Test: Dell Latitude 5490 (i5-8350U, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 223 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1195:1 (Svärta: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
54.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
34.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.28% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X AU Optronics AUO263D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 LG Philips LGD0553, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 12% | 52% | 76% | 14% | 67% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 36.28 | 40.62 12% | 55.8 54% | 67.2 85% | 41.6 15% | 66.1 82% |
| sRGB Coverage | 54.6 | 61.2 12% | 80.7 48% | 90.8 66% | 61.9 13% | 84.8 55% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.48 | 41.96 12% | 57.7 54% | 66.4 77% | 43.06 15% | 62 65% |
| Response Times | 23% | 22% | 20% | 1% | 25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.9 ? | 32.8 ? 30% | 39 ? 17% | 38 ? 19% | 41.6 ? 11% | 36 ? 23% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 26.4 ? 15% | 23 ? 26% | 25 ? 20% | 34 ? -9% | 23.2 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -3% | -60% | 14% | -9% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 227 | 215.9 -5% | 346 52% | 275 21% | 306 35% | 291 28% |
| Brightness | 211 | 205 -3% | 317 50% | 253 20% | 287 36% | 296 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 86 -2% | 85 -3% | 88 0% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.22 -16% | 0.86 -353% | 0.25 -32% | 0.3 -58% | 0.32 -68% |
| Contrast | 1195 | 981 -18% | 402 -66% | 1100 -8% | 1020 -15% | 909 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 5.1 9% | 8.64 -54% | 3.49 38% | 6.2 -11% | 4.3 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.4 | 15.6 30% | 13.58 39% | 6.77 70% | 13.6 39% | 7.5 67% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4 -67% | 11.24 -368% | 4.91 -105% | 5.8 -142% | 4.3 -79% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.41 91% | 2.62 84% | 2.39 92% | 2.04 108% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6506 100% | 6856 95% | 12530 52% | 6271 104% | 6277 104% | 6529 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 34.5 | 41.96 22% | 52 51% | 59 71% | 39.62 15% | 55.46 61% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 54.4 | 61.15 12% | 80 47% | 91 67% | 61.44 13% | 84.77 56% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
3% | 5% /
-27% | 37% /
27% | 2% /
-3% | 34% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (5904 - 15443, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U () | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (22075 - 76704, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8350U () | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3695 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4774 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | Dell Latitude 5480 Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -6% | 131% | 1% | 100% | 6% | |
| Read Seq | 465.1 | 469.4 1% | 1819 291% | 518 11% | 1155 148% | 504 8% |
| Write Seq | 425 | 264.8 -38% | 1263 197% | 267.2 -37% | 1076 153% | 497.8 17% |
| Read 512 | 410.1 | 408.1 0% | 922 125% | 562 37% | 811 98% | 396.7 -3% |
| Write 512 | 360.7 | 265.5 -26% | 804 123% | 263.5 -27% | 862 139% | 283.4 -21% |
| Read 4k | 27.34 | 24.66 -10% | 61.4 125% | 32.88 20% | 55.5 103% | 35.73 31% |
| Write 4k | 89 | 114.8 29% | 157.1 77% | 85.6 -4% | 134.6 51% | 87.8 -1% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 295.6 | 380.3 29% | 513 74% | 351.3 19% | 496.2 68% | 399.1 35% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 300.2 | 207.2 -31% | 410.2 37% | 265.2 -12% | 425.4 42% | 249.7 -17% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1770 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7903 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 918 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.61 | 9.63 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.68 | 11.1 | 5.5 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 57.4 | 21.47 | 15.01 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.9 - 32, n=42) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Rocket League | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (20.1 - 95, n=26) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (17.1 - 78.4, n=13) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13.1 - 43, n=24) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13.2 - 24.7, n=21) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (16 - 177, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 50.9, n=64) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 27.9, n=29) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | Dell Latitude 5480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | 0% | 1% | 7% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 31 -8% | 30.6 -6% | 28 3% | 28.2 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 29.6 -3% | 31 -8% | 30.6 -6% | 28 3% | 28.2 2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 29.6 -3% | 31 -8% | 30.6 -6% | 28 3% | 28.2 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 29.6 4% | 31 -0% | 31 -0% | 29.4 5% | 28.2 9% |
| Load Average * | 35.6 | 42 -18% | 33.5 6% | 34.5 3% | 31.4 12% | 31.2 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 47.1 -14% | 33.7 19% | 32.4 22% | 34.6 16% | 33 20% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 30.9 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35.6 / 41.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.34 / 0.96 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.3 / 5.54 / 6.59 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
42.4 / 67.6 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | 14% | -16% | 14% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 6.64 -101% | 2.9 12% | 4.8 -45% | 3.21 3% | 4.11 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 5.54 | 6.67 -20% | 5.6 -1% | 7.9 -43% | 6.15 -11% | 7.87 -42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.59 | 7.78 -18% | 8.15 -24% | 10.7 -62% | 6.82 -3% | 8.74 -33% |
| Load Average * | 42.4 | 30.83 27% | 30.6 28% | 35 17% | 28.5 33% | 30.2 29% |
| Load Maximum * | 67.6 | 31.7 53% | 31 54% | 31.6 53% | 34.5 49% | 32.4 52% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 21% | 1% | -12% | -20% | -30% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1556 | 1448 -7% | 1155 -26% | 1087 -30% | 782 -50% | 1234 ? -21% | |
| H.264 | 791 | 591 -25% | 623 -21% | 490 -38% | 716 ? -9% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 897 | 964 7% | 571 -36% | 672 -25% | 438 -51% | 430 -52% | 608 ? -32% |
| Load | 97 | 159 64% | 184 90% | 115 19% | 110 13% | 117 21% | 117.4 ? 21% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Dell Latitude 5490 har många positiva sidor, särskilt för företag och deras anställda: vid kontorsarbete är den väldigt effektiv och, tack vare den nästan fläktlösa driften, väldigt tyst. Inmatningsenheterna är också av hög kvalitet, men den största fördelen med denna laptop är dess otroliga batteritid, som möjliggör dagslång användning vid mindre krävande uppgifter. Den starka samlingen säkerhetsfunktioner som finns som tillval kan vara ett minst lika viktigt argument för köp.
Det är därför vi blir så ledsna att se att Dell inte har åtgärdat den största kritiken som riktats åt föregångaren: den mörka skärmen. Även om den erbjuder bättre kontrast och svärta än innan så är den fortfarande inte särskilt ljusstark. Dessutom lider den av bedrövliga reaktionstider och missfärgningar. Fläktljudet vid belastning kunde också förbättrats.
5490 är tydligt riktad huvudsakligen mot företag och deras anställda. Men man måste vara noggrann när man väljer mellan dom otaliga konfigurationer som finns tillgängliga för att få den önskade uppsättningen funktioner. För mindre säkerhetsmedvetna köpare finns det definitivt lättare, mindre och vid belastning tystare alternativ som ofta dessutom är billigare. Dom som är intresserade får en säker, kraftfull och uthållig företagslaptop som tyvärr har en väldigt mörk skärm.
5490 är aningen tunnare än sin föregångare, men dess Kaby-Lake refresh resulterar bara stundom i förbättrad prestanda när det kommer till verkliga scenarier. I många applikationer så är 5480 faktiskt aningen snabbare. Det kan därför vara värt att ta en titt på föregångaren, även om det behöver nämnas att 5480 ibland låter ännu mer vid belastning.
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
- 03/04/2018 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze
Price comparison
