Test: Asus ZenBook 15 (i7-8565U, GTX1050 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 81 %
Mitt på batteriet: 311 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1296:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.48
ΔE Greyscale 4.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Base Model BOE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS B156HAK02.0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -41% | 4% | 31% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 66.3 -1% | 36.94 -45% | 67.8 1% | 85.9 28% |
sRGB Coverage | 88.4 | 86.6 -2% | 55.3 -37% | 94.1 6% | 100 13% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 63.3 -2% | 38.16 -41% | 67.9 5% | 99.1 53% |
Response Times | 9% | 26% | -1% | 20% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 39.2 ? 13% | 33.2 ? 26% | 56 ? -24% | 44 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 37 ? | 35.2 ? 5% | 27.6 ? 25% | 29 ? 22% | 22.8 ? 38% |
PWM Frequency | 21190 ? | ||||
Screen | -2% | -26% | 7% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 311 | 273.6 -12% | 254.5 -18% | 440 41% | 357.6 15% |
Brightness | 303 | 262 -14% | 238 -21% | 389 28% | 350 16% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 86 6% | 87 7% | 83 2% | 85 5% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.3 -25% | 0.27 -13% | 0.34 -42% | 0.35 -46% |
Contrast | 1296 | 912 -30% | 943 -27% | 1294 0% | 1022 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 3.22 37% | 4.58 10% | 5.04 1% | 4.12 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.91 | 7.61 15% | 17.99 -102% | 6.99 22% | 9.91 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.48 | 4.1 -65% | 4.34 -75% | 2.04 18% | 4.23 -71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.93 | 1.4 72% | 3.3 33% | 4.98 -1% | 1.8 63% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.24 98% | 2.403 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 7641 85% | 6636 98% | 6355 102% | 7777 84% | 6613 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 56.4 -3% | 35 -40% | 61 5% | 87.5 51% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 86.2 -2% | 55 -37% | 94 7% | 100 14% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-1% | -14% /
-22% | 3% /
6% | 18% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4052 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5381 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4443 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Razer Blade 15 Base Model Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 22% | -4% | -1% | 17% | 12% | |
Write 4K | 126.2 | 112.5 -11% | 122.1 -3% | 94.8 -25% | 125 -1% | 138.5 ? 10% |
Read 4K | 41.2 | 43.09 5% | 44.61 8% | 26.45 -36% | 44.68 8% | 44.2 ? 7% |
Write Seq | 1055 | 1450 37% | 826 -22% | 1037 -2% | 1059 0% | 1265 ? 20% |
Read Seq | 884 | 1392 57% | 811 -8% | 1280 45% | 772 -13% | 1237 ? 40% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.5 | 356.1 -20% | 293.9 -34% | 277.6 -38% | 507 14% | 404 ? -9% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 338.8 | 406.9 20% | 374.8 11% | 333.9 -1% | 614 81% | 421 ? 24% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1453 | 1451 0% | 1714 18% | 1037 -29% | 1763 21% | 1491 ? 3% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1734 | 3272 89% | 1772 2% | 3135 81% | 2171 25% | 1741 ? 0% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1044 | 715 ? | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 914 | 1027 ? | ||||
AS SSD | 31% | 46% | 26% | 69% | 29% | |
Seq Read | 579 | 1803 211% | 1454 151% | 2454 324% | 2099 263% | 1363 ? 135% |
Seq Write | 411.8 | 1367 232% | 1324 222% | 948 130% | 1729 320% | 1227 ? 198% |
4K Read | 41.81 | 40.75 -3% | 50.8 22% | 19.07 -54% | 37.78 -10% | 40.8 ? -2% |
4K Write | 131.6 | 93 -29% | 106.2 -19% | 105.4 -20% | 100.9 -23% | 127.3 ? -3% |
4K-64 Read | 975 | 749 -23% | 1140 17% | 856 -12% | 1431 47% | 957 ? -2% |
4K-64 Write | 1047 | 1270 21% | 1325 27% | 953 -9% | 1273 22% | 1081 ? 3% |
Access Time Read * | 0.08 | 0.113 -41% | 0.047 41% | 0.051 36% | 0.04 50% | 0.07744 ? 3% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.04 -48% | 0.035 -30% | 0.056 -107% | 0.036 -33% | 0.03671 ? -36% |
Score Read | 1075 | 970 -10% | 1336 24% | 1120 4% | 1679 56% | 1134 ? 5% |
Score Write | 1220 | 1499 23% | 1564 28% | 1153 -5% | 1547 27% | 1331 ? 9% |
Score Total | 2845 | 2952 4% | 3587 26% | 2768 -3% | 4065 43% | 3046 ? 7% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1892 | 2507 | 1045 | 1169 ? | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 495.5 | 395.4 | 430.9 | 446 ? | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1070 | 1129 | 728 | 874 ? | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
27% | 21% /
25% | 13% /
15% | 43% /
47% | 21% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9694 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7116 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17993 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5209 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 266 | 252 | 150 | 59 |
Thief (2014) | 106 | 76 | 66 | 38 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64 | 60 | 41 | 30 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 98 | 62 | 36 | 29 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 40.8 / 41.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.48 / 0.8 Watt |
Låg belastning | 2.7 / 8 / 10.6 Watt |
Hög belastning |
74 / 89 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -99% | 0% | -46% | -127% | -24% | -50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 10.2 -278% | 4.7 -74% | 6.1 -126% | 11.7 -333% | 4.48 ? -66% | 6.8 ? -152% |
Idle Average * | 8 | 13.2 -65% | 7.9 1% | 10.2 -28% | 18.5 -131% | 9.58 ? -20% | 11.4 ? -43% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.6 | 17.6 -66% | 11.4 -8% | 13.4 -26% | 22.8 -115% | 11.6 ? -9% | 13.5 ? -27% |
Load Average * | 74 | 99.5 -34% | 47.2 36% | 82 -11% | 97.5 -32% | 77.3 ? -4% | 71.2 ? 4% |
Load Maximum * | 89 | 133.3 -50% | 48.1 46% | 122 -37% | 111.1 -25% | 105.5 ? -19% | 117.6 ? -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 113.6 | 102.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -47% | -51% | -20% | -44% | -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1587 | 690 -57% | 1027 -35% | 842 -47% | 1168 ? -26% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 519 | 330 -36% | 252 -51% | 523 1% | 375 -28% | 628 ? 21% |
Load | 171 | 87 -49% | 128 -25% | 76 -56% | 97.8 ? -43% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Asus ZenBook 15 visar sig i vår recension vara en riktigt kraftfull och mobil laptop som kan köra de senaste spelen. En tunn konstruktion, utmärkt batteritid och låg vikt gör Asus laptop än mer lämpad att användas i farten. Men den som vill använda ZenBook 15 för att spela spel kommer behöva ha den ansluten i ett nätuttag en majoritet av tiden.
Asus ZenBook 15 är en kompakt spellaptop som kan hantera de senaste titlarna. Vidare utmärker den sig när det kommer till batteritiden.
Med ZenBook 15 levererar Asus en enhet med riktigt bra hårdvara som kan möta de flesta användares behov. De saknade portarna kan reproduceras genom USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ C-porten och det går att byta SSD-enheten om så skulle krävas. Det finns inga andra uppgraderingsmöjligheter. Men med tanke på att vår recensionsenhet kommer med 16 GB RAM är det kanske inte något större problem. Tack vare Nvidias Max-Q teknik kan Asus hålla temperaturen under kontroll. Det finns inga prestandatapp, åtminstone inte när man spelar.
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
- 02/14/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker