Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Dell Latitude 5491 (8750H, MX130, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 82 %
Mitt på batteriet: 189.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 947:1 (Svärta: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.73
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
53.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.78% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Dell Latitude 5491 AU Optronics AUO133D B140HAK, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS LED, 14", 2560x1440 | Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA IVO M140NVF7 R0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 92% | 13% | 67% | 79% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 35.78 | 71.4 100% | 40.55 13% | 61 70% | 67.2 88% |
| sRGB Coverage | 53.8 | 96.6 80% | 61 13% | 87.7 63% | 90.8 69% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 36.96 | 72.1 95% | 41.9 13% | 62.1 68% | 66.4 80% |
| Response Times | 4% | 33% | 11% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 36 ? 6% | 22 ? 43% | 33 ? 14% | 38 ? 1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.4 ? | 28 ? 1% | 22 ? 23% | 26 ? 8% | 25 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 3125 ? | |||
| Screen | 38% | 25% | 59% | 33% | |
| Brightness middle | 189.4 | 311 64% | 266 40% | 655 246% | 275 45% |
| Brightness | 196 | 302 54% | 244 24% | 630 221% | 253 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 91 11% | 86 5% | 93 13% | 85 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.36 -80% | 0.2 -0% | 0.56 -180% | 0.25 -25% |
| Contrast | 947 | 864 -9% | 1330 40% | 1170 24% | 1100 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.74 | 3 55% | 4.61 32% | 3.27 51% | 3.49 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 25.5 | 6.1 76% | 7.46 71% | 5.92 77% | 6.77 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.73 | 1.7 64% | 3.22 32% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4 27% | 4.31 22% | 2.85 48% | 4.91 11% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.17 101% | 2.54 87% | 2.45 90% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6740 96% | 6961 93% | 6848 95% | 6065 107% | 6271 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 66.7 80% | 39 5% | 57 54% | 59 59% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 53.8 | 96.7 80% | 61 13% | 88 64% | 91 69% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
44% | 24% /
24% | 46% /
55% | 40% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4174 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5428 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4269 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 5491 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell Latitude 5490 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -310% | 34% | -62% | -5% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 520 | 676 30% | 905 74% | 172 -67% | 273.6 -47% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 291.5 | 254.8 -13% | 326.2 12% | 92.5 -68% | 214 -27% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1829 | 921 -50% | 1688 -8% | 216.6 -88% | 514 -72% |
| Score Total | 1995 | 2348 18% | 2630 32% | 969 -51% | 1834 -8% |
| Score Write | 588 | 147 -75% | 1084 84% | 283 -52% | 449 -24% |
| Score Read | 1003 | 1480 48% | 1070 7% | 456 -55% | 916 -9% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.056 | 2.515 -4391% | 0.055 2% | 0.229 -309% | 0.037 34% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.14 | 0.041 71% | 0.059 58% | 0.081 42% | 0.067 52% |
| 4K-64 Write | 445.9 | 96.2 -78% | 908 104% | 184.1 -59% | 300.9 -33% |
| 4K-64 Read | 720 | 1278 78% | 813 13% | 375.2 -48% | 793 10% |
| 4K Write | 97 | 1.76 -98% | 90 -7% | 73.7 -24% | 93.6 -4% |
| 4K Read | 22.13 | 58 162% | 26.75 21% | 30.07 36% | 45.99 108% |
| Seq Write | 449.8 | 487.1 8% | 856 90% | 248.1 -45% | 541 20% |
| Seq Read | 2612 | 1441 -45% | 2300 -12% | 511 -80% | 768 -71% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3403 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13241 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2303 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (30.7 - 51.2, n=8) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (22.5 - 31.3, n=8) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (13.2 - 16.9, n=8) | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (12.1 - 14, n=7) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 146.1 | 82.2 | 66 | 25.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 50.7 | 31 | 16.9 | 14 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 31.5 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 46.2 / 46.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 5491 GeForce MX130, i7-8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Dell Latitude 5490 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02 | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 10% | 2% | 8% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 27.8 6% | 29 2% | 30.5 -3% | 30.3 -3% | 30.6 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 27.8 6% | 29 2% | 30.5 -3% | 30.3 -3% | 30.6 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.5 | 27.8 6% | 29 2% | 30.5 -3% | 30.3 -3% | 30.6 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31 2% | 29 8% | 31.2 1% | 30.3 4% | 31 2% |
| Load Average * | 46.2 | 34.2 26% | 35.6 23% | 43.9 5% | 33.8 27% | 34.5 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 42.7 8% | 35.6 23% | 40.1 13% | 33.8 27% | 32.4 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.5 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.8 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
Dell Latitude 5491 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.36 / 0.72 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 7.5 / 9.7 / 13 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
74.3 / 106.6 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 i7-8850H, GeForce MX130, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 31% | 43% | 40% | 44% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 3.6 52% | 3.4 55% | 4.5 40% | 3.8 49% | 3.9 48% | 2.9 61% |
| Idle Average * | 9.7 | 7.1 27% | 7.5 23% | 8.2 15% | 8.3 14% | 6.2 36% | 5.8 40% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13 | 9.5 27% | 10.8 17% | 9.3 28% | 10.7 18% | 7.7 41% | 7.5 42% |
| Load Average * | 74.3 | 63.9 14% | 55.4 25% | 30.4 59% | 35.5 52% | 43.9 41% | 77.5 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 106.6 | 67.3 37% | 70.3 34% | 30.4 71% | 37 65% | 47.7 55% | 107 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.9 | 34 | 84 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 5491 i7-8850H, GeForce MX130, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 72 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-E-10W i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 71% | -14% | -23% | 20% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1005 | 1671 66% | 1366 36% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 577 | 794 38% | 498 -14% | 444 -23% | 695 20% | 530 -8% |
| Load | 76 | 159 109% | 76 0% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Latitude 5491 med en sexkärnig i7-8550H CPU och Nvidia GeForce MX130-grafik presterar bättre än Latitude 5490-modellerna med ULV CPU:er och integrerad grafik - ibland med stor marginal. Det förstås, för att kunna dra nytta av dom två extra CPU-kärnorna behöver program vara designade för att använda de extra trådarna. Utöver en rejäl ökning i prestanda så bockar Latitude 5491 av alla korrekta rutor då den fortfarande är samma väldesignade och säkra företagslaptop med utmärkta inmatningsenheter och god ergonomi.
Med det sagt så finns det fortfarande rum för förbättring: nya Latitude blir väldigt varm vid belastning och på grund av det är den sämre på att upprätthålla turbo boost. Fläktarna behöver jobba hårdare så systemet låter mer än tidigare. Dell har också valt att använda samma blanka tryckkänsliga FHD-skärm som Latitude 5490 är utrustad med. Panelen lämnar mycket att önska, då ljusstyrkan är alldeles för låg för att den ska kunna användas utomhus och både färgomfång och färgnoggrannhet misslyckas med att imponera. Dessutom kommer den här modellen med en större och mycket tyngre nätadapter och den håller inte lika länge på en laddning.
Vägkrigare som i huvudsak fokuserar på ordbehandling, kalkylblad och webbsurfande kommer troligen klara sig bättre med Latitude 5490, som har längre batteritid och inte blir i närheten lika varm och högljudd. Den som är nöjd med prestandan en ULV CPU kan erbjuda borde även överväga Lenovos utmärkta ThinkPad T480 eller T480s.
Dell Latitude 5491
-
07/30/2018 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Price comparison
