Test: Apple iPhone XR Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Apple iPhone XR
Brand: Apple

Återigen bra –

Apple positionerar iPhone XR mellan de två XS-modellerna storleksmässigt men utrustar den med en lägre upplöst skärm och bara en bakåtriktad kamera. Den har också några ytterligare mindre brister, men gör XR tillräckligt för att krönas till den totalt sett bästa iPhone-modellen? Läs vidare för att få reda på det.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 11/09/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple Phablet Touchscreen Smartphone iPhone iOS

Apple iPhone XR (iPhone Serie)

Processor

Apple A12 Bionic 6 x - 2.5 GHz

Grafikkort

Apple A12 Bionic GPU

Minne

3 GB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.10 tum 19.5:9, 1792 x 828 pixlar 324 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, tio punkters multitouch, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 116.93 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: 3 axlars Gyroskop, Accelerometer, Barometer, Digital Kompass, Face ID, Närhetssensor, Lightning-Port, eSIM, Galileo, QZSS

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,700/2,100, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE: FDD Band – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66; TDD Band – 34, 38, 39, 40, 41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 150.9 x 75.7

Batteri

11.16 Wh, 2942 mAh Litiumjon, 3.79 V, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 25 tim

Operativsystem

Apple iOS 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Vidvinkel: f/1.8, 1.4 μm, Fokus-Pixel, 6 linselement, OIS, True Tone-blixt, UHD Video i upp till 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, Full HD i upp till 60 FPS

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, Lightning-kabel, Hörlurar, Snabbstartsguide, Apple-klistermärke, SIM-verktyg, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (Huvud): 0.99 W/kg, IP67-certifierad, Trådlös laddning (Qi), fanless

Vikt

194 g, Strömförsörjning: 46 g

Pris

909 Kr

Länkar

Apple hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (647^min - 714^max) MBit/s +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (289^min - 805^max) MBit/s +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (6^min - 792^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s 0%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	644 (578^min - 672^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	587 MBit/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1001 (209^min - 1106^max) MBit/s +94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (532^min - 642^max) MBit/s +19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (100^min - 534^max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s +26%
Apple iPhone XS A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)	650 MBit/s +26%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	517 (477^min - 528^max) MBit/s

Apple iPhone XR; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø516 (477-528)

Apple iPhone XR; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø644 (578-672)

GPS-test: Apple iPhone XR – Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


629 cd/m²	661 cd/m²	632 cd/m²
616 cd/m²	672 cd/m²	644 cd/m²
622 cd/m²	662 cd/m²	632 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 672 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 641.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 672 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1920:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3"	Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8"	Apple iPhone 8 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		-11%	-66%	-5%	6%	-6%
Brightness middle	672	529 -21%	489 -27%	576 -14%	639 -5%	559 -17%
Brightness	641	527 -18%	486 -24%	582 -9%	637 -1%	538 -16%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	93 1%	90 -2%	94 2%	90 -2%
Black Level *	0.35		0.34 3%			0.38 -9%
Contrast	1920		1438 -25%			1471 -23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	1.4 -8%	3.8 -192%	1.3 -0%	1 23%	1.3 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	4 -48%	7.1 -163%	3.5 -30%	2.2 19%	2.7 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.6 27%	4.4 -100%	1.6 27%	2.2 -0%	1.8 18%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.16 ^102%	2.22 ^99%	2.18 ^101%	1.9 ^116%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6868 ^95%	6358 ^102%	7213 ^90%	6561 ^99%	6364 ^102%	6797 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	4750 Points
Apple iPhone XS	4824 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	4263 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3688 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2468 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	3378 Points -29%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4750 - 4824, n=5)	4779 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	11276 Points
Apple iPhone XS	11598 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	10558 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9	8786 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F1	9182 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	10024 Points -11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11244 - 11598, n=5)	11418 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +32%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	21070 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9	6219 Points -70%
Xiaomi Poco F1	14369 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	8938 Points -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic ()	21070 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points -43%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9	5736 Points
Xiaomi Poco F1	9664 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	12535 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9	5291 Points
Xiaomi Poco F1	8101 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	9225 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	77597 Points
Apple iPhone XS	77128 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	64405 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9	41093 Points -47%
Xiaomi Poco F1	63159 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	57047 Points -26%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (77128 - 77626, n=5)	77462 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	162695 Points
Apple iPhone XS	160199 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	113380 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9	48433 Points -70%
Xiaomi Poco F1	82125 Points -50%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	67730 Points -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (159735 - 162695, n=5)	160619 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	27413 Points
Apple iPhone XS	27400 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	25641 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9	26851 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F1	34928 Points +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	36755 Points +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (27400 - 27717, n=5)	27548 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	5724 Points
Apple iPhone XS	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3911 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F1	5687 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4996 Points -13%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (5205 - 6997, n=5)	6265 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	7806 Points
Apple iPhone XS	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9	4569 Points -41%
Xiaomi Poco F1	8261 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5305 Points -32%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7055 - 10647, n=5)	9099 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	2960 Points
Apple iPhone XS	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S9	2600 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2720 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4150 Points +40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2713 - 3184, n=5)	3015 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	7555 Points
Apple iPhone XS	7856 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9	4091 Points -46%
Xiaomi Poco F1	5230 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5456 Points -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (6667 - 8763, n=5)	7814 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	14085 Points
Apple iPhone XS	14951 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9	4843 Points -66%
Xiaomi Poco F1	6898 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5854 Points -58%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (10374 - 15399, n=5)	13770 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	2880 Points
Apple iPhone XS	2952 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9	2650 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2832 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4407 Points +53%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2880 - 3493, n=5)	3129 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	3629 Points
Apple iPhone XS	3514 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	2781 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3244 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3972 Points +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4201 Points +16%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3514 - 4949, n=6)	4083 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	3806 Points
Apple iPhone XS	3712 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	3069 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3553 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F1	4746 Points +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4206 Points +11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3712 - 5760, n=6)	4500 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	3121 Points
Apple iPhone XS	2960 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	2109 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9	2486 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2528 Points -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4183 Points +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2960 - 3312, n=6)	3127 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	4405 Points
Apple iPhone XS	4436 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	2981 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3376 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3669 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4275 Points -3%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4121 - 5367, n=6)	4707 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	5061 Points
Apple iPhone XS	5139 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	3325 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3697 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco F1	4468 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4250 Points -16%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4828 - 6484, n=6)	5565 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	3030 Points
Apple iPhone XS	2998 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	2187 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9	2590 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2257 Points -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4364 Points +44%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2723 - 3347, n=6)	3064 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +51%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	60 fps
Apple iPhone XS	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	119.4 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy S9	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F1	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	61 fps +2%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59.5 - 60, n=6)	59.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	232 fps
Apple iPhone XS	251 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	166.9 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9	144 fps -38%
Xiaomi Poco F1	150 fps -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	120 fps -48%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (226 - 274, n=6)	247 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +20%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	60 fps
Apple iPhone XS	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	79.2 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9	45 fps -25%
Xiaomi Poco F1	58 fps -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	42 fps -30%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (58 - 60, n=6)	59.1 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +25%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	132 fps
Apple iPhone XS	115 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	71 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S9	73 fps -45%
Xiaomi Poco F1	71 fps -46%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	73 fps -45%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (107 - 139, n=6)	124.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +24%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	60 fps
Apple iPhone XS	48 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	56.4 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9	24 fps -60%
Xiaomi Poco F1	54 fps -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	26 fps -57%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (48 - 60, n=5)	53.5 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +9%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	88 fps
Apple iPhone XS	62 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	49 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9	46 fps -48%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps -60%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	29 fps -67%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (62 - 96, n=5)	80.2 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +32%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	58 fps
Apple iPhone XS	31 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S9	14 fps -76%
Xiaomi Poco F1	33 fps -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	16 fps -72%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (31 - 58, n=5)	37.5 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps -18%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	54 fps
Apple iPhone XS	38 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9	28 fps -48%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	31 fps -43%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (38 - 62.8, n=5)	49.2 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +30%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	59 fps
Apple iPhone XS	41 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco F1	31 fps -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	18 fps -69%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (37 - 59, n=5)	44.9 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps -16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	63 fps
Apple iPhone XS	48 fps -24%
Xiaomi Poco F1	32 fps -49%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	33 fps -48%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (36.8 - 70.5, n=5)	56.1 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +26%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	59 fps
Apple iPhone XS	35 fps -41%
Xiaomi Poco F1	22 fps -63%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	19 fps -68%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (25.3 - 59, n=5)	35.6 fps -40%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps -37%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	20 fps
Apple iPhone XS	22 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco F1	14 fps -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	13 fps -35%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (16.3 - 26.3, n=5)	21.5 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +58%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F1	21.26 (11.26^min - 61.24^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	25.57 (7.38^min - 46.96^max) fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F1	15.8 (10.44^min - 44.6^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	16.92 (6.06^min - 28.78^max) fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F1	24.51 (11.54^min - 48.55^max) fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	29.12 (9.74^min - 74.17^max) fps

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS	348178 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9	243861 Points
Xiaomi Poco F1	263165 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	300617 Points
Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 370545, n=4)	347775 Points

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	218158 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9	217950 Points
Xiaomi Poco F1	227026 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	250848 Points

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco F1	4731 Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5025 Score
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	5721 Points
Apple iPhone XS	6097 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9	3285 Points -43%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3838 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4687 Points -18%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4895 - 6097, n=5)	5396 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +9%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	11946 Points
Apple iPhone XS	12202 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9	6234 Points -48%
Xiaomi Poco F1	6506 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	8604 Points -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11675 - 12591, n=5)	12077 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	3263 Points
Apple iPhone XS	4169 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S9	2669 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3239 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	6283 Points +93%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1815 - 4169, n=5)	2684 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +106%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	15969 Points
Apple iPhone XS	15875 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9	6373 Points -60%
Xiaomi Poco F1	7945 Points -50%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	6273 Points -61%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (15614 - 15969, n=5)	15755 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +5%
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	1722 Points
Apple iPhone XS	1711 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9	1099 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco F1	1296 Points -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	1424 Points -17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1711 - 1734, n=5)	1726 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points -10%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XR	2754 Points
Apple iPhone XS	2606 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9	1436 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	1571 Points -43%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2873, n=6)	2637 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points -16%

Legend

Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)

Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)

Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Apple A12 Bionic

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	272.3 Points +2%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (267 - 273, n=4)	270 Points +1%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	267.8 Points
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	223.5 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.2 Points -59%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	76 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	67.7 Points -75%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	43280 Points +1%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	42897 Points
Average Apple A12 Bionic (41367 - 43280, n=6)	42312 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	35209 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	15233 Points -64%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points -66%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2714 ms * -345%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2078 ms * -241%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1952 ms * -220%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * -160%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	720 ms * -18%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 653, n=6)	627 ms * -3%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	610 ms *
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	609 ms * -0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	161 Points
Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 166, n=6)	159.5 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	159 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)	147.1 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9	63 Points -61%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8 Plus	362 Points +6%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)	345 Points +1%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (341 - 347, n=4)	344 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	343 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	334 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	223 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)	163 Points -52%

* ... smaller is better

PUBG Mobile (HD)

Apple iPhone XR; 0.9.0: Ø40.5 (32-59)

World of Tanks Blitz (High)

Apple iPhone XR; 5.4.0: Ø59.4 (58-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


37.5 °C	38.2 °C	35.9 °C
35.5 °C	35.2 °C	35.8 °C
34.2 °C	34.3 °C	33.8 °C

Max: 38.2 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C


34.9 °C	38.4 °C	40.3 °C
34.1 °C	36.9 °C	38.6 °C
33.2 °C	35.4 °C	35.5 °C

Max: 40.3 °C
Medel: 36.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 36.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone XR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.09 Watt
Låg belastning	0.61 / 2.67 / 2.69 Watt
Hög belastning	4.34 / 5.66 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh	Average Apple A12 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		26%	-3%	-7%	11%	-10%	-61%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	0.61	0.65 -7%	0.65 -7%	0.95 -56%	0.95 -56%	0.72 -18%	1.36 ?(0.61 - 2.18, n=6) -123%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Average *	2.67	0.81 70%	1.97 26%	2.17 19%	1.34 50%	2.45 8%	3.41 ?(1.34 - 6.43, n=6) -28%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 46%
Idle Maximum *	2.69	0.92 66%	2.01 25%	2.25 16%	1.48 45%	2.52 6%	4.05 ?(1.48 - 6.69, n=6) -51%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 40%
Load Average *	4.34	4.76 -10%	4.29 1%	4.47 -3%	4 8%	3.84 12%	6.4 ?(4 - 9.8, n=6) -47%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -48%
Load Maximum *	5.66	5.16 9%	9.05 -60%	6.15 -9%	5.13 9%	9.02 -59%	8.75 ?(5.13 - 12.5, n=6) -55%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -70%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		49tim 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 12)		15tim 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16tim 51min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 30min

	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2691 mAh
Battery Runtime		-47%	-17%	-17%	-31%	-27%
Reader / Idle	2969	1182 -60%	2088 -30%	1747 -41%	1442 -51%	2085 -30%
H.264	1011	609 -40%	936 -7%	854 -16%	745 -26%	733 -27%
WiFi v1.3	910	474 -48%	808 -11%	767 -16%	570 -37%	657 -28%
Load	270	164 -39%	220 -19%	282 4%	245 -9%	211 -22%

För

+ ljusstark skärm med god färgprecision

+ kraftfull SoC

+ IP67-certifierad

+ dual-SIM (eSIM)

+ skaplig bakåtriktad kamera

+ trådlös laddning

+ bra mobilfrekvenstäckning

+ utmärkt batteritid

Emot

- positioneringen kunde varit mer exakt

- endast 12 månaders garanti

- minnet går inte att utöka

- begränsad NFC-funktionalitet

- snabbladdare ingår ej

- ingen hörlursanslutning

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Apples iPhone XR delar många komponenter med modellerna i den dyrare iPhone XS-serien, de har bland annat samma SoC, huvudkamera, Face ID-system, stöd för dubbla SIM-kort och trådlösa laddning. Apple har kompromissat på en del områden vilket inkluderar lägre IP-certifiering, ett sämre modem och en LCD-skärm med lägre upplösning. Huvudkameran saknar också XS-seriens optiska zoom och några dess porträttfunktioner.

iPhone XR är en billigare och färgrikare version av XS-serien. XR delar mycket av sin hårdvara med de dyrare syskonen utan att för prisets skull behöva kompromissa på nyckelområden.

Den lägre upplösta LCD-skärmen är i vårt tycke ett villospår. Den använder inte PWM för att justera skärmens ljusstyrka, vilket XS-serien gör; något som kan anstränga ögonen eller ge en del personer huvudvärk. Dessutom förbättrar den lägre upplösningen batteritiden rejält utan att bildkvaliteten behöver offras.

Prisskillnaden mellan XR och iPhone XS är gigantisk. Vi ser heller inga påtagliga nackdelar som hindrar oss från att rekommendera den framför de dyrare syskonen. En större storlek kan göra den mindre tilltalande än XS för somliga, men det är en fråga om smak. Totalt sett är iPhone XR mer prisvärd än både iPhone XS och XS Max.

Apple iPhone XR - 2019-09-27 09/27/2019 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design

90%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

96%

Anslutningar

48 / 70 → 69%

Vikt

89%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

91%

Spelprestanda

55 / 64 → 86%

Programprestanda

79 / 86 → 91%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 85%

Camera

69%

Medel

80%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Apple iPhone XR Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 2018-11- 9 (Update: 2018-11- 9)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile (HD)

World of Tanks Blitz (High)

Apple iPhone XR audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison