Test: Asus ZenBook 14 UX433F (i7-8565U) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 332.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1148:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 8.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 AUO B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX430UN NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 8% | 4% | 0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 67.8 5% | 68.9 7% | 65.9 2% | 62.7 -2% | 64.6 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.7 | 96.1 7% | 98.4 10% | 95.2 6% | 92.6 3% | 84.8 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.1 | 69.8 7% | 69.5 7% | 67.6 4% | 64.7 -1% | 62 -5% |
| Response Times | -9% | -80% | -5% | 3% | -37% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 39.6 ? -0% | 69.6 ? -76% | 40.4 ? -2% | 34.4 ? 13% | 43.6 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 44 ? -83% | 25.6 ? -7% | 25.6 ? -7% | 39.2 ? -63% |
| PWM Frequency | 113600 ? | 3759 ? | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | 31% | 25% | 23% | -11% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 332.8 | 320 -4% | 478.5 44% | 442.7 33% | 312 -6% | 310.4 -7% |
| Brightness | 310 | 315 2% | 466 50% | 428 38% | 295 -5% | 303 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 86 -1% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.29 -0% | 0.43 -48% | 0.31 -7% | 0.43 -48% | 0.31 -7% |
| Contrast | 1148 | 1103 -4% | 1113 -3% | 1428 24% | 726 -37% | 1001 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 1.2 77% | 3.09 40% | 2.24 56% | 7.6 -48% | 4.07 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.88 | 3.2 73% | 5.94 50% | 7.19 39% | 15.06 -27% | 8.33 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.61 | 0.5 86% | 2.06 43% | 1.11 69% | 1.96 46% | 4.07 -13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.8 | 0.8 91% | 2.4 73% | 9.7 -10% | 8.8 -0% | 2.8 68% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.063 107% | 1.42 155% | 2.01 109% | 2.217 99% |
| CCT | 8227 79% | 6548 99% | 6883 94% | 6227 104% | 6874 95% | 7033 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.1 | 62.1 7% | 69.47 20% | 61.6 6% | 59.1 2% | 55.3 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 96 8% | 98.36 10% | 95 7% | 92.3 3% | 84.6 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
22% | -16% /
9% | 7% /
16% | -3% /
-7% | -11% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3285 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4851 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3736 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus Zenbook UX430UN SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -22% | -4% | -192% | -70% | -570% | |
| Seq Read | 1201 | 2205 84% | 2416 101% | 1228 2% | 494.4 -59% | 1574 31% |
| Seq Write | 931 | 435.8 -53% | 1170 26% | 544 -42% | 300.3 -68% | 377.1 -59% |
| 4K Read | 40.25 | 29.36 -27% | 48.33 20% | 39.16 -3% | 25.39 -37% | 31.73 -21% |
| 4K Write | 111.5 | 107.4 -4% | 103.1 -8% | 106.5 -4% | 47.88 -57% | 1.73 -98% |
| 4K-64 Read | 916 | 678 -26% | 1039 13% | 466.4 -49% | 366 -60% | 115.6 -87% |
| 4K-64 Write | 871 | 444.8 -49% | 399.6 -54% | 305.1 -65% | 183.5 -79% | 2.09 -100% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.059 -18% | 0.058 -16% | 0.46 -820% | 0.089 -78% | 0.044 12% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.055 -72% | 0.036 -13% | 0.51 -1494% | 0.088 -175% | 2.391 -7372% |
| Score Read | 1076 | 926 -14% | 1329 24% | 628 -42% | 441 -59% | 305 -72% |
| Score Write | 1075 | 596 -45% | 620 -42% | 466 -57% | 261 -76% | 42 -96% |
| Score Total | 2696 | 1911 -29% | 2575 -4% | 1394 -48% | 926 -66% | 455 -83% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1153 | 585 -49% | 739 -36% | 628 -46% | 467.6 -59% | 1205 5% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 415.1 | 570 37% | 312.3 -25% | 540 30% | 270.5 -35% | 281.8 -32% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 930 | 503 -46% | 486.3 -48% | 533 -43% | 225.1 -76% | 856 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX430UN | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13ARR | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11207 poäng | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 7761 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2201 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64710 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9469 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 461 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 78.5 | 38.1 | 31.8 | 9.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 22.8 | 13.7 | 7.2 | 5.7 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 71.4 | 32.9 | 21.1 |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook UX430UN GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | -4% | 4% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 28.3 2% | 27.9 3% | 30.13 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 28.9 -0% | 27.9 3% | 30.13 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28 3% | 27.9 3% | 30 -4% | 27.9 3% | 30 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 28 4% | 27.9 4% | 30.2 -4% | 29.3 -1% | 30.13 -4% |
| Load Average * | 36.1 | 32.5 10% | 36.2 -0% | 41.8 -16% | 32 11% | 33.4 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.2 | 42.2 -2% | 45.2 -10% | 42 -2% | 39.3 5% | 33 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 29.1 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 36.1 / 41.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.78 / 0.89 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.9 / 5.9 / 8.8 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
41.7 / 44 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Asus Zenbook UX430UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -26% | -21% | -1% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 3.5 10% | 3.4 13% | 3 23% | 3.2 18% |
| Idle Average * | 5.9 | 8.3 -41% | 8.9 -51% | 7.5 -27% | 5.8 2% | 6 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.8 | 8.8 -0% | 12.3 -40% | 11.8 -34% | 6.2 30% | 9.2 -5% |
| Load Average * | 41.7 | 46.4 -11% | 54.2 -30% | 47.7 -14% | 54.1 -30% | 29.5 29% |
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 48.6 -10% | 52.1 -18% | 63.2 -44% | 56.4 -28% | 35.6 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | 45.9 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX430UN i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -33% | -12% | 5% | -23% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1146 | 819 -29% | 1243 8% | 1039 -9% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 668 6% | 465 -26% | 557 -12% | 664 5% | 560 -11% | 527 -16% |
| Load | 196 | 131 -33% | 109 -44% | 133 -32% | 98 -50% | 166 -15% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Ultrabook-marknaden har växt stadigt i fråga om tillgängliga alternativ och det blir svårare och svårare för tillverkare att stå ut från mängden. Men trots detta har Asus lyckats överraska oss med unika funktioner som UX580 ScreenPad och den nu fyrsidiga NanoEdge-infattningen som ger UX433 ett riktigt litet fotavtryck för en enhet med en skärm på 14 tum. Den nya designen är visuellt unik och känns "Zenbook" samtidigt som den förbättrar stabiliteten och anslutbarheten jämfört med förra generationens modell. Det är samma evolutionära uppgradering vi kommit att förvänta oss, men med definierande drag som är både tjusiga och ergonomiska.
Vi uppskattade särskilt att UX433 inkluderar alternativ för både en antireflexbehandlad matt skärm samt en blank skärm. En SKU med GeForce MX150 kommer också att finnas. De flesta Ultrabook-modeller har bara blanka skärmar och är begränsade till långsammare integrerad Intel-grafik.
UX433:s svagaste sida är CPU-prestandan. Det är inte hastigheten som besviker utan att ökningen som Whiskey Lake-U ger utöver 8:e generationens Kaby Lake-R är så marginell att de flesta användare troligen inte ens kommer att märka den. Detta känner Asus också till, då den officiella produktsidan för UX433 jämför Whiskey Lake-U med 7:e generationens Kaby Lake istället för 8:e generationens Kaby Lake-R för att kunna göra reklam för en större ökning i CPU-prestanda. Vi kan inte låta bli att känna att systemet kunde ha varit billigare och precis lika snabbt om det istället hade kommit med en i7-8550U eller en i5-8250U.
Till kommande revideringar hoppas vi på att se Thunderbolt 3 och en mer ljusstark skärm så att den bättre kan tävla med populära alternativ som XPS 13, MateBook X Pro, MacBook Pro 13, Samsung NP900 och andra som ger bättre synlighet utomhus. Asus bör även göra sig av med den propretiära AC-adapterporten och istället använda mer mångsidig USB Typ C-laddning. Haptisk återkoppling för det virtuella numeriska tangentbordet, en fingeravtrycksläsare och ett spillsäkert tangentbord är bara några av de saknade funktioner som tillverkaren kan tänkas vilja åtgärda för att göra UX433 ännu mer prisvärd.
En uppgradering både visuellt och kvalitetsmässigt jämfört med förra generationens UX430. Systemet känns starkt för sin storlek även om det ger avkall på en del funktioner som finns på de flesta andra ultrabook-modeller i samma prisskikt. Ökningen i CPU-prestanda som kommer av Whiskey Lake-U kommer vara mycket större för den som byter upp sig från en laptop som är minst två, tre år gammal.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX433FA
- 11/20/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
