738 Points +71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 6123, n=22)
5653 Points +68%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)
5544 Points +65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (4867 - 5440, n=8)
5089 Points +51%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4167 Points +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (2900 - 3700, n=31)
3430 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
3364 Points
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
3353 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
3066 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
2909 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-9980HK
2633 Points -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i9-8950HK
2075 Points -38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
872 Points -74%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Apple iMac Pro
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, Intel Xeon W-2145
58.4 fps +28%
Apple iMac Pro
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, Intel Xeon W-2145
48.9 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
45.6 (22min - 82max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
39.7 fps -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-9980HK
34.9 fps -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-8950HK
34 fps -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, Intel Core i9-8950HK
25.7 fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.4 - 26.7, n=2, last 2 years)
23.1 fps -49%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
21.4 (12.5min - 34max) fps -53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
12.2 fps -73%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
34321 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
14097 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30690 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9196 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
3629 poäng
Hjälp

SpecViewPerf 13

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
99.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
98.3 pt
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
97.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
75.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
55.9 pt
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
53 pt
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
52.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
47.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
38.9 pt
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
129.6 fps +40%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
125.4 fps +36%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
120.9 fps +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
109.6 fps +19%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
97.2 fps +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
92.3 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
89.2 fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
65.1 fps -29%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
54.5 fps -41%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
286.7 fps +83%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
280.2 fps +78%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
271.1 fps +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.6 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
157 fps
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
143.8 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.8 fps -19%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
14.81 fps -91%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
11.81 fps -92%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
94.6 fps +52%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
94 fps +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
93.4 fps +50%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
74.6 fps +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
73.3 fps +17%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
62.4 fps
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
41.19 fps -34%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
37.56 fps -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
35.27 fps -43%
Medical (medical-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
79.3 fps +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
79 fps +97%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
73.2 fps +83%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
53.9 fps +35%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
41.71 fps +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
40.07 fps
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
38.99 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
33.45 fps -17%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
28.08 fps -30%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.9 fps +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
204.8 fps +63%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
203.6 fps +62%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
167.1 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
155.4 fps +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
126 fps
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
120.4 fps -4%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
105.7 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
101 fps -20%
Energy (energy-02)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
36.5 fps +114%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
36.15 fps +112%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
36.03 fps +111%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
25.76 fps +51%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
17.04 fps
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
14.87 fps -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
12 fps -30%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
10.81 fps -37%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
212.3 fps +128%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
211.4 fps +127%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
208 fps +123%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.6 fps +73%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
120.7 fps +30%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
109.6 fps +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.9 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
93.1 fps
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
85.6 fps -8%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
215.7 fps +73%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
212.6 fps +70%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
207.8 fps +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
185.8 fps +49%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
134.6 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
125 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
121.3 fps -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
87.4 fps -30%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
61.2 fps -51%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
174.2 fps +96%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
173 fps +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9850H
172.7 fps +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
149.4 fps +68%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
142.5 fps +60%
Acer Nitro 5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
103 fps +16%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
93.3 fps +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
89 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
83.9 fps -6%
Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
98.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia -6!
 
89.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q -1!
 
85.5 pt
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
71.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
62.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 
62.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 -13!
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
52.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 -14!
Intel Core i9-9980HK, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
52.3 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) -2!
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
31.5 pt
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 153, n=13, last 2 years)
82.8 fps +80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (62 - 73, n=8)
68.4 fps +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 67, n=4)
57.3 fps +25%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53 (44min) fps +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
46 (38min - 74max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (34 - 47, n=15)
43.2 fps -6%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
23 (17min - 39max) fps -50%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)
56.2 fps +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=81, last 2 years)
54.6 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (44.8 - 53.2, n=7)
50.3 fps +30%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
43.6 (36min - 48max) fps +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
38.8 (34min - 43max) fps
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
36 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (29.9 - 40.3, n=31)
35.6 fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
29.4 (25min, 27P1 - 33max) fps -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
19.7 (16min - 22max) fps -49%
Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (38.2 - 43.1, n=4)
40.9 fps +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (35.1 - 38.3, n=3)
36.7 fps +28%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
32.2 (5min - 59max) fps +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
28.6 (15.57min - 43.26max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (24.9 - 26.6, n=4)
25.6 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
14.2 (7.86min - 22.94max) fps -50%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  ()
44 fps +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
27.8 (22min - 37max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  ()
27.5 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
13.1 (10min - 17max) fps -53%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps +189%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)
52 fps +155%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (44.9 - 54.6, n=3)
49.8 fps +144%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (31.8 - 37.6, n=6)
35.3 fps +73%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
20.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
14.3 (6min - 20max) fps -30%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (82 - 87, n=5)
84 fps +53%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=60, last 2 years)
70 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (50 - 74, n=2)
62 fps +13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
59 (46min - 77max) fps +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
55 (47min - 71max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (44 - 57, n=9)
51.4 fps -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
31 (27min - 39max) fps -44%
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (98.6 - 107, n=2)
102.8 fps +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (89 - 99.6, n=2)
94.3 fps +50%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
72 (57min - 86max) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (65.4 - 71.7, n=3)
68.2 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
63 (51min - 74max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
32.8 (27min - 41max) fps -48%
The Division 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (57 - 63, n=2)
60 fps +54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
53 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps +27%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
42 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
39 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (35 - 43, n=3)
38.3 fps -2%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (62.3 - 65.6, n=2)
64 fps +27%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
58.4 (52min - 68max) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (57.3 - 59.2, n=2)
58.3 fps +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
50.2 (46min - 57max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (41.8 - 44.1, n=3)
42.7 fps -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
23.2 (21min - 26max) fps -54%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (67.9 - 68.8, n=2)
68.4 fps +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (58.2 - 64.8, n=2)
61.5 fps +39%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
53.4 (47.4P1) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (45.1 - 60, n=3)
50.5 fps +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
44.4 (39.8P1) fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Average of class Multimedia
  (24 - 84, n=8, last 2 years)
51.5 fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  ()
46.1 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (41.1 - 41.6, n=2)
41.4 fps +39%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.8 (31min - 42max) fps +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
29.7 (24min - 35max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (24.4 - 26.9, n=4)
26 fps -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
13.6 (12min - 15max) fps -54%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (50.7 - 52.8, n=2)
51.8 fps +77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
51.1 fps +75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  ()
47.1 fps +61%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
34.2 (29min - 39max) fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (32.1 - 33.5, n=5)
33.1 fps +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
29.2 (23.6P1) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
15.2 (12min - 18max) fps -48%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (46.6 - 48.6, n=3)
47.7 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (41.5 - 42.3, n=2)
41.9 fps +36%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
35.6 fps +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.9 - 48.6, n=4, last 2 years)
34.2 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (29 - 34.6, n=5)
30.9 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
30.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
15.8 fps -49%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51 - 55, n=2)
53 fps +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  (48 - 51, n=2)
49.5 fps +41%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
35 (26min - 56max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (30 - 37, n=2)
33.5 fps -4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
26 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
18 (13min - 27max) fps -49%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (68.1 - 76, n=5)
72.8 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
  ()
59.6 fps +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years)
54.8 fps +15%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M
48.6 (3.43min, 30.3P1 - 105max) fps +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
47.6 (0.771min, 29.4P1 - 94.6max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
46.5 (1.023min, 26.3P1 - 84.4max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (38.1 - 51.1, n=6)
43.2 fps -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
22 (6.76min, 15.6P1 - 74.5max) fps -54%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
21.8 (7.75min, 15.4P1 - 78.2max) fps -54%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
21.5 (8.43min, 14.9P1 - 75.8max) fps -55%
05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171: Ø36.6 (34-40)
lågmed.högultraQHD4K
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 208 118 71.4
GTA V (2015) 168 91.4 47.6 34.5 32.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 68 38.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 137 125 111 107 53.9
World of Warships (2015) 43.4
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 126 44.8
Overwatch (2016) 98
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 52 27.8 16.9
Rocket League (2017) 153 107 59
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 48.4 20.4
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 76 49.1 24.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 55 40 20
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 120 58 54 46 30 13
Battlefield V (2018) 85 76 62 58.9 47 14.4
Apex Legends (2019) 63 43.5
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 86 67 64 57 41 21
Metro Exodus (2019) 92 47.1 34.3 28.6 22
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 90 50.2 35.8
The Division 2 (2019) 56 39
Anno 1800 (2019) 67 44.6 21.7
Rage 2 (2019) 113 53.7 45.2 44.4 28.4
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 175 64.1 40.5 29.7 19 7
F1 2019 (2019) 174 105 97 65 49
Control (2019) 139 41.5 29.2 18.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 41.4 30.8 21.4 3.8
FIFA 20 (2019) 144 124 90
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 50 35
GRID 2019 (2019) 46.3 36.6 23.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 34.7
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 74 56.7 50.9 44.7 28 12.8
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 75 61 54.3 35 16.2
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 97.6 55.2 35.8 20.9 0 () 0 ()
Fall Guys (2020) 59.4 59.4 38.1
Hearthstone (2020) 33.2 32 59.7 59.6
Doom Eternal (2020) 84.8 47.5 27.5 21.9 15.1
Gears Tactics (2020) 60 47.6 30.7
F1 2020 (2020) 0 game wont start
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 47.4 28 19.2 12.2
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 52.5 37.5
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 95.6 69.7 26.4
FIFA 21 (2020) 151 115 70
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 54.8 29.9 23.5
Hitman 3 (2021) 157 81.3 66.3 62
Outriders (2021) 70.7 44.4 36 27.6
Resident Evil Village (2021) 81.7 38.9 40.6
Far Cry 6 (2021) 0 game wont start
Riders Republic (2021) 61 41 28
Call of Duty Vanguard (2021) 43.1 21.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 85 31

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.9 / 29.9 / 29.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43 / 46.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.74446.547.247.747.4452531.430.830.934.330.431.131.43130.629.829.929.230.228.829.3402830.731.729.130.930.228.45029.428.928.729.527.428.828.46330.729.128.630.628.329.42880252626.529.927.227.927.110025.32624.828.424.626.126.412524.724.624.626.82424.525.316023.823.423.326.523.423.124.920025.624.423.229.524.52425.825023.922.821.827.521.121.425.631527.524.321.632.221.420.927.940031.9262237.62119.534.350031.825.622.237.320.119.235.663025.820.919.734.119.318.92880029.123.92134.518.417.931.1100030.524.921.537.618.117.332.8125032.825.220.338.417.81734.9160032.624.3204017.116.835.6200032.62418.540.616.916.936250033.521.817.741.216.816.936.5315027.218.41738.516.816.932.5400024.217.81737.216.816.929.4500023.617.31736.216.91728.2630020.117.117.131.41717.124.2800018.217.117.230.317.117.121.81000017.617.217.126.417.217.119.41250017.21717.122.2171717.91600017.317.217.220.217.217.117.8SPL41.834.331.249.729.929.744.9N3.621.56.71.31.34.6median 25.6median 23.4median 20median 34.1median 17.8median 17.1median 28Delta5.83.72.85.52.124.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Hög belastning
 39 °C42 °C37 °C 
 38 °C42 °C33 °C 
 26 °C27 °C26 °C 
Max: 42 °C
Medel: 34.4 °C
29 °C30 °C37 °C
33 °C38 °C32 °C
27 °C30 °C30 °C
Max: 38 °C
Medel: 31.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  48 °C | Rumstemperatur 19.5 °C | Fluke 62 Mini + t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203634.52529.530.9313130.24029.830.65029.434.76328.345.28026.557.310025.562.512523.667.716022.167.320023.569.62502271.33152170.640020.974.250019.872.863018.970.480018.573.3100018.273.4125017.771.6160017.371.4200017.369.725001769.431501769.440001767.4500017.166.963001768.3800017.166.41000017.163.1125001761.91600017.360.1SPL3082.3N1.360.7median 17.7median 69.4Delta22.443.54338.839.440.338.137.337.736.538.136.638.536.334.835.335.634.443.134.249.432.846.432.359.531.568.63169.930.268.329.97529.879.229.575.429.173.929.279.528.775.428.477.428.477.928.377.928.370.92876.12874.62875.727.975.327.778.141.188.54.279.6median 29.2median 75.317.433.933.532.632.430.130.831.129.830.627.537.52846.425.557.525.664.625.267.523.966.822.871.521.970.521.872.820.874.320.474.519.771.218.870.318.570.91874.717.471.817.475.317.173.417.570.317.172.917.376.517.269.117.369.117.365.317.264.417.38583.430.270.561.21.4median 70.9median 18.5median 15.82.46.614.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500MDell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.95 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.7 / 12.1 / 17 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 91.5 / 102.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4"
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
11%
-18%
-67%
-31%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
3.4
8%
6.2
-68%
9.4
-154%
8.5
-130%
Idle Average *
12.1
11
9%
9.6
21%
17.4
-44%
14.7
-21%
Idle Maximum *
17
14.9
12%
21.2
-25%
19.6
-15%
19.4
-14%
Load Average *
91.5
78.9
14%
104.3
-14%
103
-13%
89.6
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
103
91.7
11%
96.1
7%
Load Maximum *
102.3
91.2
11%
135.3
-32%
216
-111%
129.8
-27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0tim 54min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 13.0.3)
11tim 58min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 13.0.3)
7tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 40min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 58min
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 80 Wh
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-29%
104%
-9%
-19%
23%
33%
H.264
580
284
-51%
701
21%
WiFi v1.3
718
285
-60%
467
-35%
375
-48%
357
-50%
614
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra
54
88
63%
Load
58
72
24%
199
243%
76
31%
65
12%

För

+ utmärkt hantverk
+ lyxig konstruktion
+ bästa styrplattan häromkring
+ bra tangentbord
+ fantastisk bildkvalitet
+ tysta fläktar
+ magnifika högtalare

Emot

- väldigt dyr
- inget stöd för WiFi 6
- anslutningsproblem under våra prestandatester
- blank skärm
- höga interna temperaturer
- fastlödda komponenter - dåliga möjligheter till reparationer eller uppgraderingar
- svag webbkamera
- skärmen har en låst uppdateringsfrekvens på bara 60 Hz

Omdöme - En fantastisk men dyr multimedialaptop

Recension av Apple MacBook Pro 16.
Recension av Apple MacBook Pro 16.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med sin nya MacBook Pro på 16 tum har Apple förfinat sina gamla 15-tumsdesign och gjort små men viktiga ändringar. För det första har man bytt ut den kraftigt kritiserade butterfly-tangentbordsmekanismen med en saxbrytar-design som inte bara är beprövad utan dessutom borde vara hållbarare och ge mer resväg än butterfly-knapparna. Även om Apple har återanvänt mycket av designen från sin senaste MacBook Pro 15 till sin nya 16-tumsmodell är den sistnämnda aningen tjockare än sin föregångare och har effektivare kylning.

Tyvärr envisas Apple med att bara inkludera fyra Thunderbolt 3-portar och en hörlursanslutning på sin nya MacBook Pro. Ethernet, HDMI, kortläsare och USB Typ A-portar förekommer inte längre i Apples ekosystem, så man får köpa minst en adapter. På samma sätt är möjligheterna till reparationer och uppgraderingar precis lika dåliga som innan och Apple har lött fast CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD och WiFi-chip direkt på moderkortet. Det innebär inte bara att du får leva med ett utdaterad 802.11ac WiFi-chip från Broadcom utan också att du får byta hela moderkortet om någon av dessa komponenter skulle gå sönder.

MacBook Pro 16 är en utmärkt och lyxig multimedialaptop med dåliga möjligheter till reparation.

Den nya 16-tumsskärmen bjuder inte heller på några överraskningar. Den har varken stöd för 120 Hz bilduppdatering eller Adaptive Sync, men den har lika bra bildkvalitet som de MacBook Pro-modeller vi recenserat tidigare. Det större chassit har dessutom gjort att Apple kunnat utrusta MacBook Pro 16 med betydligt bättre högtalare än på sin 15-tumsföregångare. Effektivare kylning har behövts länge och gör att vår recensionsenhet får ut betydligt högre prestanda ur sin Core i9-9880H processor jämfört med sin föregångare. Även om den nya Navi GPU:n inte riktigt kommer få Windows-världen att haja till så är den en bra uppgradering från Vega-chippen som Apple använde i sin senaste MacBook Pro 15.

MacBook Pro 16 sätter inga rekord för batteritid vid jämförelse med andra multimedialaptops trots att den har ett batteri på 100 Wh. Detta då en Core i9-processor, en stor skärm och en dedikerad GPU är energikrävande komponenter. Men du bör klara dig nästan två timmar längre mellan laddningarna när du surfar på nätet jämfört med MacBook Pro 15, vilket är en påtaglig förbättring. MacBook Pro 16 bör åtminstone stå sig en hel arbetsdag mellan laddningarna, vilket ingen av våra jämförelseenheter klarade av.

Totalt sett är MacBook Pro 16 en utmärkt multimedialaptop. Den lider av en del brister, där den största är det oerhörda priset. 27.990 kronor ger dig dessutom bara ett års garanti och du vill nog överväga att köpa minst en USB Typ C-adapter.

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M - 12/02/2019 v7 (old)
Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff

Design
92 / 98 → 94%
Tangentbord
96%
Mus
100%
Anslutningar
48 / 80 → 60%
Vikt
63 / 20-72 → 83%
Batteri
86 / 95 → 90%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
85 / 90 → 94%
Programprestanda
91 / 90 → 100%
Workstation
81%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
97%
Camera
28 / 85 → 33%
Medel
81%
90%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 - En övertygande multimedialaptop som drivs av en Core i9-9880H och en Radeon Pro 5500M (Sammanfattning)
Klaus Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, 2019-12- 8 (Update: 2019-12- 9)