Test: Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F - Ser ut som en Ultrabook, spelar som en Gamer (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 312.6 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1008:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 3.78
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB BOE HF NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, IPS, 15.4", 2880x1800 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 30% | 5% | 3% | 2% | 32% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 88.1 32% | 68.1 2% | 68.7 3% | 65.3 -2% | 98.7 48% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.7 | 99.6 14% | 94.2 7% | 90 3% | 91.8 5% | 99.9 14% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.1 | 91.8 43% | 68.4 7% | 65.8 3% | 66.5 4% | 86.6 35% |
Response Times | 94% | -16% | 21% | 69% | 1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 2.3 ? 94% | 57 ? -38% | 34 ? 17% | 13.6 ? 67% | 43.2 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 2.4 ? 93% | 31 ? 7% | 25 ? 25% | 10 ? 70% | 31.2 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 961 ? | 200 ? | 117000 ? | ||
Screen | 19% | 11% | 5% | 12% | 47% | |
Brightness middle | 312.6 | 421.2 35% | 330 6% | 309 -1% | 312.7 0% | 520 66% |
Brightness | 290 | 417 44% | 310 7% | 299 3% | 305 5% | 492 70% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 94 11% | 87 2% | 84 -1% | 90 6% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.37 -19% | 0.29 6% | 0.27 13% | 0.39 -26% | |
Contrast | 1008 | 892 -12% | 1066 6% | 1158 15% | 1333 32% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.78 | 6.06 -5% | 4.03 30% | 3.9 33% | 4.57 21% | 1.2 79% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.86 | 11.89 -34% | 6.74 24% | 7.5 15% | 6.81 23% | 2.3 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.78 | 1.96 48% | 2.91 23% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.8 48% | 4.49 17% | 4.58 15% | 4.3 20% | 1.3 76% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.57 86% | 2.43 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 7864 83% | 6235 104% | 6744 96% | 7344 89% | 7098 92% | 6738 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.1 | 81 42% | 61 7% | 39 -32% | 59.4 4% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87.4 | 99.6 14% | 94 8% | 90 3% | 91.3 4% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 48% /
33% | 0% /
6% | 10% /
7% | 28% /
17% | 27% /
36% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T | |
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52) | |
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3764 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5132 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4828 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 18% | -43% | -25% | 7% | -14% | |
Seq Read | 1887 | 1723 -9% | 2018 7% | 2158 14% | 1409 -25% | 1829 -3% |
Seq Write | 1432 | 1386 -3% | 773 -46% | 680 -53% | 1316 -8% | 1315 -8% |
4K Read | 52.3 | 43.25 -17% | 24.62 -53% | 44.74 -14% | 44.99 -14% | 51.3 -2% |
4K Write | 146 | 98.3 -33% | 92.8 -36% | 123 -16% | 93 -36% | 106 -27% |
4K-64 Read | 969 | 1078 11% | 845 -13% | 623 -36% | 1092 13% | 917 -5% |
4K-64 Write | 1375 | 1456 6% | 957 -30% | 486 -65% | 1810 32% | 1212 -12% |
Access Time Read * | 0.034 | 0.05 -47% | 0.147 -332% | 0.044 -29% | 0.041 -21% | 0.063 -85% |
Access Time Write * | 0.075 | 0.039 48% | 0.057 24% | 0.051 32% | 0.118 -57% | 0.104 -39% |
Score Read | 1210 | 1294 7% | 1071 -11% | 884 -27% | 1278 6% | 1152 -5% |
Score Write | 1664 | 1693 2% | 1127 -32% | 677 -59% | 2034 22% | 1450 -13% |
Score Total | 3483 | 3638 4% | 2684 -23% | 1951 -44% | 3970 14% | 3177 -9% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1375 | 3182 131% | 1652 20% | 1641 19% | 2112 54% | 1539 12% |
Copy Program MB/s | 468 | 984 110% | 328.5 -30% | 390 -17% | 874 87% | 513 10% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1287 | 1824 42% | 700 -46% | 574 -55% | 1677 30% | 1150 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (10248 - 12259, n=14) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (6409 - 10846, n=13) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10217 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21547 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6698 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2949 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 259.1 | 196.1 | 172.2 | 72 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 156.1 | 93.6 | 54.3 | 30.7 |
Rocket League (2017) | 216.1 | 138.1 | 97.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 92 | 48 | 39 | 34 |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -6% | -13% | -9% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 28.2 1% | 28.4 -0% | 28.5 -0% | 30.4 -7% | 30.5 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 28.2 1% | 29 -2% | 30.3 -7% | 30.4 -7% | 30.5 -7% |
Idle Average * | 28.4 | 28.2 1% | 29 -2% | 30.5 -7% | 30.4 -7% | 30.5 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 29 -2% | 30.5 -7% | 31.6 -11% | 30.5 -7% |
Load Average * | 33.9 | 43.8 -29% | 35.4 -4% | 41 -21% | 43.2 -27% | 37.5 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 | 47.2 -19% | 42 -6% | 48 -21% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 47.2 -17% | 50 -24% | 51.9 -29% | 38.3 5% | 37.5 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 33.9 / 40.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Låg belastning | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hög belastning |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | -108% | -117% | 19% | 27% | 27% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 6.2 -24% | 19.3 -286% | 18.7 -274% | 3.4 32% | 4.8 4% | 2.1 58% |
Idle Average * | 13.2 | 9.6 27% | 24.2 -83% | 30.7 -133% | 11 17% | 10.1 23% | 6.7 49% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 21.2 12% | 24.5 -2% | 33.9 -41% | 14.9 38% | 10.7 55% | 11.4 52% |
Load Average * | 70 | 104.3 -49% | 122.3 -75% | 93.4 -33% | 78.9 -13% | 44 37% | 77.7 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 63.3 | 91.7 -45% | 137 -116% | 158.9 -151% | |||
Load Maximum * | 114 | 135.3 -19% | 208.4 -83% | 195.3 -71% | 91.2 20% | 94.7 17% | 131.5 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51.5 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 71 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -10% | -48% | -47% | -34% | |
Reader / Idle | 1289 | 910 -29% | 1127 -13% | 697 -46% | 786 -39% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 503 | 467 -7% | 528 5% | 370 -26% | 248 -51% | 330 -34% |
Load | 174 | 199 14% | 135 -22% | 50 -71% | 84 -52% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
ZenBook 15 UX533 och UX534 har något som de flesta andra Ultrabook-modeller på 15.6 tum inte har: En ULV-CPU från Intel tillsammans med en GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU. Konkurrenter som Dell XPS 15 eller HP Spectre x360 15 har snabbare processorer från Core H-serien med GTX 1650 som tillval och de är således större och tyngre än ZenBook. Dessa processorer passar bäst för innehållsskapare och digitala artister och är därför oftast mer våld än nöden kräver för surfande, filmströmning och ordbehandling. ZenBook 15 UX533/UX534 är en mittemellanlösning som passar för multimediabruk till vardags samtidigt som den har nästan samma spelförmåga som tidigare nämnda system från Dell och HP, allt i ett mer energieffektivt paket. Då det finns en risk att traditionella bärbara speldatorer hotas av Google Stadia och liknande går ZenBook 15 UX534 istället en bekväm väg mellan Ultrabook och instegsspelmaskin.
Asus joker är ScreenPad, som kostar 2.000 kronor extra. Om din ZenBook i huvudsak kommer sitta fast hemma eller på ett skrivbord är det istället bättre du investerar de 2.000 kronorna i en extern monitor. Men om du ofta sitter på caféer, flygplatser eller andra ställen utanför kontoret och arbetar med många flikar och fönster samtidigt kan det vara riktigt värt att ha en extra skärm oavsett situation. Kom bara ihåg att ta med dig en extern mus så du kan använda den extra skärmen fullt ut.
När det kommer till spel är ZenBook 15 UX534 effektivare än de flesta andra Ultrabook-modellerna i sin storleksklass. Du blir utan Thunderbolt 3 och processor från Core H-serien, men om du i huvudsak ska använda din ZenBook till multimediauppspelning, spel eller ordbehandling på resande fot är det möjligt att du inte ens märker detta.
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
-
09/29/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo