Test: Apple iPhone 12 - Apple-telefon med 5G (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.2 % | 11/2020 | Apple iPhone 12 A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 162 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 2532x1170 | |
86.5 % | 10/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
87 % | 09/2020 | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 235 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
89.4 % | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
87.8 % | 10/2020 | OnePlus 8T SD 865, Adreno 650 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
88.1 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 192 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Apple iPhone 11 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low LightUltraweitwinkel![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/5/5/csm_Farbchart_high_3fd98cfad8.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/9/4/csm_Farbchart_low_4b3b31cd37.jpg)
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 642 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188
Apple iPhone 12 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1" | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | OnePlus 8T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy Note20 Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -3% | -29% | -27% | -3% | -84% | |
Brightness middle | 642 | 679 6% | 684 7% | 584 -9% | 743 16% | 610 -5% |
Brightness | 639 | 671 5% | 690 8% | 576 -10% | 734 15% | 621 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 95 -2% | 95 -2% | 91 -6% | 95 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.68 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 0.8 11% | 1.3 -44% | 1.1 -22% | 0.89 1% | 2.4 -167% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.42 | 2.4 1% | 2.5 -3% | 2.3 5% | 1.69 30% | 4.3 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.1 -38% | 1.9 -138% | 1.8 -125% | 1.4 -75% | 2.8 -250% |
Gamma | 2.188 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.16 102% | 2.199 100% | 2.09 105% |
CCT | 6404 101% | 6610 98% | 6475 100% | 6355 102% | 6423 101% | 6368 102% |
Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 226.2 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 226.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 226.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8T | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (510245 - 647374, n=5) |
Basemark GPU 1.2 | |
1920x1080 Metal Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (156.4 - 169.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (232 - 258, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Metal Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (96.2 - 136, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (157.8 - 192.5, n=6, last 2 years) | |
3840x2160 Metal High Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (50.3 - 51.5, n=2) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Apple iPhone 11 | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (91892 - 92916, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 38930, n=11, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158.2 - 178.9, n=6) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (305 - 376, n=5) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 272, n=6) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chome 86) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 214, n=6) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 59963, n=6) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8T (Chrome 86) | |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 547, n=6) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone 12 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Låg belastning | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hög belastning |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh | Average Apple A14 Bionic | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -3% | 20% | 2% | 3% | -42% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.56 38% | 0.63 30% | 0.92 -2% | 1.1 -22% | 0.92 -2% | 0.933 ? -4% | 0.902 ? -0% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 2.99 -99% | 2.06 -37% | 1.41 6% | 1.5 -0% | 1.5 -0% | 3.51 ? -134% | 1.448 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 3.02 -68% | 2.08 -16% | 1.47 18% | 1.7 6% | 1.54 14% | 3.66 ? -103% | 1.608 ? 11% |
Load Average * | 5.5 | 4.17 24% | 5.55 -1% | 3.35 39% | 4.6 16% | 5.49 -0% | 5.4 ? 2% | 6.1 ? -11% |
Load Maximum * | 10.4 | 5.44 48% | 9.71 7% | 6.37 39% | 9.4 10% | 9.99 4% | 7.57 ? 27% | 9.04 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8T 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note20 4300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | -32% | -24% | -16% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 2602 | 2765 6% | 1211 -53% | 1474 -43% | 1539 -41% | 2067 -21% |
H.264 | 1135 | 1147 1% | 997 -12% | 1137 0% | 1103 -3% | 1123 -1% |
WiFi v1.3 | 945 | 866 -8% | 677 -28% | 743 -21% | 1023 8% | 589 -38% |
Load | 283 | 267 -6% | 184 -35% | 198 -30% | 203 -28% | 326 15% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Användbara förbättringar
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Apples telefoner har förstås alltid haft en unik egenskap såtillvida att de tillverkats av Apple. Men även 2020 har iPhone 12 ett antal nya förbättringar att erbjuda, exempelvis en OLED-skärm, högre prestanda och stöd för 5G.
Inte heller den här gången bryr sig Apple om aktuella standarder för toppskiktstelefoner, vilket är anledningen till att iPhone 12 fortfarande inte har en 90- eller 120 Hz-skärm och att basmodellen har ganska liten mängd lagring. När det kommer till trådlös laddning och IP-certifiering hänger Apples telefon däremot med.
Faktum att priset på Apples nya telefon återigen har ökat jämfört med föregångaren är ganska irriterande, och då ingår inte ens en AC-adapter eller ett headset. På den sistnämnda punkten går det dock att köpa Apples argument om miljöpåverkan.
iPhone 12 är ytterligare en smartphone av hög kvalitet med massor av styrka och ett bra hölje. De nya funktionerna är inte direkt revolutionerande, men de är väldigt användbara.
Ser man på den separat imponerar iPhone 12 återigen med utmärkt hantverk och vacker design. Den nya MagSafe-porten kommer troligen snart att innebära massor av nya tredjepartstillbehör, som det brukar vara, och den kan till och med användas för att ladda telefonen.
Apple har släppt en bra uppdatering som kanske inte kan ses som revolutionerande men som är ett logiskt nästa steg som uppfyller den höga standard som Apples köpare är vana vid och förväntar sig.
Apple iPhone 12
-
08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt