Test: Dell Latitude 5290 2-i-1 (i5-8350U) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 548 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1075:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.81
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.154
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 SHP1479, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung SDC4A49, IPS, 12.3", 2716x1824 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, IPS, 12", 2160x1440 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 12.5", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -4% | -3% | -38% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.5 | 62.8 -11% | 66.6 -6% | 66.7 -5% | 42.51 -40% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 94 -5% | 96.5 -2% | 98 -1% | 63.7 -35% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.5 | 64.7 -10% | 67.8 -5% | 68.7 -4% | 43.95 -39% | |
| Response Times | -17% | 387% | 25% | -0% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 42.4 ? 25% | 37 ? 35% | 45.6 ? 20% | 28.4 ? 50% | 61 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 30.8 ? 14% | 25 ? 31% | 21.6 ? 40% | 22.8 ? 37% | 36 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 1852 ? | 210.1 ? -89% | 22130 ? 1095% | 2119 ? 14% | 221.2 ? -88% | |
| Screen | -1% | -1% | 10% | -14% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 548 | 523.2 -5% | 482 -12% | 443 -19% | 388.1 -29% | 354 -35% |
| Brightness | 545 | 522 -4% | 466 -14% | 446 -18% | 344 -37% | 330 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 88 2% | 92 7% | 88 2% | 78 -9% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.42 18% | 0.395 23% | 0.41 20% | 0.39 24% | 0.63 -24% |
| Contrast | 1075 | 1246 16% | 1220 13% | 1080 0% | 995 -7% | 562 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.65 | 4 -10% | 4 -10% | 2.6 29% | 4.6 -26% | 8.28 -127% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.15 | 8.6 -20% | 7.2 -1% | 4 44% | 9.1 -27% | 12.71 -78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.81 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 5.5 -0% | 5.7 -4% | 3 45% | 6.1 -11% | 9.15 -66% |
| Gamma | 2.154 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.07 106% | 2.73 81% |
| CCT | 7052 92% | 7546 86% | 7950 82% | 6780 96% | 7104 91% | 5953 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.2 | 64.86 -1% | 62 -5% | 62.6 -4% | 59 -10% | 40 -39% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | 93.97 -5% | 96 -3% | 98 -1% | 91 -8% | 63 -36% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-5% | 127% /
71% | 11% /
10% | -7% /
-11% | -30% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1852 Hz | ≤ 98 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1852 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1852 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U (128 - 153, n=8) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U (346 - 631, n=8) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (1.3 - 3.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U (1.62 - 1.71, n=3) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (5.59 - 25.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U (5.48 - 7.33, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Average of class Office (194.4 - 2103, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U (306 - 355, n=2) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3063 - 3776, n=7) | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4200 - 4906, n=6) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4669 - 4961, n=2) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3776 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4961 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4764 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3737 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -239% | -1002% | 108% | -24% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 317.3 | 585 84% | 582 83% | 379.9 20% | 354 ? 12% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 226.9 | 286.5 26% | 386 70% | 198.2 -13% | 224 ? -1% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 512 | 1146 124% | 1036 102% | 791 54% | 506 ? -1% |
| Score Total | 1469 | 2760 88% | 1774 21% | 4653 217% | 1404 ? -4% |
| Score Write | 544 | 150 -72% | 52 -90% | 879 62% | 479 ? -12% |
| Score Read | 642 | 1768 175% | 1164 81% | 2545 296% | 650 ? 1% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.053 | 2.08 -3825% | 7.6 -14240% | 0.027 49% | 0.2029 ? -283% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.082 | 0.06 27% | 0.04 51% | 0.041 50% | 0.1329 ? -62% |
| 4K-64 Write | 411.2 | 126.1 -69% | 34 -92% | 657 60% | 351 ? -15% |
| 4K-64 Read | 472.7 | 1607 240% | 1015 115% | 2280 382% | 445 ? -6% |
| 4K Write | 102.7 | 1.23 -99% | 0.2 -100% | 132.2 29% | 91 ? -11% |
| 4K Read | 30.97 | 27.6 -11% | 41 32% | 45.24 46% | 28.1 ? -9% |
| Seq Write | 302.1 | 223.1 -26% | 171 -43% | 897 197% | 369 ? 22% |
| Seq Read | 1385 | 1328 -4% | 1070 -23% | 2197 59% | 1768 ? 28% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Office (1731 - 10701, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (24762 - 137729, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (26409 - 59483, n=71) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10387 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1847 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 66347 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8236 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1086 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 517 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 398 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.5 - 17, n=176) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60 | 34 | 28 | 9 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 28.5 / 41.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -3% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 28.2 1% | 29.6 -4% | 29.5 -4% |
| Load Average * | 28.5 | 30.4 -7% | 33.4 -17% | 30.6 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.6 | 34 18% | 34.1 18% | 32.5 22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.4 °C / -2.5 F).
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.29 / 0.57 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3 / 7.2 / 10 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
37.1 / 38.2 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -22% | -19% | 13% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 2.85 5% | 4.2 -40% | 4.1 -37% | 5 -67% | 4.3 -43% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.76 6% | 10.1 -40% | 9.2 -28% | 6.3 12% | 6.1 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 6.91 31% | 14 -40% | 11.1 -11% | 7.8 22% | 8.9 11% |
| Load Average * | 37.1 | 32.88 11% | 37.4 -1% | 33.8 9% | 19.5 47% | 16.3 56% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 37.41 2% | 34 11% | 49.2 -29% | 19.6 49% | 18.6 51% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 72 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 44% | 48% | 45% | 54% | 168% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 300 | 486 62% | 489 63% | 378 26% | 441 47% | 804 168% |
| Load | 84 | 105 25% | 112 33% | 138 64% | 134 60% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Latitude 5290 2-i-1 är på många sätt Surface Pro för företagsvärlden. Allt från dess nedtonade utseende, relativt praktiska servicemöjligheter, robusta säkerhetsalternativ, tysta drift och portutbud som ligger över genomsnittet gör att den passar perfekt ihop med vanliga kontorsbehov. Utöver allt det får vi fördelen av en extremt robust konstruktion i magnesiumlegering, en sällsynt ljusstark och levande skärm, väldigt snabb CPU-prestanda och ett bra tangentbord/styrplatta (på det separat sålda men ändå nödvändiga Travel Keyboard-tillbehöret för ca 1 300 kronor). Tillslut så tillfredställer Dell Active Pen, som finns som tillval för ca 500 kronor, behoven för en unik undergrupp av användare som behöver exakt Wacom-tryckkänslig aktiv stylus-inmatning.
Latitude 5290 2-i-1 är på många sätt företagsvärldens motsvarighet till Surface Pro; dess försiktiga kombination av lyx i konsumentklass och medvetenhet i företagsklass kombineras till en unik omvandlingsbar som möter ett antal väldigt specifika behov.
Men det finns inga perfekta enheter, och Latitude 5290 kommer med sin andel noterbara kompromisser. Den största av dom är batteritiden, där Latitude hamnar en bra bit efter en del moderna konkurrenter som använder Kaby Lake-baserade SoC:ar. Den tyngs också ner av höga drifttemperaturer vid belastning (både på ytan och internt), även om värmen till viss del har fördelats bort från enhetens kanter (där händer vanligtvis vilar). Den grundläggande garantin är alldeles för kort för en enhet med en så betydande prislapp. Avsaknaden av Thunderbolt kommer troligen irritera användare som önskar mångsidiga dockningslösningar. Och tillslut, för att återvända till den betydande prislappen vi nyss nämnde: den är dyr, ca 16 000 kronor för dagens konfiguration (som dock, för att vara rättvis, åtminstone inkluderar Travel Keyboard-överdraget och den Active Pen.
Dom främsta konkurrenterna är fortfarande förra årets Latitude 5285 (som åtminstone klarar av mycket längre batteritid än 5290), Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 (som totalt sett är väldigt bra men som är omöjlig att uppgradera och underhålla från ett hårdvaruperspektiv), HP Elite x2 1012 G2 (som är en väldigt välavrundad enhet men som är betydligt svårare att underhålla) och Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (som är en bra kandidat men som hålls tillbaka av den passiva kylningens begränsningar och andra irritationsmoment såsom PWM). Alla dessa enheter har sina unika uppsättningar av styrkor och svagheter, så innan du bestämmer dig för en omvandlingsbar företagsmodell rekommenderar vi starkt att du tar en titt på allihop. Men om löstagbar 2-i-1-funktionalitet (och kanske tryckkänslig penn-inmatning) är ett absolut måste så finns det få enheter som totat sett lyckas med så stark prestanda som Latitude 5290.
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
- 03/30/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
