Test: Apple iMac Pro (Xeon W-2140B, Radeon Pro Vega 56) (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Apple iMac Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Apple iMac Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Kontrast: 919:1 (Svärta: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
79.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Apple iMac Pro APPAE1E, , 5120x2880, 27" | Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A 5120x2880, 27" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE LEN4123, VVX17P051J00, , 3840x2160, 17.3" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD SHP1476, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7720 SHP1446 (LQ173D1), , 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV Sharp SHP144C, , 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -1% | -18% | 0% | 0% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 99 | 99.3 0% | 97.9 -1% | 67.4 -32% | 87.6 -12% | 88 -11% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 98.5 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.8 | 88.2 -1% | 85.9 -3% | 68.9 -22% | 99.2 12% | 99.6 12% | |
| Response Times | -6% | 18964% | 175% | -108% | 49% | 66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.4 ? | 30.4 ? -0% | 48 ? -58% | 39.2 ? -29% | 59.2 ? -95% | 60 ? -97% | 56.8 ? -87% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18.8 ? | 20.8 ? -11% | 33.8 ? -80% | 23.2 ? -23% | 41.6 ? -121% | 46.4 ? -147% | 38.4 ? -104% |
| PWM Frequency | 208.3 ? | 119000 ? 57029% | 1412 ? 578% | 1020 ? 390% | 1020 ? 390% | ||
| Screen | -1% | 23% | 9% | -10% | -5% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 496 | 429 -14% | 545 10% | 358 -28% | 372.4 -25% | 464 -6% | 391 -21% |
| Brightness | 468 | 424 -9% | 523 12% | 338 -28% | 368 -21% | 441 -6% | 360 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 86 -1% | 83 -5% | 90 3% | 89 2% | 87 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.58 -7% | 0.44 19% | 0.31 43% | 0.48 11% | 0.45 17% | 0.35 35% |
| Contrast | 919 | 740 -19% | 1239 35% | 1155 26% | 776 -16% | 1031 12% | 1117 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.8 7% | 1.6 47% | 2.1 30% | 2.6 13% | 3.2 -7% | 1.3 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 3.8 34% | 3.6 38% | 5.6 3% | 6.1 -5% | 2.5 57% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | ||||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.97 21% | 1.9 24% | 2 20% | 3.7 -48% | 4.2 -68% | 1.8 28% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.01 109% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 6824 95% | 6889 94% | 6834 95% | 6216 105% | 7096 92% | 6736 96% | 6461 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 79.4 | 79 -1% | 77 -3% | 63 -21% | 88.1 11% | 87.9 11% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.97 0% | 99.97 0% | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-2% | 6329% /
4076% | 92% /
48% | -45% /
-25% | 15% /
6% | 28% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 208.3 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 208.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 208.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4327 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7689 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4614 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6050 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| Aorus GTX 1080 Gaming Box (XPS 15 9575) | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| Aorus GTX 1080 Gaming Box (XPS 15 9575) | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| SPECviewperf 11 | |
| 1920x1080 Siemens NX | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| 1920x1080 Tcvis | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| 1920x1080 SolidWorks | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| 1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Maya | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| 1920x1080 Lightwave | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| 1920x1080 Ensight | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| 1920x1080 Catia | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| Apple iMac Retina 5K 27 Late 2015 3.2 GHz M390 MK472D/A | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| SiSoft Sandra 2016 | |
| Image Processing | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512) | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision) | |
| Dell Precision 7720 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Desktop (3347 - 104464, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Test: Ryzen 5 2600 och Ryzen 7 2700 (Sammanfattning) | |
| Apple iMac Pro | |
| Average AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 () | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Aorus GTX 1080 Gaming Box (XPS 15 9575) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H970 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 35787 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20785 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15302 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5831 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 115.7 | 63.9 | 41.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112 | 107.4 | 102.3 | 95.8 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 198.7 | 135.7 | 70.2 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 94 | 74.8 | 39.3 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 142.6 | 134.9 | 105.6 | 43.6 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 81.7 | 76 | 45.1 | 34.7 | |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 70 | 65 | 57 | 33 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 39.7 / 47.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 25 to 47 °C for the class Desktop.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.7 °C / 85 F.
Apple iMac Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.08 / 5.7 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 49.5 / 86.7 / 88.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
150.1 / 508.5 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Behöver du verkligen en iMac Pro eller räcker det med en vanlig iMac? Om du ställer dig den frågan behöver du troligen inte Pro-versionen, för proffskomponenterna är för en speciell användargrupp. Xeon-processorns extra kärnor måste utnyttjas fullt ut, annars är den inte snabbare. Samma sak gäller grafikkortet. Om så inte är fallet kan du få en vanlig iMac 5K, som är mycket billigare och har samma skärm.
Men iMac Pro är ändå inte en särskilt övertygande arbetsstation. Prestandan är förvisso bra, men kyllösningen har problem redan med instegskomponenterna vid maximal belastning. Skärmen kunde ha varit bättre kalibrerad efter leverans och du kommer behöva en extern skärm för grafikarbete som använder AdobeRGB-färgrymden. Andra nackdelar med detta proffssystem inkluderar de begränsade och komplicerade servicemöjligheterna. Om du förlitar dig på systemet för arbete kommer du troligen behöva köpa till extra stöd såsom reparation på plats. Andra tillverkare som Dell, HP och Lenovo har ett tydligt övertag i detta hänseende.
Instegspriset är högt, men inte helt överprissatt med tanke på komponenterna. Bara Intel Xeon-processorn kostar mer än 11.000 kronor, men vi förstår inte dom massiva priserna för extra RAM och lagring. iMac Pro har definitivt en viss dragningskraft och presterar bra, men det är inte rätt val för alla proffsanvändare.
Apple iMac Pro
- 06/27/2018 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
