Test: Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 - Allt-i-ett som får en matt skärm (Sammanfattning)
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Apple iMac Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Apple iMac Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 529 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1102:1 (Svärta: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
80% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 APPAE32, IPS, 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Pro APPAE1E, , 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2014 i7-4790K M295X APPAE01, IPS, 5120x2880, 27" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 0% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 99 0% | 99.3 1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.5 | 88.8 -1% | 88.2 -1% | |
Response Times | -54% | -40% | -22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.2 ? | 30.4 ? -12% | 30.4 ? -12% | 27 ? 1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.4 ? | 18.8 ? -52% | 20.8 ? -68% | 18 ? -45% |
PWM Frequency | 22730 ? | 208.3 ? -99% | ||
Screen | -30% | -19% | -41% | |
Brightness middle | 529 | 496 -6% | 429 -19% | |
Brightness | 511 | 468 -8% | 424 -17% | |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 95 8% | |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.54 -13% | 0.58 -21% | |
Contrast | 1102 | 919 -17% | 740 -33% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3 -114% | 2.8 -100% | 2.66 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 5.8 -123% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.5 -14% | 1.97 10% | 3.47 -58% |
Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6826 95% | 6824 95% | 6889 94% | 7127 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 80 | 79.4 -1% | 79 -1% | 66.2 -17% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 99.97 0% | 99.62 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -28% /
-29% | -20% /
-18% | -32% /
-35% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 22730 Hz | ≤ 66 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 22730 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 66 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 22730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (451 - 902, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (4085 - 16722, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (233 - 356, n=18, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2014 i7-4790K M295X | |
Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (2005 - 6588, n=18, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE | |
Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2014 i7-4790K M295X | |
Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
Average of class Desktop (77 - 333, n=15, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Desktop (5262 - 8020, n=12, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Desktop (45947 - 160423, n=12, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1967 - 2559, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (11095 - 26186, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Desktop (12.9 - 45.7, n=12, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average of class Desktop (35.5 - 49.1, n=12, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10910 () | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Average of class Desktop (0.3307 - 0.4987, n=12, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4946 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 8396 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4550 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5859 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Desktop (3347 - 104464, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) (27697 - 36522, n=6) | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) (115246 - 154025, n=6) | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
Average of class Desktop (13814 - 189497, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (2277 - 79185, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) (19850 - 27164, n=7) | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (636 - 37589, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) (6050 - 9371, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Apple iMac Pro | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
3DMark 11 Performance | 24377 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17390 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6525 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 331 | 130 | 71.6 | 44 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105 | 107 | 98.5 | 103 | 78.4 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 272 | 118 | 96 | 48 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 79.2 | 65.6 | 55.7 | 41.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 126 | 106 | 100 | 95 | 76 | 40 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 158 | 114 | 105 | 89 | 61 | 32 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 119 | 98 | 69 | 49 | 26 | |
GRID 2019 (2019) | 216 | 135 | 110 | 80 | 74 | 44 |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 265 | 167 | 149 | 143 | 111 | 58 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 242 | 154 | 107 | 78.7 | 45.7 | 24.2 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 283 | 214 | 169 | 108 | 80 | 47 |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 160 | 107 | 89 | 67 | 48 | 25 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 29.7 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 35 / 43.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 25 to 47 °C for the class Desktop.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.7 °C / 85 F.
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.03 / 0.08 Watt |
Låg belastning | 27.6 / 64.7 / 65.3 Watt |
Hög belastning |
162 / 354 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020 i9-10910, Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), Apple SSD AP1024, IPS, 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Pro W-2145, Pro Vega 56, , , 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 6500, Radeon R9 M390, Apple Fusion Drive 1TB (24 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD), , 5120x2880, 27" | Average AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -37% | 11% | 0% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 27.6 | 49.5 -79% | 29.5 -7% | 27.6 ? -0% | 42.9 ? -55% |
Idle Average * | 64.7 | 86.7 -34% | 59.2 9% | 64.7 ? -0% | 80.1 ? -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 65.3 | 88.9 -36% | 68 -4% | 65.3 ? -0% | 53 ? 19% |
Load Average * | 162 | 150.1 7% | 126 22% | 162 ? -0% | 111.9 ? 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 247 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 354 | 508.5 -44% | 231 35% | 354 ? -0% | 445 ? -26% |
* ... smaller is better
För
Emot
Omdöme - Bra desktop med ett högt pris
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Apples iMac 27 är fortfarande ett bra allt-i-ett-system som har en trevlig design och en bra 5K-skärm. Dessutom är de inbyggda högtalarna utmärkta - många kommer inte behöva externa högtalare.
Problemen börjar märkas när vi tittar på komponenternas prestanda. På grund av den begränsade kylningen kan varken CPU:n eller GPU:n använda sina fulla potential. Med tanke på det är de extra komponenterna som finns som tillval inte riktigt värda pengarna. Jämför vi processorn med aktuella AMD-modeller ser vi ytterligare ett problem, för de sistnämnda har helt enkelt mycket högre prestanda. Vi gillade heller inte att fläktarna pulserade vid kombinerad belastning.
iMac 27 är även år 2020 ett bra allt-i-allo-system, men du får vara försiktig med vilka komponenter du väljer. Tillvalskomponenterna kan inte utnyttja sin prestanda särskilt bra.
Sen har vi det nya nanotexturerade glaset. Ja, den matta ytan fungerade bra och bildkvaliteten var bara en aning sämre än på de blanka modellerna, men prispåslaget på 6.000 kronor är väldigt högt. Om du är intresserad av en iMac är det bättre att du hoppar över tillval som rör processor och grafikkort och istället lägger pengarna på mer lagring eller RAM.
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020
- 11/09/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff