Test: Chuwi HiPad Plus - En iPad-klon (Sammanfattning)

Name: Chuwi HiPad Plus
Brand: Chuwi

Kommer HiPhone härnäst?

För ca 2.700 kronor är HiPad Plus så nära du kan komma upplevelsen av en iPad eller en Galaxy Tab utan att behöva betala 2-3 gånger så mycket pengar. Men den tryckkänsliga skärmen av glas känns ömtålig och den har lägre ljusstyrka än den flesta andra surfplattor.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 02/25/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Chinese Tech

Test device courtesy of Chuwi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Chuwi HiPad Plus (HiPad Serie)

Processor

Mediatek MT8183 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Minne

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Skärm

11.00 tum 4:3, 2176 x 1600 pixlar 246 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkter, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Kortläsare: MicroSD, Sensorer: Accelerometer

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.95 x 248.3 x 179.5

Batteri

7300 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: 1 W x 2, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

505 g

Pris

269 USD

Länkar

Chuwi hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
75.2 % v7 ^(old)	02/2021	Chuwi HiPad Plus MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3	505 g	6.95 mm	11.00"	2176x1600
77.1 % v7 ^(old)		Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020 Helio MT8766B, PowerVR GE8300	462 g	9.35 mm	10.10"	1280x800
78 % v7 ^(old)		Allview iPlay 20 SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322	444 g	7.95 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11/2020	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) SD 662, Adreno 610	477 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
88 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU	495 g	7.5 mm	10.20"	2160x1620
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Huawei MatePad 10.4 Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6	460 g	7.35 mm	10.40"	2000x1200

Storleksjämförelse

Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Chuwi HiPad Plus Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Allview iPlay 20 Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020 Huawei MatePad 10.4 DIN A5 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	459 (223^min - 497^max) MBit/s +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	332 (310^min - 353^max) MBit/s +50%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	264 (204^min - 332^max) MBit/s +19%
Chuwi HiPad Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	221 MBit/s
Allview iPlay 20 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	99.9 MBit/s -55%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	342 (291^min - 400^max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	329 (323^min - 333^max) MBit/s +3%
Chuwi HiPad Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	318 MBit/s
Allview iPlay 20 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	295 MBit/s -7%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	56.5 (48^min - 74^max) MBit/s -82%

ColorChecker Chuwi HiPad Plus: 14.87 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.08 ∆E


342 cd/m²	304.2 cd/m²	301.6 cd/m²
338 cd/m²	300.2 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
331.2 cd/m²	299.7 cd/m²	284.4 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 342 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 308.5 cd/m² Minimum: 50.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 300.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 910:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.43

	Chuwi HiPad Plus 2176x1600, 11"	Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020 1280x800, 10.1"	Allview iPlay 20 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) 2000x1200, 10.4"	Apple iPad 10.2 2020 2160x1620, 10.2"	Huawei MatePad 10.4 2000x1200, 10.4"
Response Times		4%	31%	8%	35%	33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4)	50.4 ?(23.6, 26.8) 9%	29.6 ?(14.8, 14.8) 46%	47.6 ?(22.4, 25.2) 14%	39.2 ?(18.8, 20.4) 29%	38.4 ?(13.2, 25.2) 30%
Response Time Black / White *	33.2 ?(16.4, 16.8)	34 ?(18.8, 15.2) -2%	28 ?(18, 10) 16%	32.8 ?(16.4, 16.4) 1%	20 ?(7.6, 12.4) 40%	21.6 ?(7.6, 14) 35%
PWM Frequency
Screen		28%	15%	18%	27%	7%
Brightness middle	300.2	375 25%	396 32%	365 22%	477 59%	511 70%
Brightness	308	362 18%	389 26%	337 9%	452 47%	472 53%
Brightness Distribution	80	87 9%	90 13%	82 3%	86 8%	85 6%
Black Level *	0.33	0.17 48%	0.44 -33%	0.26 21%	0.5 -52%	0.53 -61%
Contrast	910	2206 142%	900 -1%	1404 54%	954 5%	964 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.23	5.6 -7%	2.39 54%	4.5 14%	2.2 58%	4.6 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.42	10.6 -26%	7.81 7%	7.8 7%	5 41%	10.3 -22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.1	5 18%	4.7 23%	5.3 13%	3.3 46%	6.5 -7%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.17 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.12 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	7873 ^83%	7667 ^85%	7326 ^89%	7702 ^84%	7019 ^93%	7553 ^86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		16% / 23%	23% / 18%	13% / 16%	31% / 28%	20% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.8 ms rise
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6379 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	4656 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	6193 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	7695 Points +21%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	5056 Points -21%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1641 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	614 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1858 Points +13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	6636 Points +304%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3338 Points +103%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	1610 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1503 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	533 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1729 Points +15%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	10023 Points +567%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3327 Points +121%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	1434 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2416 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	1309 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	2517 Points +4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3040 Points +26%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3375 Points +40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	2818 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1639 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	766 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1906 Points +16%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3483 Points +113%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	1641 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1502 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	681 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	1790 Points +19%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3406 Points +127%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	1455 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2409 Points
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	1356 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	2466 Points +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	Points -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	3782 Points +57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	2963 Points +23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	26 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	19 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	33 fps +27%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +131%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	57 fps +119%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	37 fps +42%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	37 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	20 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	35 fps -5%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	239 fps +546%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	87 fps +135%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	38 fps +3%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	9.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	18 fps
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	58 fps
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	49 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	21 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	9.6 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	19 fps -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	131 fps +524%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	47 fps +124%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	20 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.1 - 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	12 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	6.5 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	13 fps +8%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	85.8 fps +615%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	35 fps +192%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	12 fps 0%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.8 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	2.7 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	6.7 fps +40%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	31.72 fps +561%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	19 fps +296%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	7.4 fps +54%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7.7 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	2.8 fps -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	7.2 fps -6%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	51.3 fps +566%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	21 fps +173%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	7.4 fps -4%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.2 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	3.2 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	7.8 fps +50%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	37.01 fps +612%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	20 fps +285%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	7.4 fps +42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	3.3 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	8.4 fps +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	62.4 fps +661%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	22 fps +168%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	7.6 fps -7%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	2 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	4.6 fps +48%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	25.34 fps +717%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	13 fps +319%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	4.3 fps +39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2.8 fps
Allview iPlay 20 UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	1.2 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072	2.9 fps +4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	23.09 fps +725%
Huawei MatePad 10.4 HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072	7.8 fps +179%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048	2.6 fps -7%

	Chuwi HiPad Plus	Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020	Allview iPlay 20	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)	Huawei MatePad 10.4	Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
AndroBench 3-5		-15%	-39%	96%	85%	32%
Sequential Read 256KB	253.5	287.3 13%	123.3 -51%	298 18%	286 13%	266.2 5%
Sequential Write 256KB	141.2	104 -26%	160.3 14%	89.9 -36%	97.2 -31%	180.1 28%
Random Read 4KB	41.25	36.01 -13%	25.43 -38%	82 99%	67.8 64%	75 82%
Random Write 4KB	20.78	13.54 -35%	4.27 -79%	83.6 302%	81.6 293%	23.28 12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	85.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		63 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	70 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	70.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	52 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


30.8 °C	24.8 °C	25.4 °C
29.6 °C	24.6 °C	25 °C
26.2 °C	24.8 °C	25.8 °C

Max: 30.8 °C
Medel: 26.3 °C


24.2 °C	26.2 °C	31.4 °C
24.2 °C	26.2 °C	30.4 °C
24.4 °C	25.8 °C	28.2 °C

Max: 31.4 °C
Medel: 26.8 °C

Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Chuwi HiPad Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

	Chuwi HiPad Plus 7300 mAh	Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh	Apple iPad 10.2 2020 8827 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh
Power Consumption		1%	-4%	-9%	16%	16%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	2.18 16%	2.12 18%	1.3 50%	1.16 55%	1.98 24%
Idle Average *	5.9	6.4 -8%	6.43 -9%	3.5 41%	4.42 25%	5.66 4%
Idle Maximum *	6.1	6.43 -5%	6.69 -10%	5.6 8%	4.43 27%	5.69 7%
Load Average *	7.8	7.48 4%	8.17 -5%	12.5 -60%	8.86 -14%	6.96 11%
Load Maximum *	10.4	10.65 -2%	11.84 -14%	19.2 -85%	11.6 -12%	6.98 33%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Huawei MatePad 10.4 Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, Wh	1190 min +124%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 32.9 Wh	782 min +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) SD 662, Adreno 610, Wh	757 min +43%
Chuwi HiPad Plus MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, Wh	531 min

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		8tim 51min

För

+ Skärm av hög kvalitet med 2K-upplösning

+ Gediget hölje av aluminium

+ Hög prestanda per krona

+ Relativt billig

+ Kommer med Android 10

+ Kraftfulla stereohögtalare

+ MicroSD-läsare

Emot

- Skärmens glasyta böjer sig

- Kunde haft bättre RGB-balans och gråskala

- Skärmen kunde varit mer ljusstark för utomhusbruk

- Inget stöd för extern skärm via USB-C

- Medel till kraftig ghosting

- Svag vibrationseffekt

- Ingen sensor för ljusstyrka

- Ingen 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

- Ingen intern GPS

Recension av surfplattan Chuwi HiPad Plus. Recensionsex från Chuwi

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Ett gediget alternativ till den billiga Samsung Galaxy Tab A-serien samtidigt som den utgör ett stort steg upp från 2019 års HiPad i fråga om skärmkvalitet och prestanda.

Utöver ett lockande pris lyckas HiPad bra när det kommer till skärmkvalitet, visuell design och prestanda, vilket är de tre hörnstenarna för en skaplig surfplatta. De är långt från att vara bäst i sina respektive kategorier, men imponerar ändå i förhållande till vad man får betala.

Allt annat på den här surfplattan är däremot genomsnittligt eller en aning därunder. Som exempel har den inte tillräckligt hög ljusstyrka för användning utomhus och färgerna är inte lika exakta som de hade kunnat vara med tanke på att skärmen täcker hela sRGB-omfånget. Dessutom saknar den en del vanliga funktioner såsom 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, automatisk sensor för ljusstyrka, GPS och fingeravtrycksläsare. HiPad Plus passar bäst att använda inomhus och är i huvudsak för webbsurfande och videoströmning.

Chuwi HiPad Plus - 02/16/2021 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

78 / 98 → 79%

Tangentbord

71 / 80 → 89%

Mus

61%

Anslutningar

29 / 70 → 42%

Vikt

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Batteri

84%

Skärm

80%

Spelprestanda

12 / 78 → 15%

Programprestanda

59 / 92 → 64%

Temperatur

96%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

74 / 91 → 82%

Camera

47 / 85 → 55%

Medel

67%

75%

Tablet - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5250 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Chuwi HiPad Plus - En iPad-klon (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2021-02-25 (Update: 2021-02-25)