Test: Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Core i7, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 298 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1150:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ZenBook S UX391U AUO B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 SHP1484, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, , 3000x2000, 13.9" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 7% | -0% | 4% | 3% | 33% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 68.9 7% | 64 -1% | 65.9 2% | 65.8 2% | 99.2 54% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.5 | 96.6 7% | 90.7 0% | 95.2 5% | 96.2 6% | 99.9 10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 69.6 7% | 65.1 0% | 67.6 4% | 66.8 2% | 87.1 34% |
Response Times | -48% | 29% | 11% | 22% | 3% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 62.4 ? -39% | 27 ? 40% | 40.4 ? 10% | 33 ? 26% | 42.8 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 45.6 ? -56% | 24 ? 18% | 25.6 ? 12% | 24 ? 18% | 28.8 ? 1% |
PWM Frequency | 1008 ? | |||||
Screen | 20% | 14% | 14% | 19% | 37% | |
Brightness middle | 299 | 428 43% | 304 2% | 442.7 48% | 408 36% | 588 97% |
Brightness | 300 | 405 35% | 287 -4% | 428 43% | 395 32% | 561 87% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 80 -13% | 84 -9% | 88 -4% | 92 0% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.26 -0% | 0.21 19% | 0.31 -19% | 0.45 -73% | 0.45 -73% |
Contrast | 1150 | 1646 43% | 1448 26% | 1428 24% | 907 -21% | 1307 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 3.8 32% | 3.66 35% | 2.24 60% | 1.55 72% | 1.7 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 7.2 21% | 5.66 38% | 7.19 21% | 2.19 76% | 3.5 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.6 | 1.11 57% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4.4 20% | 3.51 36% | 9.7 -76% | 1.91 65% | 1.9 65% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.55 86% | 1.42 155% | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7533 86% | 7067 92% | 6955 93% | 6227 104% | 6491 100% | 6738 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.9 | 62.8 7% | 59 0% | 61.6 5% | 61 4% | 77.92 32% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.3 | 96.4 7% | 91 1% | 95 5% | 96 6% | 99.94 11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
9% | 14% /
13% | 10% /
12% | 15% /
16% | 24% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode off) | |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode on) | |
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76) | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (macOS) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (Win10) | |
HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
Huawei MateBook X | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode off) | |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode on) | |
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78) | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (macOS) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (Win10) | |
Huawei MateBook X |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3554 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4707 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4882 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3321 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1592 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 39992 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6256 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 897 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 78.1 | 39.2 | 27.4 | 12.4 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52.8 | 30.7 | 26.7 | 9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.3 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 30.1 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 36.8 / 36.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 3% | 1% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
Idle Average * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 29.1 3% | 30.13 -0% | 27.9 7% | 30.2 -0% |
Load Average * | 36.8 | 32.2 12% | 31.5 14% | 36.2 2% | 32.9 11% |
Load Maximum * | 36.8 | 37.3 -1% | 33.5 9% | 45.2 -23% | 39.3 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Asus ZenBook S UX391U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.48 / 0.73 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.24 / 6.1 / 9.2 Watt |
Hög belastning |
38.8 / 52.6 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook S UX391U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 11% | -25% | -24% | 3% | -1% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.24 | 3.14 3% | 2.8 14% | 3.5 -8% | 4.6 -42% | 3.7 -14% | 3.81 ? -18% | 4.49 ? -39% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 5.22 14% | 6.2 -2% | 8.9 -46% | 11 -80% | 5.2 15% | 6.94 ? -14% | 7.66 ? -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 6 35% | 9.4 -2% | 12.3 -34% | 12 -30% | 7.6 17% | 8.75 ? 5% | 9.56 ? -4% |
Load Average * | 38.8 | 38.5 1% | 32.2 17% | 54.2 -40% | 39.5 -2% | 41.6 -7% | 35 ? 10% | 46.6 ? -20% |
Load Maximum * | 52.6 | 50.4 4% | 36.6 30% | 52.1 1% | 34.6 34% | 50.5 4% | 47.5 ? 10% | 68.6 ? -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook S UX391U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 23% | -11% | 15% | 5% | 6% | 30% | |
H.264 | 621 | 831 34% | 649 5% | 683 10% | 896 ? 44% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 491 | 644 31% | 352 -28% | 557 13% | 337 -31% | 681 39% | 710 ? 45% |
Load | 115 | 119 3% | 104 -10% | 133 16% | 162 41% | 78 -32% | 116.6 ? 1% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Hur mycket prestanda behöver en mobil enhet? Tunna enheter har ofta problem med att använda prestandapotentialen hos moderna mobila fyrkärniga processorer. Men vardagsuppgifter behöver sällan så mycket prestanda. Vi gillade idén med ett extra Tyst Läge, som är mer utförligt jämfört med de vanliga energi-inställningarna i Windows.
Asus nya ZenBook S UX391 är extremt mobil och riktar sig mot kunder som ofta är ute och reser och behöver en kompakt enhet. Väldigt komplexa applikationer är vanligen inte överst på listan över krav, utan istället kommer den i huvudsak användas för att skriva epost, använda molnapplikationer eller ett Office-paket. ZenBook S har mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för dessa scenarier, även om du aktiverar det tysta läget.
ZenBook S UX391 är ett riktigt bra val om du vill ha en tyst och kompakt kollega. Men en del rivaler kan utnyttja prestandan hos denna fyrkärniga ULV-processor bättre och har dessutom längre batteritid.
Du får också en enhet av hög kvalitet med ett metallhölje och bra konstruktionskvalitet. Vi gillade den matta 1080p-skärmen, även om den kunde varit lite mer ljusstark och lite bättre kalibrerad efter leverans. Inmatningsenheterna är skapliga och Asus använder moderna portar. En liten dockningsstation som ingår lägger till traditionella portar.
Den mediokra prestandan har vi redan nämnt ovan. Om du behöver mer prestanda i ett kompakt chassi bör du hålla utkik efter en annan modell. Annars kan vi rekommendera ZenBook S UX391.
Asus ZenBook S UX391U
-
09/11/2018 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff