Test: Apple iPhone 12 - Apple-telefon med 5G (Sammanfattning)

Name: Apple iPhone 12
Brand: Apple

Nygammalt utseende.

iPhone 12 är kantigare än sin föregångare och har äntligen en OLED-skärm och stöd för 5G. Den är också mycket lättare och tunnare än förra årets modell. I den här recensionen får du reda på om Apple återigen skapat en hit.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Jesper Berg), Published 11/11/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple ARM iOS iPhone Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 12 (iPhone Serie)

Processor

Apple A14 Bionic 6 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Firestorm, Icestorm

Grafikkort

Apple A14 Bionic GPU

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.10 tum 19:9, 2532 x 1170 pixlar 457 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, OLED, True Tone, glansig: ja, HDR, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

64 GB SSD, 64 GB

, 57 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

Ljudanslutningar: Ljud genom lightning-porten, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Barometer

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/30/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/46/48/66), 5G (1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/28/38/40/41/66/77/78/79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 146.7 x 71.5

Batteri

2815 mAh Litiumjon, Laddning: 20W, 15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Apple iOS 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.6, fasjämförande-AF (Dual-pixel), OIS, Dubbel LED-blixt, Video @2160p/60fps (kamera 1); 12.0MP, f/2.4, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.2, video @2160p/60fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Lightning till USB-C kabel, SIM-nål, 12 Månader Garanti, eSIM, IP68-certifierad, SAR: 1.19 W/kg (huvud), 1.17 W/kg (kropp), fanless, waterproof

Vikt

162 g

Pris

876 Kr

Länkar

Apple hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	11/2020	Apple iPhone 12 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	162 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	2532x1170
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	1792x828
87 % v7 ^(old)	09/2020	Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650	235 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2020	Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	209 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.58"	2640x1200
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	OnePlus 8T SD 865, Adreno 650	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	192 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Samsung Galaxy Note20 OnePlus 8T Huawei P40 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Apple iPhone 12 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1544 (797^min - 1619^max) MBit/s +84%
Apple iPhone 12 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	840 (797^min - 876^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	833 (418^min - 883^max) MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 8T Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	716 (679^min - 724^max) MBit/s -15%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	693 (354^min - 711^max) MBit/s -17%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	864 (802^min - 879^max) MBit/s +53%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	856 (776^min - 899^max) MBit/s +51%
Huawei P40 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	821 (388^min - 998^max) MBit/s +45%
OnePlus 8T Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	767 (611^min - 837^max) MBit/s +36%
Apple iPhone 12 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	566 (363^min - 614^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s -1%

Apple iPhone 12; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø566 (363-614)

Apple iPhone 12; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø840 (797-876)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv Blume Hauptobjektiv Umgebung Hauptobjektiv Low Light Ultraweitwinkel

click to load images

Apple iPhone 12

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 12

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 12

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Apple iPhone 12

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 12: 9.78 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 18.29 ∆E


646 cd/m²	638 cd/m²	637 cd/m²
644 cd/m²	642 cd/m²	637 cd/m²
642 cd/m²	636 cd/m²	627 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 646 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 638.8 cd/m² Minimum: 6.95 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 642 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188

	Apple iPhone 12 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6"	OnePlus 8T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		-3%	-29%	-27%	-3%	-84%
Brightness middle	642	679 6%	684 7%	584 -9%	743 16%	610 -5%
Brightness	639	671 5%	690 8%	576 -10%	734 15%	621 -3%
Brightness Distribution	97	93 -4%	95 -2%	95 -2%	91 -6%	95 -2%
Black Level *		0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	0.8 11%	1.3 -44%	1.1 -22%	0.89 1%	2.4 -167%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.42	2.4 1%	2.5 -3%	2.3 5%	1.69 30%	4.3 -78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.8	1.1 -38%	1.9 -138%	1.8 -125%	1.4 -75%	2.8 -250%
Gamma	2.188 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.16 ^102%	2.199 ^100%	2.09 ^105%
CCT	6404 ^101%	6610 ^98%	6475 ^100%	6355 ^102%	6423 ^101%	6368 ^102%
Contrast		999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

226.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 226.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 226.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	1584 Points
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	1006 Points -36%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	779 Points -51%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	889 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	917 Points -42%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (1326 - 1604, n=6)	1549 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points -35%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	3913 Points
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	3300 Points -16%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3165 Points -19%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3164 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2766 Points -29%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (3476 - 4334, n=6)	4019 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points -11%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	7072 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	9361 Points +32%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6739 Points -5%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8877 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8097 Points +14%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (6711 - 7564, n=3)	7116 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	10963 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	12632 Points +15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7499 Points -32%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11586 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11272 Points +3%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (10686 - 13334, n=3)	11661 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	3153 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	4911 Points +56%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4975 Points +58%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4882 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4077 Points +29%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (2915 - 3153, n=3)	3025 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	9173 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	10059 Points +10%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7286 Points -21%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9897 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8485 Points -8%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (8333 - 9173, n=5)	8974 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	21465 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	13419 Points -37%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7905 Points -63%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12878 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11868 Points -45%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (20511 - 23094, n=5)	21609 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	3053 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points +12%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	5361 Points +76%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5718 Points +87%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5468 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4247 Points +39%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (2622 - 3084, n=5)	2953 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	5569 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	7678 Points +38%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6060 Points +9%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7145 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6544 Points +18%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (5079 - 6614, n=4)	5652 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	7282 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points -21%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	9032 Points +24%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6465 Points -11%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8222 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8005 Points +10%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (6281 - 9612, n=4)	7523 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	3054 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -20%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	5035 Points +65%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4971 Points +63%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4900 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3993 Points +31%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (2975 - 3161, n=4)	3058 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	6119 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points -1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	8386 Points +37%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6508 Points +6%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8125 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7076 Points +16%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (6119 - 7294, n=5)	6701 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8254 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	9833 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points -17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	9953 Points +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6771 Points -31%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9420 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	870 Points -91%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (9833 - 12112, n=5)	10821 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12419 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	2635 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points +22%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	5406 Points +105%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5728 Points +117%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5485 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4143 Points +57%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (2631 - 3187, n=5)	2892 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4759 Points +81%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	59.3 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps +1%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps +1%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (40 - 60, n=6)	56.6 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	319.1 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	222 fps -30%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps -52%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	207 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	191 fps -40%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (264 - 325, n=6)	309 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	59.8 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	59 fps -1%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps 0%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (52 - 60, n=6)	58.6 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	174.7 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	132 fps -24%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	118 fps -32%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	127 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	114 fps -35%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (148 - 180, n=6)	170.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	59.6 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +1%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	52 fps -13%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps -3%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (45.4 - 60, n=6)	55.9 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	114.2 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +2%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	93 fps -19%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	75 fps -34%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	88 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	80 fps -30%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (106 - 136.8, n=6)	117 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +9%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	51.5 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +17%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	52 fps +1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31 fps -40%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	46 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	44 fps -15%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (40 - 52, n=6)	47.2 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	68.5 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +7%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	55 fps -20%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	44 fps -36%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	53 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	49 fps -28%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (66 - 87.2, n=6)	74.5 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +9%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	57.7 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	54 fps -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps -38%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps -10%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (40.5 - 60, n=6)	52.9 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)	50.7 fps -12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	84.8 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +3%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	58 fps -32%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	50 fps -41%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	55 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	56 fps -34%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (79 - 105.6, n=6)	88.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)	84.9 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	46.9 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +28%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	35 fps -25%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	23 fps -51%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27 fps -42%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (34 - 53, n=6)	42.8 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	38.9 fps -17%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	30.1 fps
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +10%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	22 fps -27%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps -37%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	23 fps -24%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (29 - 32.9, n=6)	30.9 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34 fps +13%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	552897 Points
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 8192	622888 Points +13%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	496966 Points -10%
OnePlus 8T Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	576457 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	522516 Points -5%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (510245 - 647374, n=5)	580942 Points +5%

Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	168.3 fps
Average Apple A14 Bionic (156.4 - 169.4, n=3)	164.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (251 - 314, n=5, last 2 years)	268 fps +59%
Metal Medium Native (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	136 fps
Average Apple A14 Bionic (96.2 - 136, n=3)	117.4 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (152.9 - 240, n=6, last 2 years)	183.7 fps +35%
3840x2160 Metal High Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	50.3 fps
Average Apple A14 Bionic (50.3 - 51.5, n=2)	50.9 fps +1%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 4096	92705 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	58380 Points -37%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73666 Points -21%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (91892 - 92916, n=4)	92512 Points 0%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158.2 - 178.9, n=6)	163.7 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	158.5 Points
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points -22%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	70 Points -56%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)	69.8 Points -56%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	69.4 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	56.1 Points -65%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (305 - 376, n=5)	353 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	305.3 Points
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points -4%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)	121.7 Points -60%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	118.7 Points -61%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	116.6 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	95.2 Points -69%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 272, n=6)	207 runs/min +7%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	193 runs/min
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min -19%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min -25%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	71.8 runs/min -63%
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86)	71.3 runs/min -63%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	64.4 runs/min -67%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)	41.2 runs/min -79%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 214, n=6)	196.3 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	194 Points
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points -23%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)	123 Points -37%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	108 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	101 Points -48%
Huawei P40 Pro	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 59963, n=6)	58132 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	55710 Points
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points -31%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS	25953 Points -53%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	23690 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	20022 Points -64%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	19915 Points -64%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)	2294 ms * -397%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)	1914 ms * -315%
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86)	1860 ms * -303%
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138)	1854 ms * -302%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * -230%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * -24%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 547, n=6)	477 ms * -3%
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14)	461.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Apple iPhone 12; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø42.5 (38-45)

Apple iPhone 12; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.36.1460240: Ø59.2 (55-60)

Apple iPhone 12; Arena of Valor; min; 1.36.1460240: Ø59.2 (57-60)

Apple iPhone 12; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.5.3: Ø58.4 (49-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


34.3 °C	35.8 °C	36.1 °C
36.1 °C	36.7 °C	36.2 °C
36.6 °C	37.8 °C	35.7 °C

Max: 37.8 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C


34.4 °C	37.1 °C	34 °C
35 °C	37.3 °C	36.3 °C
35.3 °C	35.4 °C	37.1 °C

Max: 37.3 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 39.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 12 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning	5.5 / 10.4 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh	OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh	Average Apple A14 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-11%	-3%	20%	2%	3%	-42%	1%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.56 38%	0.63 30%	0.92 -2%	1.1 -22%	0.92 -2%	0.933 ?(0.62 - 1.34, n=6) -4%	0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.5	2.99 -99%	2.06 -37%	1.41 6%	1.5 -0%	1.5 -0%	3.51 ?(1.18 - 7.89, n=6) -134%	1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	3.02 -68%	2.08 -16%	1.47 18%	1.7 6%	1.54 14%	3.66 ?(1.21 - 7.91, n=6) -103%	1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	5.5	4.17 24%	5.55 -1%	3.35 39%	4.6 16%	5.49 -0%	5.4 ?(2.1 - 9.28, n=6) 2%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	10.4	5.44 48%	9.71 7%	6.37 39%	9.4 10%	9.99 4%	7.57 ?(3.86 - 10.8, n=6) 27%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		43tim 22min
WiFi Websurfing		15tim 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18tim 55min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 43min

	Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh	Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh	OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-32%	-24%	-16%	-11%
Reader / Idle	2602	2765 6%	1211 -53%	1474 -43%	1539 -41%	2067 -21%
H.264	1135	1147 1%	997 -12%	1137 0%	1103 -3%	1123 -1%
WiFi v1.3	945	866 -8%	677 -28%	743 -21%	1023 8%	589 -38%
Load	283	267 -6%	184 -35%	198 -30%	203 -28%	326 15%

För

+ Väldigt exakt OLED-skärm

+ Hölje av hög kvalitet

+ Kameran tar skarpa foton

+ Bra prestanda

+ Lång batteritid

+ Knappt någon värmeutveckling

+ Exakt positionering

+ Brett utbud av tillbehör

+ Täcker många LTE- och 5G-frekvenser

Emot

- PWM-flimmer

- Medelmåttiga högtalare

- Begränsad lagringskapacitet för sitt pris

- Begränsningar för hur NFC kan användas

- Skärmen har bara 60 Hz bilduppdatering

- Inget stöd för 5G mmWave i Europa

Omdöme - Användbara förbättringar

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Apples telefoner har förstås alltid haft en unik egenskap såtillvida att de tillverkats av Apple. Men även 2020 har iPhone 12 ett antal nya förbättringar att erbjuda, exempelvis en OLED-skärm, högre prestanda och stöd för 5G.

Inte heller den här gången bryr sig Apple om aktuella standarder för toppskiktstelefoner, vilket är anledningen till att iPhone 12 fortfarande inte har en 90- eller 120 Hz-skärm och att basmodellen har ganska liten mängd lagring. När det kommer till trådlös laddning och IP-certifiering hänger Apples telefon däremot med.

Faktum att priset på Apples nya telefon återigen har ökat jämfört med föregångaren är ganska irriterande, och då ingår inte ens en AC-adapter eller ett headset. På den sistnämnda punkten går det dock att köpa Apples argument om miljöpåverkan.

iPhone 12 är ytterligare en smartphone av hög kvalitet med massor av styrka och ett bra hölje. De nya funktionerna är inte direkt revolutionerande, men de är väldigt användbara.

Ser man på den separat imponerar iPhone 12 återigen med utmärkt hantverk och vacker design. Den nya MagSafe-porten kommer troligen snart att innebära massor av nya tredjepartstillbehör, som det brukar vara, och den kan till och med användas för att ladda telefonen.

Apple har släppt en bra uppdatering som kanske inte kan ses som revolutionerande men som är ett logiskt nästa steg som uppfyller den höga standard som Apples köpare är vana vid och förväntar sig.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPhone 12 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

89%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

95%

Anslutningar

46 / 70 → 66%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

93%

Spelprestanda

63 / 64 → 98%

Programprestanda

91 / 86 → 100%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

62 / 90 → 69%

Camera

76%

Medel

81%

88%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone 12 - Apple-telefon med 5G (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2020-11-11 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Apple iPhone 12 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Användbara förbättringar

More articles related to this device

Price comparison