Test: Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN (i7-8550U, MX150) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 335 cd/m²
Kontrast: 966:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB InfoVision M133NWF4R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris SHP1449, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | 3% | -44% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.4 | 63.6 -3% | 66.8 2% | 66.3 1% | 36.09 -45% | 51.6 -21% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.1 | 93 0% | 86.3 -7% | 97.4 5% | 54.2 -42% | 77.4 -17% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.4 | 65.4 -2% | 63.1 -5% | 68.1 3% | 37.28 -44% | 53.3 -20% |
Response Times | -23% | -59% | -78% | -32% | -40% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.4 ? | 35.6 ? -59% | 48 ? -114% | 56.8 ? -154% | 41 ? -83% | 41.2 ? -84% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 27.2 ? 13% | 32 ? -3% | 31.6 ? -1% | 25 ? 20% | 30 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 19690 ? | 1000 ? | 198.4 ? | 19530 ? | ||
Screen | -2% | -12% | 19% | -28% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 338 | 386.1 14% | 281 -17% | 330 -2% | 233 -31% | 461 36% |
Brightness | 321 | 357 11% | 264 -18% | 304 -5% | 217 -32% | 418 30% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 83 -8% | 83 -8% | 88 -2% | 88 -2% | 85 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.33 6% | 0.23 34% | 0.25 29% | 0.27 23% | 0.2 43% |
Contrast | 966 | 1170 21% | 1222 27% | 1320 37% | 863 -11% | 2305 139% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.2 -0% | 4.83 -15% | 1.8 57% | 5.85 -39% | 5.4 -29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 7.6 -17% | 8.89 -37% | 4.3 34% | 11.51 -77% | 12.2 -88% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5.7 -46% | 6.63 -70% | 2.5 36% | 4.87 -25% | 5.4 -38% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.28 96% | 1.85 119% | 2.11 104% | 2.47 89% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 7144 91% | 7336 89% | 6794 96% | 6588 99% | 6908 94% | 7258 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.4 | 59 -2% | 56 -7% | 61.8 2% | 34 -44% | 48.6 -20% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.1 | 92.2 -1% | 86 -8% | 97.3 5% | 54 -42% | 76.9 -17% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-5% | -25% /
-16% | -19% /
3% | -35% /
-32% | -18% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.8 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3899 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5037 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3071 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 58% | 38% | 258% | 108% | |
Seq Read | 448.2 | 1277 185% | 1369 205% | 2310 415% | 1609 259% |
Seq Write | 283.3 | 249.2 -12% | 247.8 -13% | 1479 422% | 567 100% |
4K Read | 25.47 | 28.17 11% | 31.22 23% | 50.3 97% | 29.55 16% |
4K Write | 49.58 | 101.7 105% | 89.4 80% | 127.6 157% | 117.5 137% |
4K-64 Read | 362.8 | 423.6 17% | 616 70% | 1226 238% | 506 39% |
4K-64 Write | 174.9 | 325.1 86% | 66.7 -62% | 1236 607% | 521 198% |
Access Time Read * | 0.143 | 0.102 29% | 0.233 -63% | 0.063 56% | 0.07 51% |
Access Time Write * | 0.09 | 0.051 43% | 0.034 62% | 0.029 68% | 0.031 66% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3811 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9861 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2563 poäng | |
Hjälp |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx | |
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U |
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN | |
HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 101 | 77.9 | 68.5 | 29.91 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 55.1 | 32.44 | 14.1 | 8.9 |
Doom (2016) | 58.8 | 49.43 | 21.89 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 41.7 / 43.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.33 / 0.9 Watt |
Låg belastning | 2.7 / 5.3 / 6.2 Watt |
Hög belastning |
37.6 / 60.1 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | -9% | -17% | -36% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 4.1 -52% | 2.8 -4% | 3.4 -26% | 4.4 -63% |
Idle Average * | 5.3 | 5.8 -9% | 5.8 -9% | 6.1 -15% | 6.6 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.2 | 6 3% | 7.7 -24% | 7.7 -24% | 9.2 -48% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 42.5 -13% | 48 -28% | 44.2 -18% | 61 -62% |
Load Maximum * | 60.1 | 41.4 31% | 48 20% | 60.3 -0% | 50 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35 | 37.6 | 40 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -11% | -39% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 1321 | 1108 -16% | 1198 -9% | 736 -44% | |
H.264 | 576 | 476 -17% | 346 -40% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 504 | 589 17% | 425 -16% | 344 -32% | 465 -8% |
Load | 120 | 143 19% | 118 -2% | 73 -39% |
För
Emot
Allt som allt var vi mycket nöjda med ZenBook 13 UX331UN. Den kommer med en högkvalitativ skärm och förvånansvärt dugliga högtalare, vilket är dom viktigaste ingredienserna för en multimedia-laptop som kan användas utomhus tack vare sin imponerande maximala skärmljusstyrka. Utöver det så är kombinationen av CPU och GPU kraftfull nog för at köra spel smidigt vid reducerad upplösning och detalj. På så sätt är ZenBook ett skolboksexempel på en sann mångsysslare. Den är tunn och lätt, har ett hölje av hög kvalitet, en väldigt bra styrplatta och håller sig för det mesta sval. Dessutom är batteritiden utmärkt trots ett genomsnittligt 50 Wh-batteri.
Tillsammans är dessa imponerande fördelar. Tyvärr är ZenBook ännu inte riktigt perfekt och har ett antal brister. Tangentbordet är bara halvdant, kylsystemet är inte tillräckligt kraftfullt, CPU-prestandan är inkonsekvent och processorn tenderar att strypas för tidigt eller för ofta (vilket vi kunde bekräfta i Cinebench R15 och vårt stresstest-scenario). Inte bara det, dess CPU är dessutom betydligt långsammare när datorn körs på batteri. Och låt oss inte glömma det oljud som ZenBook ger ifrån sig under belastning och vid spelande. Faktum är att det är på gränsen att kunna vara irriterande för den känsligare användaren. Sist men inte minst, den inbyggda SATA III SSD-enheten, avsaknaden av Thunderbolt 3 och den rejält begränsade USB-C porten (inget stöd för DisplayPort) är nackdelar som är värda att notera.
Lockande: I mångt och mycket har Asus lyckats träffa mitt i prick med ZenBook 13 UX331UN, på nästan alla områden.
Fördelarna väger tydligt upp nackdelarna, vilket är varför ZenBook 13 UX331UN förtjänar en rekommendation. På jakt efter en portabel laptop med en diskret GPU så är den definitivt ett strålande alternativ till Dell XPS 13.
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN
- 01/05/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig