Test: Dell Latitude 7300 - Subnotebook för företaget som inte når upp till sina prestandamål (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 79 %
Mitt på batteriet: 341 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1100:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G B133HAK, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA IVO M133NVF3-R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD AUO5B2D B133HAN Dell P/N: 06VG6 , , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 3% | -1% | 9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.6 | 67.8 5% | 65.3 1% | 64.2 -1% | 69.7 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.5 | 95.1 4% | 95.9 5% | 89.2 -3% | 99.4 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 67.8 4% | 66.6 2% | 65.2 0% | 71.1 9% |
| Response Times | -4% | -37% | 8% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 36.8 ? 6% | 57.6 ? -48% | 36 ? 8% | 54 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 30.4 ? -13% | 34 ? -26% | 24.8 ? 8% | 33 ? -22% |
| PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | 33% | 10% | 41% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 303.8 -11% | 356 4% | 316 -7% | 428 26% |
| Brightness | 306 | 289 -6% | 336 10% | 326 7% | 408 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 86 9% | 88 11% | 85 8% | 84 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.31 -0% | 0.16 48% | 0.19 39% | 0.26 16% |
| Contrast | 1100 | 980 -11% | 2225 102% | 1663 51% | 1646 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.43 | 2.9 55% | 3.6 44% | 4.5 30% | 1.16 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.33 | 5.79 44% | 5.5 47% | 12.1 -17% | 2.19 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.36 | 1.72 27% | 1.1 53% | 2.9 -23% | 0.9 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 3.7 46% | 4.7 32% | 5 28% | 1.23 82% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.118 104% | 2.48 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 8338 78% | 6323 103% | 6374 102% | 6018 108% | 6648 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 63 7% | 61.3 4% | 57.9 -2% | 65 10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 95 4% | 95.7 5% | 87.3 -4% | 99 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
11% | -0% /
18% | 6% /
8% | 7% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4211 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5417 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5093 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4208 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -16% | -24% | -15% | |
| Write 4K | 141.1 | 139.4 -1% | 120.7 -14% | 108.5 -23% | 126.7 ? -10% |
| Read 4K | 46.37 | 43.18 -7% | 58.5 26% | 40.53 -13% | 44 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 1994 | 1075 -46% | 1491 -25% | 1026 -49% | 1617 ? -19% |
| Read Seq | 2275 | 1639 -28% | 2760 21% | 2080 -9% | 1716 ? -25% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 493.3 | 662 34% | 237.5 -52% | 451 -9% | 413 ? -16% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 429 | 413.9 -4% | 336.1 -22% | 269.7 -37% | 420 ? -2% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2992 | 1195 -60% | 1512 -49% | 1770 -41% | 2076 ? -31% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3562 | 3116 -13% | 3154 -11% | 3214 -10% | 3130 ? -12% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2046 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8916 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1183 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 77.2 | 41.5 | 34.6 | 10.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.8 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.5 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35 / 35 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.3 / 0.65 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 2.5 / 6.6 / 8.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
35.4 / 68.1 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -8% | -16% | -2% | -5% | -26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 3.3 -32% | 3.4 -36% | 4.5 -80% | 3.6 -44% | 3.81 ? -52% | 4.43 ? -77% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 5.9 11% | 5.6 15% | 6.4 3% | 5.7 14% | 6.94 ? -5% | 7.58 ? -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 6.2 29% | 8.7 -0% | 9.2 -6% | 7.4 15% | 8.75 ? -1% | 9.43 ? -8% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 43.2 -22% | 43.6 -23% | 35.7 -1% | 44 -24% | 35 ? 1% | 45.8 ? -29% |
| Load Maximum * | 68.1 | 45.2 34% | 65 5% | 65.4 4% | 48.1 29% | 47.5 ? 30% | 68.7 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -9% | -13% | 19% | 17% | |
| H.264 | 663 | 764 15% | 481 -27% | 917 ? 38% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 650 | 664 2% | 499 -23% | 424 -35% | 790 22% | 729 ? 12% |
| Load | 115 | 94 -18% | 140 22% | 133 16% | 116.5 ? 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 766 | 1914 | 1808 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Dell har gjort om sin 13.3-tums Latitude utan att ändra särskilt mycket. Det gäller åtminstone den mörkare av de två modellerna med sitt kolfiberhölje, som vi råkar ha inne för recension. Aluminium-varianten ser väldigt annorlunda ut jämfört med sin föregångare.
Det kompakta och högkvalitativa höljet är en av höjdpunkterna med Latitude, precis som det bekväma tangentbordet. Skärmen har ett tryckkänsligt lager som möjliggör ytterligare en form av inmatning. MicroSD-kortläsaren är blixtsnabb och lätt att komma åt. Dessutom har Latitude massor av portar och säkerhetsfunktioner. Den är också redo för uppgraderingar tack vare två RAM-platser, en ledig WWAN-plats och ett WiFi-modem i sockel. Den har tre års på plats/i hemmet-garanti och höll nästan 11 timmar på batteri i vårt WiFi-test.
En av de största bristerna är den katastrofala styrplattan. Den känns billig och vi varken gillade eller uppskattade den grova plastytan. Med tanke på att Latitude saknar en TrackPoint får man helt enkelt använda en extern mus. Vi uppskattade heller inte den propretiära laddningsporten och hade föredragit en andra USB C- eller Thunderbolt 3-port med strömförsörjning. Ethernet saknas helt och hållet och den påstått matta skärmen visar sig snarare vara semi-blank. Vi hade förväntat oss att Dell skulle vara lite mer precisa i specifikationerna för sådana detaljer.
CPU-prestandan var ganska dålig och var till och med sämre än på Latitude 7300:s egna föregångare. Den som skaffar i7-processorn får inte den prestanda man nog förväntar sig. Det är definitivt inte okej för en dator på den här prisnivån.
Det högfrekventa fläktljudet var ytterligare en brist även om fläkten totalt sett inte lät särskilt högt. Sist men inte minst hade det varit trevligt om det funnits ett skärmalternativ med högre ljusstyrka.
Totalt sett gedigen prestanda så när som på en står svaghet: Whiskey Lake-processorn visade sig vara långsammare än föregångarens processor.
Det är upp till dig om du tycket detta är avgörande. På plus-sidan erbjuder kontorsdatorn Dell Latitude 7300 fantastisk batteritid och goda uppgraderingsmöjligheter.
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G
- 09/09/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
