Test: Apple iPad Pro 10.5 (sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T3 10 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 634 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1626:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad (2017) IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7" | Huawei MediaPad T3 10 IPS, 1280x800, 9.6" | Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 5% | -2% | -0% | -55% | -43% | -57% | |
| Brightness middle | 634 | 523 -18% | 514 -19% | 452 -29% | 410 -35% | 486 -23% | 449 -29% |
| Brightness | 625 | 500 -20% | 485 -22% | 468 -25% | 409 -35% | 457 -27% | 421 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 93 7% | 88 1% | 82 -6% | 92 6% | 88 1% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.52 -33% | 0.46 -18% | 0.32 18% | 0.25 36% | 0.32 18% | |
| Contrast | 1626 | 1006 -38% | 1117 -31% | 1281 -21% | 1944 20% | 1403 -14% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.1 42% | 1.4 26% | 1.8 5% | 4.5 -137% | 5.2 -174% | 4.7 -147% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 1.9 51% | 2.9 26% | 4 -3% | 14.2 -264% | 9 -131% | 11.1 -185% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.4 50% | 2.1 25% | 1.2 57% | 2 29% | 4.1 -46% | 4.5 -61% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.73 81% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7027 93% | 6662 98% | 6647 98% | 6500 100% | 6930 94% | 6579 99% | 7122 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.97 | 82.32 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.55 | 99.06 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Apple iPad (2017) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.44 / 6.12 / 6.14 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
8.55 / 10.62 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -3% | 0% | 18% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.44 | 1.71 -19% | 1.82 -26% | 2.19 -52% | 2.08 -44% | 1.58 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 6.12 | 7.55 -23% | 4.26 30% | 4.3 30% | 3.5 43% | 4.12 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.14 | 7.62 -24% | 4.33 29% | 4.37 29% | 3.58 42% | 4.15 32% |
| Load Average * | 8.55 | 8.39 2% | 9.82 -15% | 8.62 -1% | 6.97 18% | 6.2 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.62 | 12.08 -14% | 13.99 -32% | 11.26 -6% | 7.4 30% | 9.27 13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Apple iPad (2017) 8.827 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 6000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Asus ZenPad 3S 10 Z500KL 7800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 8% | 20% | 2% | 15% | -15% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2036 | 1850 -9% | 1496 -27% | 1903 -7% | 1985 -3% | 2090 3% | 1230 -40% | |
| H.264 | 629 | 708 13% | 845 34% | 551 -12% | 702 12% | 740 18% | 593 -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 693 | 779 12% | 764 10% | 760 10% | 602 -13% | 638 -8% | 416 -40% | 579 -16% |
| Load | 199 | 186 -7% | 225 13% | 375 88% | 222 12% | 294 48% | 248 25% |
För
Emot
Läs det fullständiga testet på engelska här.
Apple bestämde sig för att inte ge iPad Pro 10.5 någon komplett makeover. Istället satsade man på reella förbättringar där det räknas. Särskilt den nya skärmen är imponerande, med utmärkta egenskaper och HDR-möjligheter som kommer att intressera alla som gillar filmer, tv-serier och spel. Tyvärr kunde vi inte uppmäta den utlovade P3-färgrymden, utan bara det mindre sRGB-färgutrymmet.
Surfplattan har högkvalitativa kommunikationsmoduler men stöder fortfarande inte den europeiska Galileo GNSS-positioneringen. Apple har också snålat på minnet, som är långsammare än föregångarens, men det är inget som märks i daglig användning.
Sammantaget har Apple lyckats skapa en utmärkt produkt som sätter ribban väldigt högt för konkurrenterna. Den enda verkliga utmanaren är Samsungs Galaxy Tab S3, som dock har en äldre systemkrets och mindre lagring.
Lagringskapaciteten har ökats, men det har också startpriset. Den minsta modellen (64 GB) är fullt tillräcklig för de flesta användare, speciellt eftersom video och ljudinnehåll ofta streamas nuförtiden. Vi anser att modellen med 256 GB är det bästa köpet, då den till och med är lite billigare än sin föregångare med samma lagringskapacitet. 512-GB-modellen kan rekommenderas för användare som vill ha sin egen multimediasamling tillgänglig offline eller vill använda plattan för att redigera video eller bearbeta bilder.
IPad Pro 10.5 har så bra prestanda att du kanske funderar på att använda den istället för din bärbara dator. Oavsett om det gäller videoredigering av UHD-material eller bildbehandling med Adobe Lightroom fungerar iPad Pro 10.5 snabbt och effektivt, även om vi känner att Smart Keyboard inte är tillräckligt flexibelt och bara fungerar bra på hårda ytor. Däremot är Safari-webbläsarens problem med CMS och andra komplexa webbaserade appar irriterande och filhanteringen är för låst. Därför anser vi att iPad Pro är en bra surfplatta, men ingen ersättare för datorn.
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
- 06/26/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
