Test: Apple iPad Air 4 (2020) - Air-plattan närmar sig Pro-modellen (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Apple iPad Air 4 2020 A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 458 g | 6.1 mm | 10.90" | 2360x1640 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU | 456 g | 6.1 mm | 10.50" | 2224x1668 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU | 495 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 500 g | 6.3 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleZoom (5x)Low light
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 509 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1305:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTPS, 2560x1600, 11" | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -15% | -34% | 21% | -16% | -29% | |
Brightness middle | 509 | 515 1% | 477 -6% | 617 21% | 554 9% | 606 19% |
Brightness | 486 | 483 -1% | 452 -7% | 585 20% | 535 10% | 579 19% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 86 -8% | 84 -10% | 91 -2% | 89 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.41 -5% | 0.5 -28% | 0.36 8% | 0.33 15% | 0.32 18% |
Contrast | 1305 | 1256 -4% | 954 -27% | 1714 31% | 1679 29% | 1894 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.6 -23% | 2.2 -69% | 0.94 28% | 2.1 -62% | 2.9 -123% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 4.4 -57% | 5 -79% | 1.87 33% | 7.1 -154% | 6 -114% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.8 -27% | 3.3 -50% | 1.4 36% | 1.6 27% | 4.3 -95% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.156 102% | 2.32 95% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6833 95% | 6944 94% | 7019 93% | 6733 97% | 6623 98% | 7272 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 99.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (510245 - 647374, n=5) | |
Apple iPhone 11 Pro | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158.2 - 178.9, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (305 - 376, n=5) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 214, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 272, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 59963, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 547, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.14 Watt |
Låg belastning | 1.3 / 7.89 / 7.91 Watt |
Hög belastning |
9.28 / 10.78 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 8827 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -5% | -6% | 19% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 2.18 -68% | 2.12 -63% | 1.3 -0% | 1.16 11% | 1.98 -52% |
Idle Average * | 7.89 | 6.4 19% | 6.43 19% | 3.5 56% | 4.42 44% | 5.66 28% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.91 | 6.43 19% | 6.69 15% | 5.6 29% | 4.43 44% | 5.69 28% |
Load Average * | 9.28 | 7.48 19% | 8.17 12% | 12.5 -35% | 8.86 5% | 6.96 25% |
Load Maximum * | 10.78 | 10.65 1% | 11.84 -10% | 19.2 -78% | 11.6 -8% | 6.98 35% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 mAh | Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Apple iPad 10.2 2020 8827 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | 5% | 4% | 0% | 4% | |
Reader / Idle | 2039 | 1501 -26% | 2241 10% | 2001 -2% | 1963 -4% | 1877 -8% |
H.264 | 671 | 684 2% | 934 39% | 936 39% | 885 32% | 909 35% |
WiFi v1.3 | 702 | 738 5% | 782 11% | 902 28% | 811 16% | 891 27% |
Load | 388 | 214 -45% | 238 -39% | 197 -49% | 221 -43% | 233 -40% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Utförlig uppgradering av Air
Även 2020 års modell av iPad Air kommer fortsatt placera sig mellan iPad 8 och iPad Pro 11, men den ser nu mer ut som Pro-modellen. Detta märks inte bara på den nya designen utan också på att tillbehör som Magic Keyboard eller Pencil 2 går att använda på båda modellerna.
4:e generationen av iPad Air är en utförlig uppgradering och den närmar sig Pro-modellerna.
Det finns ett flertal nyheter jämfört med den föregående modellen. Utöver den senaste A14-processorn har den nu 4 GB minne, en större skärm, USB-C 3.2 och en aningen bättre kamera med stöd för inspelning av 4K-video. Touch ID är nu inbyggt i startknappen, vilket inte påverkar funktionens pålitlighet på något sätt.
iPad Pro är bättre och har mer RAM, en kraftigare SoC och en 120 Hz-skärm, så det är inte alls tänkt att iPad Air ska ersätta den, men Apple har valt lite andra skiljelinjer. Men för många är iPad Air 4 inte bara ett billigare alternativ utan också ett mer logiskt sådant. Den har mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för alla områden och passar till och med bra för att redigera bilder och video.
Apple iPad Air 4 2020
- 11/13/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt