Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Apple iPhone XS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 639 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
| Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8" | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -7% | -21% | -3% | -70% | -53% | -159% | -24% | |
| Brightness middle | 639 | 600 -6% | 529 -17% | 569 -11% | 477 -25% | 430 -33% | 974 52% | 395 -38% |
| Brightness | 637 | 606 -5% | 527 -17% | 578 -9% | 453 -29% | 437 -31% | 975 53% | 402 -37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 94 0% | 96 2% | 95 1% | 86 -9% | 87 -7% | 96 2% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.37 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.2 -20% | 1.4 -40% | 1.3 -30% | 2.1 -110% | 2.3 -130% | 5.4 -440% | 1.6 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 3 -36% | 4 -82% | 2.1 5% | 8.2 -273% | 4.6 -109% | 13.1 -495% | 3.4 -55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.6 27% | 1.6 27% | 1.6 27% | 1.6 27% | 2.4 -9% | 5 -127% | 1.1 50% |
| Gamma | 1.9 116% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6364 102% | 6707 97% | 6358 102% | 6401 102% | 6425 101% | 6160 106% | 7480 87% | 6536 99% |
| Contrast | 1445 | 1988 | 1068 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
| LG G7 ThinQ | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2873, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone XS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.95 / 1.34 / 1.48 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4 / 5.13 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Average Apple A12 Bionic | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -33% | 18% | 16% | -34% | -4% | -100% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.95 | 1.03 -8% | 0.65 32% | 0.84 12% | 0.67 29% | 0.6 37% | 1.36 ? -43% | 0.895 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * | 1.34 | 2.4 -79% | 0.81 40% | 1.54 -15% | 2.5 -87% | 1 25% | 3.41 ? -154% | 1.447 ? -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.48 | 2.6 -76% | 0.92 38% | 1.57 -6% | 2.51 -70% | 1.6 -8% | 4.05 ? -174% | 1.608 ? -9% |
| Load Average * | 4 | 2.96 26% | 4.76 -19% | 2.47 38% | 4.3 -8% | 4.3 -8% | 6.4 ? -60% | 6.41 ? -60% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.13 | 6.6 -29% | 5.16 -1% | 2.49 51% | 6.87 -34% | 8.6 -68% | 8.75 ? -71% | 9.61 ? -87% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | 5% | -22% | 24% | -11% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1442 | 1292 -10% | 1305 -10% | 1182 -18% | 1727 20% | 1347 -7% | 1806 25% |
| H.264 | 745 | 634 -15% | 801 8% | 609 -18% | 784 5% | 520 -30% | 791 6% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 570 | 564 -1% | 742 30% | 474 -17% | 744 31% | 547 -4% | 762 34% |
| Load | 245 | 180 -27% | 223 -9% | 164 -33% | 345 41% | 235 -4% | 246 0% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Apple iPhone XS är en övning i finjustering. Enheten har inte bara en snabbare och mer ekonomisk SoC än sin föregångare utan även en mer dynamisk kamera, större lagringsalternativ, en förbättrad IP-certifiering samt de operativsystemsförbättringar som kommer av övergången till iOS 12. Framför allt kan "screen time"-funktionen vara användbar för föräldrar som vill begränsa hur mycket tid deras barn får spela spel. Enhetens design förblir densamma, men det har vi kommit att förvänta oss med "S"-enheter. Den enda estetiska skillnaden är att Apple nu också säljer XS i en ny guldfärg, som vi gillade särskilt bra.
Apple iPhone XS har rikligt med bra teknik för samma pris som en liten MacBook Pro eller en iMac.
XS har en del nackdelar men inga riktiga brister. Batteritiden är bara okej, även om den är en aning bättre än iPhone X. Den nya iPhone XS-serien har också begravt Touch ID, istället förlitar sig alla nya iPhone-modeller på biometrisk säkerhet genom Face ID. Även om Apple har förbättrat hur kameran presterar i situationer med lite ljus så är teleobjektivet märkbart sämre än huvudkamerans sensor. Vi hade föredragit om Apple använde en bättre sensor till teleobjektivet, någon vi även kritiserade iPhone X för.
Vår största kritik mot iPhone XS rör dess pris. Modellen på 64 GB börjar på 11.490 kronor och versionen med 512 GB kostar absurda 15.490 kronor. Du får gräva djupt i fickorna om du ska köpa den senaste iPhone-modellen direkt och XS har inte tillräckligt med nya funktioner för att rättfärdiga en uppgradering från iPhone X. I slutändan är det din plånbok som kommer att få sista ordet.
Price comparison
