Test: Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA - Tjusig omvandlingsbar till ett lågt pris (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.6 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Port configuration
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 78 %
Mitt på batteriet: 280 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1346:1 (Svärta: 0.208 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.42
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng BOE NV140FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 N133HCE-EP2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 12% | -33% | 13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 60.1 | 66.2 10% | 39.35 -35% | 68.1 13% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.5 | 97.2 14% | 58.8 -31% | 94.7 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.1 | 68.3 12% | 40.65 -33% | 70.2 15% |
| Response Times | -46% | -20% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 60 ? -67% | 44 ? -22% | 40 ? -11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 35 ? -25% | 33 ? -18% | 28 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 192 ? | 25000 ? | ||
| Screen | 16% | -33% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 280 | 351 25% | 248 -11% | 340 21% |
| Brightness | 286 | 335 17% | 238 -17% | 336 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 87 12% | 74 -5% | 90 15% |
| Black Level * | 0.208 | 0.31 -49% | 0.235 -13% | 0.18 13% |
| Contrast | 1346 | 1132 -16% | 1055 -22% | 1889 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.97 | 1.74 56% | 5.43 -37% | 1.3 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.29 | 2.76 67% | 17.96 -117% | 2.8 66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.42 | 5.7 -67% | 0.7 80% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.83 | 2.22 22% | 3.18 -12% | 1.9 33% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.56 86% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6556 99% | 6667 97% | 6642 98% | 6735 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 62 11% | 37.3 -33% | 64.1 14% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 97 14% | 58.4 -31% | 99.6 17% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
7% | -29% /
-32% | 14% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10210U (134 - 174, n=35) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10210U (320 - 790, n=35) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3995 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 98% | 107% | 101% | 23% | 142% | |
| Write 4K | 54.6 | 137.8 152% | 162.7 198% | 172.3 216% | 87.6 ? 60% | 134.7 ? 147% |
| Read 4K | 28.19 | 44.15 57% | 190.5 576% | 44.37 57% | 40.3 ? 43% | 60.9 ? 116% |
| Write Seq | 840 | 2073 147% | 450.1 -46% | 1492 78% | 941 ? 12% | 2535 ? 202% |
| Read Seq | 905 | 2165 139% | 1624 79% | 1471 63% | 1070 ? 18% | 2795 ? 209% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 409.5 | 431.9 5% | 353.5 -14% | 483.1 18% | 418 ? 2% | 362 ? -12% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 292.4 | 427.7 46% | 397.7 36% | 551 88% | 428 ? 46% | 453 ? 55% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1038 | 2253 117% | 937 -10% | 2951 184% | 1035 ? 0% | 3333 ? 221% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1607 | 3480 117% | 2145 33% | 3289 105% | 1629 ? 1% | 4747 ? 195% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1498 | 569 ? | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1531 | 1059 ? | ||||
| AS SSD | 95% | 15% | 134% | 36% | 115% | |
| Seq Read | 1336 | 2739 105% | 1241 -7% | 2719 104% | 1398 ? 5% | 3547 ? 165% |
| Seq Write | 653 | 1307 100% | 372.5 -43% | 2441 274% | 848 ? 30% | 2152 ? 230% |
| 4K Read | 26.65 | 47.43 78% | 65.4 145% | 51.5 93% | 45.1 ? 69% | 53.9 ? 102% |
| 4K Write | 52.7 | 126 139% | 114.8 118% | 142.8 171% | 82.2 ? 56% | 160.7 ? 205% |
| 4K-64 Read | 644 | 1013 57% | 416.9 -35% | 1426 121% | 852 ? 32% | 818 ? 27% |
| 4K-64 Write | 482.9 | 1371 184% | 516 7% | 1287 167% | 654 ? 35% | 1520 ? 215% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.082 -11% | 0.097 -31% | 0.041 45% | 0.04167 ? 44% | 0.08632 ? -17% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.072 | 0.029 60% | 0.045 37% | 0.029 60% | 0.05333 ? 26% | 0.09741 ? -35% |
| Score Read | 804 | 1335 66% | 606 -25% | 1749 118% | 1037 ? 29% | 1225 ? 52% |
| Score Write | 601 | 1628 171% | 668 11% | 1674 179% | 821 ? 37% | 1896 ? 215% |
| Score Total | 1786 | 3582 101% | 1567 -12% | 4310 141% | 2372 ? 33% | 3690 ? 107% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 97% /
96% | 61% /
54% | 118% /
120% | 30% /
30% | 129% /
126% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2079 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1151 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.2 | 51.6 | 21.2 | 18.7 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 30.1 / 32.02 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.8 °C / -8.6 F).
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.35 / 0.52 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.6 / 7.5 / 9.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
42 / 51 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Lagom pris för Asus omvandlingsbara Windows-maskin
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA har ett riktigt högkvalitativt hölje. Det är välgjort och visuellt tilltalande, men också väldigt tungt, vilket särskilt märks i surfplatteläge. Tangentbordet var riktigt bra och den flimmerfria skärmen övertygade i laptopläge samtidigt som den knappt saknade något anslutningsmässigt.
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 är snarare laptop än surfplatta och övertygar med bra prestanda i förhållande till priset.
Det är bara den aningen korta batteritiden och den blanka skärmen som vi får ge den kritik för i testet. En genomsnittlig användare borde inte ha några problem med den defensiva fläktkontrollen till vardags och vi kan också stå ut med de begränsade servicemöjligheterna. Den som sällan använder sin omvandlingsbara som en surfplatta men inte heller vill köpa en ren laptop är i goda händer här.
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
- 05/19/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
