Test: Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 205 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1170:1 (Svärta: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.02
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Asus TUF FX705GM AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 30% | 31% | -1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 90 44% | 90.8 46% | 66.1 6% | 67.1 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 88.8 | 100 13% | 99.9 13% | 84.4 -5% | 86.1 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.8 | 84.8 33% | 85.8 34% | 61.7 -3% | 63 -1% |
Response Times | 4% | 17% | -281% | -253% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.4 ? | 8.8 ? -19% | 7.8 ? -5% | 39.2 ? -430% | 36 ? -386% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 7.4 ? 26% | 6.2 ? 38% | 23.2 ? -132% | 22 ? -120% |
PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 25510 ? | 119000 ? | 122000 ? | |
Screen | -33% | -15% | -61% | -68% | |
Brightness middle | 234 | 297.8 27% | 262 12% | 362 55% | 365 56% |
Brightness | 228 | 285 25% | 261 14% | 350 54% | 341 50% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 84 -1% | 94 11% | 91 7% | 89 5% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.33 -65% | 0.2 -0% | 0.29 -45% | 0.32 -60% |
Contrast | 1170 | 902 -23% | 1310 12% | 1248 7% | 1141 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.16 | 3.68 -70% | 3.96 -83% | 6.06 -181% | 6.51 -201% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.39 | 7.71 -127% | 7.29 -115% | 11.6 -242% | 12.32 -263% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.02 | 2.71 -34% | 2.18 -8% | 3.13 -55% | 2.9 -44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 5 -150% | 3.09 -55% | 7.22 -261% | 7.65 -283% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.06 107% | 2.48 89% | 2.51 88% | 2.64 83% |
CCT | 6394 102% | 6728 97% | 6977 93% | 7659 85% | 8066 81% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 84.77 46% | 76 31% | 55 -5% | 56 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 99.97 12% | 100 12% | 84 -6% | 86 -3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-16% | 11% /
-3% | -114% /
-77% | -107% /
-78% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4660 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5719 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5169 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 8% | 12% | 34% | -61% | |
Seq Read | 1571 | 1993 27% | 1749 11% | 2589 65% | 513 -67% |
Seq Write | 1236 | 1031 -17% | 1173 -5% | 1449 17% | 128.2 -90% |
4K Read | 38.49 | 35.76 -7% | 42.81 11% | 52.8 37% | 26.5 -31% |
4K Write | 101.9 | 88.4 -13% | 98.4 -3% | 112.3 10% | 62.7 -38% |
Score Read | 913 | 1520 66% | 1456 59% | 1153 26% | 414 -55% |
Score Write | 1082 | 825 -24% | 906 -16% | 1592 47% | 196 -82% |
Score Total | 2458 | 3075 25% | 3083 25% | 3291 34% | 811 -67% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13450 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.2 | 36.5 | ||
The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 | ||
Monster Hunter World (2018) | 50.8 | 40.6 | ||
F1 2018 (2018) | 92 | 58 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 53 | 47 | ||
FIFA 19 (2018) | 205 | 203 | ||
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 85 | 66 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 52 | 37 | ||
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 69.4 | 63.1 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 32 / 33 / 44 dB(A) |
Hårddisk |
| 33 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 46 / 50 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 6% | 4% | 7% | 14% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 28.6 1% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 24 ? 17% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 29.4 8% | 30 6% | 31 3% | 29 9% | 25.5 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 29.4 11% | 34 -3% | 32 3% | 31 6% | 27.2 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 44 | 33.7 23% | 36 18% | 44 -0% | 33 25% | 30.4 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 46 | 41.2 10% | 43 7% | 44 4% | 45 2% | 42.7 ? 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 47.3 1% | 45 6% | 42 12% | 45 6% | |
Load Maximum * | 50 | 48.3 3% | 45 10% | 46 8% | 51 -2% | 53.4 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -8% | -4% | -0% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 54.6 -1% | 58 -7% | 55 -2% | 50 7% | 46.2 ? 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 41.2 22% | 63 -19% | 49 8% | 52 2% | 49.1 ? 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 35 -17% | 32 -7% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% | 31.3 ? -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 35.2 -17% | 30 -0% | 34 -13% | 30 -0% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 13 / 17 / 24 Watt |
Hög belastning |
106 / 179 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | 10% | 20% | 36% | -13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 18.88 -45% | 8 38% | 11 15% | 6 54% | 13.5 ? -4% |
Idle Average * | 17 | 24.36 -43% | 14 18% | 14 18% | 9 47% | 18.9 ? -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 32.27 -34% | 22 8% | 20 17% | 13 46% | 26.7 ? -11% |
Load Average * | 106 | 107.74 -2% | 92 13% | 96 9% | 95 10% | 106.3 ? -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151 | 142 6% | 154 -2% | 97 36% | 102 32% | |
Load Maximum * | 179 | 160.28 10% | 207 -16% | 136 24% | 134 25% | 249 ? -39% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | -24% | 57% | 41% | 34% | |
Reader / Idle | 380 | 320 -16% | 346 -9% | 704 85% | 710 87% | 565 ? 49% |
H.264 | 260 | 409 ? 57% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 272 | 213 -22% | 200 -26% | 378 39% | 354 30% | 375 ? 38% |
Load | 95 | 70 -26% | 60 -37% | 141 48% | 100 5% | 85.6 ? -10% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med sin TUF-serie visar Asus att en potent spellaptop inte behöver vara överdrivet dyr.
Bortsett från det magra portutbudet (ingen kortläsare, ingen Thunderbolt 3, ingen USB 3.1 Gen 2) och det medelmåttiga ljudet så är det inte mycket som saknas hos FX705. Denna modell på 17 tum med sin blixtsnabba 144 Hz-skärm med hög kontrast drivs av en sexkärnig processor och ett välpresterande GeForce GTX 1060.
Höljet och batteritiden är heller inte så dåliga. Chassits kvalitet bör göra de flesta köpare nöjda. Dessutom kommer gamers vara glada över det RGB-belysta tangentbordet (Var försiktig: det finns två varianter av höljet med flera skillnader; se ovan).
Men det finns en hälsosam mängd konkurrens i 17-tumssektorn, såsom MSI GS73, Schenker XMG A707 och Acer Predator Helios 300. Även om de två sistnämnda modellerna hamnade en aning efter i fråga om poäng (82% istället för 83%) så har MSI fått aningen bättre poäng totalt.
Asus TUF FX705GM
- 10/19/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser