Test: Dell XPS 13 9300 – Mindre, men har långsammare CPU (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.8 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
90.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 528 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1769:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 17% | -2% | -7% | -9% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.5 | 96.1 34% | 70.1 -2% | 65.3 -9% | 64.7 -10% | 69.9 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.4 0% | 99.8 0% | 95.9 -4% | 93.1 -6% | 99.2 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.5 | 85.6 16% | 71.2 -3% | 66.6 -9% | 65.3 -11% | 71.5 -3% |
Response Times | 1521% | -26% | 1% | -3% | 11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 50.4 ? 16% | 55 ? 8% | 57.6 ? 4% | 58 ? 3% | 47.6 ? 21% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 35.2 ? -6% | 31 ? 7% | 34 ? -2% | 36 ? -8% | 29.2 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 116300 ? 4552% | 208 ? -92% | 2500 ? 0% | ||
Screen | 18% | -13% | -1% | -22% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 619 | 603 -3% | 474 -23% | 356 -42% | 404 -35% | 549.8 -11% |
Brightness | 591 | 577 -2% | 426 -28% | 336 -43% | 389 -34% | 520 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 82 -10% | 88 -3% | 85 -7% | 86 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.35 -0% | 0.29 17% | 0.16 54% | 0.37 -6% | 0.39 -11% |
Contrast | 1769 | 1723 -3% | 1634 -8% | 2225 26% | 1092 -38% | 1410 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.7 43% | 2.38 21% | 3.6 -20% | 3.72 -24% | 2.12 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 3.1 62% | 5.88 28% | 5.5 33% | 7.38 10% | 3.66 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 0.7 30% | 2.69 -169% | 1.1 -10% | 2.06 -106% | 1.37 -37% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.1 60% | 3.75 28% | 4.7 10% | 4.44 15% | 2.6 50% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.37 93% | 2.48 89% | 2.34 94% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6340 103% | 6843 95% | 6466 101% | 6374 102% | 7095 92% | 6884 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.9 | 76.7 15% | 65 -3% | 61.3 -8% | 60 -10% | 65.4 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 99.4 0% | 100 1% | 95.7 -4% | 93 -6% | 99.7 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 519% /
283% | -14% /
-13% | -2% /
-2% | -11% /
-17% | 4% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise | |
↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3988 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5194 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4832 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4122 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2875 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60637 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11119 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1673 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 542 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 74.3 | 46.8 | 40.4 | 14.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 35 | 21.6 | 11.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.4 | 49.7 | 26.2 | 24.2 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.9 | 14.7 | 14.2 | |
F1 2019 (2019) | 43 | 17 | 15 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 30 / 32.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -3% | -4% | -7% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
Idle Average * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
Load Average * | 30 | 31.1 -4% | 31.7 -6% | 34.8 -16% | 31.7 -6% | 31.7 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 32.4 | 39.3 -21% | 32.7 -1% | 34.8 -7% | 38.1 -18% | 43.4 -34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.4 / 0.52 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.4 / 6 / 10.2 Watt |
Hög belastning |
36.6 / 49.3 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | 36% | -6% | -18% | 10% | 1% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 2.1 38% | 1.8 47% | 3.4 -0% | 4.8 -41% | 2.6 24% | 4.13 ? -21% | 4.49 ? -32% |
Idle Average * | 6 | 6.9 -15% | 4.6 23% | 5.6 7% | 8.6 -43% | 5.3 12% | 7.07 ? -18% | 7.66 ? -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 7.8 24% | 6.1 40% | 8.7 15% | 10.4 -2% | 7 31% | 8.36 ? 18% | 9.56 ? 6% |
Load Average * | 36.6 | 42 -15% | 27.4 25% | 43.6 -19% | 37.9 -4% | 43.1 -18% | 30.6 ? 16% | 46.6 ? -27% |
Load Maximum * | 49.3 | 64.5 -31% | 27 45% | 65 -32% | 48.5 2% | 49 1% | 45.6 ? 8% | 68.6 ? -39% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, 58.2 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 11% | -24% | -32% | -30% | -24% | -13% | |
H.264 | 866 | 627 -28% | 764 -12% | 896 ? 3% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 703 | 777 11% | 620 -12% | 499 -29% | 498 -29% | 537 -24% | 710 ? 1% |
Load | 205 | 139 -32% | 94 -54% | 141 -31% | 116.6 ? -43% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1281 | 1032 | 1599 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme – XPS 13 9300 är totalt sett bättre än tidigare, men också dyrare
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Nya XPS 13 9300 lämnade ett riktigt gott intryck i vår recension. Höljet är välbyggt och extremt kompakt samtidigt som det är robust. Den matta 16:10-skärmen övertygade oss med undantag för de långsamma responstiderna. Vi rekommenderar dock att kalibrera den. De två högtalarna var också fullt tillräckliga.
Prestandan är ett tveeggat svärd, för CPU-prestandan är lägre än på föregångaren. Det är förstås inte en optimal utveckling, men i rättvisans namn så kommer prestandan från dess Core i5 vara mer än tillräcklig för många användare, särskilt i kombination med en snabb SSD. Det integrerade grafikkortets prestanda har dessutom ökat, så det går att spela en del spel. Detta för oss till den Core i7-processor som finns som tillval och som har en ännu snabbare iGPU. Det borde inte vara någon skillnad i fråga om ren CPU-prestanda, men grafikkortet är en betydande uppgradering som är värd en titt.
Dells nya XPS 13 9300 är en riktigt bra efterföljare till denna populära subnotebook. Vi upptäckte inga allvarliga brister i vår recension, men den nya modellen är inte direkt ett kap med sitt pris på 15.000 kronor.
Vi uppskattar att 16:10-skärmen har gjort en återkomst och vi gillade också den snabba kortläsaren. Vi hade däremot gärna sett ytterligare en USB-port. Vi kommer även snart att recensera XPS 13 9300 med den snabbare Core i7-processorn och en UHD-skärm.
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
-
03/19/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff