Test: Dell XPS 15 9575 (i5-8305G, Vega M GL, FHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| LG Gram 15Z975 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| LG Gram 15Z975 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 418.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1196:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.51
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Sharp SHP148E, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | LG Gram 15Z975 ID: LGD052A, Name: LG Philips LP156WFA-SPC1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, 15", 3240x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 15.4", 2880x1800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 35% | -1% | -14% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.3 | 89.7 42% | 66.6 5% | 54.9 -13% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 92.5 | 100 8% | 86.9 -6% | 77.1 -17% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 100 56% | 63.5 -1% | 56.3 -12% | ||
| Response Times | -6% | 14% | 32% | 720% | 22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 53.6 ? | 57.2 ? -7% | 41.2 ? 23% | 35.2 ? 34% | 37.6 ? 30% | 42.4 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36.4 ? | 39.2 ? -8% | 29.6 ? 19% | 25.6 ? 30% | 22.4 ? 38% | 28 ? 23% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 962 -4% | 1000 0% | 21930 ? 2093% | ||
| Screen | -5% | -7% | -19% | 29% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle | 418.5 | 370.1 -12% | 338.7 -19% | 273 -35% | 446 7% | 534 28% |
| Brightness | 391 | 356 -9% | 325 -17% | 276 -29% | 444 14% | 502 28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 91 5% | 89 2% | 89 2% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.37 -6% | 0.28 20% | 0.22 37% | 0.25 29% | 0.31 11% |
| Contrast | 1196 | 1000 -16% | 1210 1% | 1241 4% | 1784 49% | 1723 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 5.3 -51% | 4.9 -40% | 4.77 -36% | 1.7 51% | 1.8 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.57 | 9.9 -31% | 8.7 -15% | 10.76 -42% | 2.7 64% | 3.8 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.51 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.6 13% | 5.5 -4% | 8.6 -62% | 1.7 68% | 2.4 55% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.08 106% | 1.7 129% | 2.11 104% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7500 87% | 6284 103% | 7498 87% | 6678 97% | 6384 102% | 6563 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.9 | 88.3 53% | 63.5 10% | 50.2 -13% | 58.6 1% | 77.92 35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.1 | 100 9% | 86.92 -6% | 76.9 -17% | 92.9 1% | 99.94 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
2% | 2% /
-2% | -0% /
-11% | 375% /
188% | 27% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4693 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6303 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5134 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4702 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | LG Gram 15Z975 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 138% | 232% | -34% | 191% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 250.5 | 540 116% | 1134 353% | 179.8 -28% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 174.9 | 411.5 135% | 534 205% | 141.2 -19% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 392.7 | 1272 224% | 1936 393% | 197.5 -50% | |
| Score Total | 1113 | 2810 152% | 3781 240% | 1003 -10% | 3649 228% |
| Score Write | 307 | 1022 233% | 1556 407% | 339 10% | 1446 371% |
| Score Read | 595 | 1206 103% | 1493 151% | 442 -26% | 1471 147% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.056 | 0.034 39% | 0.026 54% | 0.232 -314% | 0.041 27% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.146 | 0.034 77% | 0.04 73% | 0.08 45% | 0.046 68% |
| 4K-64 Write | 181.2 | 789 335% | 1262 596% | 246.7 36% | 1198 561% |
| 4K-64 Read | 337.1 | 962 185% | 1206 258% | 366.5 9% | 1218 261% |
| 4K Write | 92.7 | 112.2 21% | 141.1 52% | 67.6 -27% | 90.2 -3% |
| 4K Read | 24.78 | 41.34 67% | 51.9 109% | 26.24 6% | 43.42 75% |
| Seq Write | 334.3 | 1207 261% | 1530 358% | 248.5 -26% | 1580 373% |
| Seq Read | 2335 | 2026 -13% | 2342 0% | 488.1 -79% | 2091 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 16707 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9326 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 111847 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21322 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6235 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3052 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
| Acer Nitro 5 Spin NP515-51-86CX | |
| Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
| Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 202.7 | 172 | 152 | 51.7 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 105.8 | 80.9 | 40.8 | |
| Thief (2014) | 78.8 | 72.6 | 41.1 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 77.8 | 43.8 | 23.7 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 111 | 97 | 53 | |
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 54 |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 86.1 | 45.2 | 36 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 131.1 | 79.7 | 40.6 | 31.7 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 54.1 | 36.4 | 32.3 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 184.3 | 108.2 | 50 | |
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 45 | 34 | 24 | |
| Prey (2017) | 135 | 86.6 | 69.1 | 61 |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 40.9 | 16.3 | 9.7 | |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 80 | 65 | 39 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 9 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB(A) |
| Hårddisk |
| 27.8 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35 / 44.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) Radeon Pro 560, i7-7820HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -12% | -0% | -4% | 2% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 28.4 -2% | 28.4 -2% | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 30.8 -11% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 29 -4% | 28.4 -2% | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 31 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 27.8 | 29 -4% | 28.4 -2% | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 31 -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.8 | 32.2 -16% | 28.4 -2% | 29.1 -5% | 28 -1% | 31 -12% |
| Load Average * | 35 | 47.1 -35% | 41.6 -19% | 35.7 -2% | 30.3 13% | 31.3 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.2 | 52 -18% | 36.1 18% | 39.5 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 44.2 | 47.1 -7% | 41.6 6% | 45.3 -2% | 46.5 -5% | 41.8 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G i5-8305G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh | LG Gram 15Z975 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 35% | 3% | 36% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 663 | 831 25% | 934 41% | 1078 63% | 659 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 564 | 434 -23% | 511 -9% | 677 20% | 435 -23% | 416 -26% |
| Load | 78 | 103 32% | 136 74% | 67 -14% | 131 68% | 96 23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 76 |
För
Emot
XPS 15 9575 är tänkt att göra om den vanliga XPS 15 9560 till en formidabel omvandlingsbar utan att offra det som gjorde originalet så populär. Från det perspektivet är den nya XPS-modellen definitivt lyckad då den verkligen känns som en klassisk XPS 15 i fråga om kvalitet och stabilitet men med den ökade mångsidigheten hos en 2-i-1 formfaktor. Det känns bra att se att chassit har hållt sig lika starkt som alltid i övergången till en tunnare design. Om du gillade XPS 15 9560 så kommer XPS 15 9575 kännas väldigt bekant.
Prestanda-mässigt är Core i5-8305G CPU:n och Radeon RX Vega M GL GPU:n jämförbara med Core i7-7700HQ respektive GTX 1050, oftast bara med ensiffriga procentpoäng i prestandatesterna. Dell är definitivt medvetna om det då den aktuella konfigurationen av XPS 15 9560 med en i7-7700HQ CPU och en GTX 1050 GPU har samma pris (ca 13 000 kronor) som vår XPS 15 9575-konfiguration men med dubbelt så mycket RAM (8 GB mot 16 GB) och dubbelt så mycket lagring (256 GB mot 512 GB). På så sätt är det ingen tvekan om att köparen betalar extra för den omvandlingsbara formfaktorn, den tryckkänsliga skärmen och den unika Kaby Lake-G SoC:en hos XPS 15 9575. Vi har frågat Dell flera gånger om en potentiell Kaby Lake-R eller GeForce-version av den omvandlingsbara XPS-modellen, men fokus har för tillfället legat på att leverera den bästa möjliga Kaby Lake-G upplevelsen och 9575 har definitivt nått upp till våra förväntningar på den punkten.
Skillnaderna i pris och specifikationer är uppenbara, men hur är det med temperaturer, ljudnivå och batteritid? Till vår överraskning så håller sig XPS 15 9575 svalare, tystare och ibland även längre än XPS 15 9560 vid surfande, ordbehandling eller spel. Det är en bragd värd att berömma då den omvandlingsbara XPS är jämförbar med XPS 15 i fråga och CPU- och GPU-kraft samtidigt som den är tunnare och har ett mindre batteri.
Det påtvingade Maglev-tangentbordet är en blandad upplevelse. Det är en betydande förändring från XPS 15 9560 och det fungerar inte lika bra på grund av dom mindre, halvstora piltangenterna och funktionsknapparna jämfört med dom vanliga QWERTY-knapparna. Vi tror att ett inbyggt numeriskt tangentbord likt det på 2018 års modell av Spectre x360 15 hade varit mycket mer användbart för produktivitet. Medel till tung ghosting, att den förlitar sig helt på USB Typ C, närvaron av pulsbredds-modulering, höga vikt, svampiga styrplatta, fastlödda RAM, fingeravtrycks-benägna ytor och mer begränsade alternativ för lagring summerar listan över anmärkningsvärda nackdelar. Spelmöjligheterna är goda men för en del titlar långt bakom GTX 1050, där ytterligare optimering krävs.
Dells senaste omvandlingsbara XPS-modell har många nyheter och nästan alla är lyckade. Kaby Lake-G är jämförbar med GeForce GTX 1050 och Core i7-7700HQ samtidigt som den är svalare och tystare än XPS 15 9560. Å andra sidan är Maglev-knapparna en blandad upplevelse och dess NVMe SSD från Toshiba är i allmänhet långsammare än en motsvarande Samsung PM961. Förbered dig på att bära runt på USB Typ C-adaptrar vart du än går och ta med en rengöringsduk för att hålla dom svarta knapparna fria från fett.
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
- 04/22/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
