Test: Dell Precision 5540 - Arbetsstation som också fungerar som handvärmare (Sammanfattning)
Dell Precision 5540
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1200 MHz, Minne: 1751 MHz, NVIDIA 419.72, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Minne
32 GB
, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 282 PPI, SDCA029, OLED, glansig: ja
Moderkort
Intel CM246
Hårddisk
SK hynix PC400 512 GB, 420 GB ledigt
Vikt
2 kg, Strömförsörjning: 440 g
Pris
3000 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 12/2018 | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000 | 2.1 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
Anslutbarhet - Dells arbetsstation med Thunderbolt
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (81.2 - 227, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
SDCA029 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 433 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 411.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.9 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 427 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Dell Precision 5540 SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA AUO30EB, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | -5% | -27% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 66.5 -33% | 84.4 -16% | 62.4 -38% | 68.2 -32% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 91.5 -8% | 96.2 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.3 | 68.4 -30% | 98.5 1% | 63.4 -35% | 68.8 -29% |
| Response Times | -788% | -1295% | 3081% | -1498% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 52.8 ? -1786% | 51 ? -1721% | 34.4 ? -1129% | 60.8 ? -2071% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 3.2 ? | 32 ? -900% | 31 ? -869% | 14 ? -338% | 32.8 ? -925% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.9 ? | 1020 ? 323% | 26040 ? 10709% | ||
| Screen | 2% | -23% | -12% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 427 | 588 38% | 445 4% | 542 27% | 417 -2% |
| Brightness | 411 | 555 35% | 462 12% | 528 28% | 412 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 85 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 0.29 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.5 22% | 4.75 -48% | 3.5 -9% | 4.4 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.4 | 6.3 25% | 7.79 7% | 7.8 7% | 6.7 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.8 | 0.6 79% | 1.3 54% | 1.9 32% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.5 -150% | 4.49 -149% | 4.8 -167% | 5 -178% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.33 94% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6176 105% | 6836 95% | 7374 88% | 7690 85% | 7575 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.8 | 63.2 -27% | 87 0% | 58.8 -32% | 62.3 -28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 91.1 -9% | 96 -4% |
| Contrast | 1470 | 890 | 1322 | 1438 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -269% /
-161% | -441% /
-214% | 1014% /
604% | -514% /
-233% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.9 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Dell Precision 5540 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1288 (1207.8-1407.71)
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø788 (771.02-810.57)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø961 (896-1114)
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1018 (1008.9-1100.84)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3684 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4558 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5296 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Precision 5540 SK hynix PC400 512 GB | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average SK hynix PC400 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 23% | 65% | 43% | 5% | 5% | |
| Write 4K | 98 | 93.6 -4% | 105.6 8% | 162.2 66% | 102.7 5% | 103.1 ? 5% |
| Read 4K | 41.25 | 41.87 2% | 46.32 12% | 43.71 6% | 38.32 -7% | 41.2 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 1295 | 1698 31% | 2910 125% | 2441 88% | 1417 9% | 1341 ? 4% |
| Read Seq | 1441 | 1978 37% | 2820 96% | 1753 22% | 1289 -11% | 1668 ? 16% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.2 | 383.1 -11% | 545 27% | 397.6 -7% | 278.9 -35% | 411 ? -4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 400.1 | 326.9 -18% | 632 58% | 520 30% | 348.8 -13% | 377 ? -6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1366 | 2778 103% | 3349 145% | 2519 84% | 1895 39% | 1387 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2201 | 3119 42% | 3333 51% | 3448 57% | 3352 52% | 2748 ? 25% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1381 | 1575 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1371 | 1607 | ||||
| AS SSD | 28% | 56% | 58% | 48% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 1743 | 2357 35% | 2860 64% | 2980 71% | 2379 36% | 2198 ? 26% |
| Seq Write | 930 | 1235 33% | 2604 180% | 2094 125% | 1780 91% | 1075 ? 16% |
| 4K Read | 39.1 | 43.29 11% | 45.15 15% | 45.05 15% | 51 30% | 34.5 ? -12% |
| 4K Write | 92.1 | 99.7 8% | 100.2 9% | 155.4 69% | 109.5 19% | 95.9 ? 4% |
| 4K-64 Read | 956 | 1020 7% | 1428 49% | 1291 35% | 1184 24% | 973 ? 2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 863 | 1502 74% | 1401 62% | 1506 75% | 1725 100% | 899 ? 4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.07 5% | 0.049 34% | 0.064 14% | 0.057 23% | 0.082 ? -11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.053 | 0.039 26% | 0.037 30% | 0.024 55% | 0.034 36% | 0.053 ? -0% |
| Score Read | 1170 | 1299 11% | 1759 50% | 1634 40% | 1472 26% | 1228 ? 5% |
| Score Write | 1048 | 1726 65% | 1762 68% | 1871 79% | 2013 92% | 1102 ? 5% |
| Score Total | 2781 | 3640 31% | 4411 59% | 4300 55% | 4217 52% | 2905 ? 4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2145 | 2015 | 1989 | 1701 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 565 | 597 | 457 | 346 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1320 | 1449 | 1121 | 1050 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
26% | 61% /
60% | 51% /
52% | 27% /
30% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
SK hynix PC400 512 GB
Sequential Read:
1568 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1301 MB/s
512K Read:
1223 MB/s
512K Write:
1122 MB/s
4K Read:
40.93 MB/s
4K Write:
97.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
395.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
440.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 36376 poäng | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 39269 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11695 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28401 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7320 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3356 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Workstation (23.3 - 156.5, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (32.4 - 33.4, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| Anno 1800 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| 1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
Dell Precision 5540 Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, SK hynix PC400 512 GB: Ø32.4 (30-34)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 79.5 | ||||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 32.4 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 145 | 132 | 118 | 108 | 43.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 41.7 | 28.8 | 12.3 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 101 | 87 | 73 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 27.86 | 12.9 | 9.8 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 33.3 / 38 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.8 °C / -6.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.8 °C / -6.9 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 5540 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.55 / 0.93 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 7.4 / 12.1 / 12.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
98 / 135.1 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 35% | -38% | -33% | 10% | -6% | -3% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 3.79 49% | 9.4 -27% | 13.7 -85% | 6.8 8% | 6.2 16% | 6.5 ? 12% | 8.1 ? -9% |
| Idle Average * | 12.1 | 6.9 43% | 17.4 -44% | 17.5 -45% | 11.3 7% | 9.6 21% | 11.7 ? 3% | 12.4 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.7 | 9.2 28% | 19.6 -54% | 20.9 -65% | 14.3 -13% | 21.2 -67% | 15.6 ? -23% | 17.8 ? -40% |
| Load Average * | 98 | 62 37% | 103 -5% | 77.2 21% | 78 20% | 104.3 -6% | 106 ? -8% | 91.9 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 89.9 | 64 29% | 91.7 -2% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 135.1 | 108 20% | 216 -60% | 123.7 8% | 126 7% | 135.3 -0% | 134.7 ? -0% | 157.4 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | -32% | -7% | 14% | 32% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 897 | 577 -36% | 1036 15% | 910 1% | 927 ? 3% | ||
| H.264 | 634 | 1053 66% | 560 -12% | 544 -14% | 671 ? 6% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 461 | 844 83% | 357 -23% | 532 15% | 582 26% | 467 1% | 509 ? 10% |
| Load | 102 | 100 -2% | 65 -36% | 79 -23% | 131 28% | 199 95% | 80.3 ? -21% |
För
+ kraftigare Max-Q modell av Quadro T2000
+ högkvalitativt chassi
+ bra servicemöjligheter
+ levande OLED-skärm med 4K-upplösning
Emot
- chassit når höga temperaturer
- processorn kunde haft bättre prestanda
- magert portutbud
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Dell Precision 5540 visar sig i vår recension vara en kapabel arbetsstation. Även om chassit är baserat på samma design som XPS 15 och således har samma höga kvalitet innebär det också att även den här enheten har ett magert portutbud. Men med det sagt ger Thunderbolt 3 ganska mycket flexibilitet och kan med rätt adapter kompensera för de saknade portarna.
Dell Precision 5540 är ett bra val för den som letar efter en enhet med mittenskiktsprestanda och en högupplöst skärm. Som vanligt är chassit gediget och batteritiden bra.
Tyvärr presterar processorn inte så bra som vi hade hoppats. Även om Nvidias Quadro T2000 når den förväntade prestandanivån hänger processorn inte med. I vår testloop tenderar den att långsamt falla ner till att prestera runt 15% långsammare än startvärdet. Även om OLED-skärmen med 4K-upplösning ser fantastisk ut kommer den på bekostnad av mycket kortare batteritid.
Dell Precision 5540
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Workstation - Vägt medel
Price comparison
