Test: Asus FX550IU (FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460) (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Brand: Asus

En svansong för Bristol Ridge. Vad som borde vara en av dom sista bärbara Bristol Ridge speldatorerna för 2017 innan Ryzen kommer visar oss varför bärbara AMD-datorer har misslyckats så. Ett gammalt plastchassi, en billig TN-panel och svag CPU-prestanda hjälper inte Polaris GPU:n.

Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 09/20/2017 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Gaming Laptop / Notebook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus FX550IU-WSFX (FX Serie)

Processor

AMD FX-9830P 4 x 3 - 3.7 GHz, Bristol Ridge

Grafikkort

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1180 MHz, Minne: 1250 MHz, GDDR5, 21.19.128.4

Minne

8 GB

, 1200 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel, Fastlött

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, ID: AUO38ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, glansig: nej

Moderkort

AMD CZ FCH

Hårddisk

SK Hynix HFS128G32TND, 128 GB

, Secondary: 1 TB Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Ljudkort

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm combo, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 31.8 x 380 x 251

Batteri

44 Wh Litiumjon, removeable, 4-cell

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: nej, Strömförsörjning, Crimson, Asus Smart Gesture, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.45 kg, Strömförsörjning: 499 g

Pris

700 USD

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus FX553VD-DM249T HP Omen 15-ce002ng Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Asus FX550IU-WSFX Gigabyte Sabre 15G Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, HDMI, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset

Right: USB 2.0, Unused optical bay, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T	168 MB/s +527%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX	26.8 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567	22.2 MB/s -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T	246 MB/s +747%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX	29.04 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567	27.2 MB/s -6%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	529 MBit/s +139%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	319 MBit/s +44%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	221 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	648 MBit/s +89%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	343 MBit/s
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	240 MBit/s -30%


230.1 cd/m²	226.4 cd/m²	232 cd/m²
205 cd/m²	231.9 cd/m²	212 cd/m²
207.8 cd/m²	221.2 cd/m²	218.8 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

ID: AUO38ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2

Max: 232 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 220.6 cd/m² Minimum: 10.84 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 231.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 515:1 (Svärta: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
54.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
34.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2)

	Asus FX550IU-WSFX ID: AUO38ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080	Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		74%	0%	7%	75%
Display P3 Coverage	36.26	65.7 81%	36.42 0%	38.97 7%	65.8 81%
sRGB Coverage	54.6	90.3 65%	54.9 1%	58.2 7%	90.9 66%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	37.46	65.9 76%	37.62 0%	40.3 8%	66.5 78%
Response Times		1%	-12%	12%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.2 ?(21.2, 18)	38.8 ?(20.4, 18.4) 1%	36 ?(17, 19) 8%	32 ?(16.4, 15.6) 18%	43.2 ?(21.2, 22) -10%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(22.8, 4.4)	27.2 ?(14.8, 12.4) -0%	36 ?(19, 17) -32%	25.6 ?(15.6, 10) 6%	31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8) -15%
PWM Frequency		25910 ?(20)		20000 ?(99)
Screen		58%	-3%	19%	58%
Brightness middle	231.9	335 44%	246 6%	248.4 7%	304 31%
Brightness	221	313 42%	235 6%	241 9%	289 31%
Brightness Distribution	88	83 -6%	75 -15%	84 -5%	86 -2%
Black Level *	0.45	0.27 40%	0.55 -22%	0.3 33%	0.26 42%
Contrast	515	1241 141%	447 -13%	828 61%	1169 127%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	12	4.7 61%	10.97 9%	7.5 37%	3.46 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	21.6	8.1 62%		25.2 -17%	7.72 64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	14	5.8 59%	14.25 -2%	6.5 54%	2.46 82%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.06 ^107%	1.83 ^120%	2.19 ^100%	2.38 ^92%
CCT	16348 ^40%	6518 ^100%	11200 ^58%	7852 ^83%	6915 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	34.8	58.7 69%	35 1%	37 6%	59 70%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	54.8	90.1 64%	55 0%	57.9 6%	91 66%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		44% / 53%	-5% / -4%	13% / 16%	40% / 52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points +63%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points +56%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	133 Points +43%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	132 Points +42%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	123 Points +32%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	97 Points +4%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	93 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	86 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	72 Points -23%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	69 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points +145%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	543 Points +80%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	538 (467.61^min - 538.34^max) Points +79%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	503 Points +67%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	464 Points +54%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points +9%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	301 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	256 Points -15%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	247 Points -18%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	230 Points -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	229 Points -24%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.73 Points +57%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	1.6 Points +45%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	1.51 Points +37%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	1.49 Points +35%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	1.45 Points +32%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	1.1 Points 0%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	1.1 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	1.03 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	0.94 Points -15%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	0.81 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points +124%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	6.11 Points +68%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5.81 Points +60%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	5.32 Points +46%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	3.67 Points +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	3.64 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	2.85 Points -22%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	2.75 Points -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	2.7 Points -26%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	2.66 Points -27%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	21824 Points +122%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	17618 Points +79%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	16456 Points +68%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	14148 Points +44%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	11373 Points +16%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	9822 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	8718 Points -11%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	8413 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	7420 Points -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	7200 Points -27%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5877 Points +94%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	5545 Points +83%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	4975 Points +64%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4920 Points +62%
HP Omen 17-w100ng Intel Core i5-6300HQ	4815 Points +59%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	3871 Points +28%
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	3714 Points +22%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	3033 Points
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	2640 Points -13%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	2277 Points -25%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Medion Akoya E6422 Intel Core i3-6100U	657 s * -108%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	645 s * -104%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Intel Core i5-7200U	489.4 s * -55%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 AMD A10-9620P	470.9 s * -49%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV AMD A12-9720P	415.5 s * -32%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD FX-9830P	315.9 s *
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel Core i5-8250U	314.7 s * -0%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	225.6 s * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6157

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

9822

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

3033

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.64 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

42.05 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.1 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

93 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

57.2 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

301 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4858 Points +44%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6	3850 Points +14%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3832 Points +13%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3431 Points +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	3384 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5348 Points +26%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6	5068 Points +19%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	5063 Points +19%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND	5040 Points +18%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	4260 Points

PCMark 10
Essentials
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	8191 Points +51%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	7542 Points +39%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	5417 Points
Score
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4861 Points +87%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	4364 Points +68%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	2603 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3384 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4640 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4260 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		2603 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus FX550IU-WSFX SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6	Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128	Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND	MSI GP62 7REX-1045US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
AS SSD		76%	79%	19%	246%
Copy Game MB/s	110.6	286.2 159%	323.5 192%		442.8 300%
Copy Program MB/s	70.8	224 216%	195.3 176%		326.3 361%
Copy ISO MB/s	150.8	425.4 182%	446.8 196%		1128 648%
Score Total	587	734 25%	752 28%	798 36%	1829 212%
Score Write	177	227 28%	234 32%	175 -1%	600 239%
Score Read	278	332 19%	337 21%	419 51%	849 205%
Access Time Write *	0.27	0.057 79%	0.073 73%	0.273 -1%	0.034 87%
Access Time Read *	0.145	0.094 35%	0.141 3%	0.119 18%	0.079 46%
4K-64 Write	114.5	118.3 3%	132.2 15%	97 -15%	428.2 274%
4K-64 Read	208.7	258.6 24%	257 23%	342.1 64%	628 201%
4K Write	50.6	66.6 32%	53.8 6%	65.5 29%	112 121%
4K Read	22.09	25.16 14%	28.3 28%	26.34 19%	35.84 62%
Seq Write	120.1	416.1 246%	479.8 300%	129.1 7%	601 400%
Seq Read	468.5	481.6 3%	516 10%	503 7%	1848 294%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS128G32TND

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 523 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 128 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 176.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 128.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 517 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 128.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 31.13 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 78.3 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K	72213 Points +131%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	39507 Points +26%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K	34892 Points +11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	34679 Points +11%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P	31294 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	25986 Points -17%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	22439 Points -28%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-7200U	19333 Points -38%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	8385 Points -73%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K	12186 Points +141%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6166 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	5863 Points +16%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K	5701 Points +13%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P	5062 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-7200U	3576 Points -29%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	3574 Points -29%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1593 Points -69%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K	17919 Points +130%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K	8597 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7903 Points +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P	7794 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7731 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points -38%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-7200U	4575 Points -41%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4251 Points -45%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2230 Points -71%
1280x720 Performance Combined
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K	10801 Points +294%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K	8447 Points +208%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7182 Points +162%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6707 Points +145%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points +63%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-7200U	4156 Points +52%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4113 Points +50%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P	2742 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1770 Points -35%

3DMark 11 Performance		5537 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		60282 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9968 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3962 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2148 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	61 fps +47%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K, Intel SSD 530 Series SSDSC2BW240A	55.3 fps +34%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	52.4 fps +27%
MSI GL72 6QF GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe	49.9 fps +21%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	41.4 fps
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	35 fps -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	30.2 fps -27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	13.5 fps -67%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128	12.5 fps -70%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	34.2 fps +74%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	28.3 fps +44%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K, Intel SSD 530 Series SSDSC2BW240A	27.9 (24^min - 31^max) fps +42%
MSI GL72 6QF GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe	25.6 fps +30%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	19.7 fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	17.2 fps -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	16.9 fps -14%

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)	175.3			48.7
BioShock Infinite (2013)	96			41.4
Metro: Last Light (2013)	42.6			29.5
Thief (2014)	24.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	71.7		29.6	17.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	43		35
Fallout 4 (2015)	55.4		32.3	27.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	61.5		28.4	19.7
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)		24.2	21
Overwatch (2016)	100		79.7	43
Prey (2017)	57.5	49.2	36.4	30.3
Dirt 4 (2017)	95.4	60.7	39.6	22.4
F1 2017 (2017)	37	27	24	20

The Witcher 3 high

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30.2 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning		41.6 / 45.3 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

	Asus FX550IU-WSFX Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND	Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6	Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
Noise		-5%	-10%	-6%	-8%
off / environment *	28.2	30.3 -7%	28.2 -0%	30 -6%	30.8 -9%
Idle Minimum *	30.2	30.9 -2%	33 -9%	30 1%	32.9 -9%
Idle Average *	30.3	30.9 -2%	33.3 -10%	33 -9%	32.9 -9%
Idle Maximum *	30.3	31 -2%	34.7 -15%	37 -22%	33.5 -11%
Load Average *	41.6	46.5 -12%	44.5 -7%	41 1%	43.7 -5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43.7		49.2 -13%	42 4%	46.2 -6%
Load Maximum *	45.3	46.8 -3%	52.8 -17%	50 -10%	47 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


37.8 °C	41.2 °C	28.4 °C
41.8 °C	46.2 °C	29.8 °C
30.8 °C	35.8 °C	34 °C

Max: 46.2 °C
Medel: 36.2 °C


27 °C	40.2 °C	51.2 °C
28.2 °C	42.6 °C	44 °C
32.6 °C	30 °C	27 °C

Max: 51.2 °C
Medel: 35.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27.6 °C	27 °C	24.4 °C
27.2 °C	28.2 °C	24.8 °C
26.6 °C	26.8 °C	26.6 °C

Max: 28.2 °C
Medel: 26.6 °C


25.6 °C	28.2 °C	27.2 °C
25.4 °C	28.8 °C	27.6 °C
27.4 °C	27.8 °C	26.8 °C

Max: 28.8 °C
Medel: 27.2 °C

Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


37.2 °C	38.6 °C	27.8 °C
42.2 °C	47.2 °C	28.6 °C
30.2 °C	36.2 °C	33.6 °C

Max: 47.2 °C
Medel: 35.7 °C


29 °C	43 °C	50.8 °C
29.8 °C	44.2 °C	44.4 °C
33.6 °C	30.8 °C	28.8 °C

Max: 50.8 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).

Asus FX550IU-WSFX audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.233 / 0.437 Watt
Låg belastning	5.9 / 8.8 / 9.7 Watt
Hög belastning	78.1 / 117 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus FX550IU-WSFX FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), SK Hynix HFS128G32TND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GP62 7REX-1045US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-13%	-56%	-101%	14%	9%
Idle Minimum *	5.9	9.1 -54%	14.6 -147%	18 -205%	4 32%	5 15%
Idle Average *	8.8	10.3 -17%	17.2 -95%	23 -161%	6.7 24%	8.9 -1%
Idle Maximum *	9.7	13 -34%	17.3 -78%	30 -209%	9.6 1%	11.8 -22%
Load Average *	78.1	75.6 3%	82.7 -6%	85 -9%	81 -4%	55 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	112.4	83.8 25%	107 5%	96 15%	90 20%
Load Maximum *	117	115.2 2%	136.7 -17%	158 -35%	107 9%	93 21%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		9tim 05min
WiFi Websurfing		4tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		0tim 53min

	Asus FX550IU-WSFX FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), 44 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh	Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh	HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		81%	107%	14%	-7%	20%
Reader / Idle	545	1061 95%	1174 115%	493 -10%	256 -53%	587 8%
WiFi v1.3	247	535 117%	622 152%	261 6%	198 -20%	360 46%
Load	53	70 32%	81 53%	77 45%	80 51%	56 6%
Witcher 3 ultra		68

För

+ i huvudsak stabil prestanda på processorn

+ HHD-plats och RAM-plats går att nå

+ snabb vit-svart responstid

+ 2 st expansionsplatser; VGA-ut

+ löstagbart Li-jonbatteri

+ ganska billig

+ stadiga QWERTY-knappar

Emot

- väldigt dålig gråskala innan kalibrering; svag bakgrundsbelysning

- dålig TN-panel; medelmåttig kontrastratio; smalt färgomfång

- plastchassi känns billigt; gammaldags design

- prestandan per Watt imponerar inte

- mycket långsam processor

- långsam SSD skriv-prestanda

- oanvänt och tomt utrymme för optisk enhet

- tangentbordet blir varmt vid tyngre användning

- batteritiden imponerar inte

- svårt att nå SD-kortläsaren

- tangentbordet har ingen bakgrundsbelysning

- drivrutinsproblem

- billig blank utsida på locket

- mjuka knappar på det numeriska tangentbordet

- högljutt knapslammer

Läs det längre originaltestet på engelska här.

FX550UI lider av samma problem som många äldre bärbara AMD-baserade speldatorer. I det här fallet blir den långsamt presterande FX-9830P APU:n en flaskhals som begränsar dess i övrigt väl presterande RX 460 GPU. Systemets prestanda-per-Watt är dessutom underlägsen vad Nvidia erbjuder för tillfället. Energiförbrukningen är jämförbar med konkurrerande datorer med de kraftfullare Intel HQ-klass CPU:erna och GTX 1050-grafik. FX550UI håller sig därför inte nödvändigtvis längre, svalare eller tystare än aktuella Intel/Nvidia-alternativ trots att den presterar sämre.

Den dåligt matchade kombinationen av Bristol Ridge och Polaris 11 är inte det enda att skylla på. Faktumet att FX550UI är en tömd version av den mycket äldre FX550DM gör att hela datorn känns ogenomtänkt. Det tomma utrymmet för en optisk enhet är bara ett slöseri med plats och TN-skärmen är bristfällig. AMD förtjänar bättre hårdvara från Asus likt UX550 eller ROG Strix G501-serierna. Det börjar synas större investeringar i AMD-datorer nu när GL702ZC är tillgänglig och vi hoppas att detta kommer leda till ett bättre AMD-utbud i framtiden.

Priset är fortfarande en av dom största fördelar FX550UI har över Nvidia-alternativen. För ca 5 500 kr ($700 USD) är Asus-modellen runt 1 600 - 2 400 kr ($200 - $300 USD) billigare än en Pavilion 15 eller en Sabre 15 med i7-7700HQ och GTX 1050-grafik. Dom som väljer att investera lite extra pengar i ett aktuellt Nvidia-system kommer uppleva stora förbättringar jämfört med FX550UI, särskilt när det gäller CPU-prestanda.

Det är svårt att rekommendera FX550UI på grund av det billiga plastchassit, den långsamma processorn och den dåliga TN-skärmen. Spelintresserade med liten budget borde istället spara lite till en nyare bärbar med GTX 1050 eller till en äldre och billigare med GTX 965M.

Asus FX550IU-WSFX - 09/16/2017 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

65 / 98 → 66%

Tangentbord

68%

Mus

78%

Anslutningar

43 / 81 → 53%

Vikt

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Batteri

76%

Skärm

77%

Spelprestanda

77%

Programprestanda

77%

Temperatur

86 / 95 → 90%

Ljudnivå

85 / 90 → 94%

Audio

50%

Camera

34 / 85 → 40%

Medel

67%

72%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5250 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus FX550IU (FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460) (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2017-09-20 (Update: 2017-09-22)