Test: Apple iPhone 8 (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 604 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1373:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 8 Plus A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -4% | -2% | -16% | -88% | |
| Brightness middle | 604 | 559 -7% | 556 -8% | 560 -7% | 696 15% |
| Brightness | 580 | 538 -7% | 519 -11% | 562 -3% | 680 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 90 -1% | 93 2% | 93 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.38 14% | 0.34 23% | 0.42 5% | |
| Contrast | 1373 | 1471 7% | 1635 19% | 1657 21% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.3 -8% | 1.3 -8% | 1.7 -42% | 4.3 -258% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 2.7 -17% | 2.6 -13% | 3.4 -48% | 9.4 -309% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 1.9 -19% | 1.6 -0% | 4.8 -200% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.13 103% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6688 97% | 6797 96% | 6818 95% | 6435 101% | 7255 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.15 | 81.57 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.71 | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Compute Metal Score 4.1 (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.06 / 0.14 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.54 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
2.74 / 7.78 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 8 Plus A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe | Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Sony Xperia XZ Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 12% | -10% | 17% | 8% | -23% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1629 | 2085 28% | 1770 9% | 1667 2% | 1540 -5% | 1125 -31% | 1789 10% |
| H.264 | 698 | 733 5% | 722 3% | 771 10% | 582 -17% | 502 -28% | 779 12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 585 | 657 12% | 517 -12% | 719 23% | 966 65% | 438 -25% | 692 18% |
| Load | 202 | 211 4% | 126 -38% | 264 31% | 176 -13% | 187 -7% | 252 25% |
För
Emot
iPhone 8 kan vara den sista av sitt slag, den sista Apple-telefonen med en hem-knapp och IPS-skärm. Om så är fallet gav amerikanerna oss åtminstone ett bra avslutande kapitel. Vi saknar återigen viktiga nya funktioner och innovationer, men iPhone 8 slår sin föregångare på många sätt. En viktig faktor är det nya A11-chippet, som återigen är mycket snabbare och - likt många tidigare modeller - bortanför konkurrenternas grepp. Skalet är nu gjort av glas, vilket känns bra att hålla i men är tyvärr halkigare och drar på sig fler fingeravtryck än tidigare. (Undantaget är den kolsvarta iPhone 7) Det verkar som att man var tvungen att gå tillbaka till en glaspanel på baksidan för att kunna ha trådlös laddning.
Kameran är en riktig höjdpunkt för video-entusiaster eftersom detta är den första smarta telefon som har en kamera som kan spela in Ultra HD-video i 60 bildrutor per sekund. Full HD video går att spela in i upp till 240 FPS, vilket är utmärkt för spektakulära slow motion-inspelningar. Fotokvaliteten ligger på en väldigt hög nivå och behöver inte gömma sig bakom sina rivaler. iPhone 8 är definitivt det bästa kamera-paket du kan få i en smart telefon i dagsläget - om du tycker om den grundläggande inställningsmenyn.
iPhone 8 är kraftfull, håller länge och har en bra kamera. En uppgradering från iPhone 7 är inte nödvändig, men skillnaderna är mer märkbara om du har en iPhone 6S eller en ännu äldre modell.
Du får också snabb LTE, lång batteritid och ett skal som står emot vatten och damm. Vi kan inte hitta några större nackdelar, men en del saker är irriterande. Dessa inkluderar den begränsade garantitiden och den svaga nätadaptern. Röstkvaliteten kunde ha varit bättre i 3G-nätverk och ljudet är bara genomsnittligt, trots stereohögtalare.
Apples förflyttning mot förstärkt verklighet är viktig och kommer säkert att bli framgångsrik tack vare en stor plattform och enorm potential för snabba och lönsamma tekniska framsteg. AR fungerar redan bra, men är ännu inte så exakt eller sofistikerad som Asus ZenFone AR, till exempel.
Allt som allt, iPhone 8 är en bra produkt med sofistikerade komponenter, men telefonen och användbara tillbehör är också väldigt dyra.
Apple iPhone 8
- 09/27/2019 v7 (old)
Patrick Afschar Kaboli, Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
